Technical Papers
Aug 31, 2016

Risk of Progressive Collapse of Buildings from Terrorist Attacks: Are the Benefits of Protection Worth the Cost?

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 31, Issue 2

Abstract

The paper describes a probabilistic risk assessment model to identify the risks associated with vehicle-borne improvised explosive device (VBIED) attacks to large federal government buildings in the United States. Probability of terrorist threat, hazard, damage, fatality, and economic and social loss for progressive collapse are modeled as stochastic variables. It was found that the existing annual fatality risk for building occupants is lower than acceptable risk criteria, and that progressive collapse is an exceedingly rare event in Western countries. A performance-based design using cost-benefit analysis of U.S. design provisions to mitigate against progressive collapse showed that these design measures only becomes cost-effective when the threat likelihood is a very high 1 in 1,000 per building per year. However, such provisions are more likely to be cost-effective in regions of high seismicity due to a lower cost premium.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The support of the Australian Research Council grant DP110101397 is gratefully acknowledged.

References

ASCE. (2003). “The Pentagon building performance report.” New York.
ASCE. (2013). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” ASCE/SEI 7-10, New York.
Bilow, D. N., and Kamara, M. (2004). “U.S. General Services Administration progressive collapse design guidelines applied to concrete moment-resisting frame buildings.” Structures 2004: Building on the past, securing the future, G. E. Blandford, ed., ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–27.
Brown, J., and Gardner, M. (2011). “Untapped potential for tilt-up concrete anti-terrorism applications.” Constr. Specifier, 64(8), 10–16.
Byfield, M. P. (2006). “Behavior and design of commercial multistory buildings subjected to blast.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 324–329.
Byfield, M. P., Mudalige, W., Morison, C., and Stoddart, E. (2014). “A review of progressive collapse research and regulations.” Struct. Build., 167(8), 447–456.
Carper, K. L. (2011). “Design and construction for blast resistance.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 357.
Cha, E. J., and Ellingwood, B. R. (2012). “Risk-averse decision-making for civil infrastructure exposed to low-probability, high-consequence hazards.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 104(1), 27–35.
Corley, W. G., Mlakar, P. F., Sozen, M. A., and Thornton, C. H. (1998). “The Oklahoma City bombing: Summary and recommendations for multihazard mitigation.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 100–112.
DoD (Department of Defense). (2012). “Report to Congress: Technologies to achieve progressive collapse resistance.” Office of the Under-Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, Washington, DC.
DoD (Department of Defense). (2014). “Department of Defense base structure report: FY 2014 baseline.” Deputy Under-Secretary of Defense, Installations, and Environment, Washington, DC.
Ellingwood, B. R. (2006). “Mitigating risk from abnormal loads and progressive collapse.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 315–323.
Ellingwood, B. R., Smilowitz, R., Dusenberry, D. O., Duthinh, D., Lew, H. S., and Carino, N. J. (2007). “Best practices for reducing the potential for progressive collapse in buildings.” NISTIR 7396, National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, DC.
Fletcher, K. C. (2011). “Aviation security: Case for risk-based passenger screening.” Master’s thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, CA.
Glover, N. J. (2000). “Design versus disaster.” J. Archit. Eng., 77–78.
Gould, N. C., Winn, V., and Drevinsky, D. (2006). “Progressive collapse analysis, retrofit design, and costs for existing structures.” Structures Congress 2006 (CD-ROM), B. Cross and J. Finke, eds., ASCE, Reston, VA.
Grant, M., and Stewart, M. G. (2012). “A systems model for probabilistic risk assessment of improvised explosive device attack.” Int. J. Intell. Defence Support Syst., 5(1), 75–93.
Grant, M., and Stewart, M. G. (2015). “Probabilistic risk assessment for improvised explosive device attacks causing significant building damage.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., .
GSA (General Services Administration). (2013). Alternate path analysis and design guidelines for progressive collapse resistance, Washington, DC.
HSE (Health and Safety Executive). (2013). Risk analyses or ‘predictive’ aspects of COMAH safety reports guidance for explosives sites, U.K.
ISC (Interagency Security Committee). (2013). The risk management process for federal facilities, interagency security committee standard, 1st Ed., Washington, DC.
Jackson, B. A., LaTourrette, T., Chan, E. W., Lundberg, R., Morral, A. R., and Frelinger, D. R. (2012). Efficient aviation security, RAND, Santa Monica, CA.
Kelliher, D., and Sutton-Swaby, K. (2012). “Stochastic representation of blast load damage in a reinforced concrete building.” Struct. Saf., 34(1), 407–417.
Le, J.-L., and Xue, B. (2014). “Probabilistic analysis of reinforced concrete frame structures against progressive collapse.” Eng. Struct., 76(10), 313–323.
Little, R. G. (2007). “Cost-effective strategies to address urban terrorism: A risk management approach.” The economic costs and consequences of terrorism, H. W. Richardson, P. Gordon, and J. E. Moore II, eds., Edward Elgar, U.K., 98–115.
Marchand, K. A., and Stevens, D. J. (2013). “Updates to US progressive collapse criteria and design approaches.” Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Shock and Impact Loads on Structures, CI-Premier, Singapore.
Morris, B. L., Strybos, J. W., and Marchand, K. A. (1991). “Minimum hardening measure for protection of people intensive army facilities from exterior explosive attack.”, U.S. Army Engineer District, Omaha, NE.
Mueller, J. (2014). “Terrorism since 9/11: The American cases.” ⟨http://politicalscience.osu.edu/faculty/jmueller/since.html⟩ (May 30, 2015).
Mueller, J., and Stewart, M. G. (2011a). Terror, security, and money: Balancing the risks, benefits, and costs of homeland security, Oxford University Press, New York.
Mueller, J., and Stewart, M. G. (2011b). “The price is not right: The U.S. spends too much money to fight terrorism.” Playboy, 58(10), 149–150.
Mueller, J., and Stewart, M. G. (2012). “The terrorism delusion: America’s overwrought response to September 11.” Int. Secur., 37(1), 81–110.
Mueller, J., and Stewart, M. G. (2014). “Evaluating counterterrorism spending.” J. Econ. Perspect., 28(3), 237–248.
Mueller, J., and Stewart, M. G. (2016). Chasing ghosts: The policing of terrorism, Oxford University Press, New York.
Netherton, M. D., and Stewart, M. G. (2010). “Blast load variability and accuracy of blast load prediction models.” Int. J. Protective Struct., 1(4), 543–570.
Norton, E. H. (2010). “Too much for too little: Finding the cost-risk balance for protecting federal employees in leased facilities.” Hearing before the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 56–587.
OBPR (Office of Best Practice Regulation). (2010). Best practice regulation handbook, Australian Government, Canberra, Australia.
OMB (Office of Management and Budget). (1992). “Guidelines and discount rates for benefit-cost analysis of federal programs (revised).”, Washington, DC.
Poole, R. W. (2008). “Towards risk-based aviation security policy.” Discussion Paper No. 2008-23, OECD/ITF Round Table on Security, Risk Perception and Cost-Benefit Analysis, Int. Transport Forum.
Ramabhushanam, E., and Lynch, M. (1994). “Structural assessment of bomb damage for world trade center.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 229–242.
Robinson, L. A., Hammitt, J. K., Aldy, J. E., Krupnick, A., and Baxter, J. (2010). “Valuing the risk of death from terrorist attacks.” J. Homeland Secur. Emergency Manage., 7(1), in press.
Sezen, H., Song, B. I., and Giriunas, K. A. (2014). “Progressive collapse testing and analysis of a steel frame building.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 94, 76–83.
Smith, P. D., and Rose, T. A. (2002). “Blast loading and building robustness.” Prog. Struct. Eng. Mech., 4(2), 213–223.
Song, B. I., and Sezen, H. (2013). “Experimental and analytical progressive collapse assessment of a steel frame building.” Eng. Struct., 56(11), 664–672.
START (National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism). (2010). “Global terrorism database.” ⟨https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/⟩ (Jun. 14, 2011).
Stevens, D., et al. (2011). “DoD research and criteria for the design of buildings to resist progressive collapse.” J. Struct. Eng., 870–880.
Stewart, M. G. (2008). “Cost-effectiveness of risk mitigation strategies for protection of buildings against terrorist attack.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 115–120.
Stewart, M. G. (2010). “Risk-informed decision support for assessing the costs and benefits of counter-terrorism protective measures for infrastructure.” Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot., 3(1), 29–40.
Stewart, M. G. (2011). “Life-safety risks and optimisation of protective measures against terrorist threats to infrastructure.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 7(6), 431–440.
Stewart, M. G. (2012). “Integration of uncertainty modelling, structural reliability and decision theory to provide optimal blast protection to infrastructure.” Advances in protective structures research, H. Hao and Z. X. Li, eds., CRC Press, London.
Stewart, M. G., Ellingwood, B. R., and Mueller, J. (2011). “Homeland security: A case study in risk aversion for public decision-making.” Int. J. Risk Assess. Manage., 15(5–6), 367–386.
Stewart, M. G., and Melchers, R. E. (1997). Probabilistic risk assessment of engineering systems, Chapman & Hall, U.K.
Stewart, M. G., and Mueller, J. (2011). “Cost-benefit analysis of advanced imaging technology full body scanners for airline passenger security screening.” J. Homeland Secur. Emergency Manage., 8(1), in press.
Stewart, M. G., and Mueller, J. (2013). “Terrorism risks and cost-benefit analysis of aviation security.” Risk Anal., 33(5), 893–908.
Stewart, M. G., and Mueller, J. (2014). “Terrorism risks for bridges in a multi-hazard environment.” Int. J. Protective Struct., 5(3), 275–290.
UFC (Unified Facilities Criteria). (2005). “DoD security engineering facilities planning manual.”, Dept. of Defense, Washington, DC.
UFC (Unified Facilities Criteria). (2012). “DoD minimum antiterrorism standards for buildings.”, Dept. of Defense, Washington, DC.
UFC (Unified Facilities Criteria). (2013). “Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse.”, Dept. of Defense, Washington, DC.
USGAO (United States Government Accountability Office). (2006). “Combating terrorism: Determining and reporting federal funding data.”, Washington, DC.
Wu, C. (2011). “Special issue on protection of structures against blast loading.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 358–359.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 31Issue 2April 2017

History

Received: Jul 29, 2015
Accepted: Jul 7, 2016
Published online: Aug 31, 2016
Discussion open until: Jan 31, 2017
Published in print: Apr 1, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mark G. Stewart [email protected]
Professor and Director, Centre for Infrastructure Performance and Reliability, Univ. of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share