Technical Papers
Apr 11, 2018

Key Moderators of the Relationship between Construction Crew Motivation and Performance

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144, Issue 6

Abstract

Construction crew performance is a function of both motivation and the situation in which tasks are performed. However, previous research in construction has not comprehensively investigated situational/contextual factors and their impact on the relationship between motivation and performance. This paper defines a comprehensive set of crew performance metrics, analyzes the relationship between motivational factors and crew performance, and identifies key situational/contextual factors that affect the relationship between motivation and performance. Multiple-source interview surveys identify factors that motivate construction crews, situational/contextual factors, and crew performance metrics. Correlation analysis is performed on field data to determine the relationship between motivational factors and crew performance. Hierarchical regression analysis is used to identify key moderators of the relationship between motivation and performance. This paper makes three major contributions: it develops a comprehensive set of construction crew performance metrics that relate not only to task performance, but also to contextual performance and counterproductive behavior; it reveals how motivational factors affect crew performance; and it provides a comprehensive list of key moderators of the relationship between construction crew motivation and performance.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during the study are included in the published paper. Information about the Journal’s data sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001263.

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Industrial Research Chair in Strategic Construction Modeling and Delivery (NSERC IRCPJ 428226–15), which is held by Dr. A. R. Fayek. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support and data provided by industry partners and all personnel who participated in this study. The authors thank Mr. Ming kit Yau, who diligently helped in the data entry process.

References

AbouRizk, S., P. Knowles, and U. Hermann. 2001. “Estimating labor production rates for industrial construction activities.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 127 (6): 502–511.
Ashforth, B. E., and F. Mael. 1989. “Social identity theory and the organization.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 14 (1): 20–39.
Bagozzi, R. P., and Y. Yi. 2012. “Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models.” J. Acad. Market. Sci. 40 (1): 8–34.
Bandura, A. 1977. “Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.” Psychol. Rev. 84 (2): 191–215.
Baron, R. M., and D. A. Kenny. 1986. “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51 (6): 1173–1182.
Bassioni, H. A., A. D. Price, and T. M. Hassan. 2004. “Performance measurement in construction.” J. Manage. Eng. 20 (2): 42–50.
Beal, D. J., R. R. Cohen, M. J. Burke, and C. L. McLendon. 2003. “Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations.” J. Appl. Psychol. 88 (6): 989–1004.
Bennett, R. J., and S. L. Robinson. 2000. “Development of a measure of workplace deviance.” J. Appl. Psychol. 85 (3): 349–360.
Bobko, P. 2001. Correlation and regression: Applications for industrial organizational psychology and management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Borman, W. C., and S. J. Motowidlo. 1997. “Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research.” Hum. Perform. 10 (2): 99–109.
Borman, W. C., L. A. Penner, T. D. Allen, and S. J. Motowidlo. 2001. “Personality predictors of citizenship performance.” Int. J. Select. Assess. 9 (1–2): 52–69.
Campbell, J. P. 1990. “Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology.” In Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, edited by M. D. Dunnette and L. M. Hough, 687–732. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Chan, A. P. C., and A. P. L. Chan. 2004. “Key performance indicators for measuring construction success.” Benchmarking Int. J. 11 (2): 203–221.
Cohen, J., P. Cohen, S. G. West, and L. S. Aiken. 2013. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge.
Cox, R. F., R. R. Issa, and A. Frey. 2006. “Proposed subcontractor-based employee motivational model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 132 (2): 152–163.
Dai, J., P. M. Goodrum, and W. F. Maloney. 2009. “Construction craft workers’ perceptions of the factors affecting their productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 135 (3): 217–226.
Dalal, R. S. 2005. “A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior.” J. Appl. Psychol. 90 (6): 1241–1255.
Devonish, D., and D. Greenidge. 2010. “The effect of organizational justice on contextual performance, counterproductive work behaviors, and task performance: Investigating the moderating role of ability-based emotional intelligence.” Int. J. Select. Assess. 18 (1): 75–86.
Diefendorff, J. M., and M. M. Chandler. 2011. “Motivating employees.” In APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Vol 1: Building and developing the organization, edited by S. E. Zedeck, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Fayek, A. R., and A. Oduba. 2005. “Predicting industrial construction labor productivity using fuzzy expert systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (8): 938–941.
Frazier, P. A., A. P. Tix, and K. E. Barron. 2004. “Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research.” J. Counseling Psychol. 51 (1): 115–134.
Goddard, R. D., W. K. Hoy, and A. W. Hoy. 2004. “Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions.” Educ. Res. 33 (3): 3–13.
Gruys, M. L., and P. R. Sackett. 2003. “Investigating the dimensionality of counterproductive work behavior.” Int. J. Select. Assess. 11 (1): 30–42.
Kagioglou, M., R. Cooper, and G. Aouad. 2001. “Performance management in construction: A conceptual framework.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 19 (1): 85–95.
Knight, K., and A. R. Fayek. 2000. “A preliminary study of the factors affecting the cost escalation of construction projects.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 27 (1): 73–83.
Liberda, M., J. Ruwanpura, and G. Jergeas. 2003. “Construction productivity improvement: A study of human, management and external issues.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress: Wind of Change: Integration and Innovation, 1–8. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Maloney, W. F., and J. M. McFillen. 1987. “Motivational impact of work crews.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 113 (2): 208–221.
Meyer, J. P., and N. J. Allen. 1991. “A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment.” Hum. Resourc. Manage. Rev. 1 (1): 61–89.
Omar, M. N., and A. R. Fayek. 2016. “Modeling and evaluating construction project competencies and their relationship to project performance.” Automat. Constr. 69 (Sep): 115–130.
Organ, D. W. 1988. Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com.
Podgórski, D. 2015. “Measuring operational performance of OSH management system—A demonstration of AHP-based selection of leading key performance indicators.” Saf. Sci. 73: 146–166.
Rankin, J., A. R. Fayek, G. Meade, C. Haas, and A. Manseau. 2008. “Initial metrics and pilot program results for measuring the performance of the Canadian construction industry.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 35 (9): 894–907.
Raykov, T. 1997. “Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures.” Appl. Psychol. Meas. 21 (2): 173–184.
Šajeva, S. 2007. “Identifying factors affecting motivation and loyalty of knowledge workers.” Econ. Manage. 12: 643–652.
Siriwardana, C. S., and J. Y. Ruwanpura. 2012. “A conceptual model to develop a worker performance measurement tool to improve construction productivity.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2012: Construction Challenges in a Flat World, 179–188. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Tsehayae, A. A., and A. R. Fayek. 2014. “Identification and comparative analysis of key parameters influencing construction labour productivity in building and industrial projects.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 41 (10): 878–891.
Tsehayae, A. A., and A. R. Fayek. 2016. “System model for analysing construction labour productivity.” Constr. Innovation 16 (2): 203–228.
Wang, D., D. Arditi, and A. Damci. 2017. “Construction project managers’ motivators and human values.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (4): ..
Ward, C. S., B. Curtis, and C. B. Chapman. 1991. “Objectives and performance in construction projects.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 9 (4): 343–353.
Wildman, J. L., W. L. Bedwell, E. Salas, and K. A. Smith-Jentsch. 2011. “Performance measurement at work: A multilevel perspective.” In APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Vol. 1: Building and developing the organization, edited by S. Zedeck, 303–342. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Xiong, B., M. Skitmore, and B. Xia. 2015. “A critical review of structural equation modeling applications in construction research.” Autom. Constr. 49 (Part A): 59–70.
Xiong, B., M. Skitmore, B. Xia, M. A. Masrom, K. Ye, and A. Bridge. 2014. “Examining the influence of participant performance factors on contractor satisfaction: A structural equation model.” Int. J. Project Manage. 32 (3): 482–491.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144Issue 6June 2018

History

Received: Sep 29, 2017
Accepted: Jan 3, 2018
Published online: Apr 11, 2018
Published in print: Jun 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Sep 11, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Mohammad Raoufi, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE
Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 7-385 Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, 9211 116 St. NW, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 1H9.
Aminah Robinson Fayek, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.Eng.
Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Fuzzy Hybrid Decision Support Systems for Construction; NSERC Industrial Research Chair in Strategic Construction Modeling and Delivery; Ledcor Professor in Construction Engineering; Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 7-287 Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, 9211 116 St. NW, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 1H9 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share