Technical Papers
Aug 11, 2020

CFD-Based Framework for Analysis of Soil–Pipeline Interaction in Reconsolidating Liquefied Sand

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 146, Issue 10

Abstract

Submarine buried pipelines interact with shallow soil layers that are often loose and prone to fluidization/liquefaction. Such occurrence is a possible consequence of pore pressure build-up induced by hydrodynamic loading, earthquakes, and/or structural vibrations. When liquefaction is triggered in sand, the soil tends to behave as a viscous solid–fluid mixture of negligible shear strength, possibly unable to constrain pipeline movements. Therefore, pipelines may experience excessive displacement, for instance, in the form of vertical flotation or sinking. To date, there are no well-established methods to predict pipe displacement in the event of liquefaction. To fill such a gap, this work proposes a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) framework enriched with soil mechanics principles. It is shown that the interaction between pipe and liquefied sand can be successfully analyzed via one-phase Bingham fluid modeling of the soil. Postliquefaction enhancement of rheological properties, viscosity, and yield stress can also be accounted for by linking soil–pipe CFD simulations to a separate analysis of the pore pressure dissipation. The proposed approach is thoroughly validated against the results of small-scale pipe flotation and pipe dragging tests from the literature.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. These include the numerical simulation results plotted in the manuscript, numerical code for soil–pipe CFD simulations, and numerical code for the pore pressure dissipation analysis.

Acknowledgments

Input from Omar Zanoli (Rina Consulting) is gratefully acknowledged, as well as the support for numerical simulations provided by former Master of Science students Francesco Bortolotto (AVENTA group) and Kelys Betancur Iglesias (Cathie Associates).

References

Adamidis, O., and G. Madabhushi. 2016. “Post-liquefaction reconsolidation of sand.” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 472 (2186): 20150745. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2015.0745.
Akiyoshi, T., and K. Fuchida. 1984. “Soil-pipeline interaction through a frictional interface during earthquakes.” Int. J. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 3 (1): 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-7277(84)90024-X.
Andrade, J. E., Q. Chen, P. H. Le, C. F. Avila, and T. M. Evans. 2012. “On the rheology of dilative granular media: Bridging solid- and fluid-like behavior.” J. Mech. Phys. Solids 60 (6): 1122–1136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2012.02.011.
Bai, Q., and Y. Bai. 2014. Subsea pipeline design, analysis, and installation. Houston, TX: Gulf Professional Publishing.
Bizzotto, T., M. Brown, A. Brennan, T. Powell, and H. Chandler. 2017. “Modelling of pipeline and cable flotation conditions.” In Vol. 865 of Proc., Offshore Site Investigation Geotechnics 8th Int. Conf. Proc., 865–871. London: Society for Underwater Technology.
Bonjean, D., C. Erbrich, and J. Zhang. 2008. “Pipeline flotation in liquefiable soil.” In Vol. 19,668 of Proc., Annual Offshore Tech. Conf., Houston: Offshore Technology Conference.
Boukpeti, N., D. White, and M. Randolph. 2012. “Analytical modelling of the steady flow of a submarine slide and consequent loading on a pipeline.” Géotechnique 62 (2): 137. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.10.P.001.
Brennan, A. J., and S. P. Madabhushi. 2011. “Measurement of coefficient of consolidation during reconsolidation of liquefied sand.” Geotech. Test. J. 34 (2): 139–146.
Cathie, D., J. Machin, and R. Overy. 1996. “Engineering appraisal of pipeline flotation during backfilling.” In Proc., Offshore Technology Conf. Houston, TX: Offshore Technology Conference.
Chen, Y., H. Liu, and H. Wu. 2013. “Laboratory study on flow characteristics of liquefied and post-liquefied sand.” Supplement, Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 17 (S1): 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2013.834583.
Chen, Y., H. Wu, X. Sha, and H. Liu. 2014. “Laboratory tests on flow characteristics of pre-liquefied sand.” In Proc., Int. Efforts in Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, 600–607. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Cheuk, C., D. White, and M. D. Bolton. 2008. “Uplift mechanisms of pipes buried in sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (2): 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:2(154).
Chian, S., and S. Madabhushi. 2012. “Effect of buried depth and diameter on uplift of underground structures in liquefied soils.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 41 (Oct): 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.05.020.
Cremonesi, M., F. Ferri, and U. Perego. 2017. “A basal slip model for Lagrangian finite element simulations of 3D landslides.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 41 (1): 30–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2544.
Cremonesi, M., A. Frangi, and U. Perego. 2010. “A Lagrangian finite element approach for the analysis of fluid–structure interaction problems.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 84 (5): 610–630. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2911.
Cremonesi, M., A. Frangi, and U. Perego. 2011. “A Lagrangian finite element approach for the simulation of water-waves induced by landslides.” Comput. Struct. 89 (11–12): 1086–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.12.005.
Damgaard, J., and A. Palmer. 2001. “Pipeline stability on a mobile and liquefied seabed: A discussion of magnitudes and engineering implications.” In Vol. 4 of Proc., OMAE 2001: 20th Int. Conf. on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 195–204. New York: ASME.
De Groot, M., M. Bolton, P. Foray, P. Meijers, A. Palmer, R. Sandven, A. Sawicki, and T. Teh. 2006. “Physics of liquefaction phenomena around marine structures.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 132 (4): 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(2006)132:4(227).
Della Vecchia, G., M. Cremonesi, and F. Pisanò. 2019. “On the rheological characterisation of liquefied sands through the dam-breaking test.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 43 (7): 1410–1425. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2905.
DNV (Det Norske Veritas). 2007a. Global buckling of submarine pipelines—Structural design due to high temperature/high pressure. Oslo, Norway: DNV.
DNV (Det Norske Veritas). 2007b. On-bottom stability design of submarine pipelines. Oslo, Norway: DNV.
Erbrich, C., and H. Zhou. 2017. “Optimised backfill design for preventing pipeline flotation.” In Vol. 872 of Proc., Offshore Site Investigation Geotechnics 8th Int. Conf. Proc., 872–880. London: Society for Underwater Technology.
Franci, A., E. Oñate, and J. Carbonell. 2016. “Unified Lagrangian formulation for solid and fluid mechanics and FSI problems.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 298 (Jan): 520–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2015.09.023.
Gallage, C. P. K., I. Towhata, and S. Nishimura. 2005. “Laboratory investigation on rate-dependent properties of sand undergoing low confining effective stress.” Soils Found. 45 (4): 43–60. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.45.4_43.
Guoxing, C., Z. Enquan, W. Zhihua, W. Binghui, and L. Xiaojun. 2016. “Experimental investigation on fluid characteristics of medium dense saturated fine sand in pre-and post-liquefaction.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 14 (8): 2185–2212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9907-6.
Hadush, S., A. Yashima, and R. Uzuoka. 2000. “Importance of viscous fluid characteristics in liquefaction induced lateral spreading analysis.” Comput. Geotech. 27 (3): 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(00)00015-X.
Haigh, S. K., J. Eadington, and S. P. G. Madabhushi. 2012. “Permeability and stiffness of sands at very low effective stresses.” Géotechnique 62 (1): 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.10.P.035.
Horsten, T. 2016. “Pipe uplift in liquefied sands.” M.S. thesis, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft Univ. of Technology.
Hwang, J.-I., C.-Y. Kim, C.-K. Chung, and M.-M. Kim. 2006. “Viscous fluid characteristics of liquefied soils and behavior of piles subjected to flow of liquefied soils.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 26 (2): 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.02.020.
Idelsohn, S., E. Oñate, and F. D. Pin. 2004. “The particle finite element method: A powerful tool to solve incompressible flows with free-surfaces and breaking waves.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 61 (7): 964–989. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1096.
Idelsohn, S., E. Oñate, F. D. Pin, and N. Calvo. 2006. “Fluid-structure interaction using the particle finite element method.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 195 (17–18): 2100–2123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2005.02.026.
Janbu, N. 1963. “Soil compressibility as determined by oedometer and triaxial tests.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 3rd European Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 19–25. London: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering London.
Kruse, H., P. Meijers, C. Costa Ferrer, G. de Lange, T. Vermaas, H. Havinga, J. Landwehr, and A. Heinsbroek. 2013. Effects of induced earthquakes on the Gasunie network in Groningen. [In Dutch.]. Delft, Netherlands: Deltares.
Lauder, K. L., and M. J. Brown. 2014. “Scaling effects in the 1 g modelling of offshore pipeline ploughs.” In Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics 2014, 377–383. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Ling, H. I., Y. Mohri, T. Kawabata, H. Liu, C. Burke, and L. Sun. 2003. “Centrifugal modeling of seismic behavior of large-diameter pipe in liquefiable soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 129 (12): 1092–1101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:12(1092).
Lirer, S., and L. Mele. 2019. “On the apparent viscosity of granular soils during liquefaction tests.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 17 (11): 5809–5824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00706-0.
Luan, M., P. Qu, D.-S. Jeng, Y. Guo, and Q. Yang. 2008. “Dynamic response of a porous seabed–pipeline interaction under wave loading: Soil–pipeline contact effects and inertial effects.” Comput. Geotech. 35 (2): 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.05.004.
Monforte, L., M. Arroyo, J. M. Carbonell, and A. Gens. 2017. “Numerical simulation of undrained insertion problems in geotechnical engineering with the particle finite element method (PFEM).” Comput. Geotech. 82 (Feb): 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.08.013.
Montassar, S., and P. de Buhan. 2013. “Numerical prediction of liquefied ground characteristics from back-analysis of lateral spreading centrifuge experiments.” Comput. Geotech. 52 (Jul): 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.01.010.
Muir Wood, D. 2009. Soil mechanics: A one-dimensional introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Muir Wood, D. 2014. Geotechnical modelling. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Nishimura, S., I. Towhata, and T. Honda. 2002. “Laboratory shear tests on viscous nature of liquefied sand.” Soils Found. 42 (4): 89–98. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.42.4_89.
O’Brien, J. S., and P. Y. Julien. 1988. “Laboratory analysis of mudflow properties.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 114 (8): 877–887. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1988)114:8(877).
Olson, S. M., and T. D. Stark. 2002. “Liquefied strength ratio from liquefaction flow failure case histories.” Can. Geotech. J. 39 (3): 629–647. https://doi.org/10.1139/t02-001.
Oñate, E., A. Franci, and J. Carbonell. 2014a. “Lagrangian formulation for finite element analysis of quasi-incompressible fluids with reduced mass losses.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 74 (10): 699–731. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.3870.
Oñate, E., A. Franci, and J. Carbonell. 2014b. “A particle finite element method for analysis of industrial forming processes.” Comput. Mech. 54 (1): 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1016-2.
Oñate, E., S. Idelsohn, M. Celigueta, and R. Rossi. 2008. “Advances in the particle finite element method for the analysis of fluid-multibody interaction and bed erosion in free surface flows.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 197 (19–20): 1777–1800.
Parsons, J. D., K. X. Whipple, and A. Simoni. 2001. “Experimental study of the grain-flow, fluid-mud transition in debris flows.” J. Geol. 109 (4): 427–447. https://doi.org/10.1086/320798.
Pastor, M., et al. 2014. “Application of a SPH depth-integrated model to landslide run-out analysis.” Landslides 11 (5): 793–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0484-y.
Pierson, T. C. 2005. “Hyperconcentrated flow—Transitional process between water flow and debris flow.” In Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena, 159–202. Berlin: Springer.
Pierson, T. C., and J. E. Costa. 1987. “A rheologic classification of subaerial sediment-water flows.” In Vol. 7 of Debris flows/avalanches—Process, recognition, and mitigation: Reviews in engineering geology, 1–12. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America.
Pipeline Flotation Research Council. 1966. “ASCE preliminary research on pipeline flotation: Report of the pipeline flotation research council.” J. Pipeline Div. 92 (1): 27–74.
Prime, N., F. Dufour, and F. Darve. 2014. “Solid–fluid transition modelling in geomaterials and application to a mudflow interacting with an obstacle.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 38 (13): 1341–1361. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2260.
Seed, H. B., P. P. Martin, and J. Lysmer. 1976. “Pore-water pressure changes during soil liquefaction.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 102 (GT4): 323–346.
Stark, T. D., and G. Mesri. 1992. “Undrained shear strength of liquefied sands for stability analysis.” J. Geotech. Eng. 118 (11): 1727–1747. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1992)118:11(1727).
Sumer, B. M., J. Fredsøe, S. Christensen, and M. Lind. 1999. “Sinking/floatation of pipelines and other objects in liquefied soil under waves.” Coastal Eng. 38 (2): 53–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3839(99)00024-1.
Tamate, S., and I. Towhata. 1999. “Numerical simulation of ground flow caused by seismic liquefaction.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 18 (7): 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(99)00022-6.
Teh, T., A. Palmer, M. Bolton, and J. Damgaard. 2006. “Stability of submarine pipelines on liquefied seabeds.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 132 (4): 244–251. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(2006)132:4(244).
Terzaghi, K. 1943. Theoretical soil mechanics, 11–15. New York: Wiley.
Towhata, I., W. Vargas-Monge, R. Orense, and M. Yao. 1999. “Shaking table tests on subgrade reaction of pipe embedded in sandy liquefied subsoil.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 18 (5): 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(99)00008-1.
Uzuoka, R., A. Yashima, T. Kawakami, and J.-M. Konrad. 1998. “Fluid dynamics based prediction of liquefaction induced lateral spreading.” Comput. Geotech. 22 (3–4): 243–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(98)00006-8.
Vescovi, D., P. Marveggio, and C. G. di Prisco. 2020. “Saturated granular flows: Constitutive modelling under steady simple shear conditions.” Géotechnique 70 (7): 608–620. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.19.P.023.
White, D., and D. Cathie. 2010. “Geotechnics for subsea pipelines.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Symp. on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics, 87–123. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Yasuda, S., and H. Kiku. 2006. “Uplift of sewage manholes and pipes during the 2004 Niigataken-Chuetsu earthquake.” Soils Found. 46 (6): 885–894. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.46.885.
Zhang, X., K. Krabbenhoft, and D. Sheng. 2014. “Particle finite element analysis of the granular column collapse problem.” Granular Matter 16 (4): 609–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-014-0505-5.
Zhu, M., and M. H. Scott. 2014. “Modeling fluid-structure interaction by the particle finite element method in OpenSees.” Comput. Struct. 132 (Feb): 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.11.002.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 146Issue 10October 2020

History

Received: Feb 5, 2020
Accepted: May 26, 2020
Published online: Aug 11, 2020
Published in print: Oct 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jan 11, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft Univ. of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, Netherlands (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7648-0280. Email: [email protected]
Massimiliano Cremonesi, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, piazza L. da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Francesco Cecinato, Ph.D. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9528-0249
Associate Professor, Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra ‘A. Desio,’ Università degli Studi di Milano, via L. Mangiagalli 34, 20133 Milano, Italy. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9528-0249
Gabriele Della Vecchia, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, piazza L. da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share