Technical Papers
Jul 13, 2022

Influence of Wind Turbulence on Aerodynamic Admittances of a Streamlined Bridge Deck at Different Angles of Attack

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 9

Abstract

This study revisits the modeling of buffeting forces on bridge decks and establishes the relationship between one- and two-wavenumber admittances, and between the spanwise coherence functions of turbulence and buffeting forces. The two-wavenumber admittance of the lift of a thin, flat plate section caused by vertical turbulence is then used to investigate the three-dimensionality effect of turbulence on integrated buffeting lift of a finite length. To investigate the characteristics of two-wavenumber admittance of bridge deck sections, synchronous pressure distributions of a streamlined bridge deck are measured and characterized in a wind tunnel at three different turbulent flows and several angles of attack. The means and standard deviations of surface pressure coefficients and integrated drag, lift and moment coefficients, the power spectra, spanwise correlation, and coherence of turbulence and buffeting forces are analyzed, from which the two-wavenumber admittances of drag, lift, and moments are determined. The effects of integral length scale and intensity of turbulence and angle of attack on static force coefficients and admittances are characterized. Finally, the three-dimensionality effect of turbulence on integrated buffeting forces and responses of long span bridges are investigated using the measured two-wavenumber admittances. The results of this study highlight the importance of appropriate simulation of large-scale turbulence in wind tunnel for characterizing static force coefficients and admittances of bridge deck sections, and for estimation of buffeting responses of long-span bridges.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The support for this work provided in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (No. 51525804) is greatly acknowledged.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
B = 2b
bridge deck width;
Ci(i=D,L,M)
static force coefficients and their derivatives with respect to angle of attack;
cohj(η, f) (j = D, L, M, u, w)
coherence functions of buffeting forces and turbulence;
D
drag;
|Fj(k, f) |2
correction functions, which represent the normalized two-wavenumber admittances;
f
frequency;
fps, fhs, fαs
frequencies of lateral, vertical, and torsional modes;
f~=2πfb/U
nondimensional frequency;
Is
moment of inertia per unit length of the bridge;
Iu
turbulence intensity of u-component of turbulence;
Iw
turbulence intensity of w-component of turbulence;
|Jj(f)|2(j = D, L, M)
joint acceptance functions;
k
wavenumber;
k~=2πkb
nondimensional wavenumber;
L
lift, (L is also used for span length in very limited cases);
Ljx(j=u,w)
longitudinal integral length scales of turbulence;
Ljy(j=u,w)
spanwise integral length scales of turbulence;
M
moment;
ms
mass per unit length of the bridge;
Q
integrated buffeting force or generalized buffeting force;
R(f)
ratio of generalized force spectra with respect to that based on the strip theory;
Sj(f)(j = D, L, M, u, w)
power spectra of buffeting forces and turbulence;
Sj(η, f)(j = D, L, M, u, w)
cross-power spectra of buffeting forces and turbulence;
Sj(k, f) (j = D, L, M, u, w)
wavenumber–frequency (two-wavenumber) spectra of buffeting forces and turbulence;
t
time;
U
mean wind velocity;
u
longitudinal component of turbulence;
w
vertical component of turbulence;
χij(f) (i = D, L, M;j = u, w)
one-wavenumber aerodynamic admittances;
χj2D(f)(i=D,L,M)
2D aerodynamic admittances;
χij(k, f) (i = D, L, M;j = u, w)
two-wavenumber aerodynamic admittances;
δ = L/B
aspect ratio between span length and section width;
Δy
spanwise separation;
η
separation distance between two spanwise locations;
Φj(k, f)(j = D, L, M, u, w)
wavenumber–frequency coherence functions;
λ1y,λ2y
constants of the model of spanwise cross-correlation coefficient;
ρ
air density; and
ρj(ΔyB)(j=D,L,M,u,w)
spanwise cross-correlation coefficient functions of buffeting forces and turbulence.

Subscript

st
strip theory.

References

Batchelor, G. K., and I. Proudman. 1954. “The effect of rapid distortion of a fluid in turbulent motion.” Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 7: 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmam/7.1.83.
Blake, W. K. 1986. Mechanics of flow-induced sound and vibration. Waltham, MA: Academic Press.
Chen, X. 2006. “Analysis of long span bridge response to winds: Building nexus between flutter and buffeting.” J. Struct. Eng. 132 (12): 2006–2017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:12(2006).
Chen, X., and A. Kareem. 2001. “Equivalent static wind loads for buffeting response of bridges.” Struct. Eng. 127 (12): 1467–1475. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:12(1467).
Chen, X., A. Kareem, and M. Matsumoto. 2001. “Multimode coupled flutter and buffeting analysis of long span bridges.” J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 98 (7–8): 649–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(01)00064-2.
Chen, X., and A. Kareem. 2002a. “Advances in modeling of aerodynamic forces on bridge decks.” J. Eng. Mech. 128 (11): 1193–1205. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:11(1193).
Chen, X., and A. Kareem. 2002b. “Advanced analysis of coupled buffeting response of bridges: A complex modal decomposition approach.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 17 (2): 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(02)00005-X.
Chen, X., M. Matsumoto, and A. Kareem. 2000. “Aerodynamic coupling effects on flutter and buffeting of bridges.” J. Eng. Mech. 126 (1): 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:1(17).
Davenport, A. G. 1962. “The response of slender, line-like structures to a gusty wind.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 23: 389–408.
Diana, G., S. Bruni, A. Cigada, and E. Zappa. 2002. “Complex aerodynamic admittance function role in buffeting response of a bridge deck.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 90: 2057–2072. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00321-5.
Filotas, L. T. 1969. Theory of airfoil response in a gusty atmosphere. Part I – aerodynamic transfer function. Technical Rep. No. 139. Washington, DC: UTIAS.
Graham, J. M. R. 1970. “Lifting surface theory for the problem of an arbitrarily yawed sinusoidal gust incident on a thin aerofoil in incompressible flow.” Aeronaut. Q. 21: 182–198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001925900005357.
Graham, J. M. R. 1971. “A lifting-surface theory for the rectangular wing in Non-stationary flow.” Aeronaut. Q. 22: 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001925900005667.
Han, Y., Z. Q. Chen, and X. G. Hua. 2010. “New estimation methodology of six complex aerodynamic admittance functions.” Wind Struct. Int. J. 13 (3): 293–307. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2010.13.3.293.
Jackson, R., J. M. R. Graham, and D. J. Maull. 1973. “The lift on a wing in a turbulent flow.” Aeronaut. Q. 24: 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001925900006569.
Jakobsen, J. B. 1997. “Span-wise structure of lift and overturning moment on a motionless bridge girder.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 69–71: 795–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00206-7.
Kimura, K., Y. Fujino, S. Nakato, and H. Tamura. 1996. “Characteristics of the buffeting forces on flat cylinders.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Colloquium on Bluff Body Aerodyn. and Appli. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Larose, G. L., and J. Mann. 1998. “Gust loading on streamlined bridge decks.” J. Fluids Struct. 12: 511–536. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.1998.0161.
Li, M., M. Li, and Y. Su. 2019. “Experimental determination of the two-dimensional aerodynamic admittance of typical bridge decks.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 193: 103975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.103975.
Li, M., Y. Yang, M. Li, and H. Liao. 2018a. “Direct measurement of the Sears function in turbulent flow.” J. Fluid Mech. 847: 768–785. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.351.
Li, S., M. Li, and H. Liao. 2015. “The lift on an aerofoil in grid-generated turbulence.” J. Fluid Mech. 771: 16–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2015.162.
Li, S., M. Li, and G. L. Larose. 2018b. “Aerodynamic admittance of streamlined bridge decks.” J. Fluids Struct. 78: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2017.12.014.
Liepmann, H. W. 1955. “Extension of the statistical approach to buffeting and gust response of wings of finite span.” J. Aeronaut. Sci. 22: 197–200. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.3305.
Ma, C., J. Wang, Q. S. Li, and H. Liao. 2019. “3D aerodynamic admittances of streamlined box bridge decks.” Eng. Struct. 179: 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.007.
Massaro, M., and J. M. R. Graham. 2015. “The effect of three-dimensionality on the aerodynamic admittance of thin sections in free stream turbulence.” J. Fluids Struct. 57: 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2015.05.012.
Melbourne, W. H. 1982. “Comparison of model and full-scale tests of a bridge and chimney stack.” In Proc. Int. Workshop on Wind Tunnel Modelling, 637—653. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mugridge, B. D. 1971. “Gust loading on a thin aerofoil.” Aeronaut. Q. 22: 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001925900005849.
Ribner, H. S. 1956. “Spectral theory of buffeting and gust response: Unification and extension.” J. Aeronaut. Sci. 23: 1075–1077. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.3733.
Sankaran, R., and E. D. Jancanskas. 1992. “Direct measurement of the aerodynamic admittance of two-dimensional rectangular cylinders in smooth and turbulent flows.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 41: 601–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(92)90469-Q.
Sankaran, R., and E. D. Jancauskas. 1993. “Measurements of cross-correlation in separated flows around bluff cylinders.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 49: 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(93)90023-H.
Scanlan, R. H. 1993. “Problematics in formulation of wind-force models for bridge decks.” J. Eng. Mech. 119 (7): 1353–1375. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1993)119:7(1353).
Scanlan, R. H. 2000. “Bridge deck aeroelastic admittance revisited.” J. Bridge Eng. 5 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:1(1).
Scanlan, R. H., and N. P. Jones. 1999. “A form of aerodynamic admittance for use in bridge aeroelastic analysis.” J. Fluids Struct. 13: 1017–1027. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.1999.0243.
Scanlan, R. H., N. P. Jones, and L. Singh. 1997. “Inter-relations among flutter derivatives.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 69–71: 829–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00209-2.
Sears, W. R. 1941. “Some aspects of Non-stationary airfoil theory and Its practical application.” J. Aeronaut. Sci. 8 (3): 104–108. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.10655.
Walshe, D. E., and T. A. Wyatt. 1983. “Measurement and application of the aerodynamic admittance function for a box-girder bridge.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 14: 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(83)90024-7.
Wang, J., C. Ma, H. Jing, C. Pei, and E. Dragomirescu. 2020a. “Experimental study on aerodynamic admittance of twin-box bridge decks.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 198: 104080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.104080.
Wang, J., C. Ma, Q. S. Li, and H. Qin. 2020b. “Influence of gap width on buffeting force spatial correlation and aerodynamic admittance of twin-box bridge deck.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 207: 104392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104392.
Yang, Y., M. Li, and H. Liao. 2019. “Three-dimensional effects on the transfer function of a rectangular-section body in turbulent flow.” J. Fluid Mech. 872: 348–366. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.402.
Zhao, L., and Y. Ge. 2015. “Cross-spectral recognition method of bridge deck aerodynamic admittance function.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vibr. 14: 595–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-015-0048-8.
Zhong, Y., M. Li, and C. Ma. 2018. “Aerodynamic admittance of truss girder in homogenous turbulence.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 172: 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.10.019.
Zhu, L., Q. Zhou, Q. Ding, and Z. Xu. 2018. “Identification and application of six-component aerodynamic admittance functions of a closed-box bridge deck.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 172: 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.11.002.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27Issue 9September 2022

History

Received: Dec 18, 2021
Accepted: May 19, 2022
Published online: Jul 13, 2022
Published in print: Sep 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Dec 13, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

China MCC5 Group LTD; formerly, Dept. of Bridge Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong Univ., Chengdu 610031, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3094-8615. Email: [email protected]
Xinzhong Chen, M.ASCE [email protected]
National Wind Institute, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Construction Engineering, Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX 79409 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Dept. of Bridge Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong Univ., Chengdu 610031, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9879-0626. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share