Technical Papers
Aug 30, 2013

Principal-Agent Model of Risk Allocation in Construction Contracts and Its Critique

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 140, Issue 1

Abstract

Incentives are widely used in construction procurement to motivate the contractor to make cost-reduction efforts. How to choose the right incentive intensity is a critical decision in construction procurement. In this regard, the principal-agent theory has been highly influential in theory and practice alike. However, this research argues that this theoretical model may lead to a biased decision. To demonstrate this point, this research draws on its modeling technique to analyze a standard pain-gain sharing arrangement in construction contracts, finding that taking no account of contract breakup hazards will result in underuse of incentives. When the outturn cost also depends on the contractor’s effort, high-powered incentives can better tap into the contractor’s efficiency improvement potential. The additional profit resulting from efficiency savings can serve as a buffer for downside cost shocks with the effect of reducing the likelihood of contract breakup. This benefit will make it desirable to use incentives more intensively than what is suggested by the principal-agent theory.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abu-Hijleh, S. F., and Ibbs, C. W. (1989). “Schedule-based construction incentives.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 115(3), 430–443.
Al-Subhi Al-Harbi, K. M. (1998). “Sharing fractions in cost-plus-incentive-fee contracts.” Int. J. Project Manage., 16(2), 73–80.
Arrow, K. J. (1971). Essays in the theory of risk bearing, Markham Publishing, Chicago.
Aumann, R., and Serrano, R. (2008). “An economic index of riskiness.” J. Political Econ., 116(5), 810–836.
Bajari, P., and Tadelis, S. (2001). “Incentives versus transaction costs: A theory of procurement contracts.” RAND J. Econ., 32(3), 387–407.
Barnes, M. (1983). “How to allocate risks in construction contracts.” Int. J. Project Manage., 1(1), 24–28.
Besanko, D., Dranove, D., Shanley, M., and Schaefer, S. (2009). Economics of strategy, Wiley, New York.
Bolton, P., and Dewatripont, M. (2005). Contract theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Bower, D., Ashby, G., Gerald, K., and Smyk, W. (2002). “Incentive mechanisms for project success.” J. Manage. Eng., 18(1), 37–43.
Broome, J., and Perry, J. (2002). “How practitioners set share fractions in target cost contracts.” Int. J. Project Manage., 20(1), 59–66.
Bunni, N. G. (1997). Fidic form of contract, Blackwell, London.
Chan, D. W. M., Chan, A. P. C., Lam, P. T. I., and Wong, J. M. W. (2010). “Empirical study of the risks and difficulties in implementing guaranteed maximum price and target cost contracts in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 136(5), 495–507.
Chang, C. Y. (2011). “When a project company may break up? A case study of national physical laboratory PFI project.” 2011 Academy of Management Annual Meeting.
Chang, C. Y. (2013). “Understanding the hold-up problem in the management of megaprojects: The case of the channel tunnel rail link project.” Int. J. Project Manage., 31(4), 628–637.
Chang, C. Y., and Ive, G. (2007). “Reversal of bargaining power in construction projects: Meaning, existence and implications.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 25(8), 845–855.
Chapman, C., and Ward, S. (2003). Project risk management: Processes, techniques and insights, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). “Agency theory: An assessment and review.” Acad. manage. rev., 14(1), 57–74.
Garen, J. E. (1994). “Executive compensation and principal-agent theory.” J. Political Econ., 102(6), 1175–1199.
Gibbons, R. (2005). “Incentives between firms (and within).” Manage. Sci., 51(1), 2–17.
Griffis, F., and Butler, F. M. (1988). “Case for cost-plus contracting.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 114(1), 83–94.
Grossman, S. J., and Hart, O. D. (1986). “The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration.” J. Political Econ., 94(4), 691–719.
Hart, O. (1995). Firms, contracts, and financial structure, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Hart, O., and Holmstrom, B. (1987). “The theory of contracts.” Advances in Economic Theory, Fifth World Congress of the Econometric Society, T. F. Bewley, ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 71–155.
Hart, O., and Moore, J. (1990). “Property rights and the nature of the firm.” J. Political Econ., 98(6), 1119–1158.
Hart, O., and Moore, J. (2008). “Contracts as reference points.” Q. J. Econ., 123(1), 1–48.
HM Treasury. (2006). Value for money assessment guidance, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.
Holmstrom, B., and Milgrom, P. (1987). “Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives.” Econometrica, 55(2), 303–328.
Institute of Civil Engineers. (1998). Ramp: Risk analysis and management for projects, Thomas Telford, Trowbridge, UK.
Jaraiedi, M., Plummer, R. W., and Aber, M. S. (1995). “Incentive/disincentive guidelines for highway construction contracts.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 121(1), 112–120.
Klein, B., Crawford, R. G., and Alchian, A. A. (1978). “Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process.” J. Law Econ., 21(2), 297–326.
Klemperer, P. (2004). Auctions: Theory and practice, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Laffont, J. J., and Martimort, D. (2001). The theory of incentives: The principal-agent model, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Laffont, J. J., and Tirole, J. (1987). “Auctioning incentive contracts.” J. Political Econ., 95(5), 921–937.
Laffont, J. J., and Tirole, J. (1993). A theory of incentives in procurement and regulation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
McAfee, R. P., and McMillan, J. (1986). “Bidding for contracts: A principal-agent analysis.” RAND J. Econ., 17(3), 326–338.
Milgrom, P., and Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, organization and management, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Mukerji, S. (2003). “Ambiguity aversion and cost-plus procurement contracts.” working paper, Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford.
Murray-Webster, R. (2010). Management of risk: Guidance for practitioners, Stationery Office, London, UK.
National Audit Office. (2001). The channel tunnel rail link, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.
National Audit Office. (2004). London underground PPP: Were they good deals?, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.
National Audit Office. (2006). The termination of the PFI contract for the national physical laboratory, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.
National Audit Office. (2009). The failure of Metronet, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.
Office of Government Commerce. (2005). Managing successful projects with Prince2, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.
Pratt, J. (1964). “Risk aversion in the small and in the large.” Econometrica, 32(1–2), 122–136.
Roberts, J. (2007). The modern firm: Organizational design for performance and growth, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Sappington, D. E. M. (1991). “Incentives in principal-agent relationships.” J. Econ. Persp., 5(2), 45–66.
Scherer, F. M. (1964). “The theory of contractual incentives for cost reduction.” Q. J. Econ., 78(2), 257–280.
Sha, K. (2011). “Vertical governance of construction projects: An information cost perspective.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 29(11), 1137–1147.
Smith, N. J., Merna, T., and Jobling, P. (2006). Managing risk in construction projects, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.
Stroh, L. K., Brett, J. M., Baumann, J. P., and Reilly, A. H. (1996). “Agency theory and variable pay compensation strategies.” Acad. Manage. J., 39(3), 751–767.
Stukhart, G. (1984). “Contractual incentives.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 110(1), 34–42.
Walewski, J., and Gibson, G. (2003). “International project risk assessment: Methods, procedures, and critical factors.”, Center for Construction Industry Studies, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Ward, C. S., Chapman, C., and Curtis, B. (1991). “On the allocation of risk in construction projects.” Int. J. Project Manage., 9(3), 140–147.
Williamson, O. E. (1985). “The economic institutions of capitalism.” New York: The New York, Free Press, New York.
Winch, G. M. (2010). Managing construction projects, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK.
Yescombe, E. R. (2002). Principles of project finance, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 140Issue 1January 2014

History

Received: Nov 13, 2012
Accepted: Jul 21, 2013
Published online: Aug 30, 2013
Published in print: Jan 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Jan 30, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Chen-Yu Chang [email protected]
Lecturer, Bartlett School of Construction and Project Management, Univ. College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, UK. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share