Abstract

Replacing steel reinforcement with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) reinforcement is an effective solution to avoid the corrosion problem in precast concrete tunnel-lining (PCTL) segments. In addition, using high-strength concrete (HSC) can improve the durability of concrete in the harsh environment of tunnels. This study pioneers in investigating the structural performance of GFRP-reinforced PCTL segments constructed with HSC by testing four full-scale specimens measuring 3,100 mm in length, 1,500 mm in width, and 250 mm in thickness under a three-point bending load. The investigated parameters included concrete compressive strength [normal-strength concrete (NSC) and HSC], reinforcement ratio (0.48% and 0.90%), and tie configuration (closed ties with U-shaped ties). The results are presented and discussed in terms of cracking behavior, failure mechanism, deflection behavior, strain in reinforcement and concrete, ductility, and deformability. An analytical investigation was carried out to evaluate and modify the existing design provisions (ACI 440.1R-15, CAN/CSA S806-12, CAN/CSA S6-19, and AASHTO 2018) for use in predicting the shear and flexural strength of GFRP-reinforced HSC PCTL segments. The results indicate that using HSC improves the flexural and shear strength of GFRP-reinforced PCTL segments, while it has a minimal effect on the postcracking stiffness and cracking behavior of the specimens. According to the analytical investigation, the procedure presented to modify ACI 440.1R-15 can be used to predict the flexural capacity of GFRP-reinforced HSC PCTL segments with high accuracy. In addition, CAN/CSA S806-12 predicts the shear capacity of HSC-GFRP-reinforced PCTL segments with an error of less than 7.0%.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was conducted with funding from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), the Pole de recherche et d’innovation en matériaux avancés au Quebec (PRIMA-Quebec), Mathematics of Information Technology and Complex Systems (MITACS), the Fonds de recherche du Québec en nature et technologies (FRQ-NT), and the Tier-1 Canada Research Chair in Advanced Composite Materials for Civil Structures. The authors are grateful to the precast company (Sym-Tech Béton Préfabriqué, Sainte-Hyacinthe, QC) and to the GFRP bar manufacturer (Pultrall, Thetford Mines, QC) for their effective involvement in this project. The authors also acknowledge the contribution of the technical staff of the structural lab in the Department of Civil & Building Engineering at the University of Sherbrooke.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
Af
area of longitudinal reinforcement in the bottom mesh (mm2);
Af
area of longitudinal reinforcement in the top mesh (mm2);
b
width of a section (mm);
bw
effective width of a section (mm);
c
neutral-axis depth (mm);
d
effective depth of a section (mm);
d
distance between the centroid of longitudinal reinforcement in the top mesh to the extreme compression fiber (mm);
Ec
concrete modulus of elasticity (MPa);
Ec,HSC
high-strength concrete modulus of elasticity (MPa);
Eel
elastic energy (J);
Ef
FRP reinforcement modulus of elasticity (MPa);
Etot
total absorbed energy at ultimate load (J);
Eψ = 0.005/d
absorbed energy until the curvature of 0.005/d, where d is the effective sectional depth in mm (J);
fc
concrete compressive strength (MPa);
fcr
concrete tensile strength (MPa);
ff
stress in the bottom FRP reinforcement in tension (MPa);
ff
stress in the top FRP reinforcement in tension (MPa);
h
depth of section (mm);
J
deformability factor;
JVG
curvature-based deformability index;
k
ratio of neutral-axis depth to reinforcement depth;
kn
ratio of neutral-axis depth to reinforcement depth considering the axial-load level;
L
span between reaction forces acting on the centerline in the test setup (mm);
l
clear-span length in calculating the deflection (mm);
ln
parameter to account for the effect of the section width, effective depth, concrete compressive strain, and concrete modulus of elasticity in calculating ka (N);
M
bending moment induced in the tunnel segment specimens during the test (N · mm);
Mc
moment at a concrete strain of 0.001 (N · mm);
Multimate
ultimate moment (N · mm);
N
axial load induced in the tunnel segment specimens during the test (N);
nf
ratio of the modulus of elasticity of the longitudinal FRP bars to the modulus of elasticity of the concrete;
P
amount of axial load (positive for tension and negative for compression) (N);
R
reaction force from the supports (N);
V
shear force induced in the tunnel segment specimens during the test (N);
Vc
shear capacity provided by concrete (N);
α1
ratio of the average stress of the equivalent rectangular stress block to fc;
β1
ratio of the depth of the equivalent rectangular stress block to the neutral-axis depth;
Δ
vertical distance from the center of the specimen to the point at which the reaction forces are applied in the test setup (mm);
ɛc
concrete compressive strain;
ɛcu
ultimate concrete compressive strain;
θ
inclination angle of the reaction forces in the test setup (rad);
μe
energy-based ductility index;
ξ
time-depended factor for sustained load;
ρf
longitudinal reinforcement ratio;
Ψc
curvature at a concrete strain of 0.001 (1/mm); and
Ψultimate
ultimate curvature (1/mm).

References

AASHTO. 2018. AASHTO LRFD bridge design guide specifications for GFRP-reinforced concrete. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Abdelkarim, O. I., E. A. Ahmed, H. M. Mohamed, and B. Benmokrane. 2019. “Flexural strength and serviceability evaluation of concrete beams reinforced with deformed GFRP bars.” Eng. Struct. 186: 282–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.02.024.
Abed, F., M. Al-Mimar, and S. Ahmed. 2021. “Performance of BFRP RC beams using high strength concrete.” Compos., Part C: Open Access 4: 100107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100107.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 1999. Building code requirements for structural concrete. ACI 318-99. Detroit, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2010. Report on high-strength concrete. ACI 363R-10. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2014. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI 318-14. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2015. Guide for the design and construction of structural concrete reinforced with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars. ACI 440.1R-15. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2016. Report on design and construction of fiber-reinforced precast concrete tunnel segments. ACI 544.7R-16. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI 318-19. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2020. Guide for precast concrete tunnel segments. ACI 533.5R-20. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Alca, N., S. D. Alexander, and J. G. MacGregor. 1997. “Effect of size on flexural behavior of high-strength concrete beams.” ACI Struct. J. 94 (1): 59–67.
Alguhi, H., and D. Tomlinson. 2021. “One-way shear strength of FRP–reinforced concrete members without stirrups: Design provision review.” J. Compos. Constr. 25 (3): 04021016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001125.
Angelakos, D., E. C. Bentz, and M. P. Collins. 2001. “Effect of concrete strength and minimum stirrups on shear strength of large members.” ACI Struct. J. 98 (3): 291–300.
ASCC (Austrian Society for Concrete and Construction). 2011. Guideline for concrete segmental lining systems. ÖVBB-11. Vienna, Austria: ASCC.
Ashour, S. A. 2000. “Effect of compressive strength and tensile reinforcement ratio on flexural behavior of high-strength concrete beams.” Eng. Struct. 22 (5): 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(98)00135-7.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test method for tensile properties of fiber reinforced polymer matrix composite bars. ASTM D7205-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Basaran, B., and I. Kalkan. 2020. “Investigation on variables affecting bond strength between FRP reinforcing bar and concrete by modified hinged beam tests.” Compos. Struct. 242: 112185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112185.
Bilotta, E. 2017. “Behaviour of segmental tunnel lining under static and dynamic loads.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Naples Federico II.
Bischoff, P. H., S. Gross, and C. E. Ospina. 2009. “The story behind the proposed changes to the ACI 440 deflection requirements for FRP-reinforced concrete.” ACI Spec. Publ. 264: 53–76.
Blom, C. B. M. 2002. “Design philosophy of concrete linings for tunnels in soft soils.” Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft Univ. of Technology.
Caratelli, A., A. Meda, Z. Rinaldi, and S. Spagnuolo. 2016. “Precast tunnel segments with GFRP reinforcement.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 60: 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.07.011.
Caratelli, A., A. Meda, Z. Rinaldi, S. Spagnuolo, and G. Maddaluno. 2017. “Optimization of GFRP reinforcement in precast segments for metro tunnel lining.” Compos. Struct. 181: 336–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.083.
Chang, K., and D. Seo. 2012. “Behavior of one-way concrete slabs reinforced with GFRP bars.” J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng. 11 (2): 351–358. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.11.351.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2012. Design and construction of building components with fiber reinforced polymers. CAN/CSA S806-12. Mississauga, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2019a. Canadian highway bridge design code. CAN/CSA S6-19. Mississauga, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2019b. Design of concrete structures. CAN/CSA A23.3-19. Mississauga, ON, Canada: CSA.
de Almeida, I. R. 1991. “Resistance of high strength concrete to sulfate attack: Soaking and drying test.” ACI Spec. Publ. 126: 1073–1092.
Delgado, O. A. 2012. “Structural response of precast concrete segmental tunnel linings.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Construction Engineering, Polytechnic Univ. of Catalonia (UPC).
El-Nemr, A., E. A. Ahmed, and B. Benmokrane. 2013. “Flexural behavior and serviceability of normal-and high-strength concrete beams reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer bars.” ACI Struct. J. 110 (6): 1077–1087.
El-Nemr, A., E. A. Ahmed, A. El-Safty, and B. Benmokrane. 2018. “Evaluation of the flexural strength and serviceability of concrete beams reinforced with different types of GFRP bars.” Eng. Struct. 173: 606–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.089.
El-Sayed, A. K., E. F. El-Salakawy, and B. Benmokrane. 2006. “Shear capacity of high-strength concrete beams reinforced with FRP bars.” ACI Struct. J. 103 (3): 383.
Esfahani, M. R., M. Rakhshanimehr, and S. R. Mousavi. 2013. “Bond strength of lap-spliced GFRP bars in concrete beams.” J. Compos. Constr. 17 (3): 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000359.
Goldston, M. W., A. Remennikov, Z. Saleh, and M. N. Sheikh. 2019. “Experimental investigations on the behavior of GFRP bar reinforced HSC and UHSC beams under static and impact loading.” Structures 22: 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.08.002.
Goldston, M. W., A. Remennikov, and M. N. Sheikh. 2017. “Flexural behaviour of GFRP reinforced high strength and ultra high strength concrete beams.” Constr. Build. Mater. 131: 606–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.094.
Gross, S. P., J. R. Yost, D. W. Dinehart, E. Svensen, and N. Liu. 2003. “Shear strength of normal and high strength concrete beams reinforced with GFRP bars.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on High Performance Materials in Bridges, 426–437. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Habeeb, M. N., and A. F. Ashour. 2008. “Flexural behavior of continuous GFRP reinforced concrete beams.” J. Compos. Constr. 12 (2): 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2008)12:2(115).
Hadhood, A., H. M. Mohamed, and B. Benmokrane. 2018. “Assessing stress-block parameters in designing circular high-strength concrete members reinforced with FRP bars.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (10): 04018182. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002173.
Heilegger, R., and A. Beil. 2020. “Full automated tunnel segment production system. A case study.” In Tunnel boring machines, edited by H. Wagner and A. Schulter, 215–222. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
ISIS Canada Research Network (The Canadian Network of Centers of Excellence on Intelligent Sensing for Innovative Structures). 2001. Reinforced concrete structures with fibre reinforced polymers. ISIS Manual No. 3. Winnipeg, MB, Canada: Univ. of Manitoba.
ITA (International Tunneling and Underground Space Association). 2019. Guidelines for the design of segmental tunnel linings. ITA WG2-19. Lausanne, Switzerland: ITA.
Khavaran, A. 2019. “Investigation of shear-critical one-way concrete slabs internally reinforced with GFRP bars.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Toronto.
Lau, D., and H. J. Pam. 2010. “Experimental study of hybrid FRP reinforced concrete beams.” Eng. Struct. 32 (12): 3857–3865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.028.
Mansur, M., M. Chin, and T. Wee. 1997. “Flexural behavior of high-strength concrete beams.” ACI Struct. J. 94 (6): 663–674.
Mostofinejad, D., S. M. Hosseini, B. N. Tehrani, and S. M. Hosseinian. 2021. “Empirical models for prediction of frost resistance of normal- and high-strength concretes.” Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civ. Eng. 45 (4): 2107–2131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-020-00574-8.
Mousa, S., H. M. Mohamed, and B. Benmokrane. 2019a. “Cracking and crack control in circular concrete bridge members reinforced with fiber-reinforced polymer bars.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (1): 04018108. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001335.
Mousa, S., H. M. Mohamed, and B. Benmokrane. 2019b. “Deflection prediction methodology for circular RC members reinforced with FRP bars.” ACI Struct. J. 116 (2): 279–293. https://doi.org/10.14359/51713293.
Naaman, A. E., and S. M. Jeong. 1995. “Structural ductility of concrete beams prestressed with FRP tendons.” In Proc., 2nd Int. RILEM Symp. on Non-Metallic (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures, 379–386. Bagneux, France: The International Union of Laboratories and Experts in Construction Materials, Systems and Structures (RILEM).
Ospina, C. E., and C. E. Bakis. 2007. “Indirect flexural crack control of concrete beams and one-way slabs reinforced with FRP bars.” In Proc., 8th Int. Symp. on Fiber Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement for Concrete Structures. Patras, Greece: Univ. of Patras.
Ozbakkaloglu, T., and M. Saatcioglu. 2004. “Rectangular stress block for high-strength concrete.” ACI Struct. J. 101 (4): 475–483.
Spagnuolo, S., A. Meda, Z. Rinaldi, and A. Nanni. 2017. “Precast concrete tunnel segments with GFRP reinforcement.” J. Compos. Constr. 21 (5): 04017020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000803.
Thériault, M., and B. Benmokrane. 1998. “Effects of FRP reinforcement ratio and concrete strength on flexural behavior of concrete beams.” J. Compos. Constr. 2 (1): 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1998)2:1(7).
Vijay, P., and H. V. GangaRao. 2001. “Bending behavior and deformability of glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforced concrete members.” ACI Struct. J. 98 (6): 834–842.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 26Issue 5October 2022

History

Received: Oct 15, 2021
Accepted: Jun 5, 2022
Published online: Aug 5, 2022
Published in print: Oct 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jan 5, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Building Engineering, Univ. of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada J1K 2R1. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3785-896X. Email: [email protected]
Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Building Engineering, Univ. of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada J1K 2R1. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7628-0470. Email: [email protected]
Hamdy M. Mohamed [email protected]
Research Associate-Lecturer, Dept. of Civil and Building Engineering, Univ. of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada J1K 2R1. Email: [email protected]
Former Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Building Engineering, Univ. of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada J1K 2R1. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5739-435X. Email: [email protected]
Brahim Benmokrane [email protected]
Professor of Civil Engineering, Tier-1 Canada Research Chair Professor in Advanced Composite Materials for Civil Structures and Industrial Research, and Chair Professor in FRP Reinforcement for Concrete Structures, Dept. of Civil & Building Engineering, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada J1K 2R1 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share