Finite-Element Model Updating and Dynamic Responses of Reconstructed Historical Timber Bridges using Ambient Vibration Test Results
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 34, Issue 1
Abstract
Historical timber bridges are significant cultural structures and have a long tradition. There are many pre-1950s bridges still in use today. In recent years, great resources have been devoted to the restoration of historical timber bridges to preserve and pass them to the next generations. Because wood is an orthotropic, hygroscopic, and biodegradable material, structural behavior of timber bridges should be evaluated numerically using finite-element (FE) methods before and after restoration and systematic controlled in situ, or nondestructive experimental measurements should be made. This paper considers a historical timber bridge, using numerical modeling and modal testing to determine the structural modal parameters and FE model updating for approximation of numerical results to experimental results. As an application, the Buzlupınar historical timber bridge located in the Çayeli District of Rize, Turkey, is selected. The historical Buzlupınar Bridge was built in the middle of the nineteenth century, restored at different times for different reasons such as fire and wind effects, among others, and restored in 2014–2017. The FE model of Buzlupınar Bridge was formed using commercially available software to detect the initial modal parameters referenced on relief and restoration drawings. The orthotropic material properties are selected according to the laboratory material tests. Results of nondestructive experimental measurements, ambient vibration–based system identification was obtained using the enhanced frequency domain decomposition (EFDD) method (frequency domain) and stochastic subspace identification (SSI) method (time domain). The frequency values and mode shapes obtained by the FE model and experimental measurements are compared. According to these results, six natural frequencies are obtained between 2.0 and 20.0 Hz. Although the mode shapes are compatible with each other, there is a 34.55% difference between the frequency values. In order to reduce the differences, the FE model of the historical timber bridge is updated with a manual update method. Thanks to the model updating, the maximum differences are decreased to below 1% except the fourth mode. To evaluate the influence of FE model update, time-history analyses are applied, and internal forces and displacements are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Altunışık, A. C., S. Adanur, A. F. Genç, M. Günaydın, and F. Y. Okur. 2017. “An investigation of the seismic behaviour of an ancient masonry bastion using non-destructive and numerical methods.” Exp. Mech. 57 (2): 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-016-0239-x.
Altunışık, A. C., A. Bayraktar, and H. Özdemir. 2012. “Seismic safety assessment of Eynel Highway steel bridge using ambient vibration measurements.” Smart Struct. Syst. 10 (2): 131–154. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2012.10.2.131.
APC (Ataman Project Company). 2014. Buzlupınar Bridge: Building survey, restitution and restoration projects. Trabzon, Turkey: APC.
Astaneh-Asl, A. 2018. “Preservation of a historical timber bridge in California.” In Proc., Structures Congress. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASTM. 2014. Standard test methods for small clear specimens of timber. ASTM D143. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bajzecerova, V., and J. Kanocz. 2016. “The effect of environment on timber-concrete composite bridge deck.” Procedia Eng. 156: 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.264.
Borello, D. J., B. Andrawes, J. Hajjar, S. M. Olson, and J. Hansen. 2010. “Experimental and analytical investigation of bridge timber piles under eccentric loads.” Eng. Struct. 32 (8): 2237–2246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.03.026.
Çabuk, E. 2015. “Structural modelling, analysis and evaluation of the historic Buzlupinar Bridge and recommendations for its reconstruction.” Master’s dissertation, Dept. of Architecture, Middle East Technical Univ.
Caltrans (California Dept. of Transportation). 2016. Bridge Inspection Records Information System (BIRIS) for Albion River Bridge.” Sacramento, CA: California Dept. of Transportation.
Cechakova, V., M. Rosmanit, and R. Fojtik. 2012. “FEM modeling and experimental tests of timber bridge structure.” Procedia Eng. 40: 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.059.
Dinwoodie, J. M. 1979. Timber, its nature and behavior. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Efe, H., and K. Çağatay. 2011. “Determination of some physical and mechanical properties of various wood materials.” J. Polytechnic 14 (1): 55–61.
Fortino, S., A. Genoese, A. Genoese, L. Nunes, and P. Palma. 2013. “Numerical modelling of the hygro-thermal response of timber bridges during their service life: A monitoring case-study.” Constr. Build. Mater. 47 (Oct): 1225–1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.009.
Fu, M., Y. Liu, N. Li, Z. Zhang, and E. Siviero. 2014. “Application of modern timber structure in short and medium span bridges in China.” J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 1 (1): 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-7564(15)30091-X.
GDH (General Directorate of Highways). 2012. Historical Buzlupınar Bridge: Restoration projects and technical report. Ankara, Turkey: GDH.
Gutkowski, R. M., P. A. Favre, and J. Natterer. 2007. “Laboratory tests of an anisotropic-grid timber bridge.” Constr. Build. Mater. 21 (2): 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.019.
Gutkowski, R. M., J. Natterer, and P. A. Favre. 2008. “Field load tests of an anisotropic-grid timber bridge.” Constr. Build. Mater. 22 (2): 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.05.042.
Islam, A. A., and D. Phillips. 2017. “An experimental analysis of a timber Howe truss.” Struct. 10 (May): 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2016.12.003.
Kim, K. E., and B. Andrawes. 2016. “Compression behavior of FRP strengthened bridge timber piles subjected to accelerated aging.” Constr. Build. Mater. 124 (Oct): 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.020.
Kim, K. E., and B. Andrawes. 2018. “Multihazard assessment and retrofit of deteriorated timber pile bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 32 (3): 04018020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001157.
Liu, Y. J., M. Z. Fu, S. L. Liu, S. J. Ge, Y. J. Liu, and N. Li. 2013. “Modern timber bridges and structures.” J. Archit. Civ. Eng. 30 (1): 83–91.
Lumor, R. K., J. S. Ankrah, S. Bawa, E. A. Dadzie, and O. Osei. 2017. “Rehabilitation of timber bridges in Ghana with case studies of the Kaase modular timber bridge.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 82 (Dec): 514–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.04.003.
Ostrycharczyk, A. W., and K. A. Malo. 2017. “Parametric study of radial hanger patterns for network arch timber bridges with a light deck on transverse crossbeams.” Eng. Struct. 153 (Dec): 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.021.
Ozdagli, A. I., B. Liu, and F. Morue. 2018. “Measuring total transverse reference-free displacements for condition assessment of timber railroad bridges: Experimental validation.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (6): 04018047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002041.
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center). 2012. “Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.” Accessed January 16, 2019. https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/spectras/238490/searches/219166/edit.
Ranjith, S., S. Setunge, R. Gravina, and S. Venkatesan. 2013. “Deterioration prediction of timber bridge elements using the Markov chain.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 27 (3): 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000311.
Sangree, R. H., and B. W. Schafer. 2008. “Field experiments and numerical models for the condition assessment of historic timber bridges: Case study.” J. Bridge Eng. 13 (6): 595–601. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:6(595).
Seo, J., T. K. Hosteng, B. M. Phares, and J. P. Warker. 2016. “Live-load performance evaluation of historic cover timber in the United States.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (4): 04015094. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000852.
Seo, J., C. T. Kilaru, B. Phares, and P. Lu. 2017. “Agricultural vehicle load distribution for timber bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (11): 04017085. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001112.
Sevim, B., A. C. Altunışık, and A. Bayraktar. 2012. “Earthquake behavior of Berke arch dam using ambient vibration test results.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 26 (6): 780–792. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000264.
Spyrakosab, C., E. L. Kempa, and R. Venkatareddya. 1999. “Seismic study of an historic covered bridge.” Eng. Struct. 21 (9): 877–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(98)00041-8.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 34 • Issue 1 • February 2020
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 8, 2018
Accepted: Apr 2, 2019
Published online: Oct 29, 2019
Published in print: Feb 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Mar 29, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.