Technical Papers
Jun 18, 2015

Progressive Collapse Criteria and Design Approaches Improvement

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 29, Issue 5

Abstract

Methods for the assessment of structural designs or existing structural systems for susceptibility to disproportionate (progressive) collapse and prescriptive methods intended to mitigate or decrease the likelihood of progressive (disproportionate) collapse are approaching adolescence as compared to the age and maturity of other engineering design standards and approaches. U.S., British, and Eurocode standards such as ASCE–7, BS EN 1991–1–7, 2006, and Eurocode 1: Actions on structures first established design philosophies and some prescriptive approaches, while later U.S. guidelines and IBC code provisions have attempted to fill in the gaps with refined prescriptive methods or detailed static and dynamic analysis approaches. The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) have published design and analysis guidelines in recent years. The DoD guidelines have been updated three times since inception, and GSA guidance is currently being updated to take advantage of the DoD improvements through adaptation of DoD methods within GSA applicability requirements. Additionally, the Structural Engineering Institute (SEI) in the United States has focused on the efforts of several technical experts within their Disproportionate Collapse Mitigation Standards Committee. This paper provides updates on the steadily converging approaches and documents. Specifics of analysis approach updates as well as design philosophy and applicability direction are presented and discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

ASCE. (2006). “Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings.” ASCE 41-06, Reston, VA.
British Standards. (2006). “Actions on structures—Part 1–7: General actions—Accidental actions.”, London.
DoD (Department of Defense). (2001). “Interim antiterrorism/force protection construction standards—Progressive collapse design guidance.” Washington, DC.
DoD (Department of Defense). (2005). “Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse.”, Washington, DC.
DoD (Department of Defense). (2009). “Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse.”, Washington, DC.
DoD (Department of Defense). (2012). “Minimum antiterrorism standards for buildings.”, Washington, DC.
DoD (Department of Defense). (2013). “Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse.”, Washington, DC.
Donahue, S. (2011). “Experimental evaluation of floor slab contributions in mitigating progressive collapse of steel structures.” Proc., 14th Int. Symp. on Interaction of the Effects of Munitions with Structures, Seattle.
GSA (General Services Administration). (2003). “GSA progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects.” Washington, DC.
GSA (General Services Administration). (2011). “Facility security requirements for explosive devices applicable to facility security levels III and IV: GSA’s interpretation of the interagency security committee (ISC) physical security criteria.” Washington, DC.
GSA (General Services Administration). (2013). “Alternate path analysis and design guidelines for progressive collapse resistance.” Washington, DC.
Interagency Security Committee. (2008). “Facility security level determinations for federal facilities.” Washington, DC.
Interagency Security Committee. (2010). “Physical security criteria for federal facilities.” Washington, DC.
Jamshidi, A., and Driver, R. (2013). “Structural integrity of composite steel gravity frame systems.” Proc., 2013 Structures Congress, Pittsburgh.
Le, J.-L., and Xue, B. (2013). “Probabilistic analysis of vulnerability of RC buildings against progressive collapse.” Proc., 2013 Structures Congress, Pittsburgh.
Liu, J., Tian, Y., and Orton, S. (2013). “Vulnerability of disproportionate collapse in older flat plate buildings subjected to sudden removal of a bearing column.” Proc., 2013 Structures Congress, Pittsburgh.
Main, J. A., and Lui, J. (2013). “Robustness of prototype steel frame buildings against column loss: Assessment and comparisons.” Proc., 2013 Structures Congress, Pittsburgh.
Ministry of Housing and Local Government. (1968). “Report of the inquiry into the collapse of flats at Ronan Point, Canning Town.” HM Stationery Office, London.
NIST. (2010). “An experimental and computational study of steel moment connections under column removal scenario.”, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, DC.
NIST. (2011). “An experimental and computational study of reinforced concrete assemblies under a column removal scenario.”, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, DC.
NIST. (2012). “Robustness of steel gravity frame systems with single-plate shear connections.”, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, DC.
O’Connor, M. (2013). “Robustness in tall buildings: Earth, wind and fire.” Proc., Int. Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE) Workshop–Helsinki 2013, Safety, Failures and Robustness of Large Structures, IABSE, Zurich, Switzerland.
Oosterhof, S., and Driver, R. (2012). “Performance of steel shear connections under combined moment, shear, and tension.” Proc., 2012 Structures Congress, Chicago.
Orton, S., Stinger, S., and Kirby, J. (2013). “Static and dynamic disproportionate collapse testing of a reinforced concrete frame.” Proc., 2013 Structures Congress, Pittsburgh.
Song, B., Sezen, H., and Giriunas, K. (2012). “Collapse performance evaluation of steel buildings after loss of columns.” Proc., 2012 Structures Congress, Chicago.
Stevens, D. (2012). “Assessment and proposed approach for tie forces in framed and load-bearing wall structures.”, Protection Engineering Consultants, San Antonio.
The Institution of Structural Engineers. (2013a). “Manual for the systematic risk assessment of high-risk structures against disproportionate collapse.” London.
The Institution of Structural Engineers. (2013b). “Risk in structural engineering.” London.
Weigand, J., Francisco, T., Johnson, E., Fahnestock, L., Liu, J., and Berman, J. (2013). “Large-scale experimental evaluation of steel gravity framing structural integrity.” Proc., 2013 Structures Congress, Pittsburgh.
Weigand, J., Meissner, J., Francisco, T., Berman, J., Fahnestock, L., and Liu, J. (2012). “Overview of AISC/NSF structural integrity research and preliminary results.” Proc., 2012 Structures Congress, Chicago.
Xiao, Y., Zhao, Y. B., Kunnath, S., and Lew, H. S. (2013). “Collapse test of a 3-story half-scale RC frame structure.” Proc., 2013 Structures Congress, Pittsburgh.
Xu, G., and Ellingwood, B. (2012). “An energy-based partial pushdown analysis for robustness.” Proc., 2012 Structures Congress, Chicago.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 29Issue 5October 2015

History

Received: Apr 30, 2014
Accepted: Oct 14, 2014
Published online: Jun 18, 2015
Published in print: Oct 1, 2015
Discussion open until: Nov 18, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kirk A. Marchand, M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Managing Principal, Protection Engineering Consultants, 4203 Gardendale, San Antonio, TX 78229 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
David J. Stevens, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Senior Principal, Protection Engineering Consultants, 4203 Gardendale, San Antonio, TX 78229. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share