Technical Papers
Sep 17, 2014

Predicting Ecological Effects of Watershed-Wide Rain Garden Implementation Using a Low-Cost Methodology

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 141, Issue 3

Abstract

Stormwater control measures (SCMs) have been employed to mitigate peak flows and pollutants associated with watershed urbanization. Downstream ecological effects caused by the implementation of SCMs are largely unknown, especially at the watershed scale. Knowledge of these effects could help with setting goals for and targeting locations of local restoration efforts. Unfortunately, studies such as these typically require a high level of time and effort for the investigating party, of which resources are often limited. This study proposes a low-cost investigation method for the prediction of ecological effects on the watershed scale with the implementation of rain garden systems by using publicly available data and software. For demonstration purposes, a typical urban watershed was modeled using Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) 5.0. Forty-five models were developed in which the percent impervious area was varied 3 to 80%, and the fraction of rain gardens implemented with respect to the number of structures was varied from 0 to 100%. The river chub fish (Nocomis micropogon) and its congeners (Nocomis spp.) were chosen as ecological indicators, as they are considered to be keystone species through interspecific nesting association. Depth and velocity criteria for successful nest building locations of the river chub were determined; these criteria can then be applied to many other watersheds. In this study, both base flow conditions and a typical summer storm event (1.3 cm, 6 h duration) were evaluated. During the simulated storm, nest-building locations were not affected in the 3 and 5% impervious cover models. Nest destruction was found to occur in approximately 54% of the original nest building sites for the 9% and 10% impervious areas. Nearly all of the nest-building locations were uninhabitable for impervious areas 20% and greater. Rain garden implementation significantly improved river chub habitat in the simulation, with greatest marginal benefit at lower levels of implementation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the William Penn Foundation and the Villanova Urban Stormwater Partnership (VUSP) for supporting this work. In addition, the authors would like to thank the reviewers of this work for their thoughtful comments.

References

Ahiablame, L. M., Engel, B. A., and Chaubey, I. (2013). “Effectiveness of low impact development practices in two urbanized watersheds: Retrofitting with rain barrel/cistern and porous pavement.” J. Environ. Manage., 119, 151–161.
Allan, J. D. (2004). “Landscapes and riverscapes: The influence of land use on stream ecosystems.” Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 35, 257–284.
Barr, J. W. (2012). “A multiscale investigation of the role of variability in cross-sectional properties and side tributaries on flood routing.” Master’s thesis, Univ. of Iowa, IA.
Beechie, T. J., et al. (2010). “Process-based principles for restoring river ecosystems.” BioScience, 60(3), 209–222.
Bernhardt, E. S., and Palmer, M. A. (2007). “Restoring streams in an urbanizing world.” Freshwater Biology, 52(4), 738–751.
Bernhardt, E. S., and Palmer, M. A. (2011). “River restoration: The fuzzy logic of repairing reaches to reverse catchment scale degradation.” Ecol. Appl., 21(6), 1926–1931.
Bruenderman, S. A., and Neves, R. J. (1993). “Lifer history of the endangered fine-rayed Pigtoe, Fusconaia cuneolus (Bivalva: Unionidae) in the Clinch River, Virginia.” Am. Malacological Bull., 10(1), 83–91.
Carter, T., and Jackson, C. R. (2007). “Vegetated roofs for stormwater management at multiple spatial scales.” Landsc. Urban Plann., 80(1–2), 84–94.
Davis, A. P. (2008). “Field performance of bioretention: Hydrology impacts.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 90–95.
Davis, A. P., Hunt, W. F., Traver, R. G., and Clar, M. (2009). “Bioretention technology: Overview of current practice and future needs.” J. Environ. Eng., 109–117.
Davis, A. P., Traver, R. G., Hunt, W. F., Lee, R., Brown, R. A., and Olszewski, J. M. (2012). “Hydrologic performance of bioretention storm-water control measures.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 604–614.
Debo, T. N., and Reese, A. J. (2003). Municipal stormwater management, 2nd Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Dingman, J. W. (2009). Fluvial hydraulics, Oxford University Press, New York, 57.
Emerson, C. H., and Traver, R. G. (2008). “Multiyear and seasonal variation of infiltration from storm-water best management practices.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 598–605.
Emerson, C. H., Welty, C., and Traver, R. G. (2003). “Application of HEC-HMS to model the additive effects of multiple detention basins over a range of measured storm volumes.” Proc., World Water & Environmental Resources Congress, ASCE, Philadelphia.
Federal Emergency Management Agency: Flood Insurance Study. (2010). “Montgomery County, Pennsylvania: Mill Creek.” Vol. 1, FEMA, Washington, DC.
Findlay, S. J., and Taylor, M. P. (2006). “Why rehabilitate urban river systems?” Area, 38(3), 312–325.
Finnemore, E. J., and Lynard, W. G. (1982). “Management and control technology for urban stormwater pollution.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 54(7), 1099–1111.
Gilbert Jenkins, J., Wadzuk, B., and Welker, A. (2010). “Fines accumulation and distribution in a rain garden nine years postconstruction.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 862–869.
Jenkins, R. E., and Burkhead, N. M. (1993). Freshwater fishes of Virginia, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
Kemp, S. J. (2014). “The potential and limitations of linking biological monitoring data and restoration needs of urbanized waterways: A case study.” Environ. Monit. Assess., 186(6), 3859–3873.
Kemp, W. M., et al. (2005). “Eutrophication of Chesapeake Bay: Historical trends and ecological interactions.” Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 303, 1–29.
Lobb, M. D., and Orth, D. J. (1988). “Microhabitat use by the bigmouth chub Nocomis platyrhynchus in the New River, West Virginia.” Am. Midland Naturalist, 120(1), 32–40.
Louhi, P., et al. (2011). “Twenty years of stream restoration in Finland: Little response by benthic macroinvertebrate communities.” Ecol. Appl., 21(6), 1950–1961.
Maurakis, E. G. (1998). “Breeding behaviors in Nocomis platyrhynchus and Nocomis raneyi (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae).” Virginia J. Sci., 49(4), 227–236.
McManamay, R. A., Orth, D. J., Dolloff, C. A., and Cantrell, M. A. (2010). “Gravel addition as a habitat restoration technique for tailwaters.” N. A. J. Fish. Manage., 30(5), 1238–1257.
Miller, R. (1964). “Behavior and ecology of some N. American cyprinid fishes.” Am. Midland Naturalist, 72(2), 313–357.
Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District. (2007). “Stormmwaer runoff reduction program final report: The application of stormwater runoff reduction best management practices.” 〈http://www.mmsd.com/-/media/MMSD/Documents/Water%20Quality/Reports/StormwaterRunoffReductionProgramFinalReport2007.pdf〉 (Aug. 26, 2014).
Nowak, D. J., and Greenfield, E. J. (2012). “Tree and impervious cover change in U.S. cities.” Urban For. Urban Green., 11(1), 21–30.
Pendleton, R. M., Pritt, J. J., Peoples, B. K., and Frimpong, E. A. (2012). “The strength of Nocomis nest association contributes to patterns of rarity and commonness among New River, Virginia cyprinids.” Am. Midland Naturalist, 168(1), 202–217.
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP). (2006). “Pennsylvania stormwater best management practices manual.” Chapter 6, Structural BMPs.
Peoples, B. K., McManamay, R. A., Orth, D., and Frimpong, E. A. (2014). “Nesting habitat use by river chubs in a hydrologically variable Applachian tailwater.” Ecol. Freshwater Fish, 23(2), 283–293.
Peoples, B. K., Tainer, M. B., and Frimpong, E. A. (2011). “Bluehead chub nesting activity: A potential mechanism of population persistence in degraded stream habitats.” Environ. Biol. Fish., 90(4), 379–391.
Pirhalla, D. E. (2004). “Evaluating fish—Habitat relationships for refining regional indexes of biotic integrity: Development of a tolerance index of habitat degradation for Maryland stream fishes.” Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 133(1), 144–159.
Power, M. E., et al. (1996). “Challenges in the quest for keystones.” BioScience, 46(8), 609–620.
Reighard, J. (1943). Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters, Vol. 28, Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters, 397–423.
Rossman, L. A. (2010). Storm water management model: Users manual, Environmental Protection Agency: Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OH.
Schueler, T. R. (1994). “The importance of imperviousness.” Watershed Prot. Tech., 1(3), 100–111.
Schueler, T. R., and Fraley-McNeal, L. (2008). “The impervious cover model revisited: Review of recent ICM research.” Proc., Symp. on Urbanization and Stream Ecology, EPA, UT.
Schueler, T. R., Fraley-McNeal, L., and Cappiella, K. (2009). “Is impervious cover still important? Review of recent research.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 309–315.
Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1981). Biometry, 2nd Ed., W. H. Freeman, New York.
Sudduth, E. B., Hassett, B. A., Cada, P., and Bernhardt, E. S. (2011). “Testing the field of dreams hypothesis: Functional responses to urbanization and restoration in stream ecosystems.” Ecol. Appl., 21(6), 1972–1988.
Thandaveswara, B. S. (2009). Hydraulics: Energy and momentum coefficients, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India.
USDA. (2012). “Web soil survey.” 〈http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm〉 (Aug. 6, 2012).
U.S. EPA. (2010). Stormwater management model (SWMM) 5.0., 〈http://www2.epa.gov/water-research/storm-water-management-model-swmm〉 (Aug. 6, 2012).
USGS. (2013). “Stream stats.” 〈http://water.usgs.gov/osw/streamstats/pennsylvania.html〉 (Jun. 21, 2012).
Violin, C. R., Cada, P., Suddith, E. B., Hassett, B. A., Penrose, D. L., and Bernhardt, E. S. (2011). “Effects of urbanization and urban stream restoration on the physical and biological structure of stream ecosystems.” Ecol. Appl., 21(6), 1932–1949.
Vives, S. (1990). “Nesting ecology and behavior of hornyhead Chub Nocomis biguttatus, a keystone species in Allequash Creek, Wisconsin.” Am. Midland Naturalist, 124(1), 46–56.
Walsh, C. J., Roy, A. H., Feminella, J. W., Cottingham, P. D., Groffman, P. M., and Morgan, R. P. (2005). “The urban stream syndrome: Current knowledge and the search for a cure.” J. North Am. Benthological Soc., 24(3), 706–723.
Walters, D. M., Roy, A. H., and Leigh, D. S. (2009). “Environmental indicators of macroinvertebrate and fish assemblage integrity in urbanizing watersheds.” Ecol. Indic., 9(6), 1222–1233.
Welker, A. L., Mandarano, L., Greising, K., and Mastrocola, K. (2013). “Application of a monitoring plan for storm—Water control measures in the Philadelphia region.” J. Environ. Eng., 1108–1118.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 141Issue 3March 2015

History

Received: Jul 11, 2013
Accepted: Aug 7, 2014
Published online: Sep 17, 2014
Discussion open until: Feb 17, 2015
Published in print: Mar 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Erin L. Dovel, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Staff Engineer, Kleinfelder, 321 Wall St., Princeton, NJ 08540. E-mail: [email protected]
Stanley J. Kemp [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Univ. of Baltimore, 1420 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21201. E-mail: [email protected]
Andrea L. Welker, P.E., M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Villanova Univ., 800 Lancaster Ave., Villanova, PA 19085 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share