Laboratory Tests to Evaluate Mechanical Properties and Performance of Various Flexible Pipes
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 29, Issue 5
Abstract
This study presents the experimental results for seven different tests carried out on high-density polyethylene (HDPE), PVC, and metal pipes with medium-size diameters. The main objective of the experimental program is to evaluate and characterize, under laboratory conditions, the performance and mechanical properties of the various flexible pipes considered in the study. The diameters of the pipes studied are 36 in. (914 mm) and 48 in. (1,219 mm). The laboratory tests conducted are the simple-beam test, parallel-plate test, flattening test, curved-beam test, joint-integrity test, and tensile test, as well as an environmental stress-cracking test. The results of the tests are presented in terms of load-deflection relations, load versus longitudinal and transverse strains, failure modes, and pipe stiffness. The test results indicate that HDPE and PVC pipes show good performance compared with metal pipes. In addition, the experimental results for flexible pipes meet AASHTO specifications. The HDPE and PVC pipes tested according to the ASTM and AASHTO Standards show pipe stiffness values higher than the minimum specified by the standards. The pipe stiffness values of the HDPE specimens based on the curved-beam test are two to three times greater than those based on the parallel-plate test. It was found that for a given vertical deflection, the HDPE pipe stiffness substantially increased with an increase of loading rate.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
Most of the laboratory work was performed in the FDOT Structures Research Center in Tallahassee, Florida. The technical staff, including technicians Steve, Tony, Frank, Paul, and Dave, as well as engineers Adnan and Tom, are gratefully acknowledged for their effective contribution to various aspects of the laboratory testing. Special thanks are due to Adnan Al-Saad, P.E., former project manager. His dedication and hard work to the project are gratefully acknowledged. The authors are grateful to research assistants T. Limpeteeprakarn, N. Wang, and N. Butrieng for their assistance in data processing and report preparation.
References
AASHTO. (1998). “Standard method of test for helical lock seam corrugated pipe.” M249-93, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (1998). “Standard specifications for corrugated polyethylene pipe, 300- to 1200-mm diameter.” T249-98, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2003). “Standard specification for poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) profile wall drain pipe and fittings based on controlled inside diameter.” M 304–03, Washington, DC.
ASTM. (2000). “Standard test method for apparent tensile strength of ring or tubular plastics and reinforced plastics by split disk method.” D2290, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2000). “Environmental stress cracking of ethylene plastic.” D1693, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2002). “Test method for determination of external loading characteristics of plastic pipe by parallel-plate loading.” D2412, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2009a). “Standard specification for poly (vinyl chloride) (PVC) corrugated sewer pipe with a smooth interior and fittings.” F949-03, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2009b). “Specification for poly (vinyl chloride) (PVC) profile gravity sewer pipe and fitting based on controlled inside diameter.” F794-03, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2010). “Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics.” D638, West Conshohocken, PA.
Burgon, P. P., Steven, L., Folkman, L., and Moser, A. P. (2006). “Comparison of measured and computed stiffness of high-density polyethylene pipe.” J. Transp. Res. Rec. Natl. Acad., 1976(1), 162–171.
Decoste, J. B., Malm, F. S., and Wallder, V. T. (1951). “Cracking of stressed polyethylene: Effect of chemical environment.” Ind. Eng. Chem., 43(1), 117–121.
Gabriel, L. H., and Goddard, J. B. (1999). “Curved beam stiffness and profile/wall stability.” Proc., Transportation Research Board (TRB) Congress, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Hopkins, I. L., Baker, W. O., and Howard, J. B. (1950). “Complex stressing of polyethylene.” J. Appl. Phys., 21(3), 206–213.
Hsuan, Y. G., and McGrath, T. (1999). “HDPE pipe: Recommended material specifications and design requirements.”, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
Masada, T. (2006). “An improved solution for pipe stiffness of flexible pipe specimen measured by ASTM D-2412.” Proc., ASCE Pipelines Conf., ASCE, Chicago, IL.
McGrath, T. J., and Schafer, B. W. (2003). “Parallel plate testing and simulation of corrugated plastic pipe.” Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Moser, A. P. (2001). Buried pipe design, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 29 • Issue 5 • October 2015
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 12, 2013
Accepted: Dec 17, 2013
Published online: Dec 19, 2013
Discussion open until: Feb 10, 2015
Published in print: Oct 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.