Standards of Professional Practice for Design Management
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 140, Issue 2
Abstract
This article is the result of continued research at the University of Alabama’s Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering relating to management issues in engineering failures. The research shows that many failures occur due to well-known technical issues overlooked by management during the design process. Such failures are often termed errors and omissions. This research further indicates that systematic design quality control and quality assurance, careful communication, and post-design inspection are management techniques that could prevent a large number of engineering failures. In an effort to decrease the incidence of management issues, the authors propose to structure a prototypical standard of professional practice for design management. In developing that structure, the authors (1) explored the nature of standards and the similarities that exist in definitions by various professional organizations and (2) reviewed the standard of care and considered why it may not be the engineering profession’s best resource for evaluating duties and practices.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Avvakumovitis, O. (1996). “Supervise, inspect, or observe? The structural engineer’s role in construction.” Pract. Period. Struc. Des. Constr., 79–80.
Burgess, J. A. (1988). “Assuring quality in design engineering.” J. Manage. Eng., 16–22.
Carper, K. (2001). Forensic engineering, CRC Press, New York.
Folland, R. O. (1983). “Project management communications.” J. Prof. Issues Eng, 39–44.
Gillum, J. (2000). “Professionalism, responsibility & engineering ethics.” Forensic Eng., ASCE, 57–65.
Hensey, M. (1987). “Communication lessons from structural problems.” J. Manage. Eng., 20–27.
Kardon, J. B. (2005). “Concept of “care” in engineering.” J. Perform. Construct. Facilities, 256–260.
Luth, G. P. (2000). “Chronology and context of the hyatt regency collapse.” J. Perform. Construct. Facilities, 51–61.
Ortega, I. (Presenter). (2003). “Failure prevention in innovative or high-risk construction projects due to procedural redundancy during the design phase.” Forensic Engineering, P. Bosela, N. J. Delatte and K. L. Rens, eds., ASCE, San Diego, CA, 485–494.
Osterberg, J. O. (1989). “Necessary redundancy in geotechnical engineering.” J. Geotech. Eng., 1513–1531.
Williams, C., Jr., and Johnson, P. (2013). “Inadequate design management compared to unprecedented technical issues: As a cause for engineering failure.” J. Perform. Construct. Facil.,.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 4, 2013
Accepted: Oct 17, 2013
Published online: Nov 25, 2013
Published in print: Apr 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Apr 25, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.