Artificial Specimen Damping for Substructure Real-Time Hybrid Simulation
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 143, Issue 8
Abstract
Damping plays an important role in structural dynamics by absorbing energy and reducing structural responses. The inherent damping in a building ranges from approximately 2 to 10% critical damping in the first mode; even greater levels of damping are achieved when including supplemental damping devices such as viscous oil dampers. When creating laboratory scale structures, it is difficult to achieve the target level of damping in the specimen. Solutions such as adding discrete damping devices are costly, while solutions such as adding foam or other dissipative materials may add undesired nonlinear behavior or increase the stiffness. This paper proposes a novel technique to introduce artificial damping to a dynamic specimen through shake table control. Artificial damping (AD) is introduced by designing a feedforward (FF) shake table controller that compensates for both shake table dynamics and achieves target specimen performance; that is, with larger damping than the original specimen. The performance of the proposed artificial damping by FF (AD-FF) is investigated for both traditional shake table testing and shake table real-time hybrid simulation (RTHS) through a uniaxial shake table and a two-story shear building specimen with very low damping. The target level of structural damping is accurately realized through the proposed AD-FF in both traditional shake table testing and RTHS. Moreover, damping can be introduced to specific modes of the structure, a feature that cannot be realized by using physical damping devices. In RTHS, the proposed AD-FF gives researches the ability to increase stability without changing the dominant structural response by adding damping to higher modes, even if they appear in the specimen.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Alipour, A., and Zareian, F. (2008). “Study Rayleigh damping in structures: Uncertainties and treatments.” Proc., 14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, International Association of Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo.
Charney, F. A. (2008). “Unintended consequences of modeling damping in structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 581–592.
Hilber, H. M., Hughes, T. J., and Taylor, R. L. (1977). “Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 5(3), 283–292.
Horiuchi, T., Nakagawa, M., Sugano, M., and Konno, T. (1996). “Development of a real-time hybrid experimental system with actuator delay compensation.” Proc., 11th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Pergamon, Oxford, U.K.
Jeary, A. (1997). “Damping in structures.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 72, 345–355.
Jehel, P., Léger, P., and Ibrahimbegovic, A. (2014). “Initial versus tangent stiffness-based Rayleigh damping in inelastic time history seismic analyses.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 43(3), 467–484.
Kim, S. B., Spencer, B. F., and Yun, C. B. (2005). “Frequency domain identification of multi-input, multi-output systems considering physical relationships between measured variables.” J. Eng. Mech., 461–472.
MATLAB [Computer software]. MathWorks, Natick, MA.
Nakashima, M., Kato, H., and Takaoka, E. (1992). “Development of real-time pseudo dynamic testing.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 21(1), 79–92.
Nakata, N., and Stehman, M. (2014). “Compensation techniques for experimental errors in real-time hybrid simulation using shake tables.” Smart Struct. Syst., 14(6), 1055–1079.
Ohtori, Y., Christenson, R. E., and Spencer, B. F. (2004). “Benchmark control problems for seismically excited nonlinear buildings.” J. Eng. Mech., 366–385.
Phillips, B. M., Wierschem, N. E., and Spencer, B. (2014). “Model-based multi-metric control of uniaxial shake tables.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 43(5), 681–699.
Rayleigh, J. W. S. B. (1896). The theory of sound, Vol. 2, Macmillan, London.
Seki, K., Iwasaki, M., Kawafuku, M., Hirai, H., and Yasuda, K. (2009). “Adaptive compensation for reaction force with frequency variation in shaking table systems.” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 56(10), 3864–3871.
Shao, X., Reinhorn, A. M., and Sivaselvan, M. V. (2011). “Real-time hybrid simulation using shake tables and dynamic actuators.” J. Struct. Eng., 748–760.
Shing, P. B. (2008). “Real-time hybrid testing techniques.” Modern testing techniques for structural systems, O. S. Bursi and D. J. Wagg, eds., Springer, Vienna, Austria.
Tagawa, Y., and Kajiwara, K. (2007). “Controller development for the E-defense shaking table.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part I. J. Syst. Control Eng., 221(2), 171–181.
Zhang, R., Lauenstein, P. V., and Phillips, B. M. (2016). “Real-time hybrid simulation of a shear building with a uniaxial shake table.” Eng. Struct., 119, 217–229.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 10, 2016
Accepted: Nov 29, 2016
Published online: Apr 10, 2017
Published in print: Aug 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Sep 10, 2017
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.