Technical Papers
Mar 11, 2022

Behavior of Ultrahigh-Performance Concrete Bridge Decks with New Y-Shape FRP Stay-in-Place Formworks

Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 26, Issue 3

Abstract

This study proposes using glass fiber–reinforced polymer (GFRP) as a stay-in-place structural formwork for casting bridge decks with ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC). The GFRP stay-in-place formworks completely replace the bottom layer of rebars, and the top steel reinforcement is also replaced by a GFRP mesh to mitigate the corrosion damage. The formworks were either a flat GFRP plate with square hollow section (SHS) stiffeners or a flat GFRP plate with new Y-shape stiffeners. Concentric static tests on five 1:2.75 scale decks were performed to investigate the effect of stiffener's configuration and the influence of the concrete strength on the performance of bridge decks. Rotational fixity support was used to simulate a real bridge deck connection of supporting girders. All specimens with the stay-in-place formwork exhibited punching shear failure. It was found that the use of Y-shape stiffeners significantly improved the load-carrying capacity of the proposed deck. Replacing normal concrete with UHPC further improved the loading capacity of the deck. The decks demonstrated excellent performance, with the load-carrying capacity 3.8–9.5 times higher than the established equivalent service load depending on the concrete strength and configuration of the GFRP stay-in-place formwork. Deflection at service load was less than span/1,600 for all the decks. Compared with normal-strength concrete (34 MPa), UHPC improved the maximum load-carrying capacity of the deck from 91.4 to 149 kN.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The financial support from the Australian Research Council Laureate Fellowships FL180100196 is acknowledged. The authors thank Sika Australia Pty Ltd. and Silicon Metal Company of Australia (SIMCOA) for providing the required material for this study.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
B
deck width;
b0
perimeter of the punching shear failure plane;
cx
ratios of punching shear perimeters in direction of traffic to the total perimeter;
cy
ratios of punching shear perimeters in direction of normal to traffic to the total perimeter;
dave
weighted average effective depth;
dx
the concrete thickness to the bottom GFRP plate;
dy
the concrete depth measured to the centroid of the FRP repeated pattern;
ES
Young's modulus of steel;
Ex
Young's modulus of the GFRP section in direction of traffic;
Ey
Young's modulus of the GFRP section in direction of normal to traffic;
fc
compressive strength of concrete;
L
span length;
Pn
ultimate nominal shear strength;
ρx
GFRP reinforcement ratios in the in direction of traffic;
ρy
GFRP reinforcement ratios in the in direction of normal to traffic;
ωeff
reinforcement ratio normalized with respect to the ratio of FRP and steel modulus;
ωx
GFRP reinforcement index in the direction of traffic; and
ωy
GFRP reinforcement index in the direction normal to traffic.

References

AASHTO. 2007. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Building code requirements for reinforced concrete and commentary. ACI 318-19. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Alagusundaramoorthy, P., I. E. Harik, and C. C. Choo. 2006. “Structural behavior of FRP composite bridge deck panels.” J. Bridge Eng. 11 (4): 384–393. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:4(384).
ASTM. 2017. Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C496. Philadelphia: ASTM.
ASTM. 2020. Standard specification for deformed and plain carbon-steel bars for concrete reinforcement. ASTM A615/A615M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2021. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C39/C39M-21. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bank, L. C., M. G. Oliva, H.-U. Bae, and B. V. Bindrich. 2010. “Hybrid concrete and pultruded-plank slabs for highway and pedestrian bridges.” Constr. Build. Mater. 24 (4): 552–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.10.002.
Berg, A. C., L. C. Bank, M. G. Oliva, and J. S. Russell. 2006. “Construction and cost analysis of an FRP reinforced concrete bridge deck.” Constr. Build. Mater. 20 (8): 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.02.007.
Boles, R., M. Nelson, and A. Fam. 2015. “Durability of bridge deck with FRP stay-in-place structural forms under freeze–thaw cycles.” J. Compos. Constr. 19 (4): 04014070. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000531.
Bouguerra, K., E. A. Ahmed, S. El-Gamal, and B. Benmokrane. 2011. “Testing of full-scale concrete bridge deck slabs reinforced with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars.” Constr. Build. Mater. 25 (10): 3956–3965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.028.
Cho, C.-G., G.-J. Ha, and Y.-Y. Kim. 2008. “Nonlinear model of reinforced concrete frames retrofitted by in-filled HPFRCC walls.” Struct. Eng. Mech. 30 (2): 211–223. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2008.30.2.211.
Dieter, D. A., J. S. Dietsche, L. C. Bank, M. G. Oliva, and J. S. Russell. 2002. “Concrete bridge decks constructed with fiber-reinforced polymer stay-in-place forms and grid reinforcing.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1814 (1): 219–226. https://doi.org/10.3141/1814-26.
Fam, A., and M. Nelson. 2012. “New bridge deck cast onto corrugated GFRP stay-in-place structural forms with interlocking connections.” J. Compos. Constr. 16 (1): 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000229.
Fang, H., X. Xu, W. Liu, Y. Qi, Y. Bai, B. Zhang, and D. Hui. 2016. “Flexural behavior of composite concrete slabs reinforced by FRP grid facesheets.” Composites, Part B 92: 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.02.029.
Fu, C. C., G. Zhao, Y. Ye, and F. Zhang. 2015. Serviceability-related issues for bridge live load deflection and construction closure pours. Rep. No. MD-15-SP309B4M. College Park, MD: Univ. of Maryland.
Gai, X., A. Darby, T. Ibell, and M. Evernden. 2013. “Experimental investigation into a ductile FRP stay-in-place formwork system for concrete slabs.” Constr. Build. Mater. 49: 1013–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.050.
Graybeal, B., and J. Tanesi. 2007. “Durability of an ultrahigh-performance concrete.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 19 (10): 848–854. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:10(848).
Grubb, M. A., K. E. Wilson, C. D. White, and W. N. Nickas. 2015. Load and resistance factor design (LRFD) for highway bridge superstructures—Reference manual. Rep. No. FHWA-NHI-15-047. Moon Township, PA: Michael Baker International.
Hanus, J. P., L. C. Bank, and M. G. Oliva. 2009. “Combined loading of a bridge deck reinforced with a structural FRP stay-in-place form.” Constr. Build. Mater. 23 (4): 1605–1619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.008.
He, J., Y. Liu, A. Chen, and L. Dai. 2012. “Experimental investigation of movable hybrid GFRP and concrete bridge deck.” Constr. Build. Mater. 26 (1): 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.05.002.
Herrera-Franco, P. J., and A. Valadez-González. 2005. “A study of the mechanical properties of short natural-fiber reinforced composites.” Composites, Part B 36 (8): 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.04.001.
Honickman, H., and A. Fam. 2009. “Investigating a structural form system for concrete girders using commercially available GFRP sheet–pile sections.” J. Compos. Constr. 13 (5): 455–465. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000039.
Huang, Z., W. Chen, H. Hao, Z. Chen, T. M. Pham, T. T. Tran, and M. Elchalakani. 2021a. “Flexural behaviour of ambient cured geopolymer concrete beams reinforced with BFRP bars under static and impact loads.” Compos. Struct. 261: 113282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113282.
Huang, Z., W. Chen, T. T. Tran, T. M. Pham, H. Hao, Z. Chen, and M. Elchalakani. 2021b. “Experimental and numerical study on concrete beams reinforced with Basalt FRP bars under static and impact loads.” Compos. Struct. 263: 113648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113648.
Jayaprakash, J., E. Pournasiri, F. De’nan, and M. P. Anwar. 2015. “Effect of corrosion-damaged RC circular columns enveloped with hybrid and non-hybrid FRP under eccentric loading.” J. Compos. Mater. 49 (18): 2265–2283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998314545187.
Keller, T., E. Schaumann, and T. Vallée. 2007. “Flexural behavior of a hybrid FRP and lightweight concrete sandwich bridge deck.” Composites, Part A 38 (3): 879–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.07.007.
Kim, C. H., and H. S. Jang. 2014. “Concrete shear strength of normal and lightweight concrete beams reinforced with FRP bars.” J. Compos. Constr. 18 (2): 04013038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000440.
Kuraray. 2021. PVA fibre. Osaka, Japan: Kuraray.
Le, T. D., T. M. Pham, H. Hao, and H. Li. 2020. “Behavior of precast segmental concrete beams prestressed with external steel and CFRP tendons.” J. Compos. Constr. 24 (5): 04020053. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001059.
Li, V. C., C. Wu, S. Wang, A. Ogawa, and T. Saito. 2002. “Interface tailoring for strain-hardening polyvinyl alcohol-engineered cementitious composite (PVA-ECC).” ACI Mater. J. 99 (5): 10.
Liu, Y., J. He, H. Fan, A. Chen, and L. Dai. 2011. “Experimental study on flexural behaviour of hybrid GFRP/concrete bridge deck.” In Proc., 5th International Conference on FRP Composites in Civil Engineering, 197–201. Beijing, China: Tsinghua University Press.
Magureanu, C., I. Sosa, C. Negrutiu, and B. Heghes. 2012. “Mechanical properties and durability of ultra-high-performance concrete.” ACI Mater. J. 109 (2): 177–183.
Matta, F., and A. Nanni. 2009. “Connection of concrete railing post and bridge deck with internal FRP reinforcement.” J. Bridge Eng. 14 (1): 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2009)14:1(66).
Matta, F., A. Nanni, and L. Bank. 2007. “Prefabricated FRP reinforcement for concrete bridge deck and railing: Design, laboratory validation, and field implementation.” In Asia-pacific conference on FRP in structures, edited by S. T. Smith, 319–324. Hong Kong: International Institute for FRP in Construction.
Nelson, M., E. Beriker, and A. Fam. 2014. “Splices of FRP stay-in-place structural forms in concrete bridge decks.” J. Compos. Constr. 18 (4): 04014001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000455.
Nelson, M., A. Eldridge, and A. Fam. 2013. “The effects of splices and bond on performance of bridge deck with FRP stay-in-place forms at various boundary conditions.” Eng. Struct. 56: 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.031.
Nelson, M., and A. Fam. 2013. “Structural GFRP permanent forms with T-shape ribs for bridge decks supported by precast concrete girders.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (9): 813–826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000418.
Nelson, M., and A. Fam. 2014. “Full bridge testing at scale constructed with novel FRP stay-in-place structural forms for concrete deck.” Constr. Build. Mater. 50: 368–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.056.
Nicoletta, B., J. Woods, J. Gales, and A. Fam. 2019. “Postfire performance of GFRP stay-in-place formwork for concrete bridge decks.” J. Compos. Constr. 23 (3): 04019015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000941.
Noël, M., and A. Fam. 2016. “Design equations for concrete bridge decks with FRP stay-in-place structural forms.” J. Compos. Constr. 20 (5): 04016024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000681.
Oliva, M., H. U. Bae, L. Bank, J. Russell, and S. W. Yoo. 2008. “FRP stay-in-place formwork for floor and deck construction.” In Vol. 257 of FRP stay-in-place forms for concrete structures, 106–129. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI .
Park, S. H., D. J. Kim, G. S. Ryu, and K. T. Koh. 2012. “Tensile behavior of ultra high performance hybrid fiber reinforced concrete.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 34 (2): 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.09.009.
Pournasiri, E., M. Ramli, and C. B. Cheah. 2018. “Mechanical performance of ternary cementitious composites with polypropylene fiber.” ACI Mater. J. 115 (5): 635–646. https://doi.org/10.14359/51700797.
Pultrall. 2021. V-ROD - technical data sheet. Thetford Mines, Quebec: ADS Composites Group.
Remy, O., S. Verbruggen, J. Wastiels, and T. Tysmans. 2011. “Cement composite stay-in-place formwork: A concept for future building systems.” In Proc., 18th Int. Conf. on Composite Materials. Jeju Island, Korea. http://smart.hit.edu.cn/2017/0104/c7613a169866/page.htm.
Rezaeian, H., G. C. Clifton, and J. B. P. Lim. 2020. “Failure modes for composite steel deck diaphragms subjected to in-plane shear forces—A review.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 107: 104199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104199.
Richardson, P., M. Nelson, and A. Fam. 2014. “Fatigue behavior of concrete bridge decks cast on GFRP stay-in-place structural forms.” J. Compos. Constr. 18 (3): A4013010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000432.
Ringelstetter, T. E., L. C. Bank, M. G. Oliva, J. S. Russell, F. Matta, and A. Nanni. 2006. “Cost-effective, structural stay-in-place formwork system of fiber-reinforced polymer for accelerated and durable bridge deck construction.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1976 (1): 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106197600120.
Shaikh, F. U. A., S. Luhar, HŞ Arel, and I. Luhar. 2020. “Performance evaluation of ultrahigh performance fibre reinforced concrete—A review.” Constr. Build. Mater. 232: 117152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117152.
Tian, H., Z. Zhou, Y. Zhang, and Y. Wei. 2020. “Axial behavior of reinforced concrete column with ultra-high performance concrete stay-in-place formwork.” Eng. Struct. 210: 110403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110403.
Tran, D. T., P. Phan-Vu, T. M. Pham, T. D. Dang, and L. Nguyen-Minh. 2020a. “Repeated and post-repeated flexural behavior of unbonded post-tensioned concrete T-beams strengthened with CFRP sheets.” J. Compos. Constr. 24 (2): 04019064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000996.
Tran, T. T., T. M. Pham, and H. Hao. 2020b. “Effect of hybrid fibers on shear behaviour of geopolymer concrete beams reinforced by basalt fiber reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars without stirrups.” Compos. Struct. 243: 112236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112236.
Treadwellgroup. 2020. Treadwell ArchitEX. Adelaide, SA, Australia: Treadwellgroup.
WEST SYSTEM. 2020. WEST SYSTEM 105 resin. Molendinar, QLD, Australia: WEST SYSTEM.
Wrigley, R. G., C. I. Research, I. Association, and C. Society. 2001. Permanent formwork in construction. London: CIRIA.
Yoo, D.-Y., and Y.-S. Yoon. 2015. “Structural performance of ultra-high-performance concrete beams with different steel fibers.” Eng. Struct. 102: 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.08.029.
Zuo, Y., Y. Liu, and J. He. 2018a. “Experimental investigation on hybrid GFRP-concrete decks with T-shaped perforated ribs subjected to negative moment.” Constr. Build. Mater. 158: 728–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.032.
Zuo, Y., A. Mosallam, H. Xin, Y. Liu, and J. He. 2018b. “Flexural performance of a hybrid GFRP-concrete bridge deck with composite T-shaped perforated rib connectors.” Compos. Struct. 194: 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.105.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 26Issue 3June 2022

History

Received: Aug 10, 2021
Accepted: Jan 15, 2022
Published online: Mar 11, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 11, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Emad Pournasiri
Centre for Infrastructural Monitoring and Protection, School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin Univ., Kent St., Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.
Centre for Infrastructural Monitoring and Protection, School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin Univ., Kent St., Bentley, WA 6102, Australia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4901-7113. Email: [email protected]
Hong Hao, F.ASCE
Centre for Infrastructural Monitoring and Protection, School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin Univ., Kent St., Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Flexural behavior of small-sized I-shaped UHPC beams hybrid reinforced with steel plate and BFRP, Composite Structures, 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116595, 306, (116595), (2023).
  • Effects of various additives on the crumb rubber integrated geopolymer concrete, Cleaner Materials, 10.1016/j.clema.2023.100181, 8, (100181), (2023).
  • Structural performance evaluation of UHPC/conventional concrete cast on new Y-shape FRP stay-in-place formwork for concrete bridge decks, Structures, 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.05.070, 41, (1077-1091), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share