TECHNICAL PAPERS
May 27, 2009

Simulation of the Performance of a Storm-Water BMP

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 12

Abstract

Vegetated storage-infiltration best management practices (BMPs) have become an increasingly popular means of attenuating and treating runoff from developed land. However, the hydrologic and pollutant removal performances of these facilities can be highly variable. A mathematical model of an idealized BMP was developed in order to quantify the impact of variable hydrologic and pollutant concentration input on BMP performance by simulating the treatment performance of the model system during 1,250 non-steady-state storm events generated based on historic Maryland rainfall data. The model BMP was effective in attenuating volume (42% total volume reduction) and peak flow (median peak output to peak input flow ratio was 0.058). The simulated mean effluent pollutant event mean concentration was much less than the influent (0.284 compared with 1.51 mg/L) and the overall mass load reduction was 92%. However, the performance parameters demonstrated significant variability. Consequently, the results suggest a need to incorporate into BMP performance guidelines the impact of the variable influent hydrologic and pollutant concentration characteristics. Emphasis should be placed on discharge water quality and statistical distributions rather than on single-percent removal values.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Boyce, W. E., and DiPrima, R. C. (2005). Elementary differential equations and boundary value problems, 8th Ed., Wiley, New York.
Cunnane, C. (1978). “Unbiased plotting positions—A review.” J. Hydrol., 37, 205.
Davis, A. P. (2007). “Field performance of bioretention: Water quality.” Environ. Eng. Sci., 24(8), 1049–1064.
Davis, A. P. (2008). “Field performance of bioretention: Hydrology impacts.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 13(2), 90–95.
Dean, C. M., Sansalone, J. J., Cartledge, F. K., and Pardue, J. H. (2005). “Influence of hydrology on rainfall-runoff metal element speciation.” J. Environ. Eng., 131(4), 632–642.
Dietz, M. E. (2007). “Low impact development practices: A review of current research recommendations for future directions.” Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 186, 351–363.
Dietz, M. E., and Clausen, J. C. (2005). “A field evaluation of rain garden flow and pollutant treatment.” Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 167, 123–138.
Harter, H. L. (1984). “Another look at plotting positions.” Commun. Stat. Theory Meth., 13(13), 1613.
Hsieh, C. -H., and Davis, A. P. (2005). “Evaluation and optimization of bioretention media for treatment of urban storm water runoff.” J. Environ. Eng., 131(11), 1521–1531.
Hunt, W. F., Jarrett, A. R., Smith, J. T., and Sharkey, L. J. (2006). “Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 132(6), 600.
Kreeb, L. B. (2003). “Hydrologic efficiency and design sensitivity of bioretention facilities.” Honors Research thesis, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, Md.
Li, H., Sharkey, L. J., Hunt, W. F., and Davis, A. P. (2009). “Mitigation of impervious surface hydrology using bioretention in North Carolina and Maryland.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 135(3), 109–117.
Line, D. E., and Hunt, W. F. (2009). “Performance of a bioretention area and a level spreader-grass filter strip at two highway sites in North Carolina.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 135(2), 217–224.
McCuen, R. H. (2005). Hydrologic analysis and design, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Prince Georges County. (1993). “Design manual for use of bioretention in stormwater management.” Technical Rep. Prepared for Prince George’s County (MD), Dept. of Environmental Protection, Watershed Protection Branch, Landover, Md.
Rushton, B. T. (2001). “Low-impact parking lot design reduces runoff and pollutant loads.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 127(3), 172–179.
Stagge, J. H. (2006). “Field evaluation of hydrologic and water quality benefits of grass swales for managing highway runoff.” Univ. of Maryland, College Park, Md.
University of New Hampshire Stormwater Center (UNHSC). (2006). 2005 Data Rep., CICEET, Durham, N.H.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1996). “Managing urban runoff.” EPA 841-F-96-004G, USEPA, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2000). “Low impact development (LID): A literature review.” EPA-841-B-00-005USEPA, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2002). “National water quality inventory, 2000 report.” EPA-841-R-02-001, USEPA, Washington, D.C.
Vesilind, P. A., and Morgan, S. M. (2004). Introduction to environmental engineering, Thomson, Bellmont, Calif.
Wanielista, M. P., and Yousef, Y. A. (1993). Stormwater management, Wiley, New York.
Yu, S. L., Kuo, J. T., Fassman, E. A., and Pan, H. (2001). “Field test of grassed swale performance in removing runoff pollution.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 127(3), 168–171.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 135Issue 12December 2009
Pages: 1257 - 1267

History

Received: Dec 22, 2008
Accepted: May 26, 2009
Published online: May 27, 2009
Published in print: Dec 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Thomas B. Wild
Undergraduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.
Allen P. Davis, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share