TECHNICAL PAPERS
May 22, 2009

Consultants’ Perceptions on Construction Delay Analysis Methodologies

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 135, Issue 12

Abstract

Resolving the delay claims that usually trail delayed completion of construction projects is beset with immense difficulties that often lead to disputes between the parties involved. The research reported in this paper is a part of a wider study aimed at developing a framework for reducing the attendant disputes and aiding cost-efficient dispute resolution. The focus of the part reported here is owner consultants’ perceptions on existing methodologies for analyzing project delay. Based on a survey of U.K. construction consulting organizations, the study examined, among others, the awareness and use of these methodologies, their perceived reliability, expert involvement, and obstacles to their use. The main study findings are: (i) delay analysis is a multidisciplinary task, with the project quantity surveyor often playing the leading role on the owner’s side; (ii) the simpler methodologies are used more often than the complex ones although the former are known to be less reliable than the latter; and (iii) the principal obstacles to the use of the sophisticated methodologies are: lack of adequate project information, the use of programmes not in CPM network form, and poorly updated programmes. It is thus argued that improvement in current programming and record-keeping practices will promote the use of the more reliable methodologies which, in turn, will facilitate smoother resolution of delay claims.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abdul-Malak, M. A. U., El-Saadi, M. M. H., and Abou-Zeid, M. G. (2002). “Process model for administrating construction claims.” J. Manage. Eng., 18(2), 84–94.
Ackermann, F., Eden, C., and Williams, T. (1997). “Modelling for litigation: Mixing qualitative and quantitative approaches.” Interfaces, 27, 48–65.
Al-Gahtani, K. S., and Mohan, S. B. (2005). “Total float management for delay analysis.” AACE International Transactions (CD-ROM), Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering International, W.Va.
Alkass, S., Mazerolle, M., and Harris, F. (1996). “Construction delay analysis techniques.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 14, 375–394.
Aouad, G., and Price, A. D. F. (1994). “Construction planning and information technology in the UK and US construction industries: A comparative study.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 12, 97–106.
Arditi, D., and Patel, B. K. (1989). “Impact analysis of owner-directed acceleration.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 115(1), 144–157.
Arditi, D., and Pattanakitchamroon, T. (2006). “Selecting a delay analysis method in resolving construction claims.” Int. J. Proj. Manag., 24, 145–155.
Arditi, D., and Rubinson, M. A. (1995). “Concurrent delays in construction litigation.” Cost Eng., 37(7), 20–30.
Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering International (AACEI). (2007). Recommended Practice No. 29R-03, Forensic Schedule Analysis, AACEI, Morgantown, W.Va.
Bordoli, D. W., and Baldwin, A. A. (1998). “A methodology for assessing construction project delays.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 16, 327–337.
Bubshait, A. A., and Cunningham, M. J. (1998). “Comparison of delay analysis methodologies.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124(4), 315–322.
Bubshait, A. A., and Cunningham, M. J. (2004). “Management of concurrent delay in construction.” Cost Eng., 46(6), 22–28.
Burns, R. B. (2000). Introduction to research methods, 4th Ed., Sage Publication Ltd., London.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 2nd Ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
Diekmann, J. E., and Kim, M. P. (1992). “Super change: Expert system for analysis of changes claims.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 118(2), 399–411.
Eden, C., Williams, T., and Ackermann, F. (2004). “Analyzing project cost overruns: Comparing the ‘measured mile’ analysis and system dynamics modeling.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 22(7), 445–451.
European Construction Institute. (1992). “Client management and its role in the limitation of contentious claims.” Rep. No. TF 003/3.
Finke, M. R. (1999). “Window analysis of compensable delays.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(2), 96–100.
Furtrell, D. (1994). “The ten reasons why surveys fail.” Quality Progress, 65–69.
Galloway, P. D., and Nielsen, K. R. (1990). “Concurrent schedule delay in international contracts.” Int. Constr. Law Rev., 4, 386–401.
Gidado, K. I. (1996). “Project complexity: The focal point of construction production planning.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 14, 213–225.
Gill, J., and Johnson, P. (2002). Research methods for managers, 3rd Ed., Paul Chapman, London.
Gothand, K. D. (2003). “Schedule delay analysis: Modified windows approach.” Cost Eng., 45(9), 18–23.
Gould, N. (2004). “Scheduling and executing the project: Delay, disruption and change management.” Proc., IBA Conf.: Construction Projects from Conception to Completion, Brussels, Belgium.
Hallock, B. E., and Mehta, P. M. (2007). The great debate—TIA vs WINDOWS A better path for retrospective delay analysis? AACE International Transactions, Morgantown, W. Va.
Harris, R. A., and Scott, S. (2001). “UK practice in dealing with claims for delay.” Eng., Constr., Archit. Manage., 8(5/6), 317–324.
Hegazy, T., and Zhang, K. (2005). “Daily window delay analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(5), 505–512.
Howell, G. A., Laufer, A., and Ballard, G. (1993). “Uncertainty and project objectives.” Proj. Appraisal J., 8, 37–43.
Ibbs, W., and Nguyen, L. D. (2007). “Schedule analysis under the effect of resource allocation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 133(2), 131–138.
Kangari, R. (1995). “Construction documentation in arbitration.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 121(2), 201–208.
Kelsey, J., Winch, G., and Penn, A. (2001). “Understanding the project planning process: Requirements capture for the virtual construction site.” Bartlett Research Paper 15, a VIRCON project report, University College London, London.
Kompass. (2006). “Register of product and services.” Reed business systems in association with the confederation of British industry, ⟨www.kompass.com⟩ (July 10, 2006).
Kraiem, Z. M., and Diekmann, J. E. (1987). “Concurrent delays in construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 113(4), 591–602.
Kumaraswamy, M. M., and Yogeswaran, K. (2003). “Substantiation and assessment of claims for extensions of time.” Int. J. Proj. Manag., 2(1), 27–38.
Leary, C. P., and Bramble, B. B. (1988). “Project delay: Schedule analysis models and techniques.” Proc., Project Management Institute Seminar/Symp., San Francisco, 63–69.
Lee, H., Ryu, H., Yu, J., and Kim, J. (2005). “Method for calculating scheduling delay considering lost productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(11), 1147–1154.
Lovejoy, V. A. (2004). “Claims schedule development and analysis: Collapsed as-built scheduling for beginners.” Cost Eng., 46(1), 27–30.
Lucas, D. E. (2002). “Schedule Analyser Pro—An aid in the analysis of delay time impact analysis.” Cost Eng., 44(8), 30–36.
Mazerolle, M., and Alkass, S. (1993). “An integrated system to facilitate the analysis of construction claims.” Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, ASCE, Calif., 1509–1516.
Mbabazi, A., Hegazy, T., and Saccomanno, F. (2005). “Modified but-for method for delay analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(10), 1142–1144.
Miles, M. B., and Huberman, M. (1994) Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, 2nd Ed., Thousand Oaks, London.
Nahapiet, J., and Nahapiet, H. (1985). The management of construction projects: Case studies from the USA and UK, The Chartered Institute of Building, Ascot, U.K.
Ndekugri, I., Braimah, N., and Gameson, R. (2008). “Delay analysis within construction contracting organizations.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 134(9), 692–700.
New Civil Engineer. (2006). “New civil engineer’s supplement.” NCE’s consultant file, Institute of Civil Engineers, Emap, London.
Oliveros, A. V. O., and Fayek, A. R. (2005). “Fuzzy logic approach for activity delay analysis and schedule updating.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(1), 42–51.
Pickavance, K. (2005). Delay and disruption in construction contracts, 3rd Ed., LLP Reference Publishing, London.
Rea, L. M., and Parker, P. A. (1997). Designing and conducting survey research, 2nd Ed., Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS). (2002). Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors members directory, RICS, London.
Schumacher, L. (1995). “Quantifying and apportioning delay on construction projects.” Cost Eng., 37(2), 11–13.
Scott, S. (1997). “Delay claims in UK Contracts.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 123(3), 238–244.
Scott, S., and Assadi, S. (1999). “A survey of the site records kept by construction supervisors.” Journal of Construction Management and Economics, 17, 375–382.
Scott, S., and Harris, R. A. (2004). “United Kingdom construction claims: Views of professionals.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 230(5), 734–741.
Siegel, S., and Castellan, J. N., Jr. (1988). Nonparameteric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Society of Construction Law. (2002). “Delay and disruption protocol.” Printmost (Southern) Ltd, England, ⟨http://www.eotprotocol.com⟩ (Aug. 22, 2005).
Society of Construction Law. (2006). “The great delay analysis debate.” A series of papers first presented by the Society of Construction Law, in association with the Centre of Construction Law and Management, King’s College London at King’s College, London.
Stumpf, G. R. (2000). “Schedule delay analysis.” Cost Eng., 42(7), 32–43.
Tashakorri, A., and Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combing qualitative and quantitative approaches, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
Vidogah, W., and Ndekugri, I. (1998). “Improving the management of claims on construction contracts: Consultant’s perspective.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 12, 485–499.
Wickwire, J. M., and Groff, M. J. (2004). Update on CPM proof of delay claims—Schedule update, Vol. 1, Project Management Institute College of Scheduling.
Williams, T., Ackermann, F., and Eden, C. (2003). “Structuring a delay and disruption claim: An application of cause-mapping and system dynamics.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 148, 192–204.
Winter, J., and Johnson, P. (2000). “Resolving complex delay claims.” A report on a meeting of the UK Society of Construction Law, at the National Liberal Club, Whitehall Place, London.
Yates, J. K. (1993). “Construction decision support system for delay analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 119(2), 226–244.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 135Issue 12December 2009
Pages: 1279 - 1288

History

Received: Aug 11, 2008
Accepted: May 13, 2009
Published online: May 22, 2009
Published in print: Dec 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Nuhu Braimah [email protected]
Lecturer, School of Engineering and Design, Brunel Univ., Uxbridge, West London UB8 3PH, U.K. E-mail: [email protected]
Issaka Ndekugri [email protected]
Professor of Construction and Engineering Law, School of Engineering and the Built Environment, Univ. of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna St., Wolverhampton, WV1 1SB, U.K. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share