TECHNICAL PAPERS
Aug 1, 2010

Modeling the Residual Market Value of Construction Equipment under Changed Economic Conditions

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 137, Issue 10

Abstract

This paper reapplies a statistical model that was created prior to 2003 to forecast the residual value of used heavy construction equipment in the United States. The objective is to evaluate the performance of the model in the radically changed economy in the second half of the decade. The research hypothesis addresses whether the model is still usable and functional even almost a decade after the data occurred that determined its coefficients. This existing statistical model was a comprehensive multiple linear regression analysis for various categories of common types and sizes of equipment. Manufacturer, condition rating, and auction region are included as binary indicator variables. Statistically significant macroeconomic indicators can be used directly, but they provide new challenges as various governmental data series have been discontinued or modified, so that valid replacements must be found that range until the time of the economic crisis. Performing such a reanalysis faces technical challenges, including that several macroeconomic data series since the time of the original study have been discontinued or modified by their governmental sources. Moreover, new auction sales records mostly lack conditions and are devoid of locations. Various reconstructions are explored to still enable a valid reanalysis and, on validation, are used to augment the previous data series seamlessly with new data. Expert elicitation is used to select several equipment types that are likely to be affected by the recent economic downturn. The existing implementation tool is provided with the updated data for calculating forecasted residual values that are compared statistically with actual auction sales prices. Both practical and numerical problems are identified. The model consistently underestimates the actual values, indicating that they are less affected by the economic crisis or new variability is introduced from reconstructing its inputs. It is recommended that such model should be regularly updated, ideally by a professional organization.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Dr. Michael C. Vorster (retired) of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Dr. Clifford J. Schexnayder of Arizona State University, and Dr. Aviad Shapira of Technion in Israel for discussions about the usage of different types of construction equipment; Dr. Christine M. Anderson-Cook of Los Alamos National Laboratory for information about regression analysis; Mr. Patrick T. Crail for discussions about industry practices regarding pricing structures; and Mr. Raymond T. Merryman of the U.S. Census Bureau for helpful information about discontinued and modified data series. The author would also like to thank Ms. Kimberly M. Hoffman, coordinator of science libraries at Catholic University of America, for her assistance in obtaining literature on the current economic crisis.

References

Burstein, J. D. (2005). “Development of a statistical model for the residual value of different types of heavy construction equipment.” M.S. project and report, Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA.
EquipmentWatch. (2010). LastBid, Penton Media, New York, 〈http://www.equipment watch.com/Marketing/LB_overview.jsp〉 (May 15, 2010).
Fan, H., Abourizk, S. M., Kim, H., and Zaïane, O. (2008). “Assessing residual value of heavy construction equipment using predictive data mining model.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 22(3), 181–191.
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. (2010). “Economic data—FRED.” 〈http://research.stlouisfed.org/ fred2〉 (May 15, 2010).
Gascon, C. S. (2009). “The current recession: How bad is it?” Economic SYNOPSES—Short essays and reports on the economic issues of the day, 4, St. Louis, 〈http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/es/09/ES0904.pdf〉 (May 15, 2010).
Gray, D. F. (2009). “Modeling financial crises and sovereign risks.” Ann. Rev. Financ. Econ., 1, 117–144.
Kastens, T. H. (2002). “An owning and operating cost calculator model for construction equipment.” M.S. final exam, Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA.
Lucko, G. (2003). “A statistical analysis and model of the residual value of different types of heavy construction equipment.” Ph.D. dissertation, Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA.
Lucko, G., Anderson-Cook, C. M., and Vorster, M. C. (2006). “Statistical considerations for predicting residual value of heavy equipment.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(7), 723–732.
Lucko, G., and Mitchell, Z. W. (2010). “Preparation of incongruous economic datasets for archival data analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 136(1), 49–57.
Lucko, G., Vorster, M. C., and Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2007). “Unknown element of owning costs—Impact of residual value.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 133(1), 3–9.
Mitchell, Z. W. (1998). “A statistical analysis of construction equipment repair costs using field data and the cumulative cost model.” Ph.D. dissertation, Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA.
Montgomery, D. C., Peck, E. A., and Vining, G. G. (2001). Introduction to linear regression analysis, 3rd Ed., Wiley, New York.
Moody’s Analytics. (2010). “Freelunch.com: Free economic, demographic & financial data.” 〈http://www.economy.com/freelunch〉 (May 15, 2010).
National Bureau of Economic Research. (2010). “US business cycle expansions and contractions.” 〈http://www.nber.org/cycles/cyclesmain.html〉 (May 15, 2010).
Ponnaluru, S. S. (2009). “Empirical analysis of used construction equipment and auction house revenues.” Ph.D. dissertation, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA.
Pressacco, F., and Seravalli, G. (2009). “The real origins of the global crisis.” Transition Stud. Rev., 16(3), 791–801.
Randall-Reilly Publishing. (2010). “TopBid.” 〈http://www.topbid.com〉 (May 15, 2010).
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010a). “Manufacturer homes survey: Seasonal adjustment.” U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 〈http://www.census.gov/const/mhs/methodology.html〉 (May 15, 2010).
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010b). “Value of construction put in place statistics.” U.S. Dept. of Commerce, http://www.census.gov/const/C30/oldtc.html (May 15, 2010).
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010c). “North American industry classification system (NAICS).” U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 〈http://www.census.gov/eos/www/naics〉 (May 15, 2010).
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010d). “Construction spending: Latest news: July 1, 2003.” U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 〈http://www.census.gov/const/C30/news.html〉 (May 15, 2010).
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010e). “Old classification system: 1964–2002.” U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 〈http://www.census.gov/const/www/previousseries.html〉 (May 15, 2010).
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010f). “Value of construction put in place: May 2003. Current construction reports annual, issued October 2003.” U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 〈http://www.census.gov/prod/2004pubs/c30-0305a.pdf〉 (May 15, 2010).
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010g). “NAICS update process fact sheet.” U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 〈http://www.census.gov/eos/www/naics/reference_files_tools/NAICS_Update_Process_Fact_Sheet.pdf〉 (May 15, 2010).
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010h). “State & county quickfacts: Download the database.” U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 〈http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/download_data.html〉 (May 15, 2010).
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010i). “Monthly indexes used in deriving estimates of the value of construction put in place in constant dollars (1996=100).” U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 〈http://www.census.gov/const/C30/monthly.pdf〉 (May 15, 2010).
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010j). “Summary of the state and local undercoverage evaluation (SLUE).” U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 〈http://www.census.gov/const/www/slue.pdf〉 (May 15, 2010).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 137Issue 10October 2011
Pages: 806 - 816

History

Received: May 24, 2010
Published online: Aug 1, 2010
Accepted: Aug 25, 2010
Published in print: Oct 1, 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Gunnar Lucko, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor and Director of Construction Engineering and Management Program, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Catholic Univ. of America, 620 Michigan Ave. NE, Washington, DC 20064. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share