Technical Papers
Feb 26, 2020

A New Approach for Interval Dynamic Analysis of Train-Bridge System Based on Bayesian Optimization

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 146, Issue 5

Abstract

A train-bridge system (TBS) is inevitably subjected to parameter uncertainty, which leads to variability in its dynamic responses. In practice, it is difficult to characterize parameter uncertainty using precise probability density functions due to lack of sufficient statistical information. In such situations, uncertain parameters are usually modeled as uncertain-but-bounded parameters; this is also known as interval uncertainty. This paper aims to determine the dynamic response bounds of a TBS subjected to interval uncertainty. In mathematics, estimation of dynamic response bounds can be pursued in the context of optimization, that is, the minimization or maximization of an objective function. The solver in this context shares common features of a black-box function, such as high computational cost and no closed-form solution. In view of this, the present study proposes an efficient Bayesian optimization approach for estimating the dynamic response bounds of a TBS. Specifically, a Bayesian modeling approach employing a Gaussian process prior is proposed to replace the current expensive-to-run original model solver, along with an acquisition function that trades off exploration and exploitation of the search space. By doing so, the optimization of a complex, intractable black-box function is converted to the maximization of a computationally efficient acquisition function that has a closed-form expression and is differentiable. Two test functions are provided in order to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed Bayesian optimization methodology for finding the global minimum. It is demonstrated that the Bayesian optimization methodology is efficient and effective in solving the optimization problem with a limited number of function evaluations. Next, the proposed Bayesian optimization approach is utilized for interval dynamic analysis (IDA) of the TBS. The computational accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method is compared with a direct Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) estimator, which is used as a reference solution because of its generality, robustness, and easy implementation. The comparison results show that the proposed Bayesian optimization method is feasible and reliable for IDA of the TBS in terms of both computational accuracy and efficiency. Last, the influence of the interval change ratios of the system parameters on dynamic responses is investigated. The results reveal that an increase in the parameter uncertainty level results in a higher uncertainty bound on the dynamic responses.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The work described in this paper was supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR), China (Grant No. PolyU 152241/15E) and a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51878235). The authors would also like to appreciate the funding support from the Hong Kong Scholars Program (Grant No. XJ2016039) and the Innovation and Technology Commission of Hong Kong SAR Government to the Hong Kong Branch of National Rail Transit Electrification and Automation Engineering Technology Research Center (Project No. K-BBY1).

References

Brochu, E., V. M. Cora, and N. De Freitas. 2010. “A tutorial on Bayesian optimization of expensive cost functions, with application to active user modeling and hierarchical reinforcement learning.” Preprint, submitted December 12, 2010. https://arxiv.org/abs/1012.2599.
Byrd, R. H., P. Lu, J. Nocedal, and C. Zhu. 1995. “A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization.” SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 16 (5): 1190–1208. https://doi.org/10.1137/0916069.
Chang, T. P., G. L. Lin, and E. Chang. 2006. “Vibration analysis of a beam with an internal hinge subjected to a random moving oscillator.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 43 (21): 6398–6412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.10.013.
Cheng, Y. S., F. T. K. Au, and Y. K. Cheung. 2001. “Vibration of railway bridges under a moving train by using bridge-track-vehicle element.” Eng. Struct. 23 (12): 1597–1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00058-X.
Da Silva, J. G. S. 2004. “Dynamical performance of highway bridge decks with irregular pavement surface.” Comput. Struct. 82 (11): 871–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.02.016.
Deng, L., and C. S. Cai. 2010. “Development of dynamic impact factor for performance evaluation of existing multi-girder concrete bridges.” Eng. Struct. 32 (1): 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.08.013.
Forrester, A., and A. Keane. 2008. Engineering design via surrogate modelling: A practical guide. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Frýba, L. 1996. Dynamics of railway bridges. London: Thomas Telford.
Gao, W. 2007. “Natural frequency and mode shape analysis of structures with uncertainty.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 21 (1): 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.05.007.
Gao, W., C. Song, and F. Tin-Loi. 2010. “Probabilistic interval analysis for structures with uncertainty.” Struct. Saf. 32 (3): 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2010.01.002.
Gu, L. 2001. “A comparison of polynomial based regression models in vehicle safety analysis.” In Proc., ASME Design Engineering Technical Conf. Pittsburgh, PA. New York: ASME.
Ibrahim, R. A. 1987. “Structural dynamics with parameter uncertainties.” Appl. Mech. Rev. 40 (3): 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3149532.
Jones, D., M. Schonlau, and W. Welch. 1998. “Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions.” J. Global Optim. 13 (4): 455–492. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008306431147.
Lei, X. 2017. High speed railway track dynamics: Models, algorithms and applications. Beijing: Science Press.
Lei, X., and N. A. Noda. 2002. “Analyses of dynamic response of vehicle and track coupling system with random irregularity of track vertical profile.” J. Sound Vib. 258 (1): 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2002.5107.
Li, Q., Y. L. Xu, D. J. Wu, and Z. W. Chen. 2010. “Computer-aided nonlinear vehicle-bridge interaction analysis.” J. Vib. Control 16 (12): 1791–1816. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546309341603.
Liu, N., W. Gao, C. Song, N. Zhang, and Y. L. Pi. 2013. “Interval dynamic response analysis of vehicle-bridge interaction system with uncertainty.” J. Sound Vib. 332 (13): 3218–3231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013.01.025.
Lou, P. 2005. “A vehicle-track-bridge interaction element considering vehicle’s pitching effect.” Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 41 (4): 397–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2004.07.004.
Lu, F., J. H. Lin, D. Kennedy, and F. W. Williams. 2009. “An algorithm to study non-stationary random vibrations of vehicle-bridge systems.” Comput. Struct. 87 (3): 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.10.004.
Majka, M., and M. Hartnett. 2009. “Dynamic response of bridges to moving trains: A study on effects of random track irregularities and bridge skewness.” Comput. Struct. 87 (19): 1233–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.12.004.
Mao, J., Z. Yu, Y. Xiao, C. Jin, and Y. Bai. 2016. “Random dynamic analysis of a train-bridge coupled system involving random system parameters based on probability density evolution method.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 46 (Oct): 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2016.08.003.
Mehrali, M., S. Mohammadzadeh, M. Esmaeili, and M. Nouri. 2014. “Investigating vehicle-slab track interaction considering random track bed stiffness.” Sci. Iranica Trans. A Civ. Eng. 21 (1): 82–90.
Modares, M., and R. Mullen. 2013. “Dynamic analysis of structures with interval uncertainty.” J. Eng. Mech. 140 (4): 04013011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000660.
Muscolino, G., S. Benfratello, and A. Sidoti. 2002. “Dynamics analysis of distributed parameter system subjected to a moving oscillator with random mass, velocity and acceleration.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 17 (1): 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(01)00009-1.
Rasmussen, C. E., and C. K. I. Williams. 2006. Gaussian processes for machine learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Roy, C. J., and W. L. Oberkampf. 2011. “A comprehensive framework for verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification in scientific computing.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 200 (25–28): 2131–2144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2011.03.016.
Snoek, J., H. Larochelle, and R. P. Adams. 2012. “Practical Bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms.” In Advances in neural information processing systems 25, 2951–2959. La Jolla, CA: Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation.
Sobol, I. M. 1967. “On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals.” USSR Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 7 (4): 86–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-5553(67)90144-9.
Wan, H. P., and Y. Q. Ni. 2018. “Bayesian modeling approach for forecast of structural stress response using structural health monitoring data.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (9): 04018130. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002085.
Wan, H. P., and Y. Q. Ni. 2019a. “Bayesian multi-task learning methodology for reconstruction of structural health monitoring data.” Struct. Health Monitoring. 18 (4): 1282–1309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921718794953.
Wan, H. P., and Y. Q. Ni. 2019b. “An efficient approach for dynamic global sensitivity analysis of stochastic train-track-bridge system.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 117 (Feb): 843–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.08.018.
Wan, H. P., W. X. Ren, and M. D. Todd. 2017a. “An efficient metamodeling approach for uncertainty quantification of complex systems with arbitrary parameter probability distributions.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 109 (5): 739–760. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.5305.
Wan, H. P., M. D. Todd, and W. X. Ren. 2017b. “Statistical framework for sensitivity analysis of structural dynamic characteristics.” J. Eng. Mech. 143 (9): 04017093. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001314.
Wu, S. Q., and S. S. Law. 2010. “Dynamic analysis of bridge-vehicle system with uncertainties based on the finite element model.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 25 (4): 425–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2010.05.004.
Wu, S. Q., and S. S. Law. 2011. “Dynamic analysis of bridge with non-Gaussian uncertainties under a moving vehicle.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 26 (2): 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2010.08.004.
Wu, Y. S., Y. B. Yang, and J. D. Yau. 2001. “Three-dimensional analysis of train-rail-bridge interaction problems.” Veh. Syst. Dyn. 36 (1): 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1076/vesd.36.1.1.3567.
Xia, H., N. Zhang, and G. De Roeck. 2003. “Dynamic analysis of high speed railway bridge under articulated trains.” Comput. Struct. 81 (26): 2467–2478. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(03)00309-2.
Xu, Y. L., N. Zhang, and H. Xia. 2004. “Vibration of coupled train and cable-stayed bridge systems in cross winds.” Eng. Struct. 26 (10): 1389–1406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.05.005.
Yang, Y. B., J. Yau, Z. Yao, and Y. Wu. 2004. Vehicle-bridge interaction dynamics: With applications to high-speed railways. Singapore: World Scientific.
Zeng, Z. P., F. S. Liu, P. Lou, Y. G. Zhao, and L. M. Peng. 2016. “Formulation of three-dimensional equations of motion for train-slab track-bridge interaction system and its application to random vibration analysis.” Appl. Math. Modell. 40 (11): 5891–5929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2016.01.020.
Zhai, W., and X. Sun. 1994. “A detailed model for investigating vertical interaction between railway vehicle and track.” Veh. Syst. Dyn. 23 (S1): 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423119308969544.
Zhai, W., K. Wang, and C. Cai. 2009. “Fundamentals of vehicle-track coupled dynamics.” Veh. Syst. Dyn. 47 (11): 1349–1376. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423110802621561.
Zhu, C., R. H. Byrd, P. Lu, and J. Nocedal. 1997. “Algorithm 778: L-BFGS-B: Fortran subroutines for large-scale bound-constrained optimization.” ACM Trans. Math. Software 23 (4): 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1145/279232.279236.
Zou, Q., L. Deng, and C. Jiang. 2016. “Predicting the bounds of vehicle-induced bridge responses using the interval analysis method.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (9): 04016046. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000911.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 146Issue 5May 2020

History

Received: Aug 11, 2018
Accepted: Aug 30, 2019
Published online: Feb 26, 2020
Published in print: May 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jul 26, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hua-Ping Wan, Aff.M.ASCE [email protected]
Research Professor, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou 310058, China. Email: [email protected]
Chair Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1527-7777. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share