Technical Papers
Jun 26, 2020

Detection of Railway Masts in Airborne LiDAR Data

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 146, Issue 9

Abstract

Generating an object-oriented, geometric digital twin of an existing railway from its point cloud data (PCD) is a laborious task, needing 10 times more labor hours than scanning the physical asset. The resulting modeling cost counteracts the expected benefits of the twin. This cost and effort can be reduced by automating the process of creating such models. The first perceived challenge to achieving such automation is detecting masts from airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data because their position and function (separating substructure from superstructure) is critical to the subsequent detection of other elements. This paper presents a method that tackles the aforementioned challenge by leveraging the highly regulated and standardized nature of railways. In railway infrastructure, the geometric relations of a unit contain overhead line equipment (OLE) between two mast pairs are consistent and repetitive throughout the track. The proposed method starts with tools for cleaning the PCD and roughly detecting its positioning and orientation. The resulting data sets are then processed by restricting the search region of the masts considering its positions compared with the track centerline. Subsequently, the masts are detected using the Random Sample Consensus (RANSAC) algorithm. The final deliverables of the method include the coordinates of the mast positions, detected point clusters and three-dimensional (3D) models of the masts in Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) format. The method was implemented in a prototype and tested on three railway PCDs with a cumulative length of 18 km. The results indicated that the method achieves an overall detection rate of 94%. This is the first method in automatically detecting masts from airborne LiDAR data.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data analyzed during the study were provided by a third party. Requests for data should be directed to the provider indicated in the Acknowledgements. Information about the Journal’s data-sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001263.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Cambridge Commonwealth, European & International Trust and Bentley Systems UK Ltd. Data used in the experiments were kindly made available by Fugro NL Land B.V.

References

Amos, D., P. Elsner, I. Thomas, D. Horn, U. Dornbusch, and J. Bovington. 2018. “Coincident beach surveys using UAS, vehicle mounted and airborne laser scanner: Point cloud inter-comparison and effects of surface type heterogeneity on elevation accuracies.” Remote Sens. Environ. 208 (Feb): 15–26.
Arastounia, M. 2015. “Automated recognition of railroad infrastructure in rural areas from LIDAR data.” Remote Sensing 7 (11): 14916–14938. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs71114916.
Ariyachandra, M. R. M. F., and I. Brilakis. 2019. “Understanding the challenge of digitally twinning the geometry of existing rail infrastructure.” In Proc., 12th FARU International Research Conference. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Faculty of Architecture Research Unit, Univ. of Moratuwa.
Cabo, C., C. Ordoñez, S. García-Cortés, and J. Martínez. 2018. “An algorithm for automatic detection of pole-like street furniture objects from mobile laser scanner point clouds.” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 87 (Jan): 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.10.008.
Eastman, C., K. Liston, R. Sacks, and K. Liston. 2008. BIM handbook. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
El-halawany, S. I., and D. D. Lichti. 2013. Detecting road poles from mobile terrestrial laser scanning data. London: Taylor & Francis.
Eurostat. 2019. Railway transport—Length of lines, by number of tracks. Luxembourg: European Union (Statistical Office).
Fanning, B., C. M. Clevenger, M. E. Ozbek, and H. Mahmoud. 2015. “Implementing BIM on infrastructure: Comparison of two bridge construction projects.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 20 (4): 04014044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000239.
Fukano, K., and H. Masuda. 2015. “Detection and classification of pole-like objects from mobile mapping data.” In Proc., ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, II-3/W5, 57–64. Göttingen, Germany: Copernicus Publications.
Furneaux, C., and R. Kivvits. 2008. “BIM—Implications for government.” Constr. Innovation 5: 1–43.
He, Y., Z. Song, Z. Liu, and R. Lindsey. 2016. Implementation of aerial LiDAR technology to update highway feature inventory. Fargo, ND: Mountain-Plains Consortium Publications.
Huang, J., and S. You. 2015. “Pole-like object detection and classification from urban point clouds.” In Proc., IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 3032–3038. New York: IEEE.
Kwoczyńska, B., and J. Dobek. 2016. “Elaboration of the 3D model and survey of the power lines using data from airborne laser scanning.” J. Ecol. Eng. 17 (4): 65–74. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/63954.
Leenen, M., and A. Wolf. 2018. “SCI study forecasts upturn in global rail market.” Int. Railway J.
Lehtomäki, M., A. Jaakkola, J. Hyyppä, A. Kukko, and H. Kaartinen. 2010. “Detection of vertical pole-like objects in a road environment using vehicle-based laser scanning data.” Remote Sensing 2 (3): 641–664. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs2030641.
Li, F., S. O. Elberink, and G. Vosselman. 2018. “Pole-like road furniture detection and decomposition in mobile laser scanning data based on spatial relations.” Remote Sensing 10 (4): 531.
Li, Y., W. Wang, S. Tang, D. Li, Y. Wang, Z. Yuan, R. Guo, X. Li, and W. Xiu. 2019. “Localization and extraction of road poles in urban areas from mobile laser scanning data.” Remote Sensing 11 (4): 401. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11040401.
Love, P. E. D., D. D. Ahiaga-Dagbui, and Z. Irani. 2016. “Cost overruns in transportation infrastructure projects: Sowing the seeds for a probabilistic theory of causation.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 92 (Oct): 184–194.
Luo, D., and Y. Wang. 2008. “Rapid extracting pillars by slicing point clouds.” Remote Sensing Spatial Inf. Sci. XXXVII (B3b): 215–218.
NAO (National Audit Office). 2014. Lessons from major rail infrastructure programmes. London: NAO.
NAO (National Audit Office). 2016. Modernising the Great Western railway. London: NAO.
Network Rail. 2015. A guide to overhead electrification. London: Network Rail.
Network Rail. 2018. Catalogue of network rail standards. London: Network Rail.
Pastucha, E. 2016. “Catenary system detection, localization and classification using mobile scanning data.” Remote Sensing 8 (10): 801. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8100801.
Pu, S., M. Rutzinger, G. Vosselman, and S. Oude. 2011. “Recognizing basic structures from mobile laser scanning data for road inventory studies.” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 66(6), S28–S39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.08.006.
RIA (Railway Industry Association). 2019. RIA electrification cost challenge. London: RIA.
Rodríguez-Cuenca, B., S. García-Cortés, C. Ordóñez, and M. C. Alonso. 2015. “Automatic detection and classification of pole-like objects in urban point cloud data using an anomaly detection algorithm.” Remote Sensing 7 (10): 12680–12703. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs71012680.
Salling, K. B., and S. Leleur. 2015. “Accounting for the inaccuracies in demand forecasts and construction cost estimations in transport project evaluation.” Transp. Policy 38 (Feb): 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.11.006.
Vick, S., and I. Brilakis. 2018. “Road design layer detection in point cloud data for construction progress monitoring.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 32 (5): 04018029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000772.
Yadav, M., A. Husain, A. K. Singh, and B. Lohani. 2015. “Pole-shaped object detection using mobile LiDAR data in rural road environments.” In Proc., ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, II-3/W5, 11–16. Göttingen, Germany: Copernicus Publications.
Zhu, L., and J. Hyyppa. 2014. “The use of airborne and mobile laser scanning for modeling railway environments in 3D.” Remote Sensing 6 (4): 3075–3100. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6043075.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 146Issue 9September 2020

History

Received: Oct 6, 2019
Accepted: Apr 9, 2020
Published online: Jun 26, 2020
Published in print: Sep 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Nov 26, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Construction Information Technology Laboratory, Laing O’Rourke Centre, Engineering Dept., Cambridge Univ., Civil Engineering Bldg., 7a JJ Thomson Ave., Cambridge CB3 0FA, UK (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9654-9289. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Ioannis Brilakis, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Laing O’Rourke Reader in Construction Engineering and Director, Construction Information Technology Laboratory, Laing O’Rourke Centre, Engineering Dept., Cambridge Univ., Civil Engineering Bldg., 7a JJ Thomson Ave., Cambridge CB3 0FA, UK. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share