Technical Papers
Apr 11, 2018

Structural Stakeholder Model in Public Engagement for Construction Development Projects

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144, Issue 6

Abstract

Construction development projects are often complicated and influence multiple stakeholders with different requirements and interests. Public engagement (PE) has emerged as a prerequisite for collecting stakeholders’ opinions and involving them in the planning and decision making of construction development projects. It is not easy to identify and manage stakeholders in PE because different stakeholders possess different types of power and interests that have the potential to dramatically affect stakeholder behaviors and final project outcomes. However, the effects of stakeholder attributes (i.e., power and interest) on stakeholder management in PE and final PE outcomes have been insufficiently studied. This study aimed to investigate the complicated relationships between stakeholders’ power, interests, and PE outcomes through a questionnaire survey. An integrated model for stakeholder power, interest, and PE outcomes was developed using a structural equation model. The results showed that different forms of power and interest influenced final PE outcomes either directly or indirectly. PE organizers are encouraged to directly involve project teams, experts, and reputable stakeholders in the PE process and allow the media and nongovernmental organizations to monitor the decision-making process. The findings of this study will contribute to stakeholder management for PE in construction projects by developing a structural model that can be adopted to identify stakeholder power and interests and engage appropriate stakeholders in the decision-making process. It is expected to improve PE outcomes and enhance stakeholder satisfaction for construction development projects.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during the study are included in the published article. Information about the Journal’s data sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001263.

Acknowledgments

The work described in this paper was fully supported by a grant from the Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors (Planning and Development Division, Project No. NP022075-02).

References

Berzuini, C., Dawid, P., and Beruardinelli, L. (2012). Causality: Statistical perspectives and applications, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
Bishop, P., and Davis, G. (2002). “Mapping public participation in policy choices.” Aust. J. Public Administration, 61(1), 14–29.
Boonstra, A., Boddy, D., and Bell, S. (2008). “Stakeholder management in IOS projects: Analysis of an attempt to implement an electronic patient file.” Eur. J. Inf. Syst., 17(2), 100–111.
Bourne, L. (2009). Stakeholder relationship management: A maturity model for organizational mplementation, Gower, Ashgate, Burlington, VT.
Bourne, L., and Walker, D. H. (2005). “Visualising and mapping stakeholder influence.” Manage. Decis., 43(5), 649–660.
Bouwen, R., and Taillieu, T. (2004). “Multi-party collaboration as social learning for interdependence: Developing relational knowing for sustainable natural resource management.” J. Community Appl. Soc. Psychol., 14(3), 137–153.
Browne, M. W., and Cudeck, R. (1993). “Alternative ways of assessing model fit.” Testing structural equation models, K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long, eds., SAGE, Newburry Park, CA.
Cheung, P. T. Y. (2011). “Civic engagement in the policy process in Hong Kong: Change and continuity.” Public Administration and Development, 31, 113–121.
Coff, R. W. (1999). “When competitive advantage doesn’t lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power.” Organ. Sci., 10(2), 119–133.
Cragg, W., and Greenbaum, A. (2002). “Reasoning about responsibilities: Mining company managers on what stakeholders are owed.” J. Bus. Ethics, 39(3), 319–335.
Cuppen, E., Bosch-Rekveldt, M. G. C., Pikaar, E., and Mehos, D. C. (2016). “Stakeholder engagement in large-scale energy infrastructure projects: Revealing perspectives using Q methodology.” Int. J. Project Manage., 34(7), 1347–1359.
Davis, K. (2016). “A method to measure success dimensions relating to individual stakeholder groups.” Int. J. Project Manage., 34(3), 480–493.
Delmas, M., and Toffel, M. W. (2004). “Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework.” Bus. Strategy Environ., 13(4), 209–222.
Diamantopoulos, A., and Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated, SAGE, London.
Dodd, D. M., Brummette, J., and Hazleton, V. (2015). “A social capital approach: An examination of Putnam’s civic engagement and public relations roles.” Public Relat. Rev., 41(4), 472–479.
Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., and Lampe, C. (2007). “The benefits of Facebook friends: Exploring the relationship between college students’ use of online social networks and social capital.” J. Comput. Mediated Commun., 12(3), 205–218.
French, J. R. P., and Raven, B. (1968). “The bases of social power.” Group dynamics: Research and theory, D. Cartwright and A. Zander, eds., Harper and Row, New York.
Garnett, K., and Cooper, T. (2014). “Effective dialogue: Enhanced public engagement as a legitimizing tool for municipal waste management decision-making.” Waste Manage., 34(12), 2709–2726.
Geaves, L. H., and Rowsell, E. C. (2016). “Flood risk management as a public or a private good, and the implications for stakeholder engagement.” Environ. Sci. Policy, 55(2), 281–291.
Greene, R., and Elfrers, J. (1999). Power the 48 laws, Profile Books, London.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling, SAS Institute, Cray, NC.
Hendriks, C. M. (2009). “Deliberative governance in the context of power.” Policy Soc., 28(3), 173–184.
Heravi, A., Coffey, V., and Trigunarsyah, B. (2015). “Evaluating the level of stakeholder involvement during the project planning processes of building projects.” Int. J. Project Manage., 33(5), 985–997.
Herazo, B., and Lizarralde, G. (2016). “Understanding stakeholders’ approaches to sustainability in building projects.” Sustainable Cities Soc., 26(10), 240–254.
Hinkin, T. R., and Schriesheim, C. A. (1994). “An examination of subordinate-perceived relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and leader bases of power.” Hum. Relat., 47(7), 779–800.
Holley, E., and Mitcham, C. (2016). “The pebble mine dialogue: A case study in public engagement and the social license to operate.” Resour. Policy, 47, 18–27.
Howitt, D., and Cramer, D. (1997). A guide to computing statistics with SPSS for windows, Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf, London.
Hu, L., and Bentler, P. M. (1999). “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.” Struct. Equ. Model. Multi. J., 6(1), 1–55.
Joerin, F., Desthieux, G., Beuze, S. B., and Nembrini, A. (2009). “Participatory diagnosis in urban planning: Proposal for a learning process based on geographical information.” J. Environ. Manage., 90(6), 2002–2011.
Johnson, G., and Scholes, K. (1999). Exploring corporate strategy, 5th Ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Joreskog, K. G., and Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide, Scientific Software International, Chicago.
Kaiser, H. F. (1958). “The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis.” Psychometrika, 23(3), 187–200.
Leung, M. Y., and Olomolaiye, P. (2010). “Risk and construction stakeholder management.” Construction stakeholder management, E. Chinyio and P. Olomolaiye, eds., Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, U.K.
Leung, M. Y., Yu, J. Y., and Chan, Y. S. (2014). “Focus group study to explore critical factors of public engagement process for mega development projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., .
Leung, M. Y., Yu, J. Y., and Liang, Q. (2013). “Improving public engagement in construction development projects from stakeholder’s perspective.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., .
Leung, M. Y., Yu, J. Y., Wang, L., and Zhou, W. T. (2012). Improvement of public engagement performance for planning and development projects via a value management approach, Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors (Planning and Development Division) and City Univ. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Li, T. H. Y., Ng, S. T., and Skitmore, M. (2013). “Evaluating stakeholder satisfaction during public participation in major infrastructure and construction projects: A fuzzy approach.” Autom. Constr., 29, 123–135.
Lukes, S. (2005). “Power and the battle for hearts and minds.” J. Int. Stud., 33(3), 477–493.
Mah, D. N., and Hills, P. (2014). “Participatory governance for energy policy-making: A case study of the UK nuclear consultation in 2007.” Energy Policy, 74, 340–351.
Marwell, G., and Oliver, P. (1993). The critical mass in collective action: A micro-social theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., and Wood, D. J. (1997). “Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts.” Acad. Manage. Rev., 22(4), 853–886.
Msomphora, M. R. (2015). “Stakeholder participation and satisfaction in the process of developing management plans: The case of Scottish Inshore Fisheries.” Ocean Coastal Manage., 116(11), 491–503.
Newcombe, R. (2003). “From client to project stakeholders: A stakeholder mapping approach.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 21(8), 841–848.
Olander, S. (2007). “Stakeholder impact analysis in construction project management.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 25(3), 277–287.
Olander, S., and Landin, A. (2005). “Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction projects.” Int. J. Project Manage., 23(4), 321–328.
Olmstead, J. (2000). Executive leadership: Building world-class organizations, Cashman Dudley, Houston.
Peiro, M. J., and Melia, J. L. (2003). “Formal and informal interpersonal power in organizations: Testing a bifactorial model of power in role-sets.” Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev., 52(1), 14–35.
Pomeroy, R., and Douvere, F. (2008). “The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process.” Mar. Policy, 32(5), 816–822.
Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., and Sachs, S. (2002). “Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view.” California Manage. Rev., 45(1), 6–28.
Project Management Institute. (2013). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide), 5th Ed., Newtown Square, PA.
Raustiala, K. (1997). “States, NGOs, and international environmental institutions.” Int. Stud. Quarterly, 41(4), 719–740.
Raynes-Goldie, K., and Walker, L. (2008). “Our space: Online civic engagement tools for youth.” Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth, W. L. Bennett, ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Reed, M. I. (1996). “Expert power and control in late modernity: An empirical review and theoretical synthesis.” Organiz. Stud., 17(4), 573–597.
Reichart, J. (2003). “A theoretical exploration of expectational gaps in the corporate issue construct.” Corporate Reputation Rev., 6(1), 58–69.
Rheingold, H. (2008). “Using participatory media and public voice to encourage civic engagement.” Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth, W. L. Bennett, ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 97–118.
Rowe, G., and Frewer, L. J. (2005) “A typology of public engagement mechanisms.” Sci. Tech. Hum. Values, 30(2), 251–290.
Savage, G. T., Nix, T. W., Whitehead, O. J., and Blair, J. D. (1991). “Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders.” Acad. Manage. Executive, 5(2), 61–75.
Tabachnick, B. G., and Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics, Allyn and Bacon, New York.
Wang, J., and Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modelling with Mplus: Application using Mplus, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
Xia, N., Zhong, R., Uw, C., Wang, X., and Wang, S. (2017). “Assessment of stakeholder-related risks in construction projects: Integrated analyses of risk attributes and stakeholder influence.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., .
Yang, R. J., and Shen, G. Q. P. (2014). “Framework for stakeholder management in construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng., .
Yang, R. J., and Zou, P. X. (2014). “Stakeholder-associated risks and their interactions in complex green building projects: A social network model.” Build. Environ., 73(1), 208–222.
Yu, J. Y., and Leung, M. Y. (2015). “Preparing public engagement for construction development projects: A focus group study.” Int. J. Project Manage., 33(5), 1124–1135.
Yuan, J., Skibniewski, M. J., Li, Q., and Zheng, L. (2010). “Performance objectives selection model in public-private partnership projects based on the perspective of stakeholders.” J. Manage. Eng., 89–104.
Yukl, G., and Falbe, C. M. (1991). “Importance of different power sources in downward and lateral relations.” J. Appl. Psychol., 76(3), 416–423.
Zhang, L., and El-Gohary, N. M. (2015). “Discovering stakeholder values for axiology-based value analysis of building projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., .

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144Issue 6June 2018

History

Received: Mar 27, 2017
Accepted: Oct 13, 2017
Published online: Apr 11, 2018
Published in print: Jun 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Sep 11, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Hefei Univ. of Technology, Tunxi Rd., Hefei, Anhui 230009, China (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Mei-yung Leung [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Architectural Engineering, City Univ. of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Ave., Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share