Technical Papers
Mar 15, 2022

Wind-Induced Instability Mechanism of Old Tacoma Narrows Bridge from Aerodynamic Work Perspective

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 5

Abstract

Postflutter limit cycle oscillations (LCOs) are typical nonlinear aeroelastic phenomena for bridge girders. An H-shaped section with a roughly 5:1 aspect ratio, treated as a simplified section of the Old Tacoma Narrows Bridge, was chosen for wind-induced instability re-evaluation, considering its vibration amplitude-dependent aerodynamics characteristics and nonlinear structural damping effects from the energy perspective of aerodynamic work. Forced vibrations at large torsional amplitudes in a wind tunnel were realized with the help of an improved forced motion apparatus (FMA), and synchronous measurements of forces and displacements on the FMA were achieved. Self-excited forces (SEFs) were extracted, and an energy map showing quantitative relationships between vibration amplitude, reduced velocity, and aerodynamic work acting on the section were established. Furthermore, the postflutter LCOs phenomena originating from the energy balance between nonlinear aerodynamic work input and energy consumption by structural damping effects were reillustrated, and nonlinear structural damping effects of prototype bridges are therefore discussed. Moreover, the instability paths of the bridge were investigated by the energy map, considering its vibration amplitude-dependent aerodynamics and structural damping effects from an aerodynamic work perspective. The results show that LCO velocity basically increases with vibration amplitude at different structural damping ratios in torsional degree of freedom, characterizing postflutter LCOs phenomena. The structural damping ratio at the bridge’s collapse is also re-estimated as about 0.0115 with better coincidence of on-the-spot observation and theoretical analysis. In addition, both the aerodynamic damping ratio considering nonlinear characteristics of the SEFs and the structural damping ratio basically increasing with vibration amplitude contribute to postflutter LCOs phenomena of the Tacoma Bridge. The instability paths of the bridge essentially rely on the competitive relationships between structural damping ratios, structural stiffness degeneration, and oncoming wind velocities in the process of collapse.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52108471 and 52078383) and Independent Subject of State Key Lab of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering (SLDRCE19-B-11).

References

Ammann, O. H., T. Von Karman, and G. B. Woodruff. 1941. The failure of the Tacoma narrows bridge. Washington, DC: Federal Works Agency.
Billah, K. Y., and R. H. Scanlan. 1991. “Resonance, tacoma narrows bridge failure, and undergraduate physics textbooks.” Am. J. Phys. 59 (2): 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16590.
Cigada, A., M. Falco, and A. Zasso. 2001. “Development of new systems to measure the aerodynamic forces on section models in wind tunnel testing.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 89 (7–8): 725–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(01)00075-7.
Diana, G., F. Resta, and D. Rocchi. 2008. “A new numerical approach to reproduce bridge aerodynamic non-linearities in time domain.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 96 (10–11): 1871–1884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.052.
Diana, G., F. Resta, A. Zasso, M. Belloli, and D. Rocchi. 2004. “Forced motion and free motion aeroelastic tests on a new concept dynamometric section model of the Messina suspension bridge.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 92 (6): 441–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2004.01.005.
Diana, G., D. Rocchi, T. Argentini, and S. Muggiasca. 2010. “Aerodynamic instability of a bridge deck section model: Linear and nonlinear approach to force modeling.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 98 (6–7): 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2010.01.003.
Falco, M., A. Curami, and A. Zasso. 1992. “Nonlinear effects in sectional model aeroelastic parameters identification.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 42 (1–3): 1321–1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(92)90140-6.
Farquharson, F. B. 1952. Aerodynamic stability of suspension bridges. Seattle: Univ. of Washington Experiment Station.
Gao, G., L. Zhu, J. Li, W. Han, and B. Yao. 2020a. “A novel two-degree-of-freedom model of nonlinear self-excited force for coupled flutter instability of bridge decks.” J. Sound Vibr. 480: 115406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115406.
Gao, G., L. Zhu, F. Wang, H. Bai, and J. Hao. 2020b. “Experimental investigation on the nonlinear coupled flutter motion of a typical flat closed-box bridge deck.” Sensors 20 (2): 568. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20020568.
Gao, G. Z., and L. D. Zhu. 2015. “Nonlinearity of mechanical damping and stiffness of a spring-suspended sectional model system for wind tunnel tests.” J. Sound Vibr. 355: 369–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2015.05.033.
Gao, G. Z., L. D. Zhu, W. S. Han, and J. W. Li. 2018. “Nonlinear post-flutter behavior and self-excited force model of a twin-side-girder bridge deck.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 177: 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.12.007.
Ge, Y. J., J. L. Xia, L. Zhao, and S. Y. Zhao. 2018. “Full aeroelastic model testing for examining wind-induced vibration of a 5,000 m spanned suspension bridge.” Front. Built Environ. 4: 20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2018.00020.
Hu, C. X., L. Zhao, and Y. J. Ge. 2018. “Time-frequency evolutionary characteristics of aerodynamic forces around a streamlined closed-box girder during vortex-induced vibration.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 182: 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.09.025.
Hu, C. X., L. Zhao, and Y. J. Ge. 2019. “Mechanism of suppression of vortex-induced vibrations of a streamlined closed-box girder using additional small-scale components.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 189: 314–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.04.015.
Hu, C. X., L. Zhao, and Y. J. Ge. 2021. “A simplified vortex model for the mechanism of vortex-induced vibrations in a streamlined closed-box girder.” Wind. Struct. 32: 309–319.
Larsen, A. 2000. “Aerodynamics of the Tacoma narrows bridge - 60 years later.” Struct. Eng. Int. 10 (4): 243–248. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686600780481356.
Larsen, A., and J. H. Walther. 1997. “Aeroelastic analysis of bridge girder sections based on discrete vortex simulations.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 67–68: 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00077-9.
Li, M., S. Li, H. Liao, J. Zeng, and Q. Wang. 2016. “Spanwise correlation of aerodynamic forces on oscillating rectangular cylinder.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 154: 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2016.04.003.
Li, Q. C. 1996. “Measuring flutter derivatives for bridge sectional models in water channel - closure.” J. Eng. Mech. 122 (4): 390–390. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1996)122:4(390).
Li, W., S. Laima, X. Jin, W. Yuan, and H. Li. 2020. “A novel long short-term memory neural-network-based self-excited force model of limit cycle oscillations of nonlinear flutter for various aerodynamic configurations.” Nonlinear Dyn. 100 (3): 2071–2087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-020-05631-5.
Matsumoto, M. 1999. “Vortex shedding of bluff bodies: A review.” J. Fluids Struct. 13 (7–8): 791–811. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.1999.0249.
Matsumoto, M., Y. Daito, F. Yoshizumi, Y. Ichikawa, and T. Yabutani. 1997. “Torsional flutter of bluff bodies.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 71: 871–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00213-4.
Matsumoto, M., N. Shiraishi, H. Shirato, K. Shigetaka, and Y. Niihara. 1993. “Aerodynamic derivatives of coupled/hybrid flutter of fundamental structural sections.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 49 (1–3): 575–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(93)90051-O.
Matsumoto, M., H. Shirato, and S. Hirai. 1992. “Torsional flutter mechanism of 2-d h-shaped cylinders and effect of flow turbulence.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 41 (1–3): 687–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(92)90480-X.
Matsumoto, M., H. Shirato, T. Yagi, R. Shijo, A. Eguchi, and H. Tamaki. 2003. “Effects of aerodynamic interferences between heaving and torsional vibration of bridge decks: The case of Tacoma narrows bridge.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 91 (12–15): 1547–1557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2003.09.010.
Nakamura, Y., and M. Nakashima. 1986. “Vortex excitation of prisms with elongated rectangular, h and perpendicular-to cross-sections.” J. Fluid Mech. 163: 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112086002252.
Náprstek, J., and S. Pospíšil. 2011. “Post-critical behavior of a simple non-linear system in a cross-wind.” Eng. Mech. 18 (3/4): 193–201.
Otsuki, Y., K. Washizu, H. Tomizawa, and A. Ohya. 1974. “A note on the aeroelastic instability of a prismatic bar with square section.” J. Sound Vibr. 34 (2): 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(74)80307-X.
Scanlan, R. H., and J. J. Tomko. 1971. “Airfoil and bridge deck flutter derivatives.” J. Eng. Mech. Div. 97 (6): 1717–1733. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0001526.
Schewe, G. 1989. “Nonlinear flow-induced resonances of an h-shaped section.” J. Fluids Struct. 3 (4): 327–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-9746(89)80015-5.
Siedziako, B., O. Oiseth, and A. Ronnquist. 2017. “An enhanced forced vibration rig for wind tunnel testing of bridge deck section models in arbitrary motion.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 164: 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.02.011.
Tang, Y., X. G. Hua, Z. Q. Chen, and Y. Zhou. 2019. “Experimental investigation of flutter characteristics of shallow π section at post-critical regime.” J. Fluids Struct. 88: 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.05.010.
Ukeguchi, N., H. Sakata, and H. Nishitani. 1966. “An investigation of aeroelastic instability of suspension bridges.” In Suspension Bridges Symp. Lisbon.
Wu, B., Q. Wang, H. Liao, and H. Mei. 2020. “Effects of vertical motion on nonlinear flutter of a bridge girder.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (11): 04020093. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001637.
Zhang, M., F. Xu, and Y. Han. 2020a. “Assessment of wind-induced nonlinear post-critical performance of bridge decks.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 203: 104251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104251.
Zhang, M., F. Xu, T. Wu, and Z. Zhang. 2020b. “Postflutter analysis of bridge decks using aerodynamic-describing functions.” J. Bridge Eng. 25 (8): 04020046. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001587.
Zhang, M., F. Xu, Z. Zhang, and X. Ying. 2019. “Energy budget analysis and engineering modeling of post-flutter limit cycle oscillation of a bridge deck.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 188: 410–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.03.010.
Zhao, L., X. Xie, Y.-Y. Zhan, W. Cui, Y.-J. Ge, Z.-C. Xia, S.-Q. Xu, and M. Zeng. 2020. “A novel forced motion apparatus with potential applications in structural engineering.” J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. A 21 (7): 593–608. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1900400.
Zhou, R., Y. Ge, Y. Yang, Y. Du, S. Liu, and L. Zhang. 2019. “Nonlinear behaviors of the flutter occurrences for a twin-box girder bridge with passive countermeasures.” J. Sound Vibr. 447: 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2019.02.002.
Zhu, L. D. 2005. “Mass simulation and amplitude conversion of bridge sectional model test for vortex-excited resonance.” [In Chinese.] Eng. Mech. 22 (5): 204–208.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27Issue 5May 2022

History

Received: Jul 22, 2021
Accepted: Jan 7, 2022
Published online: Mar 15, 2022
Published in print: May 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 15, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Chuanxin Hu [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Wuhan Univ. of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430065, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, State Key Lab of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, China; Key Laboratory of Transport Industry of Wind Resistant Technology for Bridge Structures, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Professor, State Key Lab of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, China; Key Laboratory of Transport Industry of Wind Resistant Technology for Bridge Structures, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Instantaneous Power Balance Algorithm for Flutter Critical Wind Speed Prediction of Bridge Girders, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 10.1061/JENMDT.EMENG-7287, 150, 2, (2024).
  • Parametric study of an H-section oscillatory wind energy converter, Ocean Engineering, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113652, 270, (113652), (2023).
  • Vertical and torsional vibrations before the collapse of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge in 1940, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 10.1017/jfm.2022.748, 949, (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share