Gender and Other Factors Influencing the Outcome of a Test to Assess Quality of Education in Civil Engineering in Colombia
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 140, Issue 2
Abstract
Increasing diversity is a desirable educational and social goal; therefore, reducing large disparities among students is a critical aspect in civil engineering schools. This paper analyzes the presence of gender, socioeconomic, and institutional disparities based on the outcome of two national standard tests in Colombia: SABER-PRO, a national test that assesses the quality of education in civil engineering programs and SABER-11, a test applied to senior high school students. The results suggest that there are no significant gender differences in topics evaluated by SABER-11, except for physics (favoring males) and verbal skill (favoring females). However, according to SABER-PRO test scores, in all topics under evaluation, men perform better than women, except verbally. This may mean that, in Colombia, the civil engineering educational process is biased toward males, or that the instrument, a standardized multiple choice test, favors men. Moreover, the SABER-PRO test is strongly influenced by institutional and socioeconomic factors, suggesting the existence of gaps related to income, age, gender, and the educational quality of the university in which students are enrolled.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
ABET. (2012). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2012–2013, 〈http://www.abet.org/DisplayTemplates/DocsHandbook.aspx?id=3143〉 (Dec. 1, 2012).
Albert, R. S., and Runco, M. A. (1986). “The achievement of eminence: A model based on a longitudinal study of exceptionally gifted boys and their families.” Conceptions of giftedness, R. J. Sternberg and J. E. Davidson, eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 332–357.
American Association of University Women Educational Foundation (AAUW). (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics, AAUW, Washington, DC.
Beder, S. (1989). “Towards a more representative engineering education.” Int. J. Appl. Eng. Educ., 5(2), 173–182.
Benbow, C. P., and Arjmand, O. (1990). “Predictors of high academic achievement in mathematics and science by mathematically talented students: A longitudinal study.” J. Educ. Psychol., 82(3), 430–441.
Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). “Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter?” Gend. Educ., 17(4), 369–386.
Bloom, B. S. (1985). Developing talent in young people, Ballantine Books, New York.
Caplan, J. B., and Caplan, P. J. (2005). “The perseverative search for sex differences in mathematics abilities.” Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach, A. M. Gallagher and J. C. Kaufman, eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., and Barnett, S. M. (2009). “Women’s underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations.” Psychol. Bull., 135(2), 218–261.
Clark, M. J., and Grandy, J. (1984). “Sex differences in the academic performance of scholastic aptitude test takers.”, College Entrance Examination Board, New York.
Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, Academic Press, New York.
Dainty, A. R. J., Neale, R. H., and Bagilhole, B. M. (2000). “Comparison of men’s and women’s careers in UK construction industry.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 110–115.
DeBerard, M. S., Spielmans, G. I., and Julka, D. C. (2004). “Predictors of academic achievement and retention among college freshmen: A longitudinal study.” Coll. Student J., 38(1), 66–80.
Dickson, L. (2010). “Race and gender differences in college major choice.” Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci., 627(1), 108–124.
Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., and Linn, M. C. (2010). “Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis.” Psychol. Bull., 136(1), 103–127.
French, B. F., Immekus, J. C., and Oakes, W. C. (2005). “An examination of indicators of engineering students’ success and persistence.” J. Eng. Educ., 94(4), 419–425.
Guo, C., Tsang, M. C., and Ding, X. (2010). “Gender disparities in science and engineering in Chinese universities.” Econ. Educ. Rev., 29(2), 225–235.
Hurtado, S., Eagan, M. K., and Hughes, B. (2012). “Priming the pump or the sieve: Institutional contexts and URM STEM degree attainments.” Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, New Orleans, LA, 〈http://www.academia.edu/3710149/Priming_the_Pump_or_the_Sieve_Institutional_Contexts_and_URM_STEM_Degree_Completion〉 (Dec. 1, 2012).
Hyde, J. S. (2005). “The gender similarity hypothesis.” Am. Psychol., 60(6), 581–592.
Instituto Colombiano para el Fomento de la Educación Superior (ICFES). (2009). Exámenes de calidad de la educación superior en ingeniería civil: Guía de Orientación, ICFES, Bogotá, Colombia (in Spanish).
Instituto Colombiano para el Fomento de la Educación Superior (ICFES). (2011). Orientaciones para el examen de Estado de la educación media ICFES SABER 11, ICFES, Bogotá, Colombia (in Spanish).
Isaacs, B. (2001). “Mystery of the missing women engineers: A solution.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 85–91.
Kehinde, J. O., and Okoli, O. G. (2004). “Professional women and career impediments in the construction industry in Nigeria.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 115–119.
Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J., Bridges, B., and Hayek, J. (2006). What matters to student success: A review of the literature, National Postsecondary Education Cooperative, Washington, DC.
Laefer, D. F. (2009). “Gender disparity in engineering as a function of physics enrollment and its implications for civil engineering.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 95–101.
Lewis, S. (1995). “Chilly courses for women? Some engineering and science experiences.” Women, culture and universities: A chilly climate? University of Technology, Sydney, Australia, 270–276.
Mau, W. C. (2003). “Factor that influence persistence in science and engineering career aspirations.” Career Dev. Q., 51(3), 234–243.
Mills, J., and Ayre, M. (2003). “Implementing an inclusive curriculum for women in engineering education.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 203–210.
Sabogal, A. (2012). “Brecha salarial entre hombres y mujeres y ciclo económico en Colombia.” Coyuntura Económica, XLII(1), 53–91 (in Spanish).
Sonnert, G., and Fox, M. F. (2012). “Women, men, and academic performance in science and engineering: The gender difference in undergraduate grade point averages.” J. Higher Educ., 83(1), 73–101.
Spelke, E. S. (2005). “Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science: A critical review.” Am. Psych., 60(9), 950–958.
Zhang, G., Anderson, T. J., Ohland, M. W., and Thorndyke, B. R. (2004). “Identifying factors influencing engineering student graduation: A longitudinal and cross-institutional study.” J. Eng. Educ., 93(4), 313–320.
Zhu, Z. (2007). “Gender differences in mathematical problem solving patterns: A review of literature.” Int. Educ. J., 8(2), 187–203.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 140 • Issue 2 • April 2014
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 12, 2012
Accepted: Oct 31, 2013
Published online: Nov 26, 2013
Published in print: Apr 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Apr 26, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.