Abstract

Proper inspection and maintenance schedules are integral to bridge functionality and safety; however, they also pose challenges in light of budget and resource limitations. As such, bridge management systems (BMSs) are always concerned with finding the best deterioration and maintenance models to optimize scheduling. The current work proposes parameterized logistic models that can capture bridge deterioration and the effect of maintenance interventions. Given a handful of easy-to-track bridge parameters, such as age, time since last major maintenance, and location, the proposed models predict the probability of a bridge (or group of bridges) to need repair throughout its service life. Combined with the appropriate probability threshold, obtained from life-cycle cost analysis, this allows for the optimization of inspection frequency and helps in maintenance planning. The results indicate that the proposed models predict the bridge condition more accurately compared to the Markov Chains models adopted by many North American BMSs. Finally, the application of the parameterized logistic models is demonstrated through a case study.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the Ontario Early Researcher Award and start-up fund provided by the Faculty of Engineering at McMaster University. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsor. The authors also thankfully acknowledge Mr. Hao Zhang, P.Eng. (City of Toronto), for his constructive feedback on bridge inspection and maintenance practices in the Province of Ontario, Canada.

References

Alipour, A., B. Shafei, and M. S. Shinozuka. 2013. “Capacity loss evaluation of reinforced concrete bridges located in extreme chloride-laden environments.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 9 (1): 8–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2010.525243.
Armstrong, J., J. Loftus, J. Weir, and W. Roy. 2008. “The highway element investment review (HEIR) guidelines: Making the right decisions in Ontario.” In Annual Conf. the Transportation Association of Canada: Transportation—A Key to a Sustainable Future. Ottawa: Transportation Association of Canada.
Balomenos, G. P., Y. Hu, J. E. Padgett, and K. Shelton. 2019. “Impact of coastal hazards on residents’ spatial accessibility to health services.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 25 (4): 04019028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000509.
Balomenos, G. P., S. Kameshwar, and J. E. Padgett. 2020. “Parameterized fragility models for multi-bridge classes subjected to hurricane loads.” Eng. Struct. 208: 110213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110213.
Balomenos, G. P., and J. E. Padgett. 2018. “Fragility analysis of pile-supported wharves and piers exposed to storm surge and waves.” J. Waterway Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 144 (2): 04017046. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000436.
Barlow, R. E., and F. Proschan. 1996. Mathematical theory of reliability. Philadelphia: SIAM.
Bazzucchi, F., L. Restuccia, and G. A. Ferro. 2018. “Considerations over the Italian road bridge infrastructure safety after the Polcevera viaduct collapse: Past errors and future perspectives.” Frattura Integr. Strutt. 46: 400–421. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.46.37.
Bernier, C., I. Gidaris, G. P. Balomenos, and J. E. Padgett. 2019. “Assessing the accessibility of petrochemical facilities during storm surge events.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 188: 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.021.
Biezma, M. V., and F. Schanack. 2007. “Collapse of steel bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil 21 (5): 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2007)21:5(398).
Biondini, F., E. Camnasio, and A. Palermo. 2014. “Lifetime seismic performance of concrete bridges exposed to corrosion.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 10 (7): 880–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2012.761248.
Bocchini, P., D. Saydam, and D. M. Frangopol. 2013. “Efficient, accurate, and simple Markov chain model for the life-cycle analysis of bridge groups.” Struct. Saf. 40: 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2012.09.004.
Bolukbasi, M., J. Mohammadi, and D. Arditi. 2004. “Estimating the future condition of highway bridge components using national bridge inventory data.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 9 (1): 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2004)9:1(16).
Butt, A. A., M. Y. Shahin, K. J. Feighan, and S. H. Carpenter. 1987. “Pavement performance prediction model using the Markov process.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1123: 12–19.
Cesare, M. A., C. Santamarina, C. Turkstra, and E. H. Vanmarcke. 1992. “Modeling bridge deterioration with Markov chains.” J. Transp. Eng. 118 (6): 820–833. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1992)118:6(820).
Chang, S. E., and M. Shinozuka. 1996. “Life-cycle cost analysis with natural hazard risk.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2 (3): 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1996)2:3(118).
Everett, T. D., P. Weykamp, H. A. Capers, Jr., W. R. Cox, T. S. Drda, L. Hummel, P. Jensen, D. A. Juntunen, T. Kimball, and G. A. Washer. 2008. Bridge evaluation quality assurance in Europe. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2017. Prefabricated bridge elements and systems cost study: Accelerated bridge construction success stories. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Ford, K. M., M. Arman, S. Labi, K. C. Sinha, A. Shirole, P. Thompson, and Z. Li. 2011. Methodology for estimating life expectancies of highway assets. Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
Fowler, J. R. 2006. “Accelerated bridge construction.” In Annual Conf. of the Transportation Association of Canada: Bridges for the 21st Century. Ottawa: Transportation Association of Canada (TAC).
Ghodoosi, F., S. Abu-Samra, M. Zeynalian, and T. Zayed. 2018. “Maintenance cost optimization for bridge structures using system reliability analysis and genetic algorithms.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (2): 04017116. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001435.
Ghosh, J., and J. E. Padgett. 2011. “Probabilistic seismic loss assessment of aging bridges using a component-level cost estimation approach.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 40 (15): 1743–1761. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1114.
Golabi, K., and R. Shepard. 1997. “Pontis: A system for maintenance optimization and improvement of US bridge networks.” Interfaces 27 (1): 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.27.1.71.
Government of Ontario. 2018. “Bridge condition dataset.” Accessed October 1, 2018. https://data.ontario.ca/dataset/bridge-conditions.
Grussing, M. N., D. R. Uzarski, and L. R. Marrano. 2006. “Condition and reliability prediction models using the weibull probability distribution.” In Applications of Advanced Technology in Transportation, 19–24. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Hawk, H., and E. P. Small. 1998. “The BRIDGIT bridge management system.” Struct. Eng. Int. 8 (4): 309–314. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686698780488712.
Jia, G., and P. Gardoni. 2018. “State-dependent stochastic models: A general stochastic framework for modeling deteriorating engineering systems considering multiple deterioration processes and their interactions.” Struct. Saf. 72: 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.01.001.
Jiang, Y., and K. C. Sinha. 1989. “Bridge service life prediction model using the Markov chain.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1223: 24–30.
Kohavi, R., and F. Provost. 1998. “Glossary of terms.” J. Mach. Learn. 30: 271–274. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017181826899.
MATLAB. 2018. Statistics toolbox release 2018a. Natick, MA: MathWorks.
McLachlan, G. J., K.-A. Do, and C. Ambroise. 2005. Vol. 422 of Analyzing microarray gene expression data. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Mirzaei, Z., B. T. Adey, L. Klatter, and P. D. Thompson. 2014. “Overview of existing bridge management systems.” In Bridge Management Committee. Australia: International Association for Bridge Maintenance and Safety (IABMAS).
Moehle, J. P., and M. O. Eberhard. 2003. “Earthquake damage to bridges.” In Bridge engineering, edited by W.-F. Chen and L. Duan, 52–84. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Morcous, G. 2006. “Performance prediction of bridge deck systems using Markov chains.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil 20 (2): 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:2(146).
MTO (Ministry of Transportation). 2008. Ontario structure inspection manual (OSIM). St. Catharines, ON: MTO.
MTO (Ministry of Transportation). 2013. Pavement design and rehabilitation manual. St. Catharines, ON: MTO.
MTO (Ministry of Transportation). 2015. Bridge repairs. St. Catharines, ON: MTO.
MTO (Ministry of Transportation). 2016. Parametric estimating guide (PEG). St. Catharines, ON: MTO.
MTO (Ministry of Transportation). 2019. MTO ICorridor: Historical provincial highways traffic volumes. St. Catharines, ON: MTO.
Murphy, K. P. 2012. Machine learning: A probabilistic perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Nelder, J. A., and R. W. M. Wedderburn. 1972. “Generalized linear models.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A 135 (3): 370–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/2344614.
Shi, X., M. Akin, T. Pan, L. Fay, Y. Liu, and Z. Yang. 2009. “Deicer impacts on pavement materials: Introduction and recent developments.” Open Civ. Eng. J. 3 (1): 16–27. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874149500903010016.
Srikanth, I., and M. Arockiasamy. 2020. “Deterioration models for prediction of remaining useful life of timber and concrete bridges: A review.” J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 7 (2): 152–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2019.09.005.
Stewart, M. G., X. Wang, and M. N. Nguyen. 2011. “Climate change impact and risks of concrete infrastructure deterioration.” Eng. Struct. 33 (4): 1326–1337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.01.010.
Tabatabai, H., C.-W. Lee, and M. A. Tabatabai. 2016. Survival analyses for bridge decks in Northern United States. Civil and Environmental Engineering Faculty Article, Paper 7. Milwaukee: Univ. of Wisconsin.
Thompson, P. D., T. Merlo, B. Kerr, A. Cheetham, and R. Ellis. 1999. “The new Ontario bridge management system.” In Vol. 153 of Proc., 8th Int. Bridge Management Conf., 1–15. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Tibshirani, R. 1996. “Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 58 (1): 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x.
Verhulst, P. F. 1845. “La Loi d’accroissement de La population.” Nouv. Mem. Acad. R. Sci. Bruxelles 18: 14–54.
Veshosky, D., C. R. Beidleman, G. W. Buetow, and M. Demir. 1994. “Comparative analysis of bridge superstructure deterioration.” J. Struct. Eng. 120 (7): 2123–2136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:7(2123).
Walpole, R. E., and R. H. Myers. 2012. Probability & statistics for engineers & scientists. London: Pearson.
Yanev, B. 1994. “User costs in a bridge management system.” Transp. Res. Circ. 423: 130–138.
Zambon, I., A. Vidovic, A. Strauss, J. Matos, and J. Amado. 2017. “Comparison of stochastic prediction models based on visual inspections of bridge decks.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 23 (5): 553–561. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2017.1323795.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 26Issue 10October 2021

History

Received: Oct 27, 2020
Accepted: Jun 11, 2021
Published online: Jul 23, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Dec 23, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ., 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L7. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4947-8828. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ., 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L7 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6468-3654. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, 760 Davis Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1729-1548. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Predicting Concrete Bridge Deck Deterioration: A Hyperparameter Optimization Approach, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 10.1061/JPCFEV.CFENG-4714, 38, 3, (2024).
  • A Big Data Approach for Investigating Bridge Deterioration and Maintenance Strategies in Taiwan, Sustainability, 10.3390/su15021697, 15, 2, (1697), (2023).
  • A Framework to Model the Wind-Induced Losses in Buildings during Hurricanes, Wind, 10.3390/wind2010006, 2, 1, (87-112), (2022).
  • State-of-the-art and annual progress of bridge engineering in 2021, Advances in Bridge Engineering, 10.1186/s43251-022-00070-1, 3, 1, (2022).
  • Fuzzy-Logistic Models for Incorporating Epistemic Uncertainty in Bridge Management Decisions, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001247, 8, 3, (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share