Technical Papers
Feb 22, 2018

Framework for Managing Integration Challenges of Last Planner System in IMPs

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144, Issue 5

Abstract

International megaprojects (IMPs) have a poor record of budget and schedule overruns. Lean Construction methods and the associated Last Planner System (LPS) have been successfully implemented in many projects, but the application of the LPS in IMPs is limited due to integration challenges and organizational behavior issues inherent in IMPs. Integration herein refers to the interfaces between subprojects in a megaproject. This paper introduces the IMPact framework to address integration challenges. A modified two-round Delphi method was used to identify, verify, and rate integration challenges. Thirty-one challenges were identified. After the development of the framework, the nominal group technique confirmed its internal validity. Finally, external validation was achieved in a focus group study. The measurement system of the proposed framework was tested on a real IMP. The validated framework provided a conceptual practical solution, based in LPS, to address the challenges within and across subprojects. It is intended to be an adaptive roadmap to address these challenges and potentially improve the performance of IMPs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Information about the Journal’s data sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001263.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the participating experts for their generous and outstanding input that made this study possible. With sincere thanks and appreciation, the authors acknowledge the feedback received from the external reviewer Prof. Herman Glenn Ballard (University of California, Berkeley) on the proposed IMPact framework. Equally, the authors acknowledge the valuable input and direction received from Dr. Magdi Sabeg (Rotor Consulting), Prof. Amer Shalaby (University of Toronto), and Dr. Arash Shahi (University of Toronto) that sparked their thinking.

References

Abdelhamid, T. (2004). “The self-destruction and renewal of lean construction theory: A prediction from Boyd’s theory.” Proc., 12th Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction, International Group for Lean Construction, Oslo, Norway.
Abdelhamid, T., El-Gafy, M., and Salem, O. (2008). “Lean construction fundamentals and principles.” Am. Prof. Constr. J., 32, 8–19.
Abdelhamid, T., Jain, S., and Mrozowski, T. (2010). “Analyzing the relationship between production constraints and construction work flow reliability: An SEM approach.” Proc., 18th Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction, International Group for Lean Construction, Oslo, Norway, 528–537.
Ballard, G. (2000). “The Last Planner System of production control.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K.
Ballard, G., and Howell, G. (1994). “Implementing lean construction—Improving downstream performance.” Proc., 2nd Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction, International Group for Lean Construction, Oslo, Norway, 101–110.
Ballard, G., and Kim, Y. (2007). “Implementing lean on capital projects.” Proc., 15th Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction, International Group for Lean Construction, Oslo, Norway, 88–97.
Ballard, G., and Tommelein, I. (2016). “Current process benchmark for the Last Planner® system.” Lean Constr. J., 12, 57–89.
BIM 360 [Computer software]. AutoDesk, San Rafael, CA.
Birrell, G. (1987). “Discussion of ‘Criticism of CPM for project planning analysis’ by Ali Jaafari (June, 1984, Vol. 110, No. 2).” J. Constr. Eng Manage., 343–345.
COAA (Construction Owners Association of Alberta). (2007). Workface planning model and implementation guide, Edmonton, Canada.
Cochrane, K., Saxe, S., Roorda, M., and Shalaby, A. (2017). “Moving freight on public transit: Best practices, challenges, and opportunities.” Int. J. Sustainable Transp., 11(2), 120–132.
Delbecq, A., Van de Ven, A., and Gustafson, D. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes, Scott-Foresman, Glenview, IL.
Dick, B. (2014). “Validity, reliability, generalizability.” Sage encyclopedia of action research, D. Coghlan and M. Brydon-Miller, eds., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Edwards, D., and Holt, G. (2010). “The case for ‘3D triangulation’ when applied to construction management research.” Constr. Innovation, 10(1), 25–41.
El-Diraby, T., and O’Connor, J. (2004). “Lessons learned in designing research methodology in field-based construction research.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 109–114.
El-Sabek, L., and McCabe, B. (2017a). “Coordination challenges of production planning and control in international mega-projects: A case study.” Lean Constr. J., 13, 25–48.
El-Sabek, L., and McCabe, B. (2017b). “Coordination challenges of production planning in the construction of international mega-projects in the Middle East.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res., 1–23.
Fernandez-Solis, J., et al. (2013). “Survey of motivations, benefits, and implementation challenges of Last Planner System users.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 354–360.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). “Over budget, overtime, over and over again: Managing major projects.” The Oxford handbook of project management, P. Morris, J. Pinto, and J. Söderlund, eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K., 321–344.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). “What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview.” Project Manage. J., 45(2), 6–19.
Giezen, M., Bertolini, L., and Salet, W. (2015). “Adaptive capacity within a mega project: A case study on planning and decision-making in the face of complexity.” Eur. Plann. Stud., 23(5), 999–1018.
Hallowell, M., and Gambatese, J. (2010). “Qualitative research: Application of the Delphi method to CEM research.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 99–107.
Hamzeh, F. (2011). “The lean journey: Implementing the Last Planner® system in construction.” Proc., 19th Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction, International Group for Lean Construction, Oslo, Norway.
Haslam, R., et al. (2005). “Contributing factors in construction accidents.” Appl. Ergon., 36(4), 401–415.
Hasson, F., Keeney, S., and McKenna, H. (2000). “Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique.” J. Adv. Nurs., 32(4), 1008–1015.
Howell, G., Ballard, G., and Tommelein, I. (2011). “Construction engineering—Reinvigorating the discipline.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 740–744.
Hsu, C. C., and Sandford, B. A. (2007). “The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus.” Pract. Assess. Res. Eval., 12(10), 1–8.
Jergeas, G., Williamson, E., Skulmoski, G., Thomas, J. (2000). “Stakeholder management on construction projects.” AACE Int. Trans., P12.1–P12.6.
Jonsen, K., and Jehn, K. (2009). “Using triangulation to validate themes in qualitative studies.” Qual. Res. Organiz. Manage., 4(2), 123–150.
Khan, S., and Tzortzopoulos, P. (2016). “A framework for evaluating an action research study on lean design management.” Proc., 24th Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction, International Group for Lean Construction, Oslo, Norway.
Kim, S., Kim, Y., Park, K., and Yoo, C. (2015). “Impact of measuring operational-level planning reliability on management-level project performance.” J. Manage. Eng., 05014021.
Koskela, L. (1992). Application of the new production philosophy to construction, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA.
Koskela, L. (2000). “An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction.” Ph.D. dissertation, Helsinki Univ. of Technology, Espoo, Finland.
Koskela, L., Howell, G., and Lichtig, W. (2006). “Contracts and production.” CIB W92 Symp. on Sustainability and Value through Construction Procurement, Univ. of Salford, Salford, U.K., 332–339.
Koskela, L., Stratton, R., and Koskenvesa, A. (2010). “Last planner and critical chain in construction management: Comparative analysis.” Proc., 18th Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction, International Group for Lean Construction, Oslo, Norway, 538–547.
Law, A. (2007). Simulation modeling and analysis, 4th Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Linstone, H., and Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Liu, J., Shahi, A., Haas, C., Goodrum, P., and Caldas, C. (2014). “Validation methodologies for construction engineering and management research.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04014046.
Love, P., Holt, G., and Li, H. (2002). “Triangulation in construction management research.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage., 9(4), 294–303.
Lu, Y., Li, Y., Pang, D., and Zhang, Y. (2015). “Organizational network evolution and governance strategies in megaprojects.” Constr. Econ. Build., 15(3), 19–33.
Lucko, G., and Rojas, E. (2010). “Research validation: Challenges and opportunities in the construction domain.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 127–135.
Mahalingam, A., Yadav, A., and Varaprasad, J. (2015). “Investigating the role of lean practices in enabling BIM adoption: Evidence from two Indian cases.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 05015006.
Malone, T., and Crowston, K. (1994). “The interdisciplinary study of coordination.” ACM Comput. Surv., 26(1), 87–119.
McKenna, H. (1994). “The Delphi technique: A worthwhile research approach for nursing?” J. Adv. Nurs., 19(6), 1221–1225.
McMillan, S., King, M., and Tully, M. (2016). “How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques.” Int. J. Clin. Pharm., 38(3), 655–662.
Mitropoulos, P., Abdelhamid, T., and Howell, G. (2005). “A systems model of construction accident causation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 816–825.
Murry, J., and Hammons, J. (1995). “Delphi: A versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research.” Rev. Higher Educ., 18(4), 423–436.
Neto, J., and Alves, T. (2007). “Strategic issues in lean construction implementation.” Proc., 15th Annual Conf. Int. Group for Lean Construction, International Group for Lean Construction, Oslo, Norway, 78–87.
Okoli, C., and Pawlowski, S. (2004). “The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications.” Inf. Manage., 42(1), 15–29.
Pill, J. (1971). “The Delphi method: Substance, context, a critique and an annotated bibliography.” Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci., 5(1), 57–71.
Priven, V., and Sacks, R. (2016). “Impacts of the social subcontract and Last Planner System interventions on the trade-crew workflows of multistory residential construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04016013.
Senior, B. (2009). “Critical path method implementation drawbacks: A discussion using action theory.” ⟨http://ascpro.ascweb.org/chair/paper/CPGT142002009.pdf⟩ (Jul. 11, 2017).
Sink, D. (1991). “Focus groups as an approach to outcomes assessment.” Am. Rev. Public Administration, 21(3), 197–204.
Stewart, D., and Shamdasani, P. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Tommelein, I. (2015). “Journey toward lean construction: Pursuing a paradigm shift in the AEC industry.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04015005.
Torrance, H. (2012). “Triangulation, respondent validation, and democratic participation in mixed methods research.” J. Mixed Methods Res., 6(2), 111–123.
Touch Plan [Computer software]. MOCA Systems, Boston.
Villego [Computer software]. BOB bv, Tiel, Netherlands.
V-Planner [Computer software]. Ghafari Associates, Dearborn, MI.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144Issue 5May 2018

History

Received: May 3, 2017
Accepted: Oct 18, 2017
Published online: Feb 22, 2018
Published in print: May 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jul 22, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Luai M. El-Sabek, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E., P.Eng.
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, 35 St. George St., Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A4 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Brenda Y. McCabe, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.Eng.
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, 35 St. George St., Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A4. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share