Technical Papers
Apr 12, 2022

Vehicular Collision Performance Evaluation of Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Piers Designed According to Current Codes in the US, Europe, and China

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 6

Abstract

Current bridge codes in the US, Europe, and China specify vehicular collision loads for the design of piers. However, the performance of piers designed according to current codes in the three countries or regions is unknown yet. This paper presents a performance evaluation of concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) piers subjected to vehicle collision. Before the evaluation, bridge specimens with a single CFST pier were designed in accordance with current bridge and structural codes in the three countries or regions, respectively. Then, a detailed finite-element (FE) model for simulating a truck collision with a CFST pier was developed and validated. By comparison with seven simplified FE models, the detailed FE model was further confirmed to be employed for the evaluation. In the evaluation, the effects of current codes in the three countries or regions, whether or not the vehicular collision load is considered, two pier heights (i.e., 6 and 12 m), two truck weights (i.e., 20 and 40 tons), and three impact speeds (i.e., 60, 100, and 140 km/h) on the performance of CFST piers were investigated. The evaluation results indicated that when a CFST pier in seismic zones is designed to resist vehicle collision according to current codes in the US and China, it only needs to meet the requirements of seismic design without additional consideration of the vehicular collision load. Moreover, a preliminary application condition should be added for the vehicular collision load specified by the current bridge code in Europe, that is, when the truck weight is more than 20 tons and/or the pier height is lower than 12 m.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The financial support for this work from the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 51408175 is greatly appreciated.

References

AASHTO. 2020. LRFD bridge design specifications. 9th ed. AASHTO LRFDBDS-9. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Abdelkarim, O. I., and M. A. ElGawady. 2017. “Performance of bridge piers under vehicle collision.” Eng. Struct. 140: 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.054.
AISC. 2010. Specification for structural steel buildings. ANSI/AISC 360-10. Chicago: AISC.
Auyeung, S., A. Alipour, and D. Saini. 2019. “Performance-based design of bridge piers under vehicle collision.” Eng. Struct. 191: 752–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.005.
Buth, C. E., W. F. Williams, M. S. Brackin, D. Lord, S. R. Geedipally, and A. Y. Abu-Odeh. 2010. Analysis of large truck collisions with bridge piers: Phase 1. Report of guidelines for designing bridge piers and abutments for vehicle collisions. Rep. No. FHWA/TX-10/9-4973-1. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute.
Cao, R., A. K. Agrawal, S. El-Tawil, X. Xu, and W. Wong. 2019a. “Heavy truck collision with bridge piers: Computational simulation study.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (6): 04019052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001398.
Cao, R., A. K. Agrawal, S. El-Tawil, X. Xu, and W. Wong. 2019b. “Performance-based design framework for bridge piers subjected to truck collision.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (7): 04019064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001423.
Cao, R., S. El-Tawil, A. K. Agrawal, X. Xu, and W. Wong. 2019c. “Behavior and design of bridge piers subjected to heavy truck collision.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (7): 04019057. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001414.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2005a. Design of concrete structures—Part 2: Concrete bridges—Design and detailing rules. Eurocode 2. BS EN 1992-2. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2005b. Design of composite steel and concrete structures—Part 2: General rules and rules for bridges. Eurocode 4. BS EN 1994-2. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Chen, L., S. El-Tawil, and Y. Xiao. 2017. “Response spectrum-based method for calculating the reaction force of piers subjected to truck collisions.” Eng. Struct. 150: 852–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.092.
Chen, L., J. Qian, B. Tu, D. M. Frangopol, and Y. Dong. 2021. “Performance-based risk assessment of reinforced concrete bridge piers subjected to vehicle collision.” Eng. Struct. 229: 111640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111640.
Chen, L., H. Wu, and T. Liu. 2020. “Shear performance evaluation of reinforced concrete piers subjected to vehicle collision.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (4): 04020026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002571.
Do, T. V., T. M. Pham, and H. Hao. 2018. “Dynamic responses and failure modes of bridge columns under vehicle collision.” Eng. Struct. 156: 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.053.
Do, T. V., T. M. Pham, and H. Hao. 2019. “Impact force profile and failure classification of reinforced concrete bridge columns against vehicle impact.” Eng. Struct. 183: 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.040.
El-Tawil, S., E. Severino, and P. Fonseca. 2005. “Vehicle collision with bridge piers.” J. Bridge Eng. 10 (3): 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:3(345).
Fan, W., X. Xu, Z. Zhang, and X. Shao. 2018. “Performance and sensitivity analysis of UHPFRC-strengthened bridge columns subjected to vehicle collisions.” Eng. Struct. 173: 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.113.
fib (fédération internationale du bétons). 2013. Model code for concrete structures 2010. fib Model Code 2010. Lausanne, Switzerland: fib.
Han, L.-H., C.-C. Hou, X.-L. Zhao, and K. J. R. Rasmussen. 2014. “Behaviour of high-strength concrete filled steel tubes under transverse impact loading.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 92: 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.09.003.
Heng, K., R. W. Li, Z. R. Li, and H. Wu. 2021. “Dynamic responses of highway bridge subjected to heavy truck impact.” Eng. Struct. 232: 111828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111828.
Hosseini, P., S. H. Ghasemi, M. Jalayer, and A. S. Nowak. 2019. “Performance-based reliability analysis of bridge pier subjected to vehicular collision: Extremity and failure.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 106: 104176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104176.
Li, R. W., H. Wu, Q. T. Yang, and D. F. Wang. 2020. “Vehicular impact resistance of seismic designed RC bridge piers.” Eng. Struct. 220: 111015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111015.
LSTC (Livermore Software Technology Corporation). 2020. LS-DYNA R12 keyword user’s manual. Livermore, CA: LSTC.
MOC (Ministry of Construction of the People’s Republic of China). 2006. Construction of concrete filled steel tubular structures. [In Chinese.] GJBT-919. Beijing: MOC.
MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China). 2014. Technical code for concrete filled steel tubular structures. [In Chinese.] GB 50936-2014. Beijing: MOHURD.
MOT (Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China). 2015. General specifications for design of highway bridges and culverts. [In Chinese.] JTG D60-2015. Beijing: MOT.
MOT (Ministry of Transport of the People's Republic of China). 2020. Specifications for seismic design of highway bridges. [In Chinese.] JTG/T 2231-01-2020. Beijing: MOT.
NCAC (FHWA/NHTSA National Crash Analysis Center). 2011. “Finite element model archive.” Accessed December 1, 2012. http://www.ncac.gwu.edu/vml/models.html.
Saini, D., and B. Shafei. 2019. “Performance of concrete-filled steel tube bridge columns subjected to vehicle collision.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (8): 04019074. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001439.
Sharma, H., P. Gardoni, and S. Hurlebaus. 2015. “Performance-based probabilistic capacity models and fragility estimates for RC columns subject to vehicle collision.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 30: 555–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12135.
Sharma, H., S. Hurlebaus, and P. Gardoni. 2012. “Performance-based response evaluation of reinforced concrete columns subject to vehicle impact.” Int. J. Impact Eng. 43: 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.11.007.
Stephens, M. T., D. E. Lehman, and C. W. Roeder. 2016. “Design of CFST column-to-foundation/cap beam connections for moderate and high seismic regions.” Eng. Struct. 122: 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.023.
Wang, R., L.-H. Han, and C.-C. Hou. 2013. “Behavior of concrete filled steel tubular (CFST) members under lateral impact: Experiment and FEA model.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 80: 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.09.003.
Wu, M., L. Jin, and X. Du. 2020. “Dynamic responses and reliability analysis of bridge double-column under vehicle collision.” Eng. Struct. 221: 111035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111035.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27Issue 6June 2022

History

Received: Oct 12, 2021
Accepted: Mar 5, 2022
Published online: Apr 12, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Sep 12, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, College of Civil Engineering, Hefei Univ. of Technology, Hefei, Anhui 230009, China; Anhui Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Structures and Materials, Hefei Univ. of Technology, Hefei, Anhui 230009, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6320-2425. Email: [email protected]
Yu-Yang Liu
College of Civil Engineering, Hefei Univ. of Technology, Hefei, Anhui 230009, China.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Residual Deformation-Based Performance Evaluation Method for CFST Piers Subjected to Vehicle Collision, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 10.1061/JPCFEV.CFENG-4211, 37, 2, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share