TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jun 22, 2009

Probabilistic Duration Estimation Model for High-Rise Structural Work

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 135, Issue 12

Abstract

The duration of a construction project is a key factor to consider before starting a new project, as it can determine project success or failure. Despite the high level of uncertainty and risk involved in construction, current construction planning relies on traditional deterministic scheduling methods that cannot clearly ascertain the level of uncertainty involved in a project. This, subsequently, can prolong a project’s duration, particularly when that project is high-rise structural work, which is not yet a common project type in Korea. Indeed, among construction processes, structural work is notable, as it is basically performed outdoors. Thus, no matter how precisely a schedule is developed, such projects can easily fail due to unexpected events that are beyond the planner’s control, such as changes in weather conditions. Therefore, in this study, to cope with the uncertainties involved in high-rise building projects, a probabilistic duration estimation model is developed in which both weather conditions and work cycle time for unit work are considered to predict structural work duration. According to the proposed estimation model, weather variables are divided into two types: weather conditions that result in nonworking days and weather conditions that result in work productivity rate (WPR) change. Obtained from actual previous data, the WPR is used with relevant nonworking day weather conditions to modify the actual number of working days per calendar days. Furthermore, on the basis of previous research results, the cycle time of the unit work area is assumed to follow the β probability distribution function. Thus, the probabilistic duration model is valid for 95% probability. Finally, a case study is conducted that confirms the model can be practically used to estimate more reliable and applicable probabilistic durations of structural work. Indeed, this model can assist schedulers and site workers by alerting them, at the beginning of a project, to project uncertainties that specifically pertain to structural work and the weather. Thus, the proposed model can enable personnel to easily amend, and increase the reliability of, the construction schedule at hand.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers acknowledge the support of the Korean Ministry of Construction and Transportation, through the Research Project No. UNSPECIFIED05 CIT D05-01.

References

AbouRizk, S. M., and Halpin, D. W. (1992). “Statistical properties of construction duration data.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 118(3), 525–543.
AbouRizk, S. M., Halpin, D. W., and Wilson, J. R. (1991). “Visual interactive fitting of beta distributions.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 117(4), 589–605.
AbouRizk, S. M., Halpin, D. W., and Wilson, J. R. (1994). “Fitting beta distributions based on sample data.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 120(2), 288–305.
AbouRizk, S. M., and Wales, R. J. (1997). “Combined discrete-event/continuous simulation for project planning.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 123(1), 11–20.
Ahuja, H. N., and Nandakumar, V. (1985). “Simulation model to forecast project completion time.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 111(4), 325–342.
Alpert, M., and Raiffa, H. (1969). “A progress report on the training of probability assessors.” Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 294–305.
Carr, R. I. (1979). “Simulation of construction project duration.” J. Constr. Div., 105(CO2), 117–128.
Chehayeb, N. N., and AbouRizk, S. M. (1998). “Simulation-based scheduling with continuous activity relationships.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124(2), 107–115.
Clemmens, J. P., and Willenbrock, J. H. (1978). “The SCRAPESIM computer simulation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 104(4), 419–435.
Farid, F., and Koning, T. L. (1994). “Simulation verifies queuing program for selecting loader-truck fleets.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 120(2), 386–404.
Fente, J., Schexnayder, C., and Knutson, K. (2000). “Defining a probability distribution function for construction simulation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 126(3), 234–241.
Halpin, D. W. (1977). “CYCLONE—Method for modeling job site processes.” J. Constr. Div., 103(CO3), 489–499.
Kavanagh, D. P. (1985). “SIREN: A repetitive construction simulation model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 111(3), 308–323.
Lee, D. E. (2005). “Probability of project completion using stochastic project scheduling simulation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(3), 310–318.
Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., and Phillips, L. D. (1977). “Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980.” Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 306–344.
Martinez, J. C., and Ioannou, P. G. (1999). “General-purpose systems for effective construction simulation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(4), 265–276.
MacCrimmon, K. R., and Ryavec, C. A. (1964). “An analytical study of the PERT assumptions.” Oper. Res., 12(1), 12–37.
Paulson, B. C. (1978). “Interactive graphics for simulating construction operations.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 104(1), 69–76.
Schexnayder, C., Knutson, K., and Fente, J. (2005). “Describing abeta probability distribution function for construction simulation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(2), 221–229.
Senior, B. A., and Halpin, D. W. (1998). “Simplified simulation system for construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124(1), 72–81.
Shi, J. J. (1999). “Activity-based construction (ABC) modeling and simulation method.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(5), 354–360.
Swanson, L. A., and Pazer, H. L. (1971). “Implications of the underlying assumptions of PERT.” Decision Sci., 2, 461–480.
Wang, W. C., and Demsetz, L. A. (2000). “Model for evaluating networks under correlated uncertainty—NETCOR.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 126(6), 458–466.
Wilson, J. R., Vaughan, D. K., Naylor, E., and Voss, R. G. (1982). “Analysis of space shuttle ground operations.” Simulation, 38(6), 187–203.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 135Issue 12December 2009
Pages: 1289 - 1298

History

Received: Mar 10, 2008
Accepted: Jun 18, 2009
Published online: Jun 22, 2009
Published in print: Dec 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hyun-soo Lee [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Architecture, Seoul National Univ., 39-430, San 56-1 Shinlim-dong, Kwanak-gu, Seoul 151-742, Korea. E-mail: [email protected]
Jae-won Shin [email protected]
Associate Research Engineer, Construction Strategy and Research Institute of Hanmiparsons, Co., Ltd., 9th Fl., City Air Tower Bldg., 159-9, Samgsung-dong, Kangnam-gu, Seoul 135-973, Korea. E-mail: [email protected]
Moonseo Park [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Architecture, Seoul National Univ., 39-433, San 56-1 Shinlim-dong, Kwanak-gu, Seoul 151-742, Korea (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Han-Guk Ryu [email protected]
Full-Time Lecturer, Changwon National Univ., 9 Sarim-dong, Changwon, Gyeongnam 641-773, Korea. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share