Performance of Highway Design-Bid-Build and Design-Build Projects by Work Types
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144, Issue 2
Abstract
The design-build (D-B) project delivery method has been used increasingly by state departments of transportation (DOTs) because of its documented benefits. Many studies have shown the superior performance of D-B projects when compared to traditional design-bid-build (D-B-B) projects. However, these studies often rely on experts’ judgments or small sample sizes based on data collected from surveys, interviews, or case studies. There are few, if any, empirical studies that have compared D-B-B and D-B highway project performance by work types. This research analyzed 139 pairs of D-B-B and D-B highway projects built by the Florida DOT. The 139 pairs of projects were classified into five categories of work types: (1) new construction; (2) reconstruction; (3) resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation (3R) projects; (4) intelligent transportation systems (ITS)–related projects; and (5) miscellaneous construction such as sidewalks, bike lanes, or landscaping. The study employed both parametric and nonparametric statistical tests to compare cost growth, schedule growth, and construction intensity metrics across the five project work types. The results show that D-B projects statistically perform better than D-B-B in terms of cost growth and schedule growth for miscellaneous construction and 3R project work types, respectively. Design-build projects also statistically provide a higher construction intensity (more work put in place) than D-B-B for new construction and reconstruction work types. No statistically significant differences between D-B-B and D-B projects were found for other project work types. This study contributes to the construction engineering and management body of knowledge by providing empirical comparisons between D-B-B and D-B project performance on the basis of different types of work. The findings from this paper may provide guidance for state DOTs and practitioners to select D-B project delivery for specific work types and benchmarks D-B against D-B-B.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Information about the Journal’s data sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001263.
Acknowledgments
This research was partially sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The opinions, findings, and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of FHWA. The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge Dr. Keith Molenaar from the University of Colorado and the staff member at FDOT who assisted with collecting project data for this study.
References
Blanding, J., and Lewis, J. (2012). “Shortening project delivery: Design-build.” ⟨http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/innovation/everydaycounts/edc-2/designbuild.cfm⟩ (Jul. 27, 2016).
CII (Construction Industry Institute). (1997). “Project delivery systems: CM at risk, design-build, and design-bid-build.” Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
CII (Construction Industry Institute). (2002). “Measuring the impacts of the delivery system on project performance-design-build and design-bid-build.”, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Culp, G. (2011). “Alternative project delivery methods for water and wastewater projects: Do they save time and money?” Leadersh. Manage. Eng., 231–240.
Design Build Institute of America. (2016). “Design-build authorization for transportation.” ⟨http://www.dbia.org/advocacy/state/Pages/default.aspx⟩ (Jul. 25, 2016).
Ellis, R. D., Pyeon, J., Herbsman, Z. J., Minchin, E., and Molenaar, K. (2007). “Evaluation of alternative contracting techniques on FDOT construction projects.” Florida Dept. of Transportation, Gainesville, FL.
Ellis, R. E., Herbsman, Z. J., and Kumar, A. (1991). “Evaluation of the FDOT design/build program.”, Florida Dept. of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL.
Ernzen, J., and Schexnayder, C. (2000). “One company’s experience with design/build: Labor cost risk and profit potential.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 10–14.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2002). Design-build contracting: Final rule, Federal Register, U.S. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2006). “Design-build effectiveness study.”, Washington, DC.
Goftar, V. N., Mounir, E. A., and Bingham, E. (2014). “A meta-analysis of literature comparing project performance between design-build and design-bid-build delivery systems.” Proc., Construction Research Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1389–1396.
Gransberg, D. D., and Buitrago, M. E. V. (2002). “Construction project performance metrics.” AACE Int. Trans., CS21, CS21–CS25.
Hale, D., Shrestha, P., Gibson, G., Jr., and Migliaccio, G. (2009). “Empirical comparison of design/build and design/bid/build project delivery methods.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 579–587.
Konchar, M., and Sanvido, V. (1998). “Comparison of U.S. project delivery systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 435–444.
Markowski, C. A., and Markowski, E. P. (1990). “Conditions for the effectiveness of a preliminary test of variance.” Am. Statistician, 44(4), 322–326.
Minchin, R., Jr., Li, X., Issa, R., and Vargas, G. (2013). “Comparison of cost and time performance of design-build and design-bid-build delivery systems in Florida.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 1–8.
Molenaar, K. R., Songer, A. D., and Barash, M. (1999). “Public-sector design/build evolution and performance.” J. Manage. Eng., 54–62.
Moser, B. K., Stevens, G. R., and Watts, C. L. (1989). “The two-sample t test versus Satterthwaite’s approximate F test.” Commun. Stat.: Theory Methods, 18(11), 3963–3975.
Park, H. S., Lee, D., Kim, S., and Kim, J. L. (2015). “Comparing project performance of design-build and design-bid-build methods for large sized public apartment housing projects in Korea.” J. Asian Arch. Build. Eng., 14(2), 323–330.
Riley, D. R., Diller, B. E., and Kerr, D. (2005). “Effects of delivery systems on change order size and frequency in mechanical construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 953–962.
Shrestha, P., Connor, J., and Gibson, G. J. (2011). “Performance comparison of large design-build and design-bid-build highway projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 1–13.
Shrestha, P., and Fernane, J. (2016). “Performance of design-build and design-bid-build projects for public universities.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 1–10.
Shrestha, P., Migliaccio, G., O’Connor, J., and Gibson, G., Jr. (2007). “Benchmarking of large design-build highway projects: One-to-one comparison and comparison with design-bid-build projects.” J. Transp. Res. Rec., 1994, 17–25.
Shrestha, P. P., Maharajan, R., Batista, J. R., and Shakya, B. (2016). “Comparison of utility managers’ and project managers’ satisfaction rating of alternative project delivery methods used in water and wastewater infrastructures.” Public Works Manage. Policy, 21(3), 263–279.
Songer, A. D., and Molenaar, K. R. (1997). “Project characteristics for successful public-sector design-build.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 34–40.
Sullivan, J., Asmar, M. E., Chalhoub, J., and Obeid, H. (2017). “Two decades of performance comparisons for design-build, construction manager at risk, and design-bid-build: Quantitative analysis of the state of knowledge on project cost, schedule, and quality.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04017009.
Touran, A., Gransberg, D. D., Molenaar, K. R., and Ghavamifar, K. (2011). “Selection of project delivery method in transit: Drivers and objectives.” J. Manage. Eng., 21–27.
Tran, D., Harper, C., Molenaar, K., Haddad, N., and Scholfield, M., (2013). “Project delivery selection matrix for highway design and construction.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2347, 3–10.
Warne, T. R. (2005). Design-build contracting for highway projects: A performance assessment, Tom Warne & Associates, LLC, South Jordan, UT.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144 • Issue 2 • February 2018
Copyright
©2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 3, 2017
Accepted: Aug 23, 2017
Published online: Dec 9, 2017
Published in print: Feb 1, 2018
Discussion open until: May 9, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.