Technical Papers
Apr 21, 2018

Impact of CIM Technologies and Agency Policies on Performance for Highway Infrastructure Projects

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144, Issue 7

Abstract

The digital tools and practices that facilitate the collection, organization, and use of accurate data and information throughout the life cycle of a highway infrastructure asset are referred to as civil integrated management (CIM). The collective impact of CIM practices and agency policies on project and asset performance has yet to be established by data-driven research. This paper empirically models the effect of CIM practices on the resulting reduction in change orders, savings in the schedule, improvements in quality of work, and safety benefits. The modeling framework in this study also incorporates suitable constructs to study the influence of agency approaches such as financial resources, team alignment, information management policies, standards, and contract specifications. Through case studies, CIM implementation and performance data were compiled in detail across 12 highway projects in the United States and a megaproject in the United Kingdom. Cross-case comparisons were then carried out using qualitative comparative analysis to extract the causal conditions for outcome measures. Results indicated the presence of multiple solution pathways for explaining performance benefits. The solution pathways that include the CIM attribute sufficiently explained the reported performance benefits for the projects. However, lower necessity scores of this attribute (below 0.6) showed that CIM as an enabling ingredient is not always necessary. As such, alternate solutions that exclude CIM in causal pathways do exist and they reiterate that technology is just a supportive tool. Information management strategies and contract standards and specifications recorded high sufficiency and necessity scores (above 0.8), indicating their significance to performance. The findings from this empirical research underscore the multidimensional nature of CIM implementation, ascertain the associated agency factors, and demonstrate a novel performance framework for agencies investing in the integration of digital practices.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during the study are included in the submitted article or supplemental materials files. The Survey questionnaire and the case study guide were published as an appendix to the research report of the NCHRP Project 10-96 and can be accessed online at https://www.nap.edu/login.php?action=guest&record_id=23690 (Appendix B and C).

Acknowledgments

This study is a product of the research funded through the NCHRP Project “Guide for Civil Integrated Management (CIM) in Departments of Transportation.” Any opinions, findings, or conclusions, or the recommendations presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NCHRP or TRB. We would like to thank the panel members for their insights and guidance. The inputs from the interviewees for the case studies are also appreciated.

References

Anderson, R., and J. Mannina 2012. “Civil integrated management.” Accessed June 15, 2015. http://www.dot.state.fl.us/structures/DesignExpo2012/CIMPresentations/CIM%20Presentation%20%20Jun%20%202012.pdf.
Barlish, K., and K. Sullivan. 2012. “How to measure the benefits of BIM: A case study approach.” Autom. Constr. 24 (Jul): 149–159.
Choi, J. O., J. T. O’Connor, and T. W. Kim. 2016. “Recipes for cost and schedule successes in industrial modular projects: Qualitative comparative analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (10): 04016055.
Dodge Data and Analytics. 2012. SmartMarket report: The business value of BIM for infrastructure. Bedford, MA: Dodge Data and Analytics.
Dodge Data and Analytics. 2014. The business value of BIM for owners: SmartMarket report. Bedford, MA: Dodge Data and Analytics.
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Building theories from case study research.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 14 (4): 532–550.
Guo, F., C. T. Jahren, Y. Turkan, and H. D. Jeong. 2017. “Civil integrated management: An emerging paradigm for civil infrastructure project delivery and management.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (2): 04016044.
Hannon, J. J. 2007. Emerging technologies for construction delivery. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Hartmann, T., J. Gao, and M. Fischer. 2008. “Areas of application for 3D and 4D models on construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 134 (10): 776–785.
Jordan, E., M. E. Gross, A. N. Javernick-Will, and M. J. Garvin. 2011. “Use and misuse of qualitative comparative analysis.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 29 (11): 1159–1173.
Kam, C., D. Senaratna, B. McKinney, and Y. Xiao. 2013. The VDC scorecard: Formulation and validation. Stanford, CA: Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford Univ.
Kang, Y., W. J. O’Brien, and S. P. Mulva. 2013. “Value of IT: Indirect impact of IT on construction project performance via best practices.” Autom. Constr. 35 (Nov): 383–396.
Legewie, N. 2013. “An introduction to applied data analysis with qualitative comparative analysis.” Forum: Qual. Social Res. 14 (3): 1–45.
McAdam, D., H. S. Boudet, J. Davis, R. J. Orr, W. R. Scott, and R. E. Levitt. 2010. “‘Site fights’: Explaining opposition to pipeline projects in the developing world.” Sociological Forum 25 (3): 401–427.
Munsi, A. 2012. “Crossrail and Bentley Systems launch UK’s first dedicated building information modelling academy.” Accessed June 1, 2015. http://www.crossrail.co.uk/news/articles/crossrail-bentley-systems-launch-uks-first-dedicated-building-information-modelling-academy.
O’Brien, W. J., B. Sankaran, F. L. Leite, N. Khwaja, I. De Sande Palma, P. Goodrum, K. Molenaar, G. Nevett, and J. Johnson. 2016. Civil integrated management (CIM) for departments of transportation, Volume 1: Guidebook. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, The National Academy of Sciences.
O’Connor, J. T., and L.-R. Yang. 2004. “Project performance versus use of technologies at project and phase levels.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 130 (3): 322–329.
Parve, L. 2012. “CIM-civil integrated management: Best practices & lessons learned.” Accessed June 15, 2015. http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/files/technology/3d-modeling/thursday_meeting/lance-parve.pdf.
Parve, L. 2015. “Understanding the benefits of 3D modeling in construction: The Wisconsin case study.” Accessed May 9, 2016. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/pubs/hif13050.pdf.
Ragin, C. C. 2009. “Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsQCA).” Chap. 5 in Vol. 51 of Configurational comparative methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Ragin, C. C. 2012. Crisp and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Los Angeles: Univ. of Southern California.
Reeder, G. D., and G. A. Nelson. 2015. Implementation manual—3D engineered models for highway construction: The Iowa experience. Ames, IA: National Concrete Pavement Technology Center, Institute for Transportation, Iowa State Univ.
Rihoux, B., and C. C. Ragin. 2009. Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. London: Sage.
Sankaran, B., W. J. O’Brien, P. M. Goodrum, N. Khwaja, F. L. Leite, and J. Johnson. 2016. “Civil integrated management for highway infrastructure.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2573: 10–17.
Santosh Kumar Delhi, V., A. Mahalingam, and S. Palukuri. 2012. “Governance issues in BOT based PPP infrastructure projects in India.” Built Environ. Project Asset Manage. 2 (2): 234–249.
Singh, R. 2008. Engineering automation: Key concepts for a 25 year time horizon. Salem, OR: Oregon Dept. of Transportation.
Taylor, T. R., M. Uddin, P. M. Goodrum, A. McCoy, and Y. Shan. 2012. “Change orders and lessons learned: Knowledge from statistical analyses of engineering change orders on Kentucky highway projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (12): 1360–1369.
Thomas, S. R., S.-H. Lee, J. D. Spencer, R. L. Tucker, and R. E. Chapman. 2004. “Impacts of design/information technology on project outcomes.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 130 (4): 586–597.
Utah DOT. 2015. Utah Department of Transportation 3D engineered models for construction implementation plan. Accessed December 30, 2015. https://www.udot.utah.gov/main/uconowner.gf?n=20649226078742790.
Vonderohe, A. 2013. Wisconsin Department of Transportation 3D technologies implementation plan. Madison, WI: Univ. of Wisconsin–Madison.
Vonderohe, A., J. Zogg, G. Whited, and K. Brockman. 2010. “Planning the implementation of three-dimensional technologies for design and construction.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2183: 129–138.
Yen, K., T. Lasky, and B. Ravani. 2014. “Cost-benefit analysis of mobile terrestrial laser scanning applications for highway infrastructure.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 20 (4): 04014022.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144Issue 7July 2018

History

Received: Mar 29, 2017
Accepted: Nov 15, 2017
Published online: Apr 21, 2018
Published in print: Jul 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Sep 21, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, 301 E. Dean Keeton St., ECJ 5.412, Austin, TX 78712-1094 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5166-872X. Email: [email protected]
William J. O’Brien, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-1094. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share