Technical Papers
May 26, 2021

Engineered Bioremediation of NAPL Polluted Sites: Experimental and Simulation-Optimization Approach under Heterogeneous Moisture and Temperature Conditions

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 8

Abstract

An integrated experimental-numerical approach is used in this study to bioremediate a toluene, a nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL), contaminated land site, having varying moisture and temperature levels. The rates of biodegradation in saturated and unsaturated zones under varying soil-moisture (100% to 20%) and temperature (30°C±2°C and 10°C±0.5°C) conditions are obtained by conducting a series of laboratory experiments first. Thereafter, an integrated approach for engineered bioremediation of a characteristic polluted subsurface site is developed considering a system of injection-extraction wells and a HYDRUS three-dimensional (3D) simulator. The injection-extraction wells system is optimally designed to enhance the natural bioremediation rate by having three injection wells and one extraction well to provide additional oxygen supply to the contaminated zone and to contain the NAPL plume in the treatment zone. The pumping rates for injection and extraction wells are optimized using an extreme learning machine-particle swarm optimization-based simulation-optimization approach (ELM-PSO). The results show that the biodegradation rates are high at 30°C for the polluted site having soil moisture content around field capacity. The degradation rate is reduced significantly at a lower temperature of 10°C, particularly when the soil moisture content is kept in the low (40%–20%) range. The designed injection-extraction well system shows that almost similar costs of remediation are required when the soil moisture content is maintained in the range of 60%–80% of the saturation level at a high (30°C) temperature. No substantial change in the time of remediation is observed by changing the soil moisture content between 60% and 80% at this high temperature. However, an elongated time period of treatment observed at a 60% moisture content as compared to the 80% level at a low (10°C) temperature indicates the dominant role of temperature stress as compared with the soil moisture availability. Further, this combination takes about 66% less time in remediating the pollutant concentration to an acceptable level than the time required at the low temperature and moisture content levels. The findings of this study are of direct use in planning remediation strategies for hydrocarbon contaminated sites.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. (Microcosms experimental data, obtained degradation rates, pumping rates used for the optimization of injection, and extraction rates).

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Prof. Van Genuchten, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, for his support during the HYDRUS simulation and to Prof. Shashi Mathur, IIT Delhi, for his suggestions during the experimental investigations. The first author would also like to thank the University Grant Commission for JRF/SRF.

References

Akbarnejad-Nesheli, S., O. B. Haddad, and H. A. Loáiciga. 2016. “Optimal in situ bioremediation design of groundwater contaminated with dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 20 (2): 04015021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000304.
Aly, A. H., and R. C. Peralta. 1999. “Optimal design of aquifer cleanup systems under uncertainty using a neural network and a genetic algorithm.” Water Resour. Res. 35 (8): 2523–2532. https://doi.org/10.1029/98WR02368.
Basu, S., B. K. Yadav, and S. Mathur. 2015. “Enhanced bioremediation of BTEX contaminated groundwater in pot-scale wetlands.” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22 (24): 20041–20049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5240-x.
Dzantor, E. K. 2007. “Phytoremediation: The state of rhizosphere ‘engineering’ for accelerated rhizodegradation of xenobiotic contaminants.” J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. Int. Res. Process Environ. Clean Technol. 82 (3): 228–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1662.
El-Kadi, A. I. 2001. “Modeling hydrocarbon biodegradation in tidal aquifers with water-saturation and heat inhibition effects.” J. Contam. Hydrol. 51 (1–2): 97–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7722(01)00119-X.
Essaid, H. I., B. A. Bekins, and I. M. Cozzarelli. 2015. “Organic contaminant transport and fate in the subsurface: Evolution of knowledge and understanding.” Water Resour. Res. 51 (7): 4861–4902. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017121.
Garg, S., C. J. Newell, P. R. Kulkarni, D. C. King, D. T. Adamson, M. I. Renno, and T. Sale. 2017. “Overview of natural source zone depletion: Processes, controlling factors, and composition change.” Groundwater Monit. Rem. 37 (3): 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwmr.12219.
Geng, X., M. C. Boufadel, and F. Cui. 2017. “Numerical modeling of subsurface release and fate of benzene and toluene in coastal aquifers subjected to tides.” J. Hydrol. 551 (Aug): 793–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.10.039.
Geng, X., Z. Pan, M. C. Boufadel, T. Ozgokmen, K. Lee, and L. Zhao. 2016. “Simulation of oil bioremediation in a tidally influenced beach: Spatiotemporal evolution of nutrient and dissolved oxygen.” J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 121 (4): 2385–2404. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC011221.
Gupta, P. K., B. Yadav, and B. K. Yadav. 2019. “Assessment of LNAPL in subsurface under fluctuating groundwater table using 2D sand tank experiments.” J. Environ. Eng. 145 (9): 04019048. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001560.
Gupta, P. K., and B. K. Yadav. 2017. “Bioremediation of non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPLS) polluted soil and water resources.” In Environmental pollutants and their bioremediation approaches, 241–256. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Gupta, P. K., and B. K. Yadav. 2020. “Three-dimensional laboratory experiments on fate and transport of LNAPL under varying groundwater flow conditions.” J. Environ. Eng. 146 (4): 04020010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001672.
He, L., G. H. Huang, and H. W. Lu. 2008a. “A simulation-based fuzzy chance-constrained programming model for optimal groundwater remediation under uncertainty.” Adv. Water Resour. 31 (12): 1622–1635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.07.009.
He, L., G. H. Huang, G. M. Zeng, and H. W. Lu. 2008b. “An integrated simulation, inference, and optimization method for identifying groundwater remediation strategies at petroleum-contaminated aquifers in western Canada.” Water Res. 42 (10–11): 2629–2639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.01.012.
He, L., Z. Xu, X. Fan, J. Li, and H. Lu. 2017. “Meta-modeling-based groundwater remediation optimization under flexibility in environmental standard.” Water Environ. Res. 89 (5): 456–465. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143017X14839994523541.
Holden, P. A., L. E. Hersman, and M. K. Firestone. 2001. “Water content mediated microaerophilic toluene biodegradation in arid Vadose zone materials.” Microb. Ecol. 42 (3): 256–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-001-0010-3.
Huang, G. B., Q. Y. Zhu, and C. K. Siew. 2006. “Extreme learning machine: Theory and applications.” Neurocomputing 70 (1–3): 489–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.126.
Kacem, M., D. Esrael, C. S. Boeije, and B. Benadda. 2019. “Multiphase flow model for NAPL infiltration in both the unsaturated and saturated zones.” J. Environ. Eng. 145 (11): 04019072. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001586.
Kechavarzi, C., K. Soga, and T. H. Illangasekare. 2005. “Two-dimensional laboratory simulation of LNAPL infiltration and redistribution in the vadose zone.” J. Contam. Hydrol. 76 (3–4): 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2004.09.001.
Li, W. C., C. F. Ni, C. H. Tsai, and Y. M. Wei. 2016. “Effects of hydrogeological properties on sea-derived benzene transport in unconfined coastal aquifers.” Environ. Monit. Assess. 188 (5): 307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5307-2.
Mategaonkar, M., and T. I. Eldho. 2012. “Simulation-optimization model for in situ bioremediation of groundwater contamination using mesh-free PCM and PSO.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 16 (3): 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000126.
Minsker, B. S., and C. A. Shoemaker. 1998. “Dynamic optimal control of in-situ bioremediation of ground water.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 124 (3): 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1998)124:3(149).
Mustapha, H. I., P. K. Gupta, B. K. Yadav, J. J. A. van Bruggen, and P. N. L. Lens. 2018. “Performance evaluation of duplex constructed wetlands for the treatment of diesel contaminated wastewater.” Chemosphere 205 (Aug): 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.036.
Olson, M. R., and T. C. Sale. 2015. “Implications of soil mixing for NAPL source zone remediation: Column studies and modeling of field-scale systems.” J. Contam. Hydrol. 177 (Jun): 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2015.04.008.
Picone, S., T. Grotenhuis, P. Van Gaans, J. Valstar, A. Langenhoff, and H. Rijnaarts. 2013. “Toluene biodegradation rates in unsaturated soil systems versus liquid batches and their relevance to field conditions.” Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97 (17): 7887–7898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4480-7.
Powers, S. E., L. M. Abriola, and W. J. Weber, Jr. 1992. “An experimental investigation of nonaqueous phase liquid dissolution in saturated subsurface systems: Steady state mass transfer rates.” Water Resour. Res. 28 (10): 2691–2705. https://doi.org/10.1029/92WR00984.
Prasad, R. K., and S. Mathur. 2008. “Potential well locations in in situ bioremediation design using neural network embedded Monte Carlo approach.” Pract. Period. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste Manage. 12 (4): 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(2008)12:4(260).
Rezaei, H., O. Bozorg-Haddad, and H. A. Loáiciga. 2017. “Effect of hydraulic conductivity uncertainty on in situ bioremediation of groundwater contaminated with dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 143 (12): 04017049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001252.
Rifai, H. S., C. J. Newell, J. R. Gonzales, and J. T. Wilson. 2000. “Modeling natural attenuation of fuels with BIOPLUME III.” J. Environ. Eng. 126 (5): 428–438. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2000)126:5(428).
Seagren, E. A., and J. G. Becker. 2002. “Review of natural attenuation of BTEX and MTBE in groundwater.” Pract. Period. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste Manage. 6 (3): 156–172. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(2002)6:3(156).
Shieh, H. J., and R. C. Peralta. 2005. “Optimal in situ bioremediation design by hybrid genetic algorithm-simulated annealing.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 131 (1): 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2005)131:1(67).
Šimůnek, J., M. T. Van Genuchten, and M. Šejna. 2012. “The HYDRUS software package for simulating the two-and three-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably-saturated porous media.” In Technical manual, version 1. Czechia, Czech Republic: PC Progress.
Singh, T. S., and D. Chakrabarty. 2010. “Multi-objective optimization for optimal groundwater remediation design and management systems.” Geosci. J. 14 (1): 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-010-0010-8.
Sudheer, C., K. Deepak, R. K. Prasad, and M. Shashi. 2013. “Optimal design of an in-situ bioremediation system using support vector machine and particle swarm optimization.” J. Contam. Hydrol. 151 (Aug): 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2013.05.003.
Taravatrooy, N., M. R. Nikoo, J. F. Adamowski, and N. Khoramshokooh. 2019. “Fuzzy-based conflict resolution management of groundwater in-situ bioremediation under hydrogeological uncertainty.” J. Hydrol. 571 (Apr): 376–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.01.063.
Tomlinson, D. W., M. O. Rivett, G. P. Wealthall, and R. E. Sweeney. 2017. “Understanding complex LNAPL sites: Illustrated handbook of LNAPL transport and fate in the subsurface.” J. Environ. Manage. 204 (Dec): 748–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.08.015.
Van Stempvoort, D., and K. Biggar. 2008. “Potential for bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater under cold climate conditions: A review.” Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 53 (1): 16–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2007.06.009.
Wang, M., and C. Zheng. 1998. “Ground water management optimization using genetic algorithms and simulated annealing: Formulation and comparison.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 34 (3): 519–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb00951.x.
Yadav, B., S. Ch, S. Mathur, and J. Adamowski. 2016. “Estimation of in-situ bioremediation system cost using a hybrid extreme learning machine (ELM)-particle swarm optimization approach.” J. Hydrol. 543 (Dec): 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.10.013.
Yadav, B., S. Mathur, and B. K. Yadav. 2018. “Simulation-optimization approach for the consideration of well clogging during cost estimation of in situ bioremediation system.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 23 (3): 04018001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001622.
Yadav, B. K., and S. M. Hassanizadeh. 2011. “An overview of biodegradation of LNAPLs in coastal (semi)-arid environment.” Water Air Soil Pollut. 220 (1–4): 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-011-0749-1.
Yadav, B. K., S. R. Shrestha, and S. M. Hassanizadeh. 2012. “Biodegradation of toluene under seasonal and diurnal fluctuations of soil-water temperature.” Water Air Soil Pollut. 223 (7): 3579–3588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-011-1052-x.
Yang, A. L., G. H. Huang, X. S. Qin, and Y. R. Fan. 2012. “Evaluation of remedial options for a benzene-contaminated site through a simulation-based fuzzy-MCDA approach.” J. Hazard. Mater. 213 (Apr): 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.02.027.
Yoon, J. H., and C. A. Shoemaker. 1999. “Comparison of optimization methods for ground-water bioremediation.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 125 (1): 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1999)125:1(54).
Zheng, C., and P. P. Wang. 2002. “A field demonstration of the simulation optimization approach for remediation system design.” Ground Water 40 (3): 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2002.tb02653.x.
Zou, Y., G. H. Huang, L. He, and H. Li. 2009. “Multi-stage optimal design for groundwater remediation: A hybrid bi-level programming approach.” J. Contam. Hydrol. 108 (1–2): 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2009.05.007.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 147Issue 8August 2021

History

Received: Dec 20, 2020
Accepted: Mar 31, 2021
Published online: May 26, 2021
Published in print: Aug 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Oct 26, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Scholar, Dept. of Hydrology, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667, India; Postdoctoral Fellow, Faculty of Environment, Univ. of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. W, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0683-4148
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Water Resources Development and Management, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9780-9030. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Brijesh Kumar Yadav
Associate Professor, Dept. of Hydrology, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667, India.
Svetlana Sushkova
Associate Professor, Southern Federal Univ., 194/1 Stachki Prospect, Rostov-on-Don 344090, Russian Federation.
Shreejita Basu
Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi 110016, India; Research Fellow, Sustainable Northwest, 2701 SE 14th Ave., Portland, OR 97202.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share