Technical Papers
Mar 18, 2024

Predicting Concrete Bridge Deck Deterioration: A Hyperparameter Optimization Approach

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 38, Issue 3

Abstract

Concrete bridge decks are critical transportation infrastructure components where deterioration can compromise structural integrity and public safety. This study develops machine learning (ML) models using the National Bridge Inventory (NBI) to classify deck conditions and predict deterioration trajectories. Models were tested and trained on inspection records from over 28,786 bridges in Michigan over 23 years, from 1992 to 2015. Eleven approaches were evaluated after hyperparameter optimization, based on 10-fold cross-validation, including logistic regression, gradient boosting, AdaBoost, random forest, extra trees, K-nearest neighbors, naive Bayes, decision tree, LightGBM, CatBoost, and bagging. Model effectiveness was assessed using accuracy, recall, F1-score, and area under the curve. Results indicate the optimized CatBoost classifier achieved 96.66% testing accuracy in rating deck conditions. The incorporation of hyperparameter optimization has significantly enhanced the overall predictive performance of the models, ensuring robust and reliable deterioration forecasting. The research sheds light on crucial factors such as deck age, area, and average daily traffic, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing bridge deck condition ratings. These insights inform preventative maintenance planning to extend service life. This work pioneers a data-driven framework to forecast concrete deterioration, empowering officials with precise predictions to optimize infrastructure management under budget constraints. The approach provides a promising decision-support tool for sustainable infrastructure.

Practical Applications

This paper explores the use of machine learning techniques for the deterioration prediction of concrete bridge decks to estimate the remaining service life of bridges. These models will contribute to the safety, efficiency, and sustainability of bridge infrastructure by providing timely information and evidence-based decision making for bridge maintenance and management. Such prediction models have several practical applications such as (1) predicting when maintenance or repairs are likely to be needed; (2) assessing the risk of failure or deterioration of different components of a bridge; (3) effectively managing the bridge life cycle by providing insights into the aging process and helping authorities plan for rehabilitation or replacement strategies; (4) enabling ongoing monitoring of the performance of a bridge under various conditions such as heavy traffic loads, environmental factors, and seismic events; and (5) assisting in effective asset management by allowing for the prioritization of investments, the efficient allocation of budgets, and the planning for the long-term sustainability of the bridge infrastructure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

References

Abdelmaksoud, A. M., G. P. Balomenos, and T. C. Becker. 2021. “Parameterized logistic models for bridge inspection and maintenance scheduling.” J. Bridge Eng. 26 (10): 04021072. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001774.
Abedin, M., S. Mokhtari, and A. B. Mehrabi. 2021. “Bridge damage detection using machine learning algorithms.” In Vol. 11593 of Proc., SPIE 11593, Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems X, 532–539. Strasbourg, France: Society of Photographic Instrumentation Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2581125.
Al Mamlook, R. E., T. Z. Abdulhameed, R. Hasan, H. I. Al-Shaikhli, I. Mohammed, and S. Tabatabai. 2020. “Utilizing machine learning models to predict the car crash injury severity among elderly drivers.” In Proc., 2020 IEEE Int. Conf. on Electro Information Technology, 105–111. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EIT48999.2020.9208259.
Althaqafi, E., and E. Chou. 2022. “Developing bridge deterioration models using an artificial neural network.” Infrastructures 7 (8): 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures7080101.
Ariza, M. S., I. Zambon, H. S. Sousa, J. A. Campos e Matos, and A. Strauss. 2019. “Comparison of forecasting models to predict concrete bridge decks performance.” Struct. Concr. 21 (4): 1240–1253. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201900434.
Assaad, R., and I. H. El-adaway. 2020a. “Bridge infrastructure asset management system: Comparative computational machine learning approach for evaluating and predicting deck deterioration conditions.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 26 (3): 04020032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000572.
Assaad, R., and I. H. El-adaway. 2020b. “Evaluation and prediction of the hazard potential level of dam infrastructures using computational artificial intelligence algorithms.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (5): 04020051.
Azizinamini, A., E. H. Power, G. F. Myers, H. C. Ozyildirim, E. S. Kline, D. W. Whitmore, and D. R. Mertz. 2014. Design guide for bridges for service life. Rep. No. SHRP 2 Report S2-R19A-RW-2. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Balaji, M., G. S. V. Rao, and C. A. Kumar. 2014. “A comparitive study of predictive models for cloud infrastructure management.” In Proc., 2014 14th IEEE/ACM Int. Symp. on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing, 923–926. New York: IEEE.
Bishop, C. 2016. Pattern recognition and machine learning. New York: Springer.
Chang, M., M. Maguire, and Y. Sun. 2019. “Stochastic modeling of bridge deterioration using classification tree and logistic regression.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 25 (1): 04018041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000466.
Chyad, A. M., O. Abudayyeh, F. Zakhil, and O. Hakimi. 2018. “Deterioration rates of concrete bridge decks in several climatic regions.” In Proc., IEEE Int. Conf. on Electro Information Technology, 65–68. New York: IEEE.
Collins, J., and J. Weidner. 2023. “Comparison of Markovian-based bridge deterioration model approaches.” J. Bridge Eng. 28 (8): 04023047. https://doi.org/10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-5920.
Dinh, K. 2014. “Condition assessment of concrete bridge decks using ground penetrating radar.” Acccessed July 19, 2023. https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/979120/.
Fang, J., J. Hu, H. Elzarka, H. Zhao, and C. Gao. 2023. “An improved inspection process and machine-learning-assisted bridge condition prediction model.” Buildings 13 (10): 2459. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13102459.
Fiorillo, G., and H. Nassif. 2020. “Improving the conversion accuracy between bridge element conditions and NBI ratings using deep convolutional neural networks.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 16 (12): 1669–1682. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1725065.
García, S., J. Luengo, and F. Herrera. 2015. “Tutorial on practical tips of the most influential data preprocessing algorithms in data mining.” Knowl.-Based Syst. 98 (Apr): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.12.006.
Hawk, H., and E. P. Small. 1998. “The BRIDGIT bridge management system.” Struct. Eng. Int. 8 (4): 309–314. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686698780488712.
Huang, Y. H. 2010. “Artificial neural network model of bridge deterioration.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 24 (6): 597–602. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000124.
Ilbeigi, M. E. M. M., and M. Ebrahimi Meimand. 2020. “Statistical forecasting of bridge deterioration conditions.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 34 (1): 04019104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001347.
Jaafaru, H., and B. Agbelie. 2022. “Bridge maintenance planning framework using machine learning, multi-attribute utility theory and evolutionary optimization models.” Autom. Constr. 141 (Sep): 104460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104460.
Kale, A., Y. Kassa, B. Ricks, and R. Gandhi. 2023. “A comparative assessment of bridge deck wearing surfaces: Performance, deterioration, and maintenance.” App. Sci. 13 (19): 10883. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131910883.
Kong, X., Z. Li, Y. Zhang, and S. Das. 2022. “Bridge deck deterioration: Reasons and patterns.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2676 (7): 570–584. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221080140.
Li, L., L. Sun, and G. Ning. 2014. “Deterioration prediction of urban bridges on network level using Markov-chain model.” Math. Probl. Eng. 2014: 728107. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/728107.
Lim, S., and S. Chi. 2019. “XGBoost application on bridge management systems for proactive damage estimation.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 41 (Aug): 100922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2019.100922.
Liu, H., J. Nehme, and P. Lu. 2023. “An application of convolutional neural network for deterioration modeling of highway bridge components in the United States.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 19 (6): 731–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2021.1979597.
Lu, P., H. Wang, and D. Tolliver. 2019. “Prediction of bridge component ratings using ordinal logistic regression model.” Math. Probl. Eng. 2019 (Apr): 9797584. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9797584.
Manafpour, A., I. Guler, A. Radlińska, F. Rajabipour, and G. Warn. 2018. “Stochastic analysis and time-based modeling of concrete bridge deck deterioration.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (9): 04018066. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001285.
Martinez, P., E. Mohamed, O. Mohsen, and Y. Mohamed. 2020. “Comparative study of data mining models for prediction of bridge future conditions.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 34 (1): 04019108. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001395.
Melhem, H. G., and Y. Cheng. 2003. “Prediction of remaining service life of bridge decks using machine learning.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 17 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2003)17:1(1).
Miao, P., H. Yokota, and Y. Zhang. 2023. “Deterioration prediction of existing concrete bridges using a LSTM recurrent neural network.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 19 (4): 475–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2021.1951778.
Morcous, G., H. Rivard, and A. M. Hanna. 2002. “Case-based reasoning system for modeling infrastructure deterioration.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 16 (2): 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2002)16:2(104).
Nguyen, T. T., and K. Dinh. 2019. “Prediction of bridge deck condition rating based on artificial neural networks.” J. Sci. Technol. Civ. Eng. 13 (3): 15–25. https://doi.org/10.31814/stce.nuce2019-13(3)-02.
Omar, T., and M. L. Nehdi. 2018. “Condition assessment of reinforced concrete bridges: Current practice and research challenges.” Infrastructures 3 (3): 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures3030036.
Rashidi Nasab, A., and H. Elzarka. 2023. “Optimizing machine learning algorithms for improving prediction of bridge deck deterioration: A case study of Ohio bridges.” Buildings 13 (6): 1517. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061517.
Seghier, M. E., X. Z. Gao, J. Jafari-Asl, D. K. Thai, S. Ohadi, and N. T. Trung. 2021a. “Modeling the nonlinear behavior of ACC for SCFST columns using experimental-data and a novel evolutionary-algorithm.” Structures 30 (Apr): 692–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.01.036.
Seghier, M. E., B. Kechtegar, M. N. Amar, J. A. Correia, and N. T. Trung. 2021b. “Simulation of the ultimate conditions of fibre-reinforced polymer confined concrete using hybrid intelligence models.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 128 (Oct): 105605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105605.
Sengupta, A., S. Ilgin Guler, and P. Shokouhi. 2021. “Interpreting impact echo data to predict condition rating of concrete bridge decks: A ML approach.” J. Bridge Eng. 26 (8): 04021044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001744.
Srikanth, I., and M. Arockiasamy. 2020. “Deterioration models for prediction of remaining useful life of timber and concrete bridges: A review.” J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 7 (2): 152–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2019.09.005.
Thompson, P. D., E. P. Small, M. Johnson, and A. R. Marshall. 1998. “The Pontis Bridge management system.” Struct. Eng. Int. 8 (4): 303–308. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686698780488758.
Wang, Y. M., and T. M. S. Elhag. 2008. “Evidential reasoning approach for bridge condition assessment.” Expert Syst. Appl. 34 (1): 689–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.10.006.
Wellalage, N. K. W., T. Zhang, and R. Dwight. 2015. “Calibrating Markov chain–based deterioration models for predicting future conditions of railway bridge elements.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (2): 04014060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000640.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 38Issue 3June 2024

History

Received: Oct 28, 2023
Accepted: Jan 2, 2024
Published online: Mar 18, 2024
Published in print: Jun 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Aug 18, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Nour Almarahlleh [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Tafila Technical Univ., Tafila 66110, Jordan. Email: [email protected]
Hexu Liu, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Construction Engineering, Western Michigan Univ., Kalamazoo, MI 49008 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Osama Abudayyeh, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor and Chair, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Construction Engineering, Western Michigan Univ., Kalamazoo, MI 49008. Email: [email protected]
Rabia Almamlook [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Business Administration, Trine Univ., 720 Park Ave., Angola, IN 46703. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share