Abstract

Piles driven in Intermediate GeoMaterials (IGM) have possessed many design and construction challenges due to high uncertainty in the engineering properties of IGM, absence of geomaterial classification and static analysis (SA) methods, inadequate Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) recommendations, and lacking knowledge on the change in pile resistances with time. This paper presents our recent development and recommendations for piles driven in fine-grained soil-based IGM (FG-IGM) based on 51 test piles from 25 bridge projects completed in four US states. FG-IGM is categorized into clay-IGM and silt-IGM based on grain size and plasticity. A classification boundary between fine-grained soil and FG-IGM is established at undrained shear strength (su) of 0.129 MPa (2.7 ksf). SA methods for unit shaft resistance (qs) are recommended based on su while SA methods for unit end bearing (qb) are established using the combination of su, pile size (D), and total pile penetration (DB). The proposed SA methods are compared against the existing α-methods developed for soil and validated using 33 independent test pile data. Our statistical assessment concludes that the proposed SA methods provide a more accurate estimation of qs and qb than the α-method. Higher LRFD resistance factors and efficiency factors are determined for the proposed SA methods than for those developed for fine-grained soils. For 1 day after the end of driving (EOD), an average 77% and 44% increase in qs can be considered for steel H-piles in clay-IGM and silt-IGM, respectively, while a higher average 132% increase in qs can be considered for 360-mm close-ended pipe piles in clay-IGM. However, pile setup should be neglected in the qb prediction as H-piles experienced both pile setup and relaxation with the percent change in qb varying from −23% to 345% in clay-IGM and −33%–22% in silt-IGM, and 360-mm close-ended pipe piles experienced −51%–202% change in qb.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the research supports from the Wyoming Department of Transportation as the lead agency, Colorado Department of Transportation, Iowa Department of Transportation, Kansas Department of Transportation, North Dakota Department of Transportation, Idaho Transportation Department, and Montana Department of Transportation under the Grant No. RS05219 as well as additional supports from Mountain-Plains Consortium.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
A
pile setup factor.
D
pile dimension or diameter;
DB
total pile penetration length;
Ei
nonlinear model errors for observation i;
f
nonlinear function;
i
observation index;
(N1)60 or N60
corrected SPT N-value;
n
number of observations;
qb
unit shaft resistance;
qs
unit shaft resistance;
qu
unconfined compressive strength;
Pa
atmospheric pressure;
p
number of predictors;
qsto
initial unit shaft resistance;
qst
unit shaft resistance at an elapsed time t after the EOD;
su
undrained shear strength;
t
duration after end of driving;
to
initial time;
x¯
mean resistance bias;
Yi
response value for observation;
yi
observed response for observation i;
y^i
predicted response for observation i;
φ
resistance factor;
β
vector of regression coefficient values;
β^
vector of estimated regression coefficient values;
βT
target reliability index;
σ^2
estimated variance;
λR, λD, and λL
mean biases for resistance, dead load, and live load; and
γD and γL
load factors for dead and live.

References

AASHTO. 2020. LRFD bridge design specifications 9th edition U.S. customary units. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Adhikari, P. 2019. “Load and resistance factor design and construction control of driven piles in intermediate geomaterials.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Wyoming.
Adhikari, P., Y. Z. Gebreslasie, K. W. Ng, T. A. Sullivan, and S. S. Wulff. 2018. “Static and dynamic analysis of driven piles in soft rocks considering LRFD using a recently developed electronic database.” In Proc., Int. Foundations Congress & Equipment Exposition, Installation, Testing, and Analysis of Deep Foundations, Geotechnical Special Publication 294, edited by M. T. Suleiman, A. Lemnitzer, and A. W. Stuedlein, 83–92. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Adhikari, P., K. W. Ng, Y. Z. Gebreslasie, and S. S. Wulff. 2020a. “Static and economic analyses of driven steel H-piles in IGM using the WyoPile database.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (5): 04020016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001546.
Adhikari, P., K. W. Ng, Y. Z. Gebreslasie, and S. S. Wulff. 2020b. “Improved α-and β-methods for the estimation of shaft resistance of steel-H piles driven into intermediate geomaterials.” In Geo-Congress 2020: Foundations, Soil Improvement, and Erosion, Geotechnical Special Publication 315, edited by J. P. Hambleton, R. Makhnenko, and A. S. Budge, 114–123, Reston, VA: ASCE.
Adhikari, P., K. W. Ng, Y. Z. Gebreslasie, S. S. Wulff, and T. A. Sullivan. 2020c. “Geomaterial classification criteria for design and construction of driven steel H-piles.” Can. Geotech. J. 57 (4): 616–621. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0786.
Akai, K. 1997. Testing methods for indurated soils and soft rocks. Interim Report. Geotechnical Engineering of Hard Soils-Soft Rocks, 1707–1739.
Akaike, H. 1974. “A new look at the statistical model identification.” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19 (6): 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705.
Allen, T. M., A. S. Nowak, and R. J. Bathurst. 2005. Calibration to determine load and resistance factors for geotechnical and structural design. Circular E-C079. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Anderson, T. W., and D. A. Darling. 1952. “Asymptotic theory of certain ‘goodness of fit’ criteria based on stochastic processes.” Ann. Math. Stat. 23: 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729437.
Barker, R. M., J. M. Duncan, K. B. Rojiani, P. S. K. Ooi, C. K. Tan, and S. G. Kim. 1991. Manuals for the design of bridge foundations. NCHRP Report 343. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academics.
Clarke, B. G., and A. Smith. 1992. “Self-boring pressuremeter tests in weak rocks.” Constr. Build. Mater. 6 (2): 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-0618(92)90057-6.
De Freitas, H. 1993. “Introduction to session 1.2: Weak arenaceous rock.” In Proc., 26th Annual Conf. of the Engineering Group Geological Society in Leeds, 115–123. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Balkema.
Fellenius, B. H. 1988. “Variation of CAPWAP results as a function of the operator.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf., on the Application of Stress-Wave Theory to Piles, edited by B. H. Fellenius, 814–825. Vancouver, Canada: BiTech.
Gu, Y., H.-L. Wei, and M. M. Balikhin. 2018. “Nonlinear predictive model selection and model averaging using information criteria.” Syst. Sci. Control Eng. 6 (1): 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642583.2018.1496042.
Haque, M. N., M. Y. Abu-Farsakh, C. Tsai, and Z. Zhang. 2017. “Load-testing program to evaluate pile-setup behavior for individual soil layers and correlation of setup with soil properties.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (4): 04016109. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001617.
James, G., D. Witten, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. 2013. An introduction to statistical learning. Vol. 112. New York: Springer.
Kulhawy, F. H., and P. W. Mayne. 1990. Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design. Rep. No. EPRI-EL-6800. Ithaca, NY: Electric Power Research Institute, Cornell Univ.
Likins, G., and F. Rausche. 2004. “Correlation of CAPWAP with static load tests.” In Proc., 7th Int. Conf., on the Application of Stresswave Theory to Piles, 153–165. Orlando, FL: Univ. of Florida.
Long, J., and A. Anderson. 2012. Improved design for driven piles on a pile load test program in Illinois. Research Rep. FHWA-ICT-12-011. Urbana, IL: Center for Transportation.
Long, H. J. 2016. Static pile load tests on driven piles in intermediate geomaterials. Project No. 0092-12-08. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Highway Research Program.
Long, J. H., J. A. Kerrigan, and M. H. Wysockey. 1999. Measured time effects for axial capacity of driving piling. Transportation Research Record 1663, Paper No. 99-1183. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Marinos, P. G. 1997. “Hard soils-soft rocks: Geological features with special emphasis to soft rocks.” In Proc., of an Int. Symp. of IAEG: Geotechnical Engineering of Hard Soils-Soft Rocks, edited by A. Anagnostopoulos et al., 1807–1818. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Balkema.
Martin, D., and P. Stacey. 2018. Guidelines for open pit slope design in weak rocks. Australia: CSIRO.
McVay, M. C., B. Birgisson, L. Zhang, A. Perez, and S. Putcha. 2000. “Load and resistance factor design (LRFD) for driven piles using dynamic methods—A Florida perspective.” Geotech. Test. J. 23 (1): 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11123J.
Mendes, M., and A. Pala. 2003. “Type I error rate and power of three normality tests.” Inf. Technol. J. 2 (2): 135–139. https://doi.org/10.3923/itj.2003.135.139.
Mokwa, R. L., and H. Brooks. 2008. Axial capacity of piles supported on intermediate geomaterials. Final Rep. No. FHWA/MT-08-008/8117-32. Bozeman, MT: Western Transportation Institute, Montana State Univ.
Ng, K. W., M. Roling, S. S. AbdelSalam, M. T. Suleiman, and S. Sritharan. 2013a. “Pile setup in cohesive soil. I: Experimental investigation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (2): 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000751.
Ng, K. W., and S. Sritharan. 2016. “A procedure for incorporating setup into load and resistance factor design of driven piles.” Acta Geotech. 11 (2): 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-014-0354-8.
Ng, K., and T. Sullivan. 2017a. “Case studies to demonstrate challenges of driven piles on rock.” Geotech. Res. 4 (2): 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgere.16.00015.
Ng, K., and T. Sullivan. 2017b. “Challenges and recommendations for steel H-piles driven in soft rock.” Geotech. Eng. 48 (3): 1–10.
Ng, K. W., M. T. Suleiman, and S. Sritharan. 2013b. “Pile setup in cohesive soil. II: Analytical quantifications and design recommendations.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (2): 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000753.
Ng, K. W., S. Y. Yasrobi, and T. A. Sullivan. 2015. “Current limitations and challenges with estimating resistance of driven piles on rock as demonstrated using three case studies in Wyoming.” In Proc., of Int. Foundations Congress & Equipment Exposition, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 256, edited by M. Iskander, M. T. Suleiman, J. B. Anderson, and D. F. Laefer, 500–517. Reston, VA: ASCE.
O’Neill, M. W., and L. C. Reese. 1999. Drilled shafts: Construction procedures and design methods. Publication No. FHWA-IF-99-025. McLean, VA: Federal Highway Administration, Office of Implementation.
Paikowsky, S. G., et al. 2004. Load and resistance factor design (LRFD) for deep foundations. NCHRP Rep. No. 507. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academics.
Rackwitz, R., and B. Flessler. 1978. “Structural reliability under combined random load sequences.” Comput. Struct. 9: 489–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(78)90046-9.
R Core Team. 2016. “R: A language and environment for statistical computing.” R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Accessed March 29, 2022. http://www.R-project.org/.
Sakr, M. 2013. “Comparison between high strain dynamic and static load tests of helical piles in cohesive soils.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 54: 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.07.010.
Santi, P. M., and B. C. Doyle. 1997. “The locations and engineering characteristics of weak rock in the US.” In Characterization of weak and weathered rock masses, association of engineering geologists special publication 9, edited by P. M. Santi, and A. Shakoor, 1–22. Denver, CO: Association of Engineering Geologists.
Schwarz, G. 1978. “Estimating the dimension of a model.” Ann. Stat. 6: 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136.
Shapiro, S. S., and M. B. Wilk. 1965. “An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples).” Biometrika 52 (3/4): 591–611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2333709.
Skov, R., and H. Denver. 1988. “Time-dependence of bearing capacity of piles.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf., on the Application of Stress-Wave Theory to Piles, edited by B. H. Fellenius, 879–888. Vancouver, BC, Canada: BiTech.
Stark, T. D., J. H. Long, A. K. Baghdady, and A. Osouli. 2017. Modified standard penetration test-based drilled shaft design method for weak rocks. Rep. No. FHWA-ICT-17-018. Urbana, IL: Illinois Center for Transportation.
Tomlinson, M. J. 1980. Foundation design and construction. 4th ed. London: Pitman Publishing.
Verbeek, G., D. Tara, and P. Middendorp. 2015. “The subjective element in dynamic load testing results.” In Proc., of the Int. Foundations Congress and Equipment Expo 2015, edited by M. Iskander, M. T. Suleiman, J. B. Anderson, and D. F. Laefer, 2577–2583. Reston, VA: ASCE.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27Issue 6June 2022

History

Received: Jun 14, 2021
Accepted: Mar 2, 2022
Published online: Apr 11, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Sep 11, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Wyoming, 1000 E. Univ. Ave., EN3050, Laramie, WY 82071-2000. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0740-6655. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Wyoming, 1000 E. Univ. Ave., EN3050, Laramie, WY 82071-2000 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5099-5454. Email: [email protected]
Shaun S. Wulff, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics, Univ. of Wyoming, 1000 E. Univ., Laramie, WY 82071-3036. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5695-4925. Email: [email protected]
Tyler Johnson [email protected]
Master’s Student, Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics, Univ. of Wyoming, 1000 E. Univ. Ave., Laramie, WY 82071-2000. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6774-7078. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share