Abstract

This paper presents a method of developing digital twins (DTs) of road bridges directly from field measurements taken under random traffic loading. In a physics-based approach, the full three-dimensional behavior of the bridge is represented using response functions and distribution factors. In contrast to conventional finite-element analysis, this approach focuses on the relationship between the applied loads and the measured responses, given the limitations on the information about the applied loads due to random passing traffic. At the same time, it takes advantage of some key features of bridge traffic loading that are consistent, regardless of the weights of the passing vehicles. The nature of traffic loading is that axles travel from one end of a bridge to the other and the response is a linear combination of axle weights and ordinates of the same influence line function, adjusted for relative axle locations. Small/medium span concrete slab–girder decks are the target structures of the study. The three-dimensional nature of such structures is a particular challenge, especially in the case of multiple vehicle presence. While these bridges are strongly orthotropic, there is a significant degree of load distribution between the girders immediately under the passing vehicle and girders under adjacent lanes. This is addressed using an iterative approach that uses transverse distribution factors. The proposed DT model is verified using both numerical simulation and field tests.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52008162), the Key Research and Development Program of Hunan Province (Grant No. 2019SK2172), the Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province (Grant No. 2020RC2018), and the Fellowship of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2020M680114).

References

AASHTO. 2012. Bridge design specifications. 8th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Chen, S.-Z., G. Wu, and D.-C. Feng. 2019. “Development of a bridge weigh-in-motion method considering the presence of multiple vehicles.” Eng. Struct. 191: 724–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.095.
Chen, Z.-W., S. Zhu, Y.-L. Xu, Q. Li, and Q.-L. Cai. 2015. “Damage detection in long suspension bridges using stress influence lines.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (3): 05014013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000681.
Deng, L., and C. S. Cai. 2009. “Identification of parameters of vehicles moving on bridges.” Eng. Struct. 31 (10): 2474–2485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.06.005.
Gregory, A., F. D.-H. Lau, M. Girolami, L. J. Butler, and M. Z. Elshafie. 2019. “The synthesis of data from instrumented structures and physics-based models via Gaussian processes.” J. Comput. Phys. 392: 248–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2019.04.065.
Grieves, M. 2014. Digital twin: Manufacturing excellence through virtual factory replication, 1–7. White Paper 1. Melbourne, FL: Florida Institute of Technology.
Heitner, B., F. Schoefs, E. J. OBrien, A. Žnidarič, and T. Yalamas. 2020. “Using the unit influence line of a bridge to track changes in its condition.” J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 10: 667–678.
Hester, D., and A. González. 2012. “A wavelet-based damage detection algorithm based on bridge acceleration response to a vehicle.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 28 (C): 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.06.007.
Hughs, E., and R. Idriss. 2006. “Live–load distribution factors for prestressed concrete, spread box-girder bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 11 (5): 573–581. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:5(573).
Inkoom, S., J. Sobanjo, and E. Chicken. 2021. “Performance assessment of deteriorating bridge channels in the presence of hurricane failures: The competing risks scenario.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 27 (1): 04020041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000573.
Jacob, B., E. J. O'Brien, and W. J. Newton. 2000. “Assessment of the accuracy and classification of weigh-in-motion systems. Part 2: European specification.” Int. J. Heavy Veh. Syst. 7 (2–3): 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHVS.2000.004831.
Liu, M., S. Fang, H. Dong, and C. Xu. 2021. “Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications.” J. Manuf. Syst. 58 (B): 346–361.
Lu, Q., A. K. Parlikad, P. Woodall, G. Don Ranasinghe, X. Xie, Z. Liang, E. Konstantinou, J. Heaton, and J. Schooling. 2020. “Developing a digital twin at building and city levels: Case study of West Cambridge campus.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (3): 05020004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000763.
McNulty, P., and E. J. O’Brien. 2003. “Testing of bridge weigh-in-motion system in a sub-Arctic climate.” J. Test. Eval. 31 (6): 497–506.
Moses, F. 1979. “Weigh-in-motion system using instrumented bridges.” Transp. Eng. 3 (105): 233–249.
OBrien, E. J., M. J. Quilligan and R. Karoumi. 2006. “Calculating an influence line from direct measurements.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.- Bridge Eng. 159 (1): 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1680/bren.2006.159.1.31.
Reiff, A. J., M. Sanayei, and R. M. Vogel. 2016. “Statistical bridge damage detection using girder distribution factors.” Eng. Struct. 109: 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.006.
Richardson, J., S. Jones, A. Brown, E. O’Brien, and D. Hajializadeh. 2014. “On the use of bridge weigh-in-motion for overweight truck enforcement.” Int. J. Heavy Veh. Syst. 21 (2): 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHVS.2014.061632.
Shim, C.-S., N.-S. Dang, S. Lon, and C.-H. Jeon. 2019. “Development of a bridge maintenance system for prestressed concrete bridges using 3D digital twin model.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 15 (10): 1319–1332. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1620789.
Shim, C., H. Kang, N. S. Dang, and D. Lee. 2017. “Development of BIM-based bridge maintenance system for cable-stayed bridges.” Smart Struct. Syst. 20 (6): 697–708.
Sofia, H., E. Anas and O. Faïz. 2020. “Mobile mapping, machine learning and digital twin for road infrastructure monitoring and maintenance: Case study of Mohammed VI Bridge in Morocco.” In 2020 IEEE Int. Conf. of Moroccan Geomatics (Morgeo). New York: IEEE.
Tan, C., and N. Uddin. 2020. “Hilbert transform based approach to improve extraction of ‘drive-by’ bridge frequency.” Smart Struct. Syst. 25 (3): 265–277.
Wang, N.-B., L.-X. He, W.-X. Ren, and T.-L. J. E. S. Huang. 2017. “Extraction of influence line through a fitting method from bridge dynamic response induced by a passing vehicle.” Eng. Struct. 151: 648–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.067.
Yang, S.-I., D. M. Frangopol, and L. C. Neves. 2006. “Optimum maintenance strategy for deteriorating bridge structures based on lifetime functions.” Eng. Struct. 28 (2): 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.06.024.
Yang, Y. B., J. Yau, Z. Yao, and Y. Wu. 2004. Vehicle–bridge interaction dynamics: With applications to high-speed railways. Singapore: World Scientific.
Ye, C., L. Butler, C. Bartek, M. Iangurazov, Q. Lu, A. Gregory, M. Girolami and C. Middleton. 2019. “A digital twin of bridges for structural health monitoring.” In Proc., 12th Int. Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring 2019. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.
Yu, Y., C. Cai, and L. Deng. 2018. “Nothing-on-road bridge weigh-in-motion considering the transverse position of the vehicle.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 14 (8): 1108–1122. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1401095.
Zhao, H., C. Tan, E. J. OBrien, N. Uddin, and B. Zhang. 2020. “Wavelet-based optimum identification of vehicle axles using bridge measurements.” Appl. Sci. 10 (21): 7485. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217485.
Zhao, H., N. Uddin, E. O'Brien, X. Shao, and P. Zhu. 2014. “Identification of vehicular axle weights with a bridge weigh-in-motion system considering transverse distribution of wheel loads.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (3): 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000533.
Žnidarič, A. 2017. “Influence of number and quality of weigh-in-motion data on evaluation of load effects on bridges.” Ph.D. thesis, Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za gradbeništvo in geodezijo.
Znidaric, A., I. Lavric and J. Kalin. 2002. “The next generation of bridge weigh-in-motion systems.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Weigh-in-Motion. Ames, IA: Iowa State Univ.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27Issue 1January 2022

History

Received: Apr 21, 2021
Accepted: Oct 2, 2021
Published online: Nov 15, 2021
Published in print: Jan 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Apr 15, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Key Laboratory for Wind and Bridge Engineering of Hunan Province, College of Civil Engineering, Hunan Univ., Changsha 410082, China. Email: [email protected]
Postdoctoral Researcher, Key Laboratory for Wind and Bridge Engineering of Hunan Province, College of Civil Engineering, Hunan Univ., Changsha 410082, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1106-7943. Email: [email protected]
Eugene J. OBrien [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. College Dublin, Dublin D04 V1W8, Ireland. Email: [email protected]
Graduate Student, Key Laboratory for Wind and Bridge Engineering of Hunan Province, College of Civil Engineering, Hunan Univ., Changsha 410082, China. Email: [email protected]
Nasim Uddin, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alabama at Birmingham, 1075 13th St S, Birmingham, AL 35205. Email: [email protected]
Hongjie Guo [email protected]
Undergraduate Student, Key Laboratory for Wind and Bridge Engineering of Hunan Province, College of Civil Engineering, Hunan Univ., Changsha 410082, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Bridge Damage Identification Using Rotation Measurement, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-5891, 28, 5, (2023).
  • An Extended Bridge Weigh-in-Motion System without Vehicular Axles and Speed Detectors Using Nonnegative LASSO Regularization, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-5864, 28, 5, (2023).
  • A Novel Low-Cost GNSS Solution for the Real-Time Deformation Monitoring of Cable Saddle Pushing: A Case Study of Guojiatuo Suspension Bridge, Remote Sensing, 10.3390/rs14205174, 14, 20, (5174), (2022).
  • Review of Digital Twins for Constructed Facilities, Buildings, 10.3390/buildings12112029, 12, 11, (2029), (2022).
  • Evaluation of 3D Reconstruction Methods from Terrestrial LiDAR Point Cloud Data to Create Digital Twins of Civil Infrastructure Projects, International Conference on Transportation and Development 2022, 10.1061/9780784484319.008, (81-92), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share