Technical Papers
Aug 3, 2022

Occupational Health and Safety Implications of an Aging Workforce in the Australian Construction Industry

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 148, Issue 10

Abstract

The proportion of older workers in the construction workforce is increasing rapidly, due to an aging population globally. While the presence of older workers offers many benefits, they are deemed to pose added occupational health and safety (OHS) challenges. Understanding age-related OHS risks is essential to initiate appropriate interventions. Construction workers’ compensation data collected by Safe Work Australia from 2008 to 2019 was analyzed using three-way chi-square technique to investigate the influence of age on OHS performance, with consideration of moderating factors such as gender, organizational size, occupation, incident mechanism, and nature of injury or illness. Findings suggest that older (aged55) and aging (aged 45–54) construction workers are more vulnerable overall to fatalities and permanent incapacities. Organizational size has a statistically significant influence on the relationship between age and incident frequency and severity, with the greatest number of fatalities among older workers in micro-sized organizations. Gender has a statistically significant influence on the relationship, with older female workers recording zero fatalities. Similarly, permanent incapacities increase with age among male workers whilst it decreases among females. There is a noticeable increase in fatalities and permanent incapacities among older workers in four occupations: carpenter and joiners, plumbers, electricians, and construction laborers. Regarding incident mechanisms, exposure to chemicals and substances caused the greatest number of fatalities among older workers, followed by falls and then vehicle incidents. Exposure to loud sound and pressure is associated with the greatest number of permanent incapacities. Occupational respiratory diseases, circulatory diseases, and cancer are associated more with fatalities among older workers than injuries. Nervous system and sense organ diseases caused the highest number of permanent incapacities. These insights can inform construction organizations and policymakers about aspects for implementing purposeful preventive measures to safeguard the aging workforce.

Practical Applications

The presence in the construction workforce of workers in different age groups offers both opportunities and challenges from the perspective of OHS management. Construction organizations must manage the unique OHS challenges posed by workers of different age, in order to improve their overall OHS performance. Specifically, attention must be paid to older and aging workers, in order to reap the performance benefits derivable from them. Construction organizations need to implement measures that better protect older workers against death and permanent incapacity due to their increased vulnerabilities. In addition, incidents causing temporary incapacity need to be reduced for younger construction workers, given their high representation. Similarly, construction practitioners, organizations, and policymakers could use insights into the relationship between age, incident severity, and other variables (such as occupation, organization size, gender, and injury mechanisms) to inform OHS management procedures and practices and implement purposeful preventive measures, rather than adopting a one-size-fits-all approach. Organizational initiatives to support an aging construction workforce should widen their focus by encompassing adjustments for task allocation, task design, and work environment, to safeguard vulnerable groups of workers. Additionally, increased awareness of OHS risks among workers of different ages could make them extra cautious about more vulnerable occupations, injury mechanisms, and injury types commensurate to their age.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code used during the study were provided by a third party. Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider as indicated in the Acknowledgements.

Acknowledgments

This article uses data supplied by Safe Work Australia and has been compiled in collaboration with state, territory and Commonwealth workers’ compensation regulators. The views expressed are the responsibility of the authors and are not necessarily the views of Safe Work Australia or the state, territory and Commonwealth workers’ compensation regulators. The authors would like to thank Safe Work Australia for providing the dataset for the research. Without their support, the research would not have been possible.

References

ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics). 2013. “Australian and New Zealand standard industrial classification (ANZSIC) 2006 (Revision 2.0).” Accessed April 20, 2022. https://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/subscriber.nsf/0/ A5E774A14620FB5ACA257BA3001385EA/$File/12920_revision2.pdf.
ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics). 2021. “ANZSCO—Australian and New Zealand standard classification of occupations.” Accessed April 20, 2022. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/classifications/anzsco-australian-and-new-zealand-standard-classification-occupations/2021.
ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics). 2022. “Labour force, Australia, detailed.” Accessed March 20, 2022. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/labour/employment-and-unemployment/labour-force-australia-detailed/latest-release.
Ackrill, R., V. Caven, and J. Alaktif. 2017. “‘Black boxes’ and ‘fracture points’: The regulation of gender equality in the UK and French construction industries.” Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manage. 28 (21): 3027–3046. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1277366.
ASCC (Australian Safety and Compensation Council). 2008. “Types of occurrence classification system, Third edition (revision one) (TOOCS 3.1).” Accessed April 20, 2022. https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/system/files/ documents/1702/typeofoccurrenceclassificationsystemtoocs3rdeditionrevision1.pdf.
Austin, N. 2012. “Implications of an aging workforce.” In Proc., ASSE Professional Development Conf. and Exposition. Des Plaines, IL: American Society of Safety Engineers.
Bersin, J., and T. Chamorro-Premuzic. 2018. New ways to gauge talent and potential: Digital tools and methods can make the process of talent assessment easier and more precise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan Management Review.
Bluff, E. 2019. “How SMEs respond to legal requirements to provide information, training, instruction and supervision to workers about work health and safety matters.” Saf. Sci. 116 (Jul): 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.036.
Camino López, M. A., O. J. González Alcántara, I. Fontaneda, and M. Mañanes. 2018. “The risk factor of age in construction accidents: Important at present and fundamental in the future.” BioMed Res. Int. 2018 (Dec): 11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2451313.
Centre for Work Health and safety. 2020. “The aging demographic of the Australian workforce: Prevention of work health and safety harm.” Accessed March 20, 2021. https://www.centreforwhs.nsw.gov.au/Projects/completed-projects/the-ageing-demographic-of-the-australian-workforce-prevention-of-work-health-and-safety-harm.
Chau, N., J.-M. Mur, L. Benamghar, C. Seigfried, J.-L. Dangelzer, M. Francais, R. Jacquin, and A. Sourdot. 2004. “Relationships between certain individual characteristics and occupational injuries for various jobs in the construction industry: A case-control study.” Am. J. Ind. Med. 45 (1): 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.10319.
Choi, J. O., J. S. Shane, and Y.-Y. Chih. 2022. “Diversity and inclusion in the engineering-construction industry.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (2): 02021002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001005.
Choi, S. D. 2013. “Aging workforce and ergonomics in construction: Opportunities and challenges.” J. Ergon. 3 (1): 1000e116. https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7556.1000e116.
Cocker, F., A. Martin, J. Scott, A. Venn, and K. Sanderson. 2012. “Psychological distress and related work attendance among small-to-medium enterprise owner/managers: Literature review and research agenda.” Int. J. Ment. Health Promot. 14 (4): 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623730.2013.771036.
Connell, R. 2012. “Gender, health and theory: Conceptualizing the issue, in local and world perspective.” Social Sci. Med. 74 (11): 1675–1683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.006.
Crawford, J. O., A. Davis, H. Cowie, and K. Dixon. 2016. The aging workforce: Implications for occupational safety and health—A research review—Executive summary. Santiago de Compostela, Spain: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work.
Crawford, J. O., R. A. Graveling, H. A. Cowie, and K. Dixon. 2010. “The health safety and health promotion needs of older workers.” Occup. Med. 60 (3): 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqq028.
Curtis, H. M., H. Meischke, B. Stover, N. J. Simcox, and N. S. Seixas. 2018. “Gendered safety and health risks in the construction trades.” Ann. Work Exposures Health 62 (4): 404–415. https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxy006.
de Celis, I. L.-R., S. F. de Bobadilla-Güémez, M. del Mar Alonso-Almeida, and E. Velasco-Balmaseda. 2017. “Women’s occupational health and safety management: An issue for corporate social responsibility.” Saf. Sci. 91 (Jan): 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.07.019.
Dement, J. M., K. Ringen, L. S. Welch, E. Bingham, and P. Quinn. 2005. “Surveillance of hearing loss among older construction and trade workers at Department of Energy nuclear sites.” Am. J. Ind. Med. 48 (5): 348–358. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20217.
Dement, J. M., K. Ringen, L. S. Welch, E. Bingham, and P. Quinn. 2009. “Mortality of older construction and craft workers employed at Department of Energy (DOE) nuclear sites.” Am. J. Ind. Med. 52 (9): 671–682. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20729.
EU-OSHA (European Agency for Safety and Health at Work). 2017. Healthy workplaces for all ages. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, EU-OSHA.
Evans, W. J., and B. F. Hurley. 1995. “Age, gender, and muscular strength.” J. Gerontology 50A (Nov): 41–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/50a.special_issue.41.
Fuller, T., A. Hasan, and I. Kamardeen. 2022. “A systematic review of factors influencing the implementation of health promotion programs in the construction industry.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 29 (6): 2554–2573. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2021-0257.
Gibb, A., J. Leaviss, and P. Bust. 2013. “Older construction workers: Needs and abilities.” In Proc., 29th Annual ARCOM Conf., edited by S. D. Smith and D. D. Ahiaga-Dagbui, 261–271. Reading, UK: Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
Grosch, J. W. 2006. “Older workers in the US: National data regarding working conditions and health.” In Proc., 28th Int. Congress on Occupational Health. Milan, Italy: International Commission on Occupational Health.
Grosch, J. W., and G. S. Pransky. 2009. “Safety and health issues for an aging workforce.” In Aging and work: Issues and implications in a changing landscape, 334–356. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hansen, P. W., V. Schlünssen, K. Fonager, J. H. Bønløkke, C. D. Hansen, and H. Bøggild. 2022. “Association of perceived work pace and physical work demands with occupational accidents: A cross-sectional study of aging male construction workers in Denmark.” BMC Public Health 22 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12461-6.
Hasan, A., A. Ghosh, M. N. Mahmood, and M. J. Thaheem. 2021. “Scientometric review of the twenty-first century research on women in construction.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (3): 04021004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000887.
Hashiguchi, N., S. Sengoku, Y. Kubota, S. Kitahara, Y. Lim, and K. Kodama. 2021. “Age-dependent influence of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations on construction worker performance.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18 (1): 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010111.
Herdt-Losavio, M. L., S. Lin, B. R. Chapman, M. Hooiveld, A. Olshan, X. Liu, R. D. DerPersis, J. Zhu, and C. M. Druschel. 2010. “Maternal occupation and the risk of birth defects: An overview from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.” Occup. Environ. Med. 67 (1): 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2009.048256.
Hinze, J., J. N. Devenport, and G. Giang. 2006. “Analysis of construction worker injuries that do not result in lost time.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 132 (3): 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:3(321).
Hong, Y., A. W. A. Hammad, S. Sepasgozar, and A. Akbarnezhad. 2019. “BIM adoption model for small and medium construction organisations in Australia.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 26 (2): 154–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-04-2017-0064.
Lipscomb, H. J., J. M. Dement, L. Li, J. Nolan, and D. Patterson. 2003. “Work-related injuries in residential and drywall carpentry.” Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 18 (6): 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473220301422.
Loeppke, R. R., et al. 2013. “Advancing workplace health protection and promotion for an aging workforce.” J. Occup. Environ. Med. 55 (5): 500–506. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e31829613a4.
Messing, K., and J. M. Stellman. 2006. “Sex, gender and women’s occupational health: The importance of considering mechanism.” Environ. Res. 101 (2): 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2005.03.015.
NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health). 2005. “Safety concerns of older drivers demand more attention from employers and workers.” Accessed February 15, 2011. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2005-159/pdfs/2005-159.pdf?id=10.26616/NIOSHPUB2005159.
Office of Industrial Relations. 2019. “Aging workforce report: Employer readiness to support the needs of Australia’s aging workforce.” Accessed March 22, 2021. https://www.worksafe.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/22156/australias-aging-workforce-report-2019.pdf.
O’Neill, T. 2020. “Mental wellbeing in the aging construction workforce.” Accessed March 16, 2021. https://www.madworldsummit.com/news/mental-wellbeing-in-the-aging-construction-workforce.
Ore, T., and D. E. Fosbroke. 1997. “Motor vehicle fatalities in the United States construction industry.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 29 (5): 613–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(97)00013-4.
Oxley, H. 2009. Policies for healthy aging: An overview. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Pan, W., L. Chen, and W. Zhan. 2020. “Implications of construction vocational education and training for regional competitiveness: Case study of Singapore and Hong Kong.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (2): 05019010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000750.
Park, H. J., and B. Y. Jeong. 2021. “Older male construction workers and sustainability: Work-related risk factors and health problems.” Sustainability 13 (23): 13179. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313179.
Peeters, M. C., and H. van Emmerik. 2008. “An introduction to the work and well-being of older workers: From managing threats to creating opportunities.” J. Managerial Psychol. 23 (4): 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940810869006.
Peng, L., and A. H. S. Chan. 2019. “A meta-analysis of the relationship between aging and occupational safety and health.” Saf. Sci. 112 (Feb): 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.10.030.
Poscia, A., U. Moscato, D. I. La Milia, S. Milovanovic, J. Stojanovic, A. Borghini, A. Collamati, W. Ricciardi, and N. Magnavita. 2016. “Workplace health promotion for older workers: A systematic literature review.” BMC Health Serv. Res. 16 (5): 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1518-z.
Pratt, S. G. 2003. Work-related roadway crashes: Challenges and opportunities for prevention. Cincinnati: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
Salminen, S. 2004. “Have young workers more injuries than older ones? An international literature review.” J. Saf. Res. 35 (5): 513–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2004.08.005.
Sattelmair, J. R., J. H. Pertman, and D. E. Forman. 2009. “Effects of physical activity on cardiovascular and noncardiovascular outcomes in older adults.” Clin. Geriatric Med. 25 (4): 677–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2009.07.004.
Schwatka, N. V., L. M. Butler, and J. R. Rosecrance. 2012. “An aging workforce and injury in the construction industry.” Epidemiological Rev. 34 (1): 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxr020.
Silverstein, M. 2008. “Meeting the challenges of an aging workforce.” Am. J. Ind. Med. 51 (4): 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20569.
Sokas, R. K., X. S. Dong, and C. T. Cain. 2019. “Building a sustainable construction workforce.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16 (21): 4202. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214202.
Spector, T. D., D. J. Hart, D. Nandra, D. V. Doyle, N. Mackillop, J. R. Gallimore, and M. B. Pepys. 1997. “Low-level increases in serum C-reactive protein are present in early osteoarthritis of the knee and predict progressive disease.” Arthritis Rheumatism 40 (4): 723–727. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780400419.
Strandberg, T. E., and R. S. Tilvis. 2000. “C-reactive protein, cardiovascular risk factors, and mortality in a prospective study in the elderly.” Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis Vasc. Biol. 20 (4): 1057–1060. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.20.4.1057.
Suarthana, E., K. G. M. Moons, D. Heederik, and E. Meijer. 2007. “A simple diagnostic model for ruling out pneumoconiosis among construction workers.” Occup. Environ. Med. 64 (9): 595–601. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2006.027904.
Sunindijo, R. Y., and I. Kamardeen. 2017. “Work stress is a threat to gender diversity in the construction industry.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (10): 04017073. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001387.
Warr, P. 1993. “In what circumstances does job performance vary with ages?” Eur. Work Organizational Psychol. 3 (3): 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602009308408593.
Welch, L. S., E. Haile, L. I. Boden, and K. L. Hunting. 2008. “Age, work limitations and physical functioning among construction roofers.” Work 31 (4): 377–385.
Yeoh, H. T., T. E. Lockhart, and X. Wu. 2013. “Non-fatal occupational falls on the same level.” Ergonomics 56 (2): 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.746739.
Zwerling, C., P. S. Whitten, C. S. Davis, and N. L. Sprince. 1997. “Occupational injuries among workers with disabilities: The national health interview survey, 1985–1994.” JAMA 278 (24): 2163–2166. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03550240053033.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 148Issue 10October 2022

History

Received: Jan 6, 2022
Accepted: May 19, 2022
Published online: Aug 3, 2022
Published in print: Oct 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jan 3, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, School of Architecture and Built Environment, Deakin Univ., Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7296-3605. Email: [email protected]
Lecturer, School of Architecture and Built Environment, Deakin Univ., Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2031-4288. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Impact of Age on Construction Workers’ Preattentive and Attentive Visual Processing for Hazard Detection, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5760, 40, 3, (2024).
  • Differences in Workers’ Safety Behavior by Project Size and Risk Level of Work in South Korea, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-12890, 149, 5, (2023).
  • Developing a National Data-Driven Construction Safety Management Framework with Interpretable Fatal Accident Prediction, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-12848, 149, 4, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share