Technical Papers
Mar 11, 2022

Cyclic Performance of GFRP-RC T-Connections with Different Anchorage and Connection Details

Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 26, Issue 3

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of different configurations of connection reinforcement and anchorages on the cyclic behavior of glass fiber–reinforced polymer (GFRP) reinforced-concrete (RC) exterior beam–column connections (T-connections). Three full-scale GFRP-RC T-connections were tested under reversed cyclic loading. One connection was detailed with 90-degree hooked anchorage and horizontal stirrups, while the other two connections were detailed with L-shaped anchorage by placing additional Z- or U-shaped bars at the connection region. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of the anchorage type (90-degree hook or L-shaped) at the end of the longitudinal bars of the beam on the cyclic performance (strength, ductility, and energy dissipation) of GFRP-RC T-connections. Moreover, the anchorage performances in terms of anchorage resistance, bond stress–slip of bars within the joint were evaluated and compared with each other. Test results indicated that all the connections passed a 5.09% drift ratio without any loss of strength. The addition of U-bars into the L-shaped anchorage connection significantly improved the strength, ductility, and energy dissipation compared with the other two connections.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the technical officers, especially Jordan Wallace and Duncan Best, for their support and help during the experimental work of this study. The first author acknowledges the financial support from the Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan and the Graduate Research School of University of the Wollongong, Australia.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
Ab
nominal area of an individual FRP bar;
Ac
confined concrete core area of column;
Af
total area of tensile reinforcement in beam;
AFH
area of ties for confinement of column in each cross-sectional direction;
AFH,provided
provided area of horizontal stirrups at connection;
AFH,required
required area of horizontal stirrups at connection;
Ag
gross area of column section;
Aj
effective joint area parallel to axis of reinforcement-generating shear;
Cc
compressive force developed by concrete in beam section under flexure;
d
effective depth of beam section;
db
nominal diameter of FRP bar;
dcs
the smaller of the distances from closest concrete surface to the center of the bar and the two-thirds of the center-to-center spacing of the bars being developed;
DR
applied drift ratio;
Ef
elastic modulus of FRP bar;
Ei
energy dissipation per cycle;
fa
anchorage resistance of longitudinal bars of the beam;
fb
bent portion tensile strength of FRP bar;
fbf
design tensile stress level in FRP flexural reinforcement of the beam;
fc
compressive strength of concrete;
ff
stress level in tensile reinforcement of the beam;
ffc
compressive strength of FRP bar;
ffh
design tensile stress level in FRP transverse reinforcement of the column;
ffu
ultimate tensile strength of FRP bar;
h
depth of column section;
hb
depth of beam section;
hc
cross-sectional dimension of column core;
Hc
vertical distance between the horizontal roller supports on the column;
kp
peak-to-peak stiffness of hysteresis loop;
k1
bar location factor;
k2
concrete density factor;
k3
bar size factor;
k4
bar fiber factor;
k5
bar surface profile factor;
Kc
confinement factor;
L
distance from the loading point to the center of the column;
Lb
length of beam from face of column to center of the loading point;
a
anchorage length of the longitudinal FRP bar of the beam;
db
development of bent FRP bar in tension;
db,provided
provided development of longitudinal bar of the beam;
o
greater of depth of the column, one-sixth of clear span of the member and 450 mm;
Mnb
nominal flexural capacity of the beam;
Mnc
nominal flexural capacity of the column;
MR
column-to-beam flexural strength ratio;
n
number of FRP bars in tension;
P
applied load at the free end of the beam;
Pci
crack initiation load;
Pe
virtual yield load;
Pf
applied column axial load;
Pmax
maximum load achieved by beam during experiment;
Pn
nominal load-carrying capacity of the beam;
Po
nominal unconfined axial load capacity of column;
Ps
service load;
S
slip of FRP bar;
S1
slip of FRP bar at maximum bond stress;
S2
slip of FRP bar at end of effective bond region;
s
spacing of ties;
s1
spacing of tie legs;
Tf
maximum tensile force developed by tensile reinforcement in beam section under flexure;
Vc
shear force in column;
Vj,max
maximum connection shear developed during the experiment;
Vnf
nominal connection shear capacity;
Vuf
design connection shear force;
Zb
internal lever arm of beam section;
γ
factor that depends on the level of confinement provided to the joint by adjoining members;
δ
design drift ratio, shall not be less than 0.03;
Δ
beam tip displacement;
Δcapacity
displacement capacity;
Δe
virtual yield displacement;
Δu
ultimate yield displacement;
ɛb
average strain in longitudinal bar of the beam over the anchorage length;
ɛf
strain in longitudinal bar of the beam;
ɛf1
strain in longitudinal bar of the beam at the end of anchorage;
ɛf2
strain in longitudinal bar of the beam at the face of the column;
ɛfu
ultimate strain FRP bar;
µ
displacement ductility;
τ
bond stress for FRP bar;
τavg
average bond stress developed in connection during the experiment;
τb,max
maximum bond stress;
τb,r
residual bond stress;
τb,u
average effective bond stress; and
ϕf
resistance factor of FRP bar.

References

ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2002. Recommendations for design of beam-column connections in monolithic reinforced concrete structures. ASCE Committee 352. ACI-ASCE 352-02. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2012. Guide test methods for fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs) for reinforcing or strengthening concrete structures. ACI 440.3R-12. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2015. Guide for the design and conctruction of concrete reinforced with FRP bars. ACI 440.1R-15. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019a. Building code requirements for structural concrete. ACI 318-19. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019b. Acceptance criteria for moment frames based on structural testing and commentary. ACI 374.1-05 (R2019). Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Ali, M. A., and E. El-Salakawy. 2016. “Seismic performance of GFRP-reinforced concrete rectangular columns.” J. Compos. Constr. 20 (3): 04015074. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000637.
AS (Australian Standard). 2014a. Compressive strength tests—Concrete, mortar and grout specimens. AS 1012.9. Sydney, Australia: AS.
AS (Australian Standard). 2014b. Methods of testing concrete—Method 10: Determination of indirect tensile strength of concrete cylinders. AS 1012.10-02 (R2014). Sydney, Australia: AS.
AS (Australian Standard). 2014c. Methods of testing concrete—Determination of the static chord modulus of elasticity and poisson’s ratio of concrete specimens. AS 1012.17-97 (R2014). Sydney, Australia: AS.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test method for tensile properties of fiber reinforced polymer matrix composite bars. ASTM D7205/D7205M. West Conshocken, PA: ASTM.
Chun, S. C., S. H. Lee, T. H. Kang, B. Oh, and J. W. Wallace. 2007. “Mechanical anchorage in exterior beam-column joints subjected to cyclic loading.” ACI Struct. J. 104 (1): 102–112.
Cosenza, E., G. Manfredi, and R. Realfonzo. 1997. “Behavior and modeling of bond of FRP rebars to concrete.” J. Compos. Constr. 1 (2): 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1997)1:2(40).
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2002. Design and construction of building structures with fiber-reinforced polymers. CSA S806-02. Toronto, ON: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2017. Design and construction of building structures with fiber-reinforced polymers. CSA S806-12 (R2017). Toronto, ON: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2019a. Canadian highway bridge design code. CSA S6-19. Toronto, ON: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2019b. Design of concrete structures. CSA A23.3-19. Toronto, ON: CSA.
Elshamandy, M. G., A. S. Farghaly, and B. Benmokrane. 2018. “Experimental behavior of glass fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced concrete columns under lateral cyclic load.” ACI Struct. J. 115 (2): 337–349. https://doi.org/10.14359/51700985.
Focacci, F., A. Nanni, and C. E. Bakis. 2000. “Local bond-slip relationship for FRP reinforcement in concrete.” J. Compos. Constr. 4 (1): 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2000)4:1(24).
Foraboschi, P. 2016. “Structural layout that takes full advantage of the capabilities and opportunities afforded by two-way RC floors, coupled with the selection of the best technique, to avoid serviceability failures.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 70: 387–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.09.010.
Foraboschi, P. 2020. “Optimal design of seismic resistant RC columns.” Materials 13 (8): 1919. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13081919.
Fukuyama, H., Y. Masuda, Y. Sonobe, and M. Tanigaki. 1995. “Structural performances of concrete frame reinforced with FRP reinforcement.” In Proc., 2nd Int. RILEM Symp. Non-Metallic (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures, edited by L. Taerwe, 275–286. London: E & FN SPON.
Ghobarah, A., and T. El-Amoury. 2005. “Seismic rehabilitation of deficient exterior concrete frame joints.” J. Compos. Constr. 9 (5): 408–416. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:5(408).
Ghomi, S. K., and E. El-Salakawy. 2016. “Seismic performance of GFRP-RC exterior beam–column joints with lateral beams.” J. Compos. Constr. 20 (1): 04015019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000582.
Hadi, M. N. S., and T. M. Tran. 2014. “Retrofitting nonseismically detailed exterior beam–column joints using concrete covers together with CFRP jacket.” Constr. Build. Mater. 63: 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.019.
Hadi, M. N. S., and T. M. Tran. 2016. “Seismic rehabilitation of reinforced beam–column joints with concrete cover and wrapping with FRP composites.” Mater. Struct. 49: 467–485. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0511-4.
Hadi, M. N. S., and J. Youssef. 2016. “Experimental investigation of GFRP-reinforced and GFRP-encased square concrete specimens under axial and eccentric load, and four-point bending test.” J. Compos. Constr. 20 (5): 04016020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000675.
Hasaballa, M. 2014. “GFRP-reinforced concrete exterior beamcolumn joints subjected to seismic loading.” Ph.D.thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba.
Hasaballa, M., and E. El-Salakawy. 2016. “Shear capacity of exterior beam-column joints reinforced with GFRP bars and stirrups.” J. Compos. Constr. 20 (2): 04015047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000609.
Hasaballa, M., and E. El-Salakawy. 2018. “Anchorage performance of GFRP headed and bent bars in beam-column joints subjected to seismic loading.” J. Compos. Constr. 22 (6): 04018060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000888.
Hassanein, A., N. Mohamed, A. S. Farghaly, and B. Benmokrane. 2019. “Experimental investigation: New ductility-based force modification factor recommended for concrete shear walls reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer bars.” ACI Struct. J. 116 (1): 213–224.
Lisa, V., and S. Shamim. 2015. “Investigation of bond properties of alternate anchorage schemes for glass fiber-reinforced polymer bars.” ACI Struct. J. 112 (1): 59–68.
Mady, M., A. El-Ragaby, and E. El-Salakawy. 2011. “Seismic behavior of beam-column joints reinforced with GFRP bars and stirrups.” J. Compos. Constr. 15 (6): 875–886. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000220.
Mohamed, N., A. S. Farghaly, B. Benmokrane, and K. W. Neale. 2014. “Drift capacity design of shear walls reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer bars.” ACI Struct. J. 111 (6): 1397. https://doi.org/10.14359/51687099.
Pultron, C. 2017. MateenBar-Tecnical Submittle Pultorn Composites. Mina Jebel Ali UAE. Accessed September, 2017. https://www.mateenbar.com
Putrall. 2017. V-ROD technical data sheets. Thetford Mines, QC, Canada: Putrall.
Said, A. M., and M. L. Nehdi. 2004. “Use of FRP for RC frames in seismic zones. Part II. Performance of steel-free GFRP-reinforced beam-column joints.” Appl. Compos. Mater. 11 (4): 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ACMA.0000035480.85721.b5.
Saleh, Z., M. N. Sheikh, A. M. Remennikov, and A. Basu. 2020. “Response of concrete beams reinforced with GFRP bars under static loads.” In Vol. 37 of ACMSM25. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, edited by C. Wang, J. Ho, and S. Kitipornchai, 765–774. Singapore: Springer.
Sharbatdar, M. K., M. Saatcioglu, B. Benmokrane, and E. El-Salakawy. 2007. “Behaviour of FRP reinforced concrete beam-column joints under cyclic loading.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Durability and Field Applications of Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites for Construction, (CDCC-07), 541–548. Sherbrooke, QC, Canada: Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Sherbrooke.
Soric, Z., T. Kisicek, and J. Galic. 2010. “Deflections of concrete beams reinforced with FRP bars.” Mater. Struct. 43 (1): 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-010-9600-1.
Vijay, P. V., and H. V. GangaRao. 2001. “Bending behavior and deformability of glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforced concrete members.” ACI Struct. J. 98 (6): 834–842.
Yost, J. R., and S. P. Gross. 2002. “Flexural design methodology for concrete beams with fiber-reinforced polymers.” ACI Struct. J. 99 (3): 308–316.
Zhang, X., L. Wang, J. Zhang, and Y. Liu. 2016. “Model for flexural strength calculation of corroded RC beams considering bond–slip behavior.” J. Eng. Mech. 142 (7): 04016038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001079.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 26Issue 3June 2022

History

Received: May 28, 2021
Accepted: Jan 11, 2022
Published online: Mar 11, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 11, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Muhammad Safdar [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil, Mining and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Wollongong, Wollongong 2522, Australia. Email: [email protected]
M. Neaz Sheikh [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Civil, Mining and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil, Mining and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6490-889X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Finite element analysis to predict the cyclic performance of GFRP-RC exterior joints with diagonal bars, Journal of Building Engineering, 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105774, 65, (105774), (2023).
  • Effect of connection transverse reinforcement on the behavior of GFRP-RC T-connections: Numerical investigation, Construction and Building Materials, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129827, 363, (129827), (2023).
  • Seismic Response of GFRP-RC Interior Beam-to-Column Joints under Cyclic Static Loads, Buildings, 10.3390/buildings12111987, 12, 11, (1987), (2022).
  • Numerical study on shear strength of GFRP-RC T-Joints, Structures, 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.07.017, 43, (926-943), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share