Unified Ultimate Axial Strain Model for Large Rupture Strain FRP–Confined Concrete Based on Energy Approach
Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 27, Issue 2
Abstract
Using large rupture strain (LRS) fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites as confining material has become increasingly prominent in structural repair or retrofitting, owing to their advantageous high deformation capacity. Economic and rational usage of LRS FRP relies on displacement-based design, which requires calculation of the ultimate deformation of a member. However, prediction of the ultimate strain of LRS FRP–confined concrete is more complex and can be more inaccurate than prediction of strength, especially for structural elements under large deformation or severe damage conditions. This study proposes a unified ultimate strain model for LRS FRP–confined concrete based on an energy balance method. A unified expression form is derived using this method, providing an ultimate strain model with no restrictions on column cross section, in terms of circular, square, or oblong columns. The proposed ultimate strain model has a wider application and a better performance than other models. Furthermore, according to this paper’s updated database, the characteristic points on the whole stress–strain curve can also be accurately determined. Using the new ultimate strain model for LRS FRP–confined concrete and its characteristic points, the whole entire stress–strain curve of LRS FRP–confined concrete is accurately derived.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the first author on reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52078299 and 51908137) and the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Fund Project (Grant Nos. 2020A1515011552). Funding from the Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (Grant Nos. KQTD20200820113004005 and 20200807104705001) is also acknowledged.
Notation
The following symbols are used in this paper:
- b
- width of specimen (mm);
- D
- diameter of circular column (mm);
- Ec
- elastic modulus of unconfined concrete (GPa);
- Efrp0
- initial elastic modulus of LRS FRP (GPa);
- Efrp1
- second-stage elastic modulus of LRS FRP (GPa);
- El
- confinement stiffness ratio;
- E1
- first slope of LRS FRP–confined concrete (E1 = Ec);
- E2
- second slope of LRS FRP–confined concrete (MPa);
- E3
- third slope of LRS FRP–confined concrete (MPa);
- fco
- unconfined concrete strength (MPa);
- fcu
- ultimate strength of LRS FRP–confined concrete (MPa);
- fcuo
- strength corresponding to ultimate strain of unconfined concrete (MPa);
- ffrp
- ultimate rupture strength for LRS FRP sheet (MPa);
- ffrp0
- tensile stress of LRS FRP at transition strain ɛfrp0 (MPa);
- fl
- maximum confining pressure provided by FRP jacket (MPa);
- fm
- axial stress at postpeak transition strain ɛm (MPa);
- f30
- strength of Grade 30 concrete (f30 = 30 MPa);
- H
- height of column (mm);
- h
- length of rectangular section (mm);
- kfrp
- FRP volume rate;
- kɛ
- strain reduction factor;
- r
- corner radius (mm);
- t
- thickness of FRP (mm);
- Uad
- additional energy absorption of concrete due to increased internal resistance of concrete caused by confinement (J);
- Uc
- total strain energy capacity of LRS FRP–confined concrete (J);
- Ucf
- additional energy absorption capacity of LRS FRP–confined concrete (J);
- Uco
- strain energy capacity of unconfined concrete (J);
- Ufrp
- total work done by FRP jacket (J);
- U0
- equivalent LRS FRP energy absorption capacity (J);
- U1
- energy of unconfined concrete with strain from 0 to ɛcuo (J);
- U2
- energy difference between confined concrete and unconfined concrete (J);
- U3
- residual strain energy for unconfined concrete (J);
- U4
- residual strain energy absorption capacity for LRS FRP–confined concrete after LRS FRP rupture (J);
- Vcolumn
- volume of concrete column (mm3);
- Vfrp
- volume of FRP jacket (mm3);
- ɛc
- axial strain of concrete;
- ɛco
- axial strain corresponding to peak strength for unconfined concrete;
- ɛcu
- ultimate strain of LRS FRP–confined concrete;
- ɛcuo
- ultimate strain of unconfined concrete (ɛcuo = 1.75ɛco);
- ɛf,rup
- rupture strain of LRS FRP jacket;
- ɛfrp
- tensile rupture strain of LRS FRP sheet;
- ɛfrp0
- coupon test tensile strain of FRP at transition point;
- ɛm
- axial strain at postpeak transition point of LRS FRP–confined concrete;
- λ
- energy absorption factor;
- σc
- axial stress of LRS FRP–confined concrete (MPa); and
- σco
- axial stresses for unconfined concrete.
References
Abbasnia, R., F. Hosseinpour, M. Rostamian, and H. Ziaadiny. 2012. “Effect of corner radius on stress–strain behavior of FRP confined prisms under axial cyclic compression.” Eng. Struct. 40: 529–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.020.
Alkhrdaji, T., and K. Soudki. 2005. Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures. ACI 440.2R-02. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ASTM. 2008. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM D3039M-08. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM D3039/D3039M-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bai, Y.-L., J.-G. Dai, M. Mohammadi, G. Lin, and S.-J. Mei. 2019. “Stiffness-based design-oriented compressive stress-strain model for large-rupture-strain (LRS) FRP-confined concrete.” Compos. Struct. 223: 110953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110953.
Bai, Y.-L., J.-G. Dai, and J.-G. Teng. 2014. “Cyclic compressive behavior of concrete confined with large rupture strain FRP composites.” J. Compos. Constr. 18 (1): 04013025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000386.
Bai, Y.-L., S.-J. Mei, P. Li, and J. Xu. 2021. “Cyclic stress-strain model for large-rupture strain fiber-reinforced polymer (LRS FRP)-confined concrete.” J. Build. Eng. 42: 102459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102459.
Bai, Y.-L., Y.-F. Zhang, J.-F. Jia, Q. Han, X.-L. Du, and T. Ozbakkaloglu. 2022. “Compressive behavior of large-scale PEN and PET FRP–confined RC columns with square cross sections.” J. Compos. Constr. 26 (4): 04022034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001222.
Berthet, J. F., E. Ferrier, and P. Hamelin. 2005. “Compressive behavior of concrete externally confined by composite jackets. Part A: Experimental study.” Constr. Build. Mater. 19 (3): 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.05.012.
Cao, Y.-G., Y.-F. Wu, and X.-Q. Li. 2016. “Unified model for evaluating ultimate strain of FRP confined concrete based on energy method.” Constr. Build. Mater. 103: 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.11.042.
Dai, J.-G., Y.-L. Bai, and J. G. Teng. 2011. “Behavior and modeling of concrete confined with FRP composites of large deformability.” J. Compos. Constr. 15 (6): 963–973. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000230.
Fallah Pour, A., A. Gholampour, and T. Ozbakkaloglu. 2018. “Influence of the measurement method on axial strains of FRP-confined concrete under compression.” Compos. Struct. 188: 415–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.017.
Han, Q., W. Y. Yuan, Y. L. Bai, and X. L. Du. 2020. “Compressive behavior of large rupture strain (LRS) FRP-confined square concrete columns: Experimental study and model evaluation.” Mater. Struct. 53 (4): 1–20.
Harries, K. A., and S. A. Carey. 2003. “Shape and “gap” effects on the behavior of variably confined concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res. 33 (6): 881–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)01085-2.
Huang, L., S. S. Zhang, T. Yu, and Z. Y. Wang. 2018. “Compressive behaviour of large rupture strain FRP-confined concrete-encased steel columns.” Constr. Build. Mater. 183: 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.074.
Ilki, A., O. Peker, E. Karamuk, C. Demir, and N. Kumbasar. 2008. “FRP retrofit of low and medium strength circular and rectangular reinforced concrete columns.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 20 (2): 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2008)20:2(169).
Isleem, H. F., D. Wang, and Z. Wang. 2018. “Modeling the axial compressive stress-strain behavior of CFRP-confined rectangular RC columns under monotonic and cyclic loading.” Compos. Struct. 185: 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.023.
Ispir, M. 2015. “Monotonic and cyclic compression tests on concrete confined with PET-FRP.” J. Compos. Constr. 19 (1): 04014034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000490.
Ispir, M., K. D. Dalgic, and A. Ilki. 2018. “Hybrid confinement of concrete through use of low and high rupture strain FRP.” Composites, Part B 153: 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.026.
Jiang, J., P. Li, and N. Nisticò. 2019. “Local and global prediction on stress-strain behavior of FRP-confined square concrete sections.” Compos. Struct. 226: 111205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111205.
Lam, L., and J. G. Teng. 2003a. “Design-oriented stress–strain model for FRP-confined concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 17 (6–7): 471–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(03)00045-X.
Lam, L., and J. G. Teng. 2003b. “Design-oriented stress-strain model for FRP-confined concrete in rectangular columns.” J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 22 (13): 1149–1186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684403035429.
Lam, L., and J. G. Teng. 2004. “Ultimate condition of fiber reinforced polymer-confined concrete.” J. Compos. Constr. 8 (6): 539–548. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:6(539).
Li, P., Y. Ren, Y. Zhou, Z. Zhu, and Y. Chen. 2022. “Experimental study on the mechanical properties of corroded RC columns repaired with large rupture strain FRP.” J. Build. Eng. 54: 104413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104413.
Li, P., L. Sui, F. Xing, M. Li, Y. Zhou, and Y.-F. Wu. 2019a. “Stress–strain relation of FRP-confined predamaged concrete prisms with square sections of different corner radii subjected to monotonic axial compression.” J. Compos. Constr. 23 (2): 04019001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000921.
Li, P., and Y.-F. Wu. 2015. “Stress–strain model of FRP confined concrete under cyclic loading.” Compos. Struct. 134: 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.056.
Li, P., Y.-F. Wu, Y. Zhou, and F. Xing. 2019b. “Stress-strain model for FRP-confined concrete subject to arbitrary load path.” Composites, Part B 163: 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.002.
Lignola, G. P., A. Prota, G. Manfredi, and E. Cosenza. 2008. “Effective strain in FRP jackets on circular RC columns.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf., on FRP Composites in Civil Engineering. https://www.iifc.org/proceedings/CICE_2008/papers/2.A.5.pdf.
Mai, A. D., M. N. Sheikh, and M. N. S. Hadi. 2021. “Strain model for discretely FRP confined concrete based on energy balance principle.” Eng. Struct. 241: 112489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112489.
Mander, J. B., M. J. N. Priestley, and R. Park. 1988. “Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete.” J. Struct. Eng. 114 (8): 1804–1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
Micelli, F., and R. Modarelli. 2013. “Experimental and analytical study on properties affecting the behaviour of FRP-confined concrete.” Composites, Part B 45 (1): 1420–1431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.055.
Ozbakkaloglu, T. 2013. “Behavior of square and rectangular ultra high-strength concrete-filled FRP tubes under axial compression.” Composites, Part B 54: 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.05.007.
Ozbakkaloglu, T., and J. C. Lim. 2013. “Axial compressive behavior of FRP-confined concrete: Experimental test database and a new design-oriented model.” Composites, Part B 55: 607–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.07.025.
Ozbakkaloglu, T., J. C. Lim, and T. Vincent. 2013. “FRP-confined concrete in circular sections: Review and assessment of stress-strain models.” Eng. Struct. 49: 1068–1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.010.
Pham, T. M., and M. N. S. Hadi. 2013. “Strain estimation of CFRP-confined concrete columns using energy approach.” J. Compos. Constr. 17 (6): 04013001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000397.
Pimanmas, A., and S. Saleem. 2019. “Evaluation of existing stress–strain models and modeling of PET FRP–confined concrete.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 31 (1): 1–41.
Popovics, S. 1973. “A numerical approach to the complete stress–strain curve of concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res. 3 (5): 583–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(73)90096-3.
Saleem, S., Q. Hussain, and A. Pimanmas. 2017. “Compressive behavior of PET FRP–confined circular, square, and rectangular concrete columns.” J. Compos. Constr. 21 (3): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000754.
Saleem, S., A. Pimanmas, and W. Rattanapitikon. 2018. “Lateral response of PET FRP-confined concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 159: 390–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.116.
Smith, S. T., S. J. Kim, and H. Zhang. 2010. “Behavior and effectiveness of FRP wrap in the confinement of large concrete cylinders.” J. Compos. Constr. 14 (5): 573–582. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000119.
Tijani, I. A., Y.-F. Wu, and C. W. Lim. 2020. “Energy balance method for modeling ultimate strain of fiber-reinforced polymer-repaired concrete.” Struct. Concr. 21 (2): 804–820. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201900260.
Wang, L.-M., and Y.-F. Wu. 2008. “Effect of corner radius on the performance of CFRP-confined square concrete columns: Test.” Eng. Struct. 30 (2): 493–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.04.016.
Wang, Y., P. Liu, Q. Cao, G. Chen, B. Wan, Z. Wei, and Y.-L. Bai. 2021. “Comparison of monotonic axial compressive behavior of rectangular concrete confined by FRP with different rupture strains.” Constr. Build. Mater. 299: 124241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124241.
Wu, Y. F., and Y. G. Cao. 2017. “Energy balance method for modeling ultimate strain of confined concrete.” ACI Struct. J. 114 (2): 373–381.
Wu, Y.-F., and J.-F. Jiang. 2013. “Effective strain of FRP for confined circular concrete columns.” Compos. Struct. 95: 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.08.021.
Wu, Y.-F., T. Liu, and D. J. Oehlers. 2006. “Fundamental principles that govern retrofitting of reinforced concrete columns by steel and FRP jacketing.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 9 (4): 507–533. https://doi.org/10.1260/136943306778812769.
Wu, Y.-F., and Y.-Y. Wei. 2010. “Effect of cross-sectional aspect ratio on the strength of CFRP-confined rectangular concrete columns.” Eng. Struct. 32 (1): 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.08.012.
Xiao, Y., and H. Wu. 2003. “Compressive behavior of concrete confined by various types of FRP composite Jackets.” J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 22 (13): 1187–1201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684403035430.
Zeng, J.-J., W.-Y. Gao, Z.-J. Duan, Y.-L. Bai, Y.-C. Guo, and L.-J. Ouyang. 2020a. “Axial compressive behavior of polyethylene terephthalate/carbon FRP-confined seawater sea-sand concrete in circular columns.” Constr. Build. Mater. 234: 117383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117383.
Zeng, J., Y. Guo, L. Li, and W. Chen. 2018. “Behavior and three-dimensional finite element modeling of circular concrete columns partially wrapped with FRP strips.” Polymers 10 (3): 253. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10030253.
Zeng, J.-J., Y.-Y. Ye, W.-Y. Gao, S. Smith, and Y.-C. Guo. 2020b. “Stress-strain behavior of polyethylene terephthalate fiber-reinforced polymer-confined Normal-, high- and ultra-high-strength concrete.” J. Build. Eng. 30: 101243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101243.
Zeng, J.-J., Y.-Y. Ye, Y.-C. Guo, J.-F. Lv, Y. Ouyang, and C. Jiang. 2020c. “PET FRP-concrete-high strength steel hybrid solid columns with strain-hardening and ductile performance: Cyclic axial compressive behavior.” Composites, Part B 190: 107903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107903.
Zeng, J.-J., D.-H. Zhu, J. Liao, Y. Zhuge, Y.-L. Bai, and L. Zhang. 2022. “Large-rupture-strain (LRS) FRP-confined concrete in square stub columns: Effects of specimen size and assessments of existing models.” Constr. Build. Mater. 326: 126869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126869.
Zhang, Y., Y. Wei, J. Bai, G. Wu, and Z. Dong. 2020. “A novel seawater and sea sand concrete filled FRP-carbon steel composite tube column: Concept and behaviour.” Compos. Struct. 246: 112421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112421.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 28, 2022
Accepted: Sep 22, 2022
Published online: Dec 19, 2022
Published in print: Apr 1, 2023
Discussion open until: May 19, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.