Technical Papers
Mar 14, 2022

Robustness Assessment Framework for Through Tied-Arch Bridge Considering Tie-Bar Failure

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 5

Abstract

Compared with those of other bridge types, the structural system of through tied-arch bridges is particularly susceptible to failure owing to the deterioration and fracturing of tie-bars as well as a lack of structural robustness, which are the main internal and external causes of progressive collapse accidents, respectively. In particular, low structural robustness strongly influences the severity of accidents induced by tie-bar breakage. To objectively reflect the possible failure mode induced by tie-bar failure and to provide improved structural robustness in through tied-arch bridges, within which the suspended deck system is relatively independent, a robustness assessment framework considering tie-bar failure is proposed in this study, by considering the design and maintenance essentials. First, the main analysis parameters for the extreme-event limit state considering tie-bar failure are put forward, including the critical tie-bar failure rate, partial factor for load effects, transverse reduction factor of multilane loading, dynamic magnification factor of material strength, and reduction factors of residual strength. Second, the quantitative assessment index of structural robustness IT,rob is proposed based on the safety redundancy of the remaining structural members, and robustness assessment rules are put forward in accordance with the different calculation results of IT,rob and horizontal displacement. A typical rigid-framed through tied-arch bridges is assessed using the proposed framework. The assessment results reveal that multiple fortifications against extreme events of tie-bar failure can be established by designing the tie-bars and the piers with sufficient safety features to form the first and final line of defense against the tie-bar breakage effect. Moreover, proper maintenance should be conducted to guarantee the structural robustness of bridges in use. The methodology is well suited for the design of new through tied-arch bridges and to access the robustness of existing bridges to ensure the safety of transportation services.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (Grant No. 2020J01480); Scientific Start-Up Project of Fuzhou University (Grant No. GXRC-19049).

References

AASHTO. 2017. AASHTO load and resistance factor design (LRFD) bridge design specifications. 8th ed. LRFD-8. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Agarwal, J., I. Blockley, and J. Woodman. 2003. “Vulnerability of structural systems.” Struct. Saf. 25 (3): 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(02)00068-1.
Anitori, G., R. Casas, and M. Ghosn. 2013. “Redundancy and robustness in the design and evaluation of bridges: European and North American perspectives.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (12): 1241–1251. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000545.
AQSIQ (General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine). 2014b. Steel stand for prestressed concrete. GB/T 5224-2014. [In Chinese.] Beijing: AQSIQ.
Baker, W., M. Schubert, and H. Faber. 2008. “On the assessment of robustness.” Struct. Saf. 30 (3): 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.11.004.
CECS (China Association for Engineering Construction Standardization). 2014. Code for anti-collapse design of building structures. CECS 392: 2014. [In Chinese.] Beijing: CECS.
Chen, B., J. Wei, J. Zhou, and J. Liu. 2017. “Application of concrete-filled steel tube arch bridges in China: Current status and prospects.” [In Chinese.] China Civ. Eng. J. 50 (6): 50–61. https://doi.org/10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2017.06.006.
DoD (Department of Defense). 2016. Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse. UFC 4-023-03. Washington, DC: DoD.
Fan, B. 2019. “Calculation method of cable breaking effect and technical condition evaluation for cable tied through arch bridges considering robustness.” [In Chinese.] Ph.D. thesis, College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou Univ.
Fan, B.-H., J.-Z. Su, and B.-C. Chen. 2021. “Condition evaluation for through and half-through arch bridges considering robustness of suspended deck systems.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 24 (6): 962–976. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433220945835.
Fan, B.-H., S.-G. Wang, and B. C. Chen. 2020. “Dynamic effect of tie-bar failure on through tied arch bridge.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 34 (5): 04020089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001492.
Fan, Y., J. Zhu, J. Pei, Z. Li, and Y. Wu. 2015. “Analysis for Yangmingtan Bridge collapse.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 56 (5): 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.05.003.
Ghosn, M., F. Moses, and M. Frangopol. 2010. “Redundancy and robustness of highway bridge superstructures and substructures.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 6 (1–2): 257–278. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15732470802664498.
GSA (General Services Administration). 2016. Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects (revision 1ed). GSA 2013. Washington, DC: GSA.
Hashemi, S. K., M. A. Bradford, and H. R. Valipour. 2016. “Dynamic response of cable-stayed bridge under blast load.” Eng. Struct. 127 (2): 719–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.08.038.
ISO. 1994. Accidental actions due to human activities. DP10252. Geneva: ISO.
Khuyen, H. T., and E. Iwasaki. 2016. “An approximate method of dynamic amplification factor for alternate load path in redundancy and progressive collapse linear static analysis for steel truss bridges.” Case Stud. Struct. Eng. 6 (1): 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csse.2016.06.001.
Kim, J., and E. B. Williamson. 2015. “Finite-element modeling of twin steel box-girder bridges for redundancy evaluation.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (10): 04014106. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000706.
Lonetti, P., and A. Pascuzzo. 2014. “Vulnerability and failure analysis of hybrid cable-stayed suspension bridges subjected to damage mechanisms.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 45 (5): 470–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.07.002.
Miao, F., and M. Ghosn. 2016. “Reliability-based progressive collapse analysis of highway bridges.” Struct. Saf. 63 (11): 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.05.004.
Moaveni, S. 1999. Finite element analysis: Theory and application with ANSYS. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development). 2010a. Code for design of concrete structures. GB50010-2010. [In Chinese.] Beijing: MOHURD.
MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development). 2010b. Technical specification for concrete structures of tall building. JGJ3-2010. [In Chinese.] Beijing: MOHURD.
MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development). 2013. Technical code for concrete-filled steel tube arch bridges. GB 50923-2013. [In Chinese.] Beijing: MOHURD.
MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development). 2019. Technical specification for concrete structures of tall buildings. JGJ 3-2019. [In Chinese.] Beijing: MOHURD.
MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development). 2020. Unified standard for reliability design of highway engineering structures. JTG 2120-2020. [In Chinese.] Beijing: MOHURD.
MOT (Ministry of Transport). 2008. Guidelines for seismic design of highway bridges. JTG/T B02-01-2008. [In Chinese.] Beijing: MOT.
MOT (Ministry of Transport). 2011. Specification for inspection and evaluation of load-bearing capacity of highway bridges. JTG/T J21-2011. [In Chinese.] Beijing: MOT.
MOT (Ministry of Transport). 2011. Standard for technical condition evaluation of highway bridges. JTG/T H21-2011. [In Chinese.] Beijing: MOT.
MOT (Ministry of Transport). 2015. General specificaiton for design of highway bridges and culverts. JTG D60-2015. [In Chinese.] Beijing: MOT.
MOT (Ministry of Transport). 2018. Specifications for design of highway reinforced concrete and prestressed concrete bridges and culverts. JTG3362-2018. [In Chinese.] Beijing: MOT.
NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program). 2005. NCHRP synthesis 354: Inspection and management of bridges with fracture-critical details. Washington, DC: NCHRP. https://doi.org/10.17226/13887.
NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program). 2018. Fracture-critical system analysis for steel bridge. NCHRP Research rep. 883. Washington, DC: NCHRP.
Shoghijavan, M., and U. Starossek. 2018. “Structural robustness of long-span cable-supported bridges in a cable-loss scenario.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (2): 04017133. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001186.
Smith, W. 2006. “Structural robustness analysis and the fast fracture analogy.” Struct. Eng. Int. 16 (2): 118–123. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686606777962521.
Starossek, U., and M. Haberland. 2008. “Approaches to measures of structural robustness.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Bridge Maintenance, Safety, and Management. Seoul: IABMAS.
Tavakoli, H., and M. M. Afrapoli. 2018. “Robustness analysis of steel structures with various lateral load resisting systems under the seismic progressive collapse.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 83 (5): 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.10.003.
Tu, B., Y. Dong, and Z. Fang. 2019. “Time-dependent reliability and redundancy of corroded prestressed concrete bridges at material, component, and system levels.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (9): 04019085. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001461.
Vernay, D., F. Favre, and I. Smith. 2018. “Robust model updating methodology for estimating worst-case load capacity of existing bridges.” J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 8 (5): 773–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-018-0305-4.
Wu, G., W. Qiu, and T. Wu. 2019. “Nonlinear dynamic analysis of the self-anchored suspension bridge subjected to sudden breakage of a hanger.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 97 (2): 701–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.01.028.
Wu, W., H. Wang, Y. Zhu, J. Yu, H. Zhao, and H. Zhang. 2018. “New hanger design approach of tied-arch bridge to enhance its robustness.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 22 (11): 4547–4554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-1835-3.
Yu, Y. 2015. “Study on robustness of suspended floor system in half-through and through arch bridges.” Ph.D. thesis, [In Chinese.] College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou Univ.
Zheng, J., and J. Wang. 2018. “Concrete-filled steel tube arch bridges in China.” Engineering 4 (1): 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2017.12.003.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27Issue 5May 2022

History

Received: Apr 28, 2021
Accepted: Jan 11, 2022
Published online: Mar 14, 2022
Published in print: May 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 14, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou Univ., No. 2, the North Wulongjiang Rd., Fuzhou City, Fujian Prov., China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1422-3101. Email: [email protected]
Su-guo Wang, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou Univ., No. 2, the North Wulongjiang Rd., Fuzhou City, Fujian Prov., China. Email: [email protected]
Bao-chun Chen, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou Univ., No. 2, the North Wulongjiang Rd., Fuzhou City, Fujian Prov., China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Robustness-Based Condition Evaluation Framework for Through Tied-Arch Bridge, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 10.1061/JPCFEV.CFENG-4048, 37, 2, (2023).
  • Bowstring Bridge: Suspension Removal and Base for Progressive Collapse Analysis, Innovations in Smart Cities Applications Volume 6, 10.1007/978-3-031-26852-6_67, (726-738), (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share