Technical Papers
May 29, 2020

Vulnerability Assessment of Bridge Piers Damaged in Barge Collision to Subsequent Hurricane Events

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25, Issue 8

Abstract

In a hurricane event, bridges that span rivers near coasts are at risk of experiencing water rise and increased wave loads. Such riverine bridges often allow barges to pass underneath them on a daily basis, introducing the risk of barge collision. Considering that a barge collision can occur at any time prior to or during a hurricane, there are situations that a bridge pier damaged by a barge is not repaired when a hurricane occurs. This can be due to an inadequate assessment of pier damage, unavailability of resources for repair activities, or shortage of reaction time between the barge collision and the hurricane event. Such a multihazard risk, in which residual damage due to barge collision(s) increases the vulnerability of bridge piers to hurricane-induced wave loads, was largely unexplored in the literature. This motivated the current study to investigate a set of representative bridge piers under various barge collision and hurricane event scenarios. For this purpose, rigorous finite-element simulations are conducted to capture and compare the structural response of both intact and damaged bridge piers. With an in-depth understanding of deformation patterns and failure modes, the cumulative consequences of these two extreme events are determined in various combinations. This leads to the quantification of how hurricane-induced damage is magnified, making a bridge pier vulnerable to failure, as the extent of residual damage due to barge collision increases. The outcome of this systematic assessment is expected to help ensure the safety and functionality of the bridge structures that serve the coastal communities separated by rivers, especially during hurricane events.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AASHTO. 1991. Guide specification and commentary for vessel collision design of highway bridges. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2017. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 8th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
API (American Petroleum Institute). 2002. Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms—Working stress design. Rep. No. RP 2A-WSD. 21st ed. Washington, DC: API.
ASCE. 2017. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE 7-16. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Auyeung, S., and A. Alipour. 2016. “Evaluation of AASHTO suggested design values for reinforced concrete bridge piers under vehicle collisions.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2592: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3141%2F2592-01.
Auyeung, S., A. Alipour, and D. Saini. 2019. “Performance-based design of bridge piers under vehicle collision.” Eng. Struct. 191: 752–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.005.
Bowles, J. E. 1988. Foundation analysis and design. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cao, R., A. K. Agrawal, S. El-Tawil, X. Xu, and W. Wong. 2019a. “Performance-based design framework for bridge piers subjected to truck collision.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (7): 04019064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001423.
Cao, R., S. El-Tawil, A. K. Agrawal, X. Xu, and W. Wong. 2019b. “Behavior and design of bridge piers subjected to heavy truck collision.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (7): 04019057. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001414.
Carey, T. J., H. B. Mason, A. R. Barbosa, and M. H. Scott. 2019. “Multi-hazard earthquake and tsunami effects on soil–foundation–bridge systems.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (4): 04019004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001353.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2006. Actions on structures, Part 1.7. Eurocode 1. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Consolazio, G. R., R. A. Cook, G. B. Lehr, and H. T. Bollmann. 2002. Barge impact testing of the St. George Island Causeway Bridge: Phase I: Feasibility study. Structures Research Rep. No. 783. Gainesville, FL: Univ. of Florida.
Consolazio, G. R., R. A. Cook, M. C. McVay, D. Cowan, A. Biggs, and L. Bui. 2006. Barge impact testing of the St. George Island Causeway Bridge. Phase III: Physical testing and data interpretation. Structures Research Rep. No. 26868. Gainesville, FL: Univ. of Florida.
Consolazio, G. R., and D. R. Cowan. 2003. “Nonlinear analysis of barge crush behavior and its relationship to impact resistant bridge design.” Comput. Struct. 81 (8–11): 547–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00474-1.
Consolazio, G. R., and M. T. Davidson. 2008. “Simplified dynamic analysis of barge collision for bridge design.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2050 (1): 13–25. https://doi.org/10.3141/2050-02.
Consolazio, G. R., M. T. Davidson, and D. R. Cowan. 2009. “Barge bow force–deformation relationships for barge–bridge collision analysis.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2131 (1): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.3141/2131-01.
Consolazio, G. R., M. T. Davidson, and D. J. Getter. 2010. Vessel crushing and structural collapse relationships for bridge design. Structures Research Rep. No. 72908/74039. Gainesville, FL: Engineering and Industrial Experiment Station, Univ. of Florida.
El-Hacha, R., H. Elagroudy, and S. Rizkalla. 2004. “Bond characteristics of micro-composite multi-structural formable steel reinforcement.” In Proc., 5th Structural Specialty Conf. of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, 1–10. Montreal, Canada: Canadian Society of Civil Engineering.
Fritz, H. M., D. A. Phillips, A. Okayasu, T. Shimozono, H. Liu, F. Mohammed, V. Skanavis, C. E. Synolakis, and T. Takahashi. 2012. “The 2011 Japan tsunami current velocity measurements from survivor videos at Kesennuma Bay using LiDAR.” Geophys. Res. Lett. 39 (7): L00G23. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050686.
Getter, D., and G. R. Consolazio. 2011. “Relationships of barge bow force-deformation for bridge design: Probabilistic consideration of oblique impact scenarios.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2251 (1): 3–15. https://doi.org/10.3141/2251-01.
Getter, D. J., M. T. Davidson, G. R. Consolazio, and R. C. Patev. 2015. “Determination of hurricane-induced barge impact loads on floodwalls.” Eng. Struct. 104: 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.021.
Gholipour, G., C. Zhang, W. H. Kang, and A. A. Mousavi. 2019a. “Reliability analysis of girder bridge piers subjected to barge collisions.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 15 (9): 1200–1220. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1609530.
Gholipour, G., C. Zhang, and M. Li. 2018. “Effects of soil–pile interaction on the response of bridge pier to barge collision using energy distribution method.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 14 (11): 1520–1534. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2018.1450427.
Gholipour, G., C. Zhang, and A. A. Mousavi. 2019b. “Analysis of girder bridge pier subjected to barge collision considering the superstructure interactions: The case study of a multiple-pier bridge system.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 15 (3): 392–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2018.1543710.
Gholipour, G., C. Zhang, and A. A. Mousavi. 2020. “Nonlinear numerical analysis and progressive damage assessment of a cable-stayed bridge pier subjected to ship collision.” Mar. Struct. 69: 102662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2019.102662.
Jansen, B. 2017. “Texas has 53,488 bridges. Here’s the toll Harvey is expected to take on those.” USA Today, August 30, 2017. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/08/30/harvey-floodwaters-topple-bridges-gnaw-roads/616930001/.
Jiang, H., J. Wang, M. G. Chorzepa, and J. Zhao. 2017. “Numerical investigation of progressive collapse of a multi-span continuous bridge subjected to vessel collision.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (5): 04017008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001037.
Kameshwar, S., and J. E. Padgett. 2014. “Multi-hazard risk assessment of highway bridges subjected to earthquake and hurricane hazards.” Eng. Struct. 78: 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.05.016.
Kameshwar, S., and J. E. Padgett. 2018. “Response and fragility assessment of bridge columns subjected to barge-bridge collision and scour.” Eng. Struct. 168: 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.082.
Kantrales, G. C., G. R. Consolazio, D. Wagner, and S. Fallaha. 2015. “Experimental and analytical study of high-level barge deformation for barge–bridge collision design.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (2): 04015039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000801.
LSTC (Livermore Software Technology Corporation). 2016. LS-DYNA theory manual. Livermore, CA: LSTC.
Malvar, L. J., and J. E. Crawford. 1998. “Dynamic increase factors for steel reinforcing bars.” In Proc., 28th Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board Seminar, 1–17. Port Hueneme, CA: Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center.
Mosqueda, G., K. A. Porter, J. O’Conner, and P. McAnany. 2007. “Damage to engineered buildings and bridges in the wake of Hurricane Katrina.” In Proc., Structures Congress 2007: Forensic Engineering Conf., edited by E. C. Stovner, 1–11. Reston, VA: ASCE.
O’Neill, M., and J. Murchison. 1983. An evaluation of p–y relationships in sands. University Park, TX: Univ. of Houston.
Okeil, A. M., and C. S. Cai. 2008. “Survey of short- and medium-span bridge damage induced by Hurricane Katrina.” J. Bridge Eng. 13 (4): 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:4(377).
Peck, R., W. Hanson, and T. Thornburn. 1974. Foundation engineering handbook. London: Wiley.
Saini, D. S., and B. Shafei. 2017. “Calibration of barge models for the reliable prediction of impact force on bridge piers.” In Proc., Structures Congress 2017: Blast, impact loading, and response of structures, edited by J. G. Soules, 27–36. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Saini, D. S., and B. Shafei. 2019a. “Concrete constitutive models for low velocity impact simulations.” Int. J. Impact Eng. 132: 103329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103329.
Saini, D. S., and B. Shafei. 2019b. “Investigation of concrete-filled steel tubes strengthened with CFRP against impact loads.” J. Compos. Struct. 208: 744–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.057.
Saini, D. S., and B. Shafei. 2019c. “Performance of concrete-filled steel tube bridge columns subjected to vehicle collision.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (8): 04019074. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001439.
Saini, D. S., and B. Shafei. 2019d. “Prediction of extent of damage to metal roof panels under hail impact.” Eng. Struct. 187: 362–371. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001439.
Saini, D. S., and B. Shafei. 2020. “Damage assessment of wood frame shear walls subjected to lateral wind load and windborne debris impact.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod. 198: 104091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104091.
SCDOT (South Carolina Department of Transportation). 2018. Hurricane Michael operations report. Columbia, South Carolina: SCDOT.
Sha, Y., and H. Hao. 2012. “Nonlinear finite element analysis of barge collision with a single bridge pier.” Eng. Struct. 41: 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.026.
Sha, Y., and H. Hao. 2013. “Laboratory tests and numerical simulations of barge impact on circular reinforced concrete piers.” Eng. Struct. 46: 593–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.09.002.
Stearns, M., and J. E. Padgett. 2012. “Impact of 2008 Hurricane Ike on bridge infrastructure in the Houston/Galveston region.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 26 (4): 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000213.
Testa, A. C., M. N. Furtado, and A. Alipour. 2015. “Resilience of coastal transportation networks in the face of climatic extreme events.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2532: 29–36. https://doi.org/10.3141/2532-04.
Walters, R. A., M. T. Davidson, G. R. Consolazio, and R. C. Patev. 2017. “Characterization of multi-barge flotilla impact forces on wall structures.” Mar. Struct. 51: 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2016.09.005.
Wang, W., and G. Morgenthal. 2018. “Reliability analyses of RC bridge piers subjected to barge impact using efficient models.” Eng. Struct. 166: 485–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.089.
Yuan, P., and I. E. Harik. 2009. “Equivalent barge and flotilla impact forces on bridge piers.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (5): 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000080.
Yuan, P., I. E. Harik, and M. T. Davidson. 2008. Multi-barge flotilla impact forces on bridges. Lexington, KY: Univ. of Kentucky.
Zheng, W., and Y. T. Chen. 2014. “Novel probabilistic approach to assessing barge-bridge collision damage based on vibration measurements through transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling.” J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 4 (2): 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-013-0063-2.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25Issue 8August 2020

History

Received: Mar 31, 2019
Accepted: Feb 7, 2020
Published online: May 29, 2020
Published in print: Aug 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Oct 29, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kofi Oppong, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011. Email: [email protected]
Dikshant Saini, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5677-6324. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share