Abstract

This paper presents results of a first-ever experimental study on the axial compressive behavior of large-scale square reinforced concrete (RC) columns confined with polyethylene naphthalate (PEN)/terephthalate (PET) fiber–reinforced polymer (FRP) composites, which is a new type of FRP with a large rupture strain (LRS) of over 5%. In total, 10 large-scale square RC columns were tested under axial compression, including 8 LRS FRP–wrapped RC columns and 2 RC columns, which served as control specimens. The key experimental parameters were the sectional corner radius and the thickness and type of LRS FRP. The test results show that the effective confinement stiffness ratio of an FRP jacket, as determined by the corner radius and FRP thickness, has a significant effect on the axial compressive behavior of LRS FRP–jacketed large-scale square RC columns. Based on the experimental results, this paper presents an evaluation of two existing LRS FRP–confined concrete models for noncircular columns. Finally, based on the test findings, a refined model for LRS FRP–confined large-scale square columns is presented to provide more accurate predictions of the compressive behavior of these columns.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the financial support received from the Natural Science Fund of Beijing (Grant No. 8212003), the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong SAR (Grant No. PolyU 152171/15E), the National Natural Science Fund of China (Grant Nos. 51778019 and 51978017), the Beijing Nova Programme (Grant No. Z201100006820095), and the Young Talents Cultivation Project of Beijing Municipal Institutions (Grant No. CIT&TCD201904018).

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
Ag
gross area of the column section with rounded corners;
b
width of the cross section;
Cfrp
constant strength value where the second linear curve intersects with the stress axis for the LRS FRP;
Deq
equivalent diameter in the model of Zhang (2021);
de
equivalent diameter in the model of Lam and Teng (2003b);
ds
steel bar diameter;
Ec
initial tangent modulus of unconfined concrete;
Efrp1
initial elastic modulus of the LRS FRP;
Efrp2
second-stage elastic modulus of the LRS FRP;
Es
elastic modulus of steel reinforcements;
Esec
secant modulus at the initial peak point of LRS FRP–confined concrete;
E2
slope of the linear part of the initial strength–softening branch for LRS FRP–confined concrete;
E3
slope of the final branch for LRS FRP–confined concrete;
fc
axial stress of LRS FRP–confined concrete;
ffrp
tensile strength of the LRS FRP;
fl
confining pressure provided by the FRP jacket;
fu
ultimate strength of the steel reinforcement;
fy
yield strength of the steel reinforcement;
fc
peak stress of the unconfined concrete cylinder;
fco
peak stress of the control RC column;
fc1
initial peak axial stress of LRS FRP–confined concrete;
fcs
axial stress corresponding to the change in slope of the initial strength–softening segment for LRS FRP–confined concrete;
fc2
axial stress corresponding to the end of the initial strength–softening segment for LRS FRP–confined concrete;
fcu,f
final axial stress of LRS FRP–confined concrete;
fcu
ultimate axial stress of LRS FRP–confined concrete;
fcc
maximum axial stress of LRS FRP–confined concrete;
h
length of the cross section;
Nfrp
the number of FRP layers;
r
corner radius;
rc
corner radius ratio;
ks
shape factor;
kɛ
strain reduction factor of the LRS FRP for a noncircular section;
n
coefficient in the model of Pimanmas and Saleem (2019);
K
stiffness ratio.
tfrp
nominal thickness of FRP;
ɛc
axial strain of LRS FRP–confined concrete;
εc
axial strain at the peak stress of the unconfined concrete cylinder;
ɛco
axial strain at the peak stress of the control RC column;
ɛcu
ultimate axial strain of LRS FRP–confined concrete;
ɛcu,f
final axial strain of LRS FRP–confined concrete;
ɛfrp
ultimate strain of the LRS FRP;
ɛfrp0
strain at which the slopes of two linear portions of the LRS FRP curve intersect;
ɛh
hoop strain in the FRP jacket;
ɛu
ultimate strain of the steel reinforcement;
ɛcs
axial strain corresponding to the change in slope of the initial strength–softening segment for LRS FRP–confined concrete;
ɛc1
axial strain corresponding to the initial peak axial stress of LRS FRP–confined concrete;
ɛc2
axial strain corresponding to the end of the initial strength–softening segment for LRS FRP–confined concrete;
ɛy
yield strain of the steel reinforcement;
ρeff
threshold effective confinement stiffness in the model of Zhang (2021);
ρf
FRP reinforcement ratio;
ρk,eff
effective confinement stiffness ratio;
ρsc
longitudinal steel reinforcement ratio;
ρɛ
strain ratio;
κa
efficiency factor; and
σf
instantaneous tensile stress of the LRS FRP.

References

ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI 318-19. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Anggawidjaja, D., T. Ueda, J. G. Dai, and H. Nakai. 2006. “Deformation capacity of RC piers wrapped by new fiber-reinforced polymer with large fracture strain.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 28 (10): 914–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.07.011.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM D3039/D3039M-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bai, Y.-L., J.-G. Dai, M. Mohammadi, G. Lin, and S.J. Mei. 2019. “Stiffness-based design-oriented compressive stress–strain model for large-rupture-strain (LRS) FRP-confined concrete.” Compos. Struct. 223: 110953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110953.
Bai, Y.-L., J.-G. Dai, and J. G. Teng. 2014. “Cyclic compressive behavior of concrete confined with large rupture strain FRP composites.” J. Compos. Constr. 18 (1): 04013025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000386.
Bai, Y.-L., S.-J. Mei, C.-W. Chan, and Q.-Q. Li. 2021a. “Compressive behavior of large-size square PEN FRP-concrete-steel hybrid multi-tube concrete columns.” Eng. Struct. 246: 113017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113017.
Bai, Y. L., Y. F. Zhang, J. F. Jia, S. J. Mei, Q. Han, and J. G. Dai. 2021b. “Simplified plasticity damage model for large rupture strain (LRS) FRP-confined concrete.” Compos. Struct. 280, 114916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114916.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 1987. Method for tensile testing of metals (including aerospace materials). BS 18. London: BSI.
Chan, C. W., T. Yu, and Y. L. Bai. 2021. “Behavior of large-scale hybrid FRP-concrete-steel multitube concrete columns under axial compression.” J. Compos. Constr. 25 (1): 04020084. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001106.
Dai, J.-G., Y.-L. Bai, and J. G. Teng. 2011. “Behavior and modeling of concrete confined with FRP composites of large deformability.” J. Compos. Constr. 15 (6): 963–973. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000230.
Dai, J.-G., L. Lam, and T. Ueda. 2012. “Seismic retrofit of square RC columns with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) fibre reinforced polymer composites.” Constr. Build. Mater. 27 (1): 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.058.
De Luca, A., F. Nardone, F. Matta, A. Nanni, G. P. Lignola, and A. Prota. 2011. “Structural evaluation of full-scale FRP-confined reinforced concrete columns.” J. Compos. Constr. 15 (1): 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000152.
Han, Q., W. Y. Yuan, Y. L. Bai, and X. L. Du. 2020a. “Compressive behavior of large rupture strain (LRS) FRP-confined square concrete columns: Experimental study and model evaluation.” Mater. Struct. 53 (4): 99. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01534-4.
Han, Q., W.-Y. Yuan, T. Ozbakkaloglu, Y.-L. Bai, and X.-L. Du. 2020b. “Compressive behavior for recycled aggregate concrete confined with recycled polyethylene naphthalate/terephthalate composites.” Constr. Build. Mater. 261: 120498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120498.
Huang, L., S. S. Zhang, T. Yu, and Z. Y. Wang. 2018. “Compressive behaviour of large rupture strain FRP-confined concrete-encased steel columns.” Constr. Build. Mater. 183: 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.074.
Ispir, M. 2015. “Monotonic and cyclic compression tests on concrete confined with PET-FRP.” J. Compos. Constr. 19 (1): 04014034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000490.
Ispir, M., K. D. Dalgic, and A. Ilki. 2018. “Hybrid confinement of concrete through use of low and high rupture strain FRP.” Composites Part B. 153: 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.026.
Lam, L., and J. G. Teng. 2003a. “Design-oriented stress–strain model for FRP-confined concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 17 (6–7): 471–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(03)00045-X.
Lam, L., and J. G. Teng. 2003b. “Design-oriented stress–strain model for FRP-confined concrete in rectangular columns.” J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 22 (13): 1149–1186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684403035429.
Li, P. D., L. Sui, F. Xing, M. Li, Y. Zhou, and Y.-F. Wu. 2019. “Stress–strain relation of FRP-confined predamaged concrete prisms with square sections of different corner radii subjected to monotonic axial compression.” J. Compos. Constr. 23 (2): 04019001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000921.
Li, P. D., Y.-F. Wu, Y. W. Zhou, and F. Xing. 2018. “Cyclic stress–strain model for FRP-confined concrete considering post-peak softening.” Compos. Struct. 201: 902–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.088.
Liao, J. J., K. Y. Yang, J.-J. Zeng, W.M. Quach, Y.Y. Ye, and L. H. Zhang. 2021. “Compressive behavior of FRP-confined ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) in circular columns.” Eng. Struct. 249: 113246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113246.
Lim, J. C., and T. Ozbakkaloglu. 2014. “Design model for FRP-confined normal-and high-strength concrete square and rectangular columns.” Mag. Concr. Res. 66 (20): 1020–1035. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.14.00059.
Lin, G., and J. G. Teng. 2020. “Advanced stress–strain model for FRP-confined concrete in square columns.” Composites Part B. 197: 108149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108149.
Matthys, S., H. Toutanji, K. Audenaert, and L. Taerwe. 2005. “Axial behavior of large-scale columns confined with fiber-reinforced polymer composites.” ACI Struct. J. 102 (2): 258–267.
Ozbakkaloglu, T. 2013a. “Behavior of square and rectangular ultra high-strength concrete-filled FRP tubes under axial compression.” Composites Part B 54: 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.05.007.
Ozbakkaloglu, T. 2013b. “Compressive behavior of concrete-filled FRP tube columns: Assessment of critical column parameters.” Eng. Struct. 51: 188–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.01.017.
Ozbakkaloglu, T., J. C. Lim, and T. Vincent. 2013. “FRP-confined concrete in circular sections: Review and assessment of stress–strain models.” Eng. Struct. 49: 1068–1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.010.
Pimanmas, A., and S. Saleem. 2018. “Dilation characteristics of PET FRP-confined concrete.” J. Compos. Constr. 22 (3): 04018006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000841.
Pimanmas, A., and S. Saleem. 2019. “Evaluation of existing stress–strain models and modeling of PET FRP-confined concrete.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 31 (12): 04019303. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002941.
Saleem, S., Q. Hussain, and A. Pimanmas. 2017. “Compressive behavior of PET FRP-confined circular, square, and rectangular concrete columns.” J. Compos. Constr. 21 (3): 04016097. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000754.
Saleem, S., A. Pimanmas, M. I. Qureshi, and W. Rattanapitikon. 2021. “Axial behavior of PET FRP-confined reinforced concrete.” J. Compos. Constr. 25 (1): 04020079. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001092.
Silva, M., and C. Rodrigues. 2006. “Size and relative stiffness effects on compressive failure of concrete columns wrapped with glass FRP.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 18 (3): 334–342. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:3(334).
Standards Australia. 2014. Method of testing concrete compressive strength tests—Concrete, mortar and grout specimens. AS1012.9. Sydney, Australia: Standards Australia.
Toutanji, H., M. Han, J. Gilbert, and S. Matthys. 2010. “Behavior of large-scale rectangular columns confined with FRP composites.” J. Compos. Constr. 14 (1): 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000051.
Wang, D. Y., Z. Y. Wang, S. T. Smith, and T. Yu. 2016. “Size effect on axial stress–strain behavior of CFRP-confined square concrete columns.” Constr. Build. Mater. 118: 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.158.
Wang, L.-M., and Y.-F. Wu. 2008. “Effect of corner radius on the performance of CFRP-confined square concrete columns: Test.” Eng. Struct. 30 (2): 493–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.04.016.
Wang, Y. C., and J. I. Restrepo. 2001. “Investigation of concentrically loaded reinforced concrete columns confined with glass fiber-reinforced polymer jackets.” ACI Struct. J. 98 (3): 377–385.
Wang, Y.-F., and H.-L. Wu. 2011. “Size effect of concrete short columns confined with aramid FRP jackets.” J. Compos. Constr. 15 (4): 535–544. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000178.
Wang, Z. Y., D. Y. Wang, S. T. Smith, and D. G. Lu. 2012. “Experimental testing and analytical modeling of CFRP-confined large circular RC columns subjected to cyclic axial compression.” Eng. Struct. 40: 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.01.004.
Yuan, W.-Y., Q. Han, Y.-L. Bai, X.-L. Du, and Z.-W. Yan. 2021. “Compressive behavior and modelling of engineered cementitious composite (ECC) confined with LRS FRP and conventional FRP.” Compos. Struct. 272: 114200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114200.
Zeng, J. J., G. Lin, J. G. Teng, and L. J. Li. 2018. “Behavior of large-scale FRP-confined rectangular RC columns under axial compression.” Eng. Struct. 174: 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.086.
Zeng, J. J., J. G. Teng, G. Lin, and L. J. Li. 2021. “Large-scale FRP-confined rectangular RC columns with section curvilinearization under axial compression.” J. Compos. Constr. 25 (3): 04021020.
Zhang, S. M. 2021. “Size effect of axial compression behavior of high ductility FRP-confined concrete.” M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Beijing Univ. of Technology.
Zhou, Y. W., X. Chen, X. H. Wang, L. L. Sui, X. X. Huang, M. H. Guo, and B. Hu. 2020. “Seismic performance of large rupture strain FRP retrofitted RC columns with corroded steel reinforcement.” Eng. Struct. 216: 110744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110744.
Zhou, Y.-W., and Y.-F. Wu. 2012. “General model for constitutive relationships of concrete and its composite structures.” Compos. Struct. 94 (2): 580–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.08.022.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 26Issue 4August 2022

History

Received: Sep 8, 2021
Accepted: Mar 13, 2022
Published online: May 11, 2022
Published in print: Aug 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Oct 11, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Univ. of Technology, Beijing 100124, China. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Univ. of Technology, Beijing 100124, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3386-4975. Email: [email protected]
Jun-Feng Jia [email protected]
Professor, Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Univ. of Technology, Beijing 100124, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Professor, Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Univ. of Technology, Beijing 100124, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1664-3065. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Univ. of Technology, Beijing 100124, China. Email: [email protected]
Togay Ozbakkaloglu, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Ingram School of Engineering, Texas State Univ., San Marcos, TX 78667. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Unified Ultimate Axial Strain Model for Large Rupture Strain FRP–Confined Concrete Based on Energy Approach, Journal of Composites for Construction, 10.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-3944, 27, 2, (2023).
  • Dilation Characteristics of FRP-Confined Square Engineered Cementitious Composite Columns, Journal of Composites for Construction, 10.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-3926, 27, 2, (2023).
  • Seismic behaviour of shear critical square RC columns strengthened by large rupture strain FRP, Engineering Structures, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115679, 280, (115679), (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share