Technical Papers
Dec 10, 2011

Determining the Appropriate Proportion of Owner-Provided Design in Design-Build Contracts: Content Analysis Approach

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 138, Issue 9

Abstract

The request for proposal (RFP) with the design-build (DB) procurement arrangement is a document in which an owner develops his requirements and conveys the project scope to DB contractors. Owners should provide an appropriate level of design in DB RFPs to adequately describe their requirements without compromising the prospects for innovation. This paper examines and compares the different levels of owner-provided design in DB RFPs by the content analysis of 84 requests for RFPs for public DB projects advertised between 2000 and 2010 with an aggregate contract value of over $5.4 billion. A statistical analysis was also conducted to explore the relationship between the proportion of owner-provided design and other project information, including project type, advertisement time, project size, contractor selection method, procurement process, and contract type. The results show that the majority (64.8%) of the RFPs provides less than 10% of the owner-provided design. The owner-provided design proportion has a significant association with project type, project size, contractor selection method, and contract type. In addition, owners are generally providing less design in recent years than previously. The research findings also provide owners with perspectives to determine the appropriate level of owner-provided design in DB RFPs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AASHTO. (2005). “Design-build environmental process and level of detail: Eight case studies.” 〈http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/NotesDocs/25-25(12)_FR.pdf〉 (Jun. 2010).
American Institute of Architects. (2008). The architect’s handbook of professional practice, 14th Ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Beard, J. L., Loulakis, M. C. Sr., and Wundram, E. C. (2001). Design-build—Planning through development, McGraw-Hill, NY.
Chan, D. W. M., Chan, A. P. C., Lam, P. T. I., Lam, E. W. M., and Wong, J. M. W. (2007). “Evaluating guaranteed maximum price and target cost contracting strategies in Hong Kong construction industry.” J. Financial Manage, Property Constr., 12(3), 139–149.
Chen, C. H. (2004). “Effect of completion level of owner’s basic design in design-build projects.” Master degree thesis, Dept. of Construction Engineering, National Kaohsiung First Univ. of Science and Technology, Taiwan.
Design-Build Institute of America (DBIA). (1995). Design-build RFQ/RFP guide for public sector projects, Design-Build Institute of America (DBIA), Washington, D.C.
Design-Build Institute of America (DBIA). (1997). DBIA contracting guide, Washington, D.C.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2006). “Design-build effectiveness study.” 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/reports/designbuild/designbuild0.htm〉 (Jun. 2010).
Fellows, R., and Liu, A. (2008). Research methods for construction, 3rd Ed., Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.
Hale, D. R., Shrestha, P. P., Gibson, G. E., and Migliaccio, G. C. (2009). “Empirical comparison of design/build and design/bid/build project delivery methods.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 135(7), 579–587.
Haque, M. E., Alkaabi, N., and Arosha, D. S. (2001). “Selection of a right project delivery system: a tabular knowledge base approach.” Proc., Third Int. Conf. on Construction Project Management, Nanyang Technological Univ., Singapore, 471–480.
Harris, F., and McCaffer, R. (1995). Modern construction management, BSP Professional Books, Oxford.
Innovative Pavement Research Foundation. (2009). “Using design-build acquisition for airfield pavement.” 〈http://www.iprf.org/products/06-1/18395%20IPRF%2006-1%20Final%20Technical%20Report%20091109.pdf〉 (Jun. 2012).
Janssens, D. E. L. (1991). Design-build explained, Macmillan Education Ltd, London.
Kolbe, R. H., and Burnett, M. S. (1991). “Content analysis research: an examination of applications with directives for improving research reliability and objectivity.” J. Consumer Res., 18(2), 243–250.
Konchar, M. D., and Sanvido, V. E. (1998). “Comparison of U.S project delivery system.” J. Construc. Eng. Manage., 124(6), 435–444.
McClave, J., Benson, P. G., and Sincich, T. (2010). Statistics for Business and Economics, 11th Ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Molenaar, K. R., and Gransberg, D. D. (2001). “Design-build selection for small highway projects.” J. Manage. Eng., 17(4), 214–223.
Molenaar, K. R., Vanegas, J. A., and Martinez, H. (2000). “Appropriate risk allocation in design-build request for proposals (RFPs).” Proc., Construction Congress VI: Building together for a better tomorrow in an increasingly complex world, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1083–1092.
North American Industry Classification System. (2007). “Small business size standards.” 〈http://www.sbaonline.sba.gov/idc/groups/public/documents/sba_homepage/serv_sstd_tablepdf.pdf〉 (Jun. 2012).
Pheng, L. S., and Chuan, Q. T. (2006). “Environmental factors and work performance of project managers in the construction industry.” Int. J. Project. Manage., 24(1), 24–37.
Royal Institute of British Architects. (2007). “The RIBA outline plan of work 2007.” 〈http://www.architecture.com〉 (Jul. 2010).
Songer, A. D., and Molenaar, K. R. (1997). “Project characteristics for successful public-sector design-build.” J. Construc. Eng. Manage., 123(1), 34–40.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 138Issue 9September 2012
Pages: 1017 - 1022

History

Received: Sep 5, 2011
Accepted: Dec 8, 2011
Published online: Dec 10, 2011
Published in print: Sep 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Lecturer, School of Urban Development, Queensland Univ. of Technology, Garden Point Campus, 2 George St., Brisbane QLD 4000, Australia (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Albert Chan [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Building and Real Estate, Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Hung Hum, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Keith Molenaar [email protected]
M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, 428 UCB, Univ. of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309-0428. E-mail: [email protected]
Martin Skitmore [email protected]
Professor, School of Urban Development, Queensland Univ. of Technology, Garden Point Campus, 2 George St., Brisbane QLD 4000, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share