Web-Based Tool for Interoperability among Structural Analysis Applications
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 146, Issue 6
Abstract
Over the last decade, building information modeling (BIM) has been the main player in the architectural, engineering, construction, and operation (AECO) industry. The BIM workflow is becoming more powerful by progressively integrating more applications of the AECO industry. It is worth noting that further elaborations are still to take place to address the in-practice interoperability issues in which import and export information among applications need to be automated. This paper provides a comprehensive interoperability assessment in the structural analysis domain, where the available information exchange methods have been evaluated based on Likert scale criteria. Three scores are considered to evaluate the accuracy of information exchange, including complete transfer, partial transfer, and no transfer. The transfer is considered complete when geometry, static loads, boundary conditions, and material properties are successfully transferred. These four parameters represent the practical need for information exchange in terms of structural analysis in which each application is capable of running its solver to obtain the analysis results. Five commercial structural analysis applications are considered in the assessment, representing the most common in the field: SAP2000, ETABS, ROBOT, STAAD Pro, and RFEM. Based on the assessment results, a web-based structural analysis model converter (SAMC) is developed to enable ISO-based interoperability among structural analysis applications, building on the industry foundation classes (IFC) data model. SAMC has been validated for two applications, namely, SAP2000 and STAAD Pro, while the concept is proven to link any structural application that is willing to join the BIM workflow.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and codes generated or utilized during the course of this research work are available from the corresponding author by request.
•
Five test case models that are used for the interoperability assessment (SAP2000, ETABS, RSA, STAAD Pro, and RFEM models).
•
SAP2000, ETABS, ROBOT, STAAD Pro, and RFEM models after the conversion process used for the interoperability assessment.
•
The original and converted SAP2000 and STAAD Pro models for the two case studies used in the SAMC tool validation.
•
A free to use web-based SAMC tool converter for SAP2000 and STAAD Pro, performing export/import IFC from/to SAP2000, export/import IFC from/to STAAD Pro, and bidirectional conversion between SAP2000 and STAAD Pro, available at http://samc3.azurewebsites.net.
References
Autodesk. 2018. “Robot structural analysis: Structural FEM analysis.” Accessed February 1, 2019. https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/robot-structural-analysis-products/getting-started?sort=score.
Bentley. 2013. “Bentley community: STAAD forum.” Accessed April 1, 2019. https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/79455/sap2000-to-staadpro-converter.
Bentley. 2015. “STAAD pro: Structural FEM analysis.” Accessed March 1, 2019. https://www.bentley.com/en/products/product-line/structural-analysis-software/staadpro.
buildingSMART International. 2019a. “IFC specifications database.” Accessed April 10, 2019. https://technical.buildingsmart.org/standards/ifc/ifc-schema-specifications.
buildingSMART International. 2019b. “Technical resource.” Accessed March 15, 2019. https://technical.buildingsmart.org.
Chen, P. H., L. Cui, and C. Y. Wan. 2005. “Implementation of IFC-based web server for collaborative building design between architects and structural engineers.” Autom. Constr. 14 (1): 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2004.08.013.
Computers and Structures. 2017a. “SAP2000 FEM design application.” Accessed March 15, 2019. https://www.csiamerica.com/products/sap2000.
Computers and Structures. 2017b. “ETABS FEM design application.” Accessed April 5, 2019. https://www.csiamerica.com/products/etabs.
Crowley, A., and A. Watson. 2000. “CIMSteel integration standards, release 2: Overview.” Accessed April 1, 2019. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/8437774/cimsteel-integration-standards-release-2.
Dlubal Software. 2013. “RFEM: Structural FEM analysis.” Accessed April 5, 2019. https://www.dlubal.com/en/products/rfem-fea-software/what-is-rfem.
Eastman, C. 2011. BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Eastman, C. M., Y. S. Jeong, R. Sacks, and I. Kaner. 2010. “Exchange model and exchange object concepts for implementation of national BIM standards.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 24 (1): 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2010)24:1(25).
Han, F., and S. Zhu. 2009. “Bottom-up/top-down image parsing with attribute grammar.” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 31 (1): 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2008.65.
Hu, Z. Z., X. Y. Zhang, H. W. Wang, and M. Kassem. 2016. “Improving interoperability between architectural and structural design models: An industry foundation classes-based approach with web- based tools.” Autom. Constr. 66 (Jun): 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.02.001.
Huahui, L., and D. Xueyuan. 2018. “Interoperability analysis of IFC-based data exchange between heterogeneous BIM software.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 24 (7): 537–555. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2018.6132.
Liebich, T. 2009. IFC 2x edition 3 model implementation guide, version 2.0. Dresden, Germany: buildingSMART International Modeling Support Group.
Liu, Z., Y. Li, and H. Zhang. 2010. “IFC-based integration tool for supporting information exchange from architectural model to structural model.” J. Cent. S. Univ. Technol. 17 (6): 1344–1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-010-0640-z.
Mackey, A. 2010. “ASP.NET MVC. In: Introducing.NET 4.0.” Accessed February 9, 2019. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4302-2456-3_13.
Mehran, O., H. Reza, P. Eleni, P. Roshani, and A. Mehrdad. 2017. “Collaboration in BIM-based construction networks: A bibliometric-qualitative literature review.” Int. J. Project Manage. 35 (2017): 1288–1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.001.
Muller, M. F., A. Garbers, F. Esmanioto, N. Huber, E. R. Loures, and O. Canciglieri. 2017. “Data interoperability assessment though IFC for BIM in structural design—A five-year gap analysis.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 23 (7): 943–954. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2017.1341850.
Pratt, M. J. 2001. “Introduction to ISO 10303-the STEP standard for product data exchange.” J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 1 (1): 102–103. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1354995.
Qin, L., X. Y. Deng, and X. L. Liu. 2011. “Industry foundation classes based integration of architectural design and structural analysis.” J. Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ. (Sci.) 16 (1): 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-011-1099-2.
Ramaji, I., and A. Memari. 2018. “Interpretation of structural analytical models from the coordination view in building information models.” Autom. Constr. 90 (Jun): 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.02.025.
SAMC Portal. 2019. “Structural analysis model converter application.” Accessed February 5, 2019. http://samc3.azurewebsites.net.
Serror, M. H., J. Inoue, Y. Adachi, and Y. Fujino. 2008. “Shared computer-aided structural design model for construction industry (infrastructure).” Comput.-Aided Des. 40 (7): 778–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2007.07.003.
Smith, D. K., and M. Tardif. 2012. Building information modeling: A strategic implementation guide for architects, engineers, constructors, and real estate asset managers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Steel, J., R. Drogemuller, and B. Toth. 2012. “Model interoperability in building information modelling.” J. Software Syst. Modell. 11 (1): 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-010-0178-4.
Terence, P. 2007. The definitive ANTLR reference: Building domain-specific languages. 1st ed., 376. Raleigh: Pragmatic Bookshelf.
Terence, P. 2013. The definitive ANTLR 4 reference. 1st ed., 328. Raleigh: Pragmatic Bookshelf.
Venugopal, M., C. M. Eastman, R. Sacks, and J. Teizer. 2012. “Semantics of model views for information exchanges using the industry foundation class schema.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 26 (2): 411–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2012.01.005.
Wan, C. Y., P. H. Chen, and P. Tiong. 2004. “Assessment of IFCs for structural analysis domain.” J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 9 (6): 75–95.
Wang, X., Z. P. Cui, Q. L. Zhang, and H. Z. Yang. 2013. “Creating structural analysis model from IFC based structural model.” Adv. Mater. Res. 712–715 (June 2013): 901–904. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.712-715.901.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 146 • Issue 6 • June 2020
Copyright
©2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 3, 2019
Accepted: Dec 4, 2019
Published online: Apr 2, 2020
Published in print: Jun 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Sep 2, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.