Assessing Scope and Managing Risk in the Highway Project Development Process
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 135, Issue 9
Abstract
The project development process is a critical component of highway projects. Decisions made during this phase have a significant impact on the final project outcomes. This paper describes a research project that studied this process and subsequently developed a method to help the highway project team improve the project development process. This method does so by proactively identifying risk sources based on the analysis of the project scope. This method uses a comprehensive list of scope elements with descriptions and a mechanism to evaluate quantitatively the scope elements’ level of definition. Assessing the level of definition of each scope element and of the project as a whole allows the project team to determine the potential level of risk to which the project is exposed. The project team can then develop risk mitigation plans to respond to the potential high risk elements. The proposed method was tested on real completed and ongoing projects undertaken by experienced professionals. The method was well received by the subject matter experts, and a number of benefits were observed, including the use as an integrated checklist, a mechanism for monitoring the project development progress, as well as a means for improving communication and promoting alignment within the project team.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers thank the Texas Dept. of Transportation for its financial support. They would also acknowledge the support of the project monitoring committee. Michael Thole is a former graduate student at The University of Texas at Austin.
References
Arts, J., and Lamoen, F. V. (2005). “Before EIA: Defining the scope of infrastructure projects in The Netherlands.” J. Environ. Assess. Policy Manage., 7(1), 51–80.
Ashley, D. B., Diekmann, J. E., and Molenaar, K. R. (2006). “Guide to risk assessment and allocation for highway construction management.” Rep. No. FHWA-PL-06-032, Federal Highway Administration, Office of International Programs, Washington, D.C.
Atkinson, R., Crawford, L., and Ward, S. (2006). “Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 24(8), 687–698.
Caldas, C. H., Gibson, G. E., and Le, T. (2007b). “TxDOT best practices model and implementation guide for advance planning risk analysis for transportation projects.” Texas Dept. of Transportation Research Rep. No. 0-5478-P2, Center for Transportation Research, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
Caldas, C. H., Gibson, G. E., and Le, T. (2007c). “User guide for the advance planning risk analysis tool for transportation projects.” Texas Dept. of Transportation Research Rep. No. 0-5478-P1, Center for Transportation Research, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
Caldas, C. H., Le, T., Gibson, G. E., and Thole, M. (2007a). “Identifying right-of-way requirements during the project development process.” Texas Dept. of Transportation Research Rep. No. 0-5478-1, Center for Transportation Research, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
California Department of Transportation. (2003). “Project risk management handbook.” Rep. Prepared for the California Dept. of Transportation, Office of Project Management Process Improvement, Sacramento, Calif.
Chapman, C. (1997). “Project risk analysis and management—PRAM the generic process.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 15(5), 273–281.
Cho, C. -S., and Gibson, G. E. (2001). “Building project scope definition using project definition rating index (PDRI).” J. Archit. Eng., 7(4), 115–125.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1994). “Pre-project planning: Begin a project the right way.” Research Summary Rep. No. 39-1, Construction Industry Institute, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (2008a). “Project definition rating index, building projects, 3rd Ed.” Implementation Resource Rep. No. 155-2, Construction Industry Institute, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (2008b). “Project definition rating index, industrial projects, 3rd Ed.” Implementation Resource Rep. No. 113-2, Construction Industry Institute, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
Dumont, P. R., Gibson, G. E., and Fish, J. R. (1997). “Scope management using the project definition rating index (PDRI).” J. Manage. Eng., 13(5), 54–60.
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA). (2000). “Project development guide.” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., ⟨http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/realestate/pdg.htm⟩ (Oct. 24, 2008).
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA). (2001). “Real estate acquisition guide for local public agencies.” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., ⟨http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/REALESTATE/lpaguide/index.htm⟩ (Oct. 24, 2008).
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA). (2002). “European right-of-way and utilities best practices.” Rep. Prepared for Federal Highway Administration, FHWA-PL-02–013, Office of International Programs, FHwA, Washington, D.C.
Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M. K. S., and Buhl, S. L. (2003). “How common and how large are cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects?” Transplant. Rev., 23(1), 71–88.
Gibson, G. E., Jr., Kaczmarowski, J. H., and Lore, H. E., Jr. (1995). “Preproject-planning process for capital facilities.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 121(3), 312–318.
Hackney, J. W. (1965). Control and management of capital projects, Wiley, New York.
Hackney, J. W. (1992). Control and management of capital projects, 2nd Ed., K. K. Humphreys, ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). (2002). “Project delivery streamlining: Design, right-of-way, environmental focus areas.” Rep. Prepared for Program Delivery Streamlining Task Force, MnDOT, Minneapolis.
Shane, J. S. (2006). “A fundamental study of scope definition in early highway project development.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colo.
Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). (2000). Right-of-way considerations training course (DES 110) student manual, TxDOT, Austin, Tex.
Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). (2003). Project development process manual, Design Division, TxDOT, Austin, Tex.
Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). (2004a). Environmental manual, Environmental Affairs Division, TxDOT, Austin, Tex.
Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). (2004b). Hydraulic design manual, Design Division, TxDOT, Austin, Tex.
Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). (2005a). Right of way manual, Right of Way Division, TxDOT, Austin, Tex.
Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). (2005b). Roadway design manual, Design Division, TxDOT, Austin, Tex.
Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). (2005c). PS&E preparation manual, Design Division, TxDOT, Austin, Tex.
Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). (2005d). Utility manual, Right of Way Division, TxDOT, Austin, Tex.
Thole, M. (2006). “Advance planning in highway project development processes: Key variable identification and categorization.” MS thesis, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
Waters, T. (2000). “Innovative practices to reduce delivery time for right-of-way in project development.” Rep. Prepared for National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Williams, T. (1995). “A classified bibliography of recent research relating to project risk management.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 85(1), 18–38.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 135 • Issue 9 • September 2009
Pages: 900 - 910
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: May 23, 2008
Accepted: Feb 2, 2009
Published online: Apr 30, 2009
Published in print: Sep 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.