Technical Papers
Aug 2, 2013

Comparison of Preproject Planning for Green and Conventional Buildings

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139, Issue 11

Abstract

The importance of green buildings has been frequently highlighted. However, barriers such as greater complexity, lack of understanding of sustainability, and the perception of a greater possibility of cost overrun have hindered the dissemination of green buildings. More planning efforts for green buildings can presumably help mitigate these barriers. This paper investigates preproject planning efforts for green and conventional building projects. Project-level data were collected (124 in total, 71 from conventional building projects and 53 from green building projects), with project data consisting of general information about the project, a Project Definition Rate Index (PDRI) survey, and cost performance. The project data were categorized into four groups based on their project type (green and conventional) and cost performance (actual cost on/under budget and over budget). For the four groups, a two-way analysis of variance test was used to compare the degree of preproject planning efforts measured by PDRI. The analysis indicated that green projects tend to have more investment in preproject planning efforts than conventional projects, and the difference was marginally statistically significant at the level of α=0.05. In addition, a comparison of the mean PDRI values of the four groups revealed that green projects with a superior cost performance invest more in preproject planning efforts than other groups, and the difference was statistically meaningful. From the interaction effect, we also found that the impact of preproject planning on cost performance is more critical for green projects than for conventional projects. Regarding the preproject planning category, we found that green projects with superior cost performance tend to involve more planning with regard to business strategy, project requirements, site information, building programming, and building/project design parameters. These findings make two contributions. First, the findings help practitioners justify additional preproject planning efforts for green projects. Second, some of the results of this study will be useful to practitioners initiating sustainable projects by helping with the determination of which aspects of green buildings should involve more extensive planning. These findings will help reduce the possibility of cost overruns and allow more green projects to be deployed in order to address the need for sustainability.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2010-0023229).

References

Ahn, C., Peña-Mora, F., Lee, S. H., and Arboleda, C. (2013). “Consideration of the environmental cost in construction contracting for public works: A+C and A+B+C bidding methods.” J. Manage. Eng., 29(1), 86–94.
Architecture 2030. (2011). “Buildings consume more energy than any other sector.” 〈http://architecture2030.org/the_problem/problem_energy〉 (Mar. 15, 2013).
Bayraktar, M., and Owens, C. (2010). “LEED implementation guide for construction practitioners.” J. Archit. Eng., 16(3), 85–93.
Beusker, E., Stoy, C., and Pollalis, S. N. (2012). “Estimation model and benchmarks for heating energy consumption of schools and sport facilities in Germany.” Build. Environ., 49(3), 324–335.
Brown, M. B., and Forsythe, A. B. (1974). “Robust tests for the equality of variances.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 69(346), 364–367.
Bunz, K., Henze, G., and Tiller, D. (2006). “Survey of sustainable building design practices in North America, Europe, and Asia.” J. Archit. Eng., 12(1), 33–62.
Cho, C. S., and Gibson, G. E. (2001). “Building project scope definition using project definition rating index.” J. Archit. Eng., 7(4), 115–125.
Chong, W. K., Kumar, S., Haas, C. T., Beheiry, S. M., Coplen, L., and Oey, M. (2009). “Understanding and interpreting baseline perceptions of sustainability in construction among civil engineers in the United States.” J. Manage. Eng., 25(3), 143–154.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1995). An analysis of the impacts of using three dimensional computer models in the management of construction, Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1997). Pre-project planning tools: PDRI and alignment, Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (2002). Benchmarking and metrics summary report for 2001, Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (2008). Sustainable design and construction in industrial construction, Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (2009). Project definition rating index: Building projects, Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX.
Fortunato, B., Hallowell, M., Behm, M., and Dewlaney, K. (2012). “Identification of safety risks for high-performance sustainable construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 138(4), 499–508.
George, R., Bell, L. C., and Back, W. E. (2008). “Critical activities in the front-end planning process.” J. Manage. Eng., 24(2), 66–74.
Gibson, G., Kaczmarowski, J., and Lore, H., Jr. (1995). “Preproject-planning process for capital facilities.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 121(3), 312–318.
Gibson, G. E., and Pappas, M. P. (2003). Starting smart: Key practices for developing scopes of work for facility projects, Federal Facilities Council Technical Report, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
Gibson, G. E., Wang, Y. R., Cho, C. S., and Pappas, M. P. (2006). “What is preproject planning, anyway?” J. Manage. Eng., 22(1), 35–42.
Hamilton, M., and Gibson, G. E. (1996). “Benchmarking preproject planning effort.” J. Manage. Eng., 12(2), 25–33.
Hanna, A., and Skiffington, M. (2010). “Effect of preconstruction planning effort on sheet metal project performance.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 136(2), 235–241.
Hernandez, P., and Kenny, P. (2010). “From net energy to zero energy buildings: Defining life cycle zero energy buildings (LC-ZEB).” Energy Build., 42(6), 815–821.
Kang, Y., O’Brien, W. J., Thomas, S., and Chapman, R. E. (2008). “Impact of information technologies on performance: Cross study comparison.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 134(11), 852–863.
Kang, Y., Spiegelhalter, T., Pala, N., Zhu, Y., and Bhattarai, A. (2012). “A dynamic and context-driven benchmarking framework for zero-net-energy buildings.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Kats, G., Alevantis, L., Berman, A., Mills, E., and Perlman, J. (2003). The costs and financial benefits of green buildings, A Report to California’s Sustainable Building Task Force, Sustainable Building Task Force, Sacramento, CA.
Kats, G., Braman, J., and James, M. J. (2010). Greening our built world: Costs, benefits, and strategies, Island Press, Washington, DC.
Kibert, C. J. (2008). Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery, Wiley, New York.
McGraw-Hill Construction. (2010). Business benefits of green buildings, SmartMarket Report, New York.
McGraw-Hill Construction. (2012). Construction industry workforce shortages: Role of certification, training and green jobs in filling the gaps, SmartMarket Report, New York.
Menches, C. L., Hanna, A. S., Nordheim, E. V., and Russell, J. S. (2008). “Impact of pre-construction planning and project characteristics on performance in the US electrical construction industry.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 26(8), 855–869.
Mollaoglu-Korkmaz, S., Swarup, L., and Riley, D. (2013). “Delivering sustainable, high performance buildings: Influence of project delivery methods on integration and project outcomes.” J. Manage. Eng., 29(1), 71–78.
Nalewaik, A., and Venters, V. (2008). “Costs and benefits of building green.” AACE International Trans., 1–9.
Rajendran, S., Gambatese, J., and Behm, M. (2009). “Impact of green building design and construction on worker safety and health.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 135(10), 1058–1066.
Riley, D., Pexton, K., and Drilling, J. (2003). “Procurement of sustainable construction services in the United States: The contractor’s role in green buildings.” Unit. Nation Program Environ (UNEP) Ind. Environ., 26(2), 66–69.
Royston, J. P. (1982). “An extension of Shapiro and Wilk's W test for normality to large samples.” Appl. Statist., 31(2), 115–124.
RSMeans. (2010). Green building: Project planning and cost estimating. Kingston, MA.
Schaufelberger, J., and Cloud, J. (2009). “LEED certification: A constructor’s perspective.” Proc., Construction Research Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Son, H., Kim, C., Chong, W. K., and Chou, J. S. (2011). “Implementing sustainable development in the construction industry: Constructors’ perspectives in the US and Korea.” Sustain. Dev., 19(5), 337–347.
Son, H., Kim, C., and Kim, C. (2012). “Hybrid principal component analysis and support vector machine model for predicting the cost performance of commercial building projects using pre-project planning variables.” Autom. Constr., 27(11), 60–66.
Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
SustainAbility. (2002). Good news & bad: The media, corporate social responsibility and sustainable development, Ketchum and the United Nations Environment Programme Gordian Knot Rep., Beacon, London.
Torcellini, P., Pless, S., Deru, M., and Crawley, D. (2006). “Zero energy buildings: A critical look at the definition.” Proc., ACEEE Summer Study, ACEEE, Washington, DC.
U.S. Green Building Council. (2010). LEED 2009 for new construction and major renovations, Washington, DC.
Weerasinghe, G., Soundararajan, K., and Ruwanpura, J. (2007). “LEED-PDRI framework for pre-project planning of sustainable building projects.” J. Green Build., 2(3), 123–143.
World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). (2007). Energy efficiency in buildings: Business realities and opportunities, Geneva.
World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). (2009). Energy efficiency in buildings—Transforming the market, Geneva.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139Issue 11November 2013

History

Received: Nov 29, 2012
Accepted: Jun 20, 2013
Published online: Aug 2, 2013
Published in print: Nov 1, 2013
Discussion open until: Jan 2, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Youngcheol Kang [email protected]
M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Florida International Univ., OHL School of Construction, 10555 West Flagler St., EC 2934, Miami, FL 33174. E-mail: [email protected]
Changwan Kim [email protected]
A.M.ASCE
Associate Professor, Chung-Ang Univ., Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Seoul 156-756, Korea (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Chung-Ang Univ., Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Seoul 156-756, Korea. E-mail: [email protected]
Seungtaek Lee [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Chung-Ang Univ., Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Seoul 156-756, Korea. E-mail: [email protected]
Charinee Limsawasd [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Florida International Univ., OHL School of Construction, 10555 West Flagler St., EC 2900, Miami, FL 33174. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share