Technical Papers
Jun 13, 2013

Improving Public Engagement in Construction Development Projects from a Stakeholder’s Perspective

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139, Issue 11

Abstract

Public engagement (PE) involves multidisciplinary stakeholders contributing their perspectives to a project in order to achieve a common goal. However, it is not easy to take the needs and wishes of stakeholders into account while balancing their diverse power and interests in the engagement process. The unbalanced distribution of power and interests inevitably causes conflict during engagement with multiple stakeholders. Research on how to improve PE performance from a stakeholder’s perspective is still in its infancy. This study used a survey to investigate the complicated relationships between stakeholder’s power, interests, conflict, and project satisfaction. The results showed that different forms of power and interest influenced final satisfaction with PE projects either directly or indirectly, through conflict. The PE organizers are encouraged to include more representatives from different groups of stakeholders in the team decision-making process to enable active engagement with their interests and to establish a systematic and logical team-decision-making process to decrease task conflict. The findings of this study will contribute to balancing stakeholder’s power and interests, managing conflict effectively, improving PE performance for construction development projects, and, finally, to maximizing public value.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The work described in this paper was fully supported by a grant from the Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors (Planning and Development Division, Project No. NP022075-02).

References

Adams, G. R., and Schvaneveldt, J. D. (1985). Understanding research methods, Longman, New York.
Amason, A. C. (1996). “Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management.” Acad. Manage. J., 39(1), 123–148.
Awakul, P., and Ogunlana, S. O. (2002). “The effect of attitudinal differences on interface conflicts in large scale construction projects: A case study.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 20(4), 365–377.
Beierle, T. C. (1999). “Using social goals to evaluate public participation in environmental decisions.” Pol. Stud. Rev., 16(3–4), 75–103.
Blodgett, J. G., Lu, L., Rose, G. M., and Vitell, S. J. (2001). “Ethical sensitivity to stakeholder interests: A cross-cultural comparison.” J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 29(2), 190–202.
Bourne, L., and Walker, D. H. (2005). “Visualising and mapping stakeholder influence.” Manag. Dec., 43(5), 649–660.
Carpini, M. X., Cook, F. L., and Jacobs, L. R. (2004). “Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature.” Ann. Rev. Polit. Sci., 7(1), 315–344.
Cheung, P. T. Y. (2011). “Civic engagement in the policy process in Hong Kong: Change and continuity.” Publ. Admin. Dev., 31(2), 113–121.
Chinyio, E. A., and Akintoye, A. (2008). “Practical approaches for engaging stakeholders: Findings from the UK.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 26(6), 591–599.
Civil Engineering Development Department (CEDD). (2009). CEDD Technical Circular No. 02/2009: Public Consultation/Engagement Guidelines, Hong Kong: Civil Engineering Development Department, 〈http://www.cedd.gov.hk/eng/publications/technical_circulars〉 (Dec. 6, 2011).
Couldry, N., Livingstone, S., and Markham, T. (2007). Media consumption and public engagement beyond the presumption of attention, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK.
Cragg, W., and Greenbaum, A. (2002). “Reasoning about responsibilities: Mining company managers on what stakeholders are owed.” J. Bus. Ethics, 39(3), 319–335.
De Dreu, C. K. W. (2006). “When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams.” J. Manage., 32(1), 83–107.
Freeman, R. E. (1994). “The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions.” Bus. Ethics Q., 4(4), 409–421.
French, J. R. P., and Raven, B. (1968). “The bases of social power.” Group dynamics: Research and theory, D. Cartwright and A. Zander, eds., Harper & Row, New York.
Gamble, J. (2010). Evaluating vibrant communities, Tamarack, Waterloo, ON.
Garmendia, E., and Stagl, S. (2010). “Public participation for sustainability and social learning: Concepts and lessons from three case studies in Europe.” Ecol. Econ., 69(8), 1712–1722.
Gassenheimer, J. B., and Calantone, R. J. (1994). “Managing economic dependence and relational activities within a competitive environment.” J. Bus. Res., 29(3), 189–197.
Greene, R., and Elfrers, J. (1999). Power the 48 laws, Profile Books, London.
Greenwood, M. (2007). “Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility.” J. Bus. Ethics, 74(4), 315–327.
Gregory, R., and Keeney, R. L. (1994). “Creating policy alternatives using stakeholder values.” Manage. Sci., 40(8), 1035–1048.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Hales, C. P. (2001). Managing through organization, Thomson Learning Business, London.
Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
Hendriks, C. M. (2009). “Deliberative governance in the context of power.” Pol. Soc., 28(3), 173–184.
Hinkin, T. R., and Schriesheim, C. A. (1994). “An examination of subordinate-perceived relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and leader bases of power.” Hum. Relat., 47(7), 779–800.
Holtbrugge, D., Berg, N., and Puck, J. F. (2007). “To bribe or to convince? Political stakeholders and political activities in German multinational corporations.” Int. Bus. Rev., 16(1), 47–67.
Hooton, M., Chang, P., Carter, M., Chan, S. Y., Chu, C. K., and Wong, W. M. (2011). “Cross bay link: Public engagement in planning urban infrastructure.” Procedia Eng., 14(1), 108–116.
Howitt, D., and Cramer, D. (1997). A guide to computing statistics with SPSS for Windows, Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf, London.
Jehn, K. A., and Mannix, E. (2001). “The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance.” Acad. Manage. J., 44(2), 238–251.
Jones, T. M., Felps, W., and Bigley, G. A. (2007). “Ethical theory and stakeholder-related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture.” Acad. Manage. Rev., 32(1), 137–155.
Kaiser, H. F. (1958). “The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis.” Psychometrika, 23(3), 187–200.
Karjalainen, T. P., and Jarvikoski, T. (2010). “Negotiating river ecosystems: Impact assessment and conflict mediation in the cases of hydro-power construction.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 30(5), 319–327.
Kasumagic, L. (2008). “Engaging youth in community development: Post-war healing and recovery in Bosnia and Herzegovina.” Int. Rev. Educ., 54(3–4), 375–392.
Kitzinger, J. (2006). “The role of media in public engagement.” Engaging science: Thoughts, deeds, analysis and action, J. Turney, ed., Wellcome Trust, London.
Leung, M. Y. (2001). Value management in construction projects, Univ. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Leung, M. Y., Liu, A. M. M., and Ng, S. T. (2005). “Is there a relationship between construction conflicts and participants’ satisfaction?” Eng. Construct. Architect. Manage., 12(2), 149–168.
Leung, M. Y., Ng, S. T., and Cheung, S. (2004). “Measuring construction project participant satisfaction.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 22(3), 319–331.
Leung, M. Y., and Olomolaiye, P. (2010). “Risk and construction stakeholders.” Construction stakeholder management, E. Chinyio, ed., Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 75–98.
Lloyd-Smith, M. (2009). “Information, power and environmental justice in Botany: The role of community information systems.” J. Environ. Manage., 90(4), 1628–1635.
Lodge, M., and Hamill, R. (1986). “A partisan schema for political information processing.” Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., 80(2), 505–520.
Lukes, S. (2005). “Power and the battle for hearts and minds.” J. Int. Stud., 33(3), 477–493.
Margolis, H. (1996). Dealing with risk: Why the public and the experts disagree on environmental issues, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Marwell, G., and Oliver, P. (1993). The critical mass in collective action: A micro-social theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
McCoy, M. L., and Scully, P. L. (2002). “Deliberative dialogue to expand civic engagement: What kind of talk does democracy need?” Natl. Civ. Rev., 91(2), 117–137.
Moura, H. M., and Teixeira, J. C. (2010). “Managing stakeholders conflicts.” Construction stakeholder management, E. Chinyio, ed., Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 286–316.
Newcombe, R. (2003). “From client to project stakeholders: A stakeholder mapping approach” Constr. Manage. Econ., 21(8), 841–848.
Olander, S., and Landin, A. (2005). “Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction projects.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 23(4), 321–328.
Olander, S. (2007). “Stakeholder impact analysis in construction project management” Constr. Manage. Econ., 25(3), 277–287.
Olmstead, J. (2000). Executive leadership: Building world-class organizations, Cashman Dudley, Houston.
Peiro, M. J., and Melia, J. L. (2003). “Formal and informal interpersonal power in organizations: Testing a bifactorial model of power in role-sets.” Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev., 52(1), 14–35.
Petts, J. (2008). “Public engagement to build trust: False hopes?” J. Risk Res., 11(6), 821–835.
Phillips, R. (2003). “Stakeholder legitimacy.” Bus. Ethics Q., 13(1), 25–41.
Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., and Sachs, S. (2002). “Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view.” Calif. Manage. Rev., 45(1), 6–28.
Prell, C., et al. (2007). “If you have a hammer everything looks like a nail: “Traditional” versus participatory model building.” Interdiscip. Sci. Rev., 32(3), 263–282.
Rahim, M. A. (2001). Managing conflict in organizations, 3rd Ed., Quorum Books, Westport, CT.
Raven, B. H. (1993). “The bases of power: Origins and recent development.” J. Soc. Issues, 49(4), 227–251.
Rawwas, M. Y. A., Vitell, S. J., and Barnes, J. H. (1997). “Management of conflict using individual power sources: A retailers’ perspective.” J. Bus. Res., 40(1), 49–64.
Raynes-Goldie, K., and Walker, L. (2008). “Our space: Online civic engagement tools for youth.” Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth, W. L. Bennett, ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Reed, M. I. (1996). “Expert power and control in late modernity: An empirical review and theoretical synthesis.” Organ. Stud., 17(4), 573–597.
Reed, M. S. (2008). “Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review.” Biol. Conserv., 141(10), 2417–2431.
Reichart, J. (2003). “A theoretical exploration of expectational gaps in the corporate issue construct.” Corp. Reput. Rev., 6(1), 58–69.
Renn, O. (2001). “The need for integration: Risk policies require the input from experts, stakeholders and the public at large.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety, 72(2), 131–135.
Rheingold, H. (2008). “Using participatory media and public voice to encourage civic engagement.” Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth, W. L. Bennett, ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Rogers, J. C., Simmons, E. A., Convery, I., and Weatherall, A. (2008). “Public perception of opportunities for community-based renewable energy projects.” Energy Policy, 36(11), 4217–4226.
Rowe, G., and Frewer, L. J. (2000). “Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation.” Sci. Tech. Hum. Values, 25(3), 29–39.
Rowe, G., and Frewer, L. J. (2005). “A typology of public engagement mechanisms.” Sci. Tech. Hum. Values, 30(2), 251–290.
Rowe, G., Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J., Poortinga, W., and Pidgeon, N. F. (2008). “Analysis of a normative framework for evaluating public engagement exercises: Reliability, validity and limitations.” Public Understanding Sci., 17(4), 419–441.
Savage, G. T., Nix, T. W., Whitehead, O. J., and Blair, J. D. (1991). “Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders.” Acad. Manage. Exec., 5(2), 61–75.
Scutchfield, F. D., Hall, L., and Ireson, C. (2006). “The public and public health organizations: Issues for community engagement in public health.” Health Policy, 77(1), 76–85.
Stromer-Galley, J., and Muhlberger, P. (2009). “Agreement and disagreement in group deliberation: Effects on deliberation satisfaction, future engagement and decision legitimacy.” Polit. Commun., 26(2), 173–192.
Sunshine, J., and Tyler, T. R. (2003). “The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing.” Law Soc. Rev., 37(3), 513–548.
Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics, Allyn and Bacon, New York.
Van de Vliert, E., Nauta, A., Giebels, E., and Janssen, O. (1999). “Constructive conflict at work.” J. Organ. Behav., 20(4), 475–491.
Van Deth, J. W., and Elff, M. (2004). “Politicisation, economic development and political interest in Europe.” Eur. J. Polit. Res., 43(3), 477–508.
Vos, J. F. J., and Achterkamp, M. C. (2006). “Stakeholder identification in innovation projects: Going beyond classification.” Eur. J. Innovation Manage., 9(2), 161–178.
Ward, H. (2004). Public sector roles in strengthening corporate social responsibility: Taking stock, The World Bank Group, Washington, DC.
Wenweipao. (2012). Balance interests of all parties: Be sensitive and rational in making compensation, 〈http://paper.wenweipo.com/2012/10/05/ED1210050019.htm〉 (Oct. 5, 2012).
Yearley, S. (2000). “Making systematic sense of public discontents with expert knowledge: Two analytical approaches and a case study.” Public Understanding Sci., 9(2), 105–122.
Yukl, G., and Falbe, C. M. (1991). “Importance of different power sources in downward and lateral relations.” J. Appl. Psychol., 76(3), 416–423.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139Issue 11November 2013

History

Received: Dec 1, 2012
Accepted: Jun 11, 2013
Published online: Jun 13, 2013
Published in print: Nov 1, 2013
Discussion open until: Jan 5, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mei-yung Leung [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Architectural Engineering, City Univ. of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Architectural Engineering, City Univ. of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong. E-mail: [email protected]
Master, Dept. of Civil and Architectural Engineering, City Univ. of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share