Abstract

Production planning and control are critical in guiding projects toward meeting their targets. This paper uses the power of the last planner system (LPS) combined with conventional methods to assess schedule performance. Although previous studies have proposed multiple metrics within LPS, research correlating these various metrics to overall schedule performance has been both challenging and time-consuming. This study proposes new metrics and details a calculation method to measure significant aspects of planning performance that are not yet supported by a measurement metric. Moreover, the paper introduces a framework and a dashboard to employ these metrics to guide project-level and production planning. Results from applying the proposed framework to two construction projects in the United States show that projects tend to run behind the scheduled milestones due to poor performance in (1) making tasks ready and removing constraints, (2) committing to critical tasks, and (3) matching load to capacity. Findings underline major issues in construction planning where teams constantly struggle with aligning near-term planning with long-term planning. The proposed metrics can provide a proactive detection of issues and constant visibility of project status so that planning teams can apply earlier control measures to improve reliable planning and reduce milestone delays.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the University Research Board (URB) Grant No. 22264 and the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at the American University of Beirut. All findings and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not reflect those of the contributors.

References

Alarcón, L. F., J. L. Salvatierra, and J. A. Letelier. 2014. “Using last planner indicators to identify early signs of project performance.” In Proc., 22nd Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction, edited by B. T. Kalsaas, L. Koskela,and T. A. Saurin, 547–558. Gløshaugen, Norway: Group for Lean Construction.
Anbari, F. T. 2003. “Earned value project management method and extensions.” Project Manage. J. 34 (4): 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280303400403.
Ballard, G. 2000. The last planner system of production control. Ph.D. dissertation, School of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Birmingham.
Ballard, G., and G. Howell. 1998. “Shielding production: Essential step in production control.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 124 (1): 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:1(11).
Ballard, G., and I. Tommelein. 2016. “Current process benchmark for the last planner® system.” Accessed November 15, 2016. https://www.leanconstruction.org/learning/publications/lean-construction-journal/lcj-back-issues/2016-issue/.
Birrell, G. S. 1987. “Discussion of ‘Criticism of CPM for project planning analysis’ by Ali Jaafari (June 1984, Vol. 110, No. 2).” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 113 (2): 343–345. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1987)113:2(343).
Cameron, W. B. 1963. Informal sociology, a casual introduction to sociological thinking, 13. New York: Random House.
Cândido, L. F., L. F. M. Heineck, and J. D. P. B. Neto. 2014. “Critical analysis on earned value management (EVM) technique in building construction.” In Proc., 22nd Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction, 159–170. Gløshaugen, Norway: Group for Lean Construction.
Chan, A. P. C., D. Scott, and A. P. L. Chan. 2004. “Factors affecting the success of a construction project.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 130 (1): 153–155. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:1(153).
Chitla, V. R., and T. S. Abdelhamid. 2003. “Comparing process improvement initiatives based on percent plan complete and labor utilization factors.” In Proc., 11th Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction. Gløshaugen, Norway: Group for Lean Construction.
Demachkieh, F., and M.-A. Abdul-Malak. 2018. “Synthesis of improvements to EVMS key parameters representation.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress, 399–408. Reston, VA: ASCE.
El Samad, G., F. Hamzeh, and S. Emdanat. 2017. “Last planner system–The need for new metrics.” In Proc., 25th Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction. Gløshaugen, Norway: Group for Lean Construction.
Emdanat, S., and M. Azambuja. 2016. “Aligning near and long term planning for LPS implementations: A review of existing and new metrics.” In Proc., 24th Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction. Gløshaugen, Norway: Group for Lean Construction.
Formoso, C. T., and C. B. Moura. 2009. “Evaluation of the impact of the last planner system on the performance of construction projects.” In Proc., 17th Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction. Gløshaugen, Norway: Group for Lean Construction.
González, V., L. F. Alarcón, and F. Mundaca. 2008. “Investigating the relationship between planning reliability and project performance.” Prod. Plann. Control 19 (5): 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537280802059023.
Hamzeh, F. R., G. Ballard, I. D. Tommelein. 2008. “Improving construction work flow the connective role of lookahead planning.” In Proc., 16th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, 635–646. Gløshaugen, Norway: Group for Lean Construction.
Hamzeh, F. R., I. Saab, I. D. Tommelein, and G. Ballard. 2015a. “Understanding the role of tasks anticipated in lookahead planning through simulation.” Autom. Constr. 49 (Jan): 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.09.005.
Hamzeh, F. R., E. Zankoul, and C. Rouhana. 2015b. “How can ‘tasks made ready’ during lookahead planning impact reliable workflow and project duration?” Constr. Manage. Econ. 33 (4): 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2015.1047878.
Hevner, A. R., S. T. March, J. Park, and S. Ram. 2004. “Design science in information systems research.” MIS Q. 28 (1): 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625.
Howell, G. A., H. G. Ballard, and I. D. Tommelein. 2010. “Construction engineering: Reinvigorating the discipline.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (10): 740–744. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000276.
Jang, J. W., and Y. W. Kim. 2007. “Use of percent of constraint removal to measure the make-ready process.” In Proc., 15th Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction. Gløshaugen, Norway: Group for Lean Construction.
Kerzner, H. 1998. Project management, a systems approach to planning, scheduling and controlling. 6th ed. New York: Wiley.
Kerzner, H. 2013. Project management metrics, KPIs, and dashboards—A guide to measuring and monitoring project performance. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
Kim, Y. W., and G. Ballard. 2000. “Is the earned-value method an enemy of work flow?” In Proc., 8th Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction. Gløshaugen, Norway: Group for Lean Construction.
Koskela, L., G. Ballard, G. Howell, and I. Tommelein. 2002. “The foundations of lean construction.” In Design and construction: Building in value, 211–226. Oxford, UK: Butterworth Heinemann.
Koskela, L., and G. Howell. 2002. “The underlying theory of project management is obsolete.” In Proc., PMI Research Conf., 293–302. New York: IEEE.
Laufer, A., and D. Cohenca. 1990. “Factors affecting construction-planning outcomes.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 116 (1): 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1990)116:1(135).
Laufer, A., and R. L. Tucker. 1987. “Is construction project planning really doing its job? A critical examination of focus, role and process.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 5 (3): 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446198700000023.
Mitropoulos, P. 2005. “Planned work ready: A proactive metric for project control.” In Proc., 13th Int. Group for Lean Construction Conf. Gløshaugen, Norway: Group for Lean Construction.
Olano, R. M., L. F. Alarcon, and C. Razuri. 2009. “Understanding the relationship between planning reliability and schedule performance: A case study.” In Proc., 17th Int. Group for Lean Construction Conf., 139–153. Gløshaugen, Norway: Group for Lean Construction.
Rizk, L., F. Hamzeh, and S. Emdanat. 2017. “Introducing new capacity planning metrics in production planning.” In Proc., 25th Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction. Gløshaugen, Norway: Group for Lean Construction.
Rocha, C. G. D., C. Formoso, P. Tzortzopoulos, L. Koskela, and A. Tezel. 2012. Design science research in lean construction: Process and outcomes, 10. Gløshaugen, Norway: Group for Lean Construction.
Rouhana, C., and F. Hamzeh. 2016. “An ABC approach to modelling the emergence of ‘new tasks’ in weekly construction planning.” Accessed November 23, 2016. https://www.leanconstruction.org/learning/publications/lean-construction-journal/lcj-back-issues/2016-issue/.
Rozenes, S., G. Vitner, and S. Spraggett. 2006. “Project control: Literature review.” Project Manage. J. 37 (4): 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280603700402.
Russell, J. S., E. J. Jaselskis, and S. P. Lawrence. 1997. “Continuous assessment of project performance.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 123 (1): 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1997)123:1(64).
Sacks, R., O. Seppänen, V. Priven, and J. Savosnick. 2017. “Construction flow index: A metric of production flow quality in construction.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 35 (1–2): 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2016.1274417.
Song, K., S. Pollalis, and F. Pena-Mora. 2005 “Project dashboard: Concurrent visual representation method of project metrics on 3D building models.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Computing in Civil Engineering. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Suk, S.-J., B.-G. Hwang, J. Dai, H. Caldas Carlos, and P. Mulva Stephen. 2012. “Performance dashboard for a pharmaceutical project benchmarking program.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (7): 864–876. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000503.
Viana, D. D., C. T. Formoso, and E. L. Isatto. 2017. “Understanding the theory behind the last planner system using the language-action perspective: Two case studies.” Prod. Plann. Control 28 (3): 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2016.1233360.
Weber, R. 2018. “Design-science research.” Chap. 11 in Research methods. 2nd ed. edited by K. Williamson and G. Johanson, 267–288. Cambridge, MA: Chandos.
Womack, J. P., and D. T. Jones. 2003. Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. New York: Free Press.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 145Issue 11November 2019

History

Received: Jun 25, 2018
Accepted: Feb 26, 2019
Published online: Aug 23, 2019
Published in print: Nov 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Jan 23, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, 7-287 Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, 9211 116th St., Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 1H9 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3986-9534. Email: [email protected]
Master’s Graduate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, American Univ. of Beirut, Riad El Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8158-2599. Email: [email protected]
Director of Management Services, Ghafari Associates, LLC, 17101 Michigan Ave., Dearborn, MI 48126. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6606-3165. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share