Technical Papers
Jun 4, 2020

Time-Varying Seismic Fragility Analysis of Offshore Bridges with Continuous Rigid-Frame Girder under Main Aftershock Sequences

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25, Issue 8

Abstract

Durability damage of reinforced concrete bridges in an offshore environment often occurs in varying degrees with the extension of service life. Meanwhile, statistical data on earthquake damage show that most of the main earthquakes are accompanied by strong aftershocks, and the seismic response of bridges under the main shock and main aftershock is different. To analyze the effects of the main aftershock sequence and durability damage on the seismic performance of concrete bridges, this study establishes a nonlinear dynamic analysis model of an offshore bridge with a continuous rigid-frame girder based on the OpenSEES platform. Moreover, this work constructs the main aftershock sequence considering the degradation of the mechanical properties of materials after durability damage repair under normal maintenance conditions and the time-varying seismic effect of shortening the subsequent service period, and investigates the time-varying seismic fragility of offshore bridges under the main aftershock sequence. Results show that the seismic response of bridge structures considering the main aftershock sequence is significantly larger than that considering the main shock only. Material deterioration will lead to the increase in the seismic response of bridge components under earthquake. The seismic time-varying fragility of offshore bridges considering material deterioration and seismic time-varying effects is analyzed based on time-varying seismic action in the entire life cycle. The influences of the two factors should be considered comprehensively when evaluating the seismic performance of bridges throughout their entire life.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51608488, 11872339, and 11472248).

References

Amato, A. et al. 1998. “The 1997 Umbria-Marche, Italy, earthquake sequence: A first look at the main shocks and aftershocks.” Geophys. Res. Lett. 25 (15): 2861–2864. https://doi.org/10.1029/98GL51842.
Aviram, A., K. R. Mackie, and B. Stojadinovic. 2008. “Effect of abutment modeling on the seismic response of bridge structures.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vib. 7 (4): 395–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-008-1008-3.
Baltay, A. S., and T. C. Hanks. 2014. “Understanding the magnitude dependence of PGA and PGV in NGA-West 2 data.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 104 (6): 2851–2865. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120130283.
Chadwell, C. B., and R. A. Imbsen. 2004. “XTRACT: A tool for axial force-ultimate curvature interactions.” In Proc., Structures 2004: Building on the Past, Securing the Future, 1–9. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Chen, G. S., F. Xiao, W. Zatar, and J. L. Hulsey. 2018. “Characterization of nonstationary mode interaction of bridge by considering deterioration of bearing.” Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018: 5454387. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5454387.
Chopra, A. K., and R. K. Goel. 2001. “Direct displacement-based design: use of inelastic vs. elastic design spectra.” Earthquake Spectra 17 (1): 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586166.
Chouhan, R. K. S., and V. K. Srivastava. 1970. “Global variation of b in the gutenberg richter’s relation LogN=a-bM with depth.” Pure Appl. Geophys. PAGEOPH 82 (1): 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876175.
CN-CECS. 2007. Standard for durability assessment of concrete structures. Beijing: Xi’an Univ. of Architectural Science and Technology.
CN-JT. 1989. Specifications of earthquake resistant design for highway engineering. Beijing: Ministry of Communications Highway Planning and Design Institute.
Cornell, C. A. 1967. “Engineering seismic risk analysis.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 58 (5): 1583–1606.
Cornell, C. A., F. Jalayer, R. O. Hamburger and D. A. Foutch. 2002. “Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (4): 526–533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526).
Crandall, S. H., and W. D. Mark. 1963. Random vibration in mechanical system. New York: Academic Press.
Das, S. 2003. “Spatial relation between main earthquake slip and its aftershock distribution.” Rev. Geophys. 41 (3): 1013. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002RG000119.
Ditlevsen, O. 1979. “Narrow reliability bounds for structural systems.” J. Struct. Mech. 7 (4): 453–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601217908905329.
Duncan, J. M., and R. L. Mokwa. 2001. “Passive earth pressures: Theories and tests.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (3): 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:3(248).
Feng, M. Q., and S. H. Kim. 2003. “Fragility analysis of bridges under ground motion with spatial variation.” Int. J. Non Linear Mech. 38 (5): 705–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7462(01)00128-7.
Gao, X. W., and A. B. Bao. 1985. “Probabilistic model and its statistical parameters for seismic load.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vib. 5 (1), 13–22.
Hatzigeorgiou, G. D., and D. E. Beskos. 2009. “Inelastic displacement ratios for SDOF structures subjected to repeated earthquakes.” Eng. Struct. 31 (11): 2744–2755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.07.002.
HAZUS99. 1999. HAZUS99 user’s manual. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Hwang, H., J. B. Liu, and Y. H. Chiu. 2001. Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges. MAEC report, Project MAEC RR-4. Urbana, IL: Mid-America Earthquake Center.
Hwang, H. H. M., and J. R. Huo. 1994. “Generation of hazard-consistent ground motion.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 13 (6): 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-7261(94)90008-6.
Kirkpatrick, T. J., R. E. Weyers, C. M. Anderson-Cook and M. M. Sprinkel. 2002. “Probabilistic model for the chloride-induced corrosion service life of bridge decks.” Cem. Concr. Res. 32 (12): 1943–1960. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00905-5.
Krinitzsky, E. L., and F. K. Chang. 1988. “Intensity-related earthquake ground motions.” Environ. Eng. Geosci. 25 (4): 425–435. https://doi.org/10.2113/gseegeosci.xxv.4.425.
Li, X. L., and X. Zhu. 2004. “Velocity pulse for near-fault ground motions and its effect on seismic response of pier.” J. Northern Jiaotong Univ. 28 (1): 11–16.
Liang, Y., Y. Jia-lei, W. Jun-lei, Z. Peng, and H. Bao-jie. 2019. “Analysis on the time-varying fragility of offshore concrete bridge.” Complexity 2019: 2739212. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2739212.
Mackie, K., and B. Stojadinović. 2001. “Probabilistic seismic demand model for California highway bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 6 (6): 468–481. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:6(468).
Mahin, S. A. 1980. “Effects of duration and aftershocks on inelastic design earthquake.” Proc. Seventh World Conf. Earthquake Eng. 5: 677–679.
Mander, J. B., and M. J. N. Priestley. 1988. “Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete.” J. Struct. Eng. 114 (8): 1804–1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
Mangat, P. S., and M. C. Limbachiya. 1999. “Effect of initial curing on chloride diffusion in concrete repair materials.” Cem. Concr. Res. 29 (9): 1475–1485. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846%2899%2900130-1.
McKenna, F., G. L. Fenves, and M. H. Scott. 2000. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Monteiro, I., F. A. Branco, J. de Brito, and R. Neves. 2012. “Statistical analysis of the carbonation coefficient in open air concrete structures.” Constr. Build. Mater. 29: 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.028.
Murzewski, J. 2001. “Probability, reliability and statistical methods in engineering design.” Struct. Saf. 23 (1): 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(00)00025-4.
Nielson, B. 2005. Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.
Nielson, B. G., and R. Desroches. 2007. “Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (6): 823–839. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.655.
Park, Y. J. 1985. “Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete.” J. Struct. Eng. 111 (4): 722–739. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722).
Park, Y.-J., A. H.-S. Ang, and Y. K. Wen. 1985. “Seismic damage analysis of reinforced concrete buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 111 (4): 740–757. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(740).
Seible, F., M. J. N. Priestley, and G. M. Calvi. 1996. Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Shinozuka, M., M. Q. Feng, J. Lee, and T. Naganuma. 2000. “Statistical analysis of fragility curves.” J. Eng. Mech. 126 (12): 1224–1231. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1224).
Shome, N., C. Cornell, P. Bazzurro, and J. E. Carballo. 1998. “Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses.” Earthquake Spectra 14 (3): 469–500. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586011.
Vidal, T., A. Castel, and R. Francois. 2004. “Analyzing crack width to predict corrosion in reinforced concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res. 34 (1): 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00246-1.
Wang, G. Q., X. Y. Zhou, P. Z. Zhang, and H. Igel. 2002. “Characteristics of amplitude and duration for near fault strong ground motion from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan Earthquake.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 22 (1): 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(01)00047-1.
Wells, D. L., and K. J. Coppersmith. 1994. “New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84 (4): 974–1002.
Yamamoto, Y., and J. W. Baker. 2013. “Stochastic model for earthquake ground motion using wavelet packets.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 103 (6): 3044–3056. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120120312.
Zhang, J., and Y. Huo. 2009. “Evaluating effectiveness and optimum design of isolation devices for highway bridges using the fragility function method.” Eng. Struct. 31 (8): 1648–1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.017.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25Issue 8August 2020

History

Received: Apr 20, 2019
Accepted: Feb 12, 2020
Published online: Jun 4, 2020
Published in print: Aug 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Nov 4, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Lecturer, College of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou Univ., Zhengzhou 450000, China. Email: [email protected]
M.S. Candidate, College of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou Univ., Zhengzhou 450000, China. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4252-4972. Email: [email protected]
Professor, College of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou Univ., Zhengzhou 450000, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7745-7074. Email: [email protected]
M.S. Candidate, College of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou Univ., Zhengzhou 450000, China. Email: [email protected]
M.S. Candidate, College of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou Univ., Zhengzhou 450000, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share