Technical Papers
Jan 16, 2019

Life-Cycle Cost Comparison of Corrosion Management Strategies for Steel Bridges

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 4

Abstract

Corrosion of metals is one of the primary factors leading to the deterioration of bridge structures in the US. Protective coatings applied to the surface of the metal have been widely used as a corrosion protection system for steel bridge components. Because the coating also can deteriorate over time, other strategies, such as using steels with better corrosion resistance (i.e., weathering steels), have also been adopted. A recently developed structural stainless steel has shown better performance than conventional weathering steels, particularly in harsh environments, but it comes with a high initial cost. The aim of this study is to compare the life-cycle costs (LCCs) of various corrosion management strategies for bridge steel structures, using either coated carbon steel or structural stainless steel. To evaluate the structural performance of the coated carbon steel structure, a new probabilistic corrosion model is developed for the first time that explicitly incorporates the coating degradation in the steel deterioration process. Using two case studies, this study compares the LCCs of cyclical- and condition-based maintenance strategies and investigates the impact of different coating systems on the LCC. The results show that the structural stainless steel may be more economically beneficial than coated carbon steel, but the payoff time depends on the parameters used in the LCC analysis, such as the maintenance strategies adopted for the coated carbon steel, the coating type, the discount factor, and the size of the structure considered.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AASHTO. 2012. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 6th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AISC. 2011. Steel construction manual. Chicago: AISC.
Albrecht, P., and T. Hall Jr. 2003. “Atmospheric corrosion resistance of structural steels.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 15 (1): 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:1(2).
Almeida, J. O., P. F. Teixeira, and R. M. Delgado. 2015. “Life cycle cost optimisation in highway concrete bridges management.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 11 (10): 1263–1276. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.845578.
Ditlevsen, O., and H. O. Madsen. 1996. Structural reliability methods. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Dong, Y., and D. Frangopol. 2016. “Probabilistic time-dependent multihazard life-cycle assessment and resilience of bridges considering climate change.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (5): 04016034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000883.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2011. Improved corrosion-resistant steel for highway bridge construction. FHWA-HRT-11-062. McLean, VA: Office of Infrastructure Research and Development.
Gallivin, F., J. Ang-Olson, and A. Papson. 2010. Greenhouse gas mitigation measures for transportation construction, maintenance, and operations activities. San Francisco: ICF International.
Gjørv, O. E. 2014. Durability design of concrete structures in severe environments. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Helsel, J. L., R. Lanterman, and K. Wissmar. 2008. “Expected service life and cost considerations for maintenance and new construction protective coating work.” In Vol. 4 of Proc., Corrosion Conf. Expo, 2438–2459. Houston, TX: NACE International.
ISO. 2012a. Corrosion of metals and alloys–Corrosivity of atmospheres–Classification, determination and estimation. ISO 9923. Geneva: ISO.
ISO. 2012b. Corrosion of metals and alloys–Corrosivity of atmospheres–Guiding values for the corrosivity categories. ISO 9924. Geneva: ISO.
Kallias, A. N., B. Imam, and M. K. Chryssanthopoulos. 2017. “Performance profiles of metallic bridges subject to coating degradation and atmospheric corrosion.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 13 (4): 440–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1164726.
Kendall, A., G. Keoleian, and G. Helfand. 2008. “Integrated life-cycle assessment and life-cycle cost analysis model for concrete bridge deck applications.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 14 (3): 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2008)14:3(214).
Koch, G. H., M. P. H. Brongers, N. G. Thompson, Y. P. Virmani, and J. H. Payer. 2002. Corrosion costs and preventive strategies in the United States. FHWA-RD-01-156. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Kong, J. S., and D. Frangopol. 2003. “Life-cycle reliability-based maintenance cost optimization of deteriorating structures with emphasis on bridges.” J. Struct. Eng. 129 (6): 818–828. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:6(818).
Kreislova, K., and H. Geiplova. 2012. “Evaluation of corrosion protection of steel bridges.” Procedia Eng. 40: 229–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.085.
Landolfo, R., L. Cascini, and F. Portioli. 2010. “Modeling of metal structure corrosion damage: A state of the art report.” Sustainability 2 (7): 2163–2175. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2072163.
Liu, M., and D. Frangopol. 2005. “Multiobjective maintenance planning optimization for deteriorating bridges considering condition, safety, and life-cycle cost.” J. Struct. Eng. 13 (5): 833–842. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:5(833).
Melchers, R. E. 1998. “Probabilistic modeling of immersion marine corrosion.” In Structural safety and reliability, edited by M. Shinozuka, Y. K. Wen, and N. Shiraishi, 1143–1149. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
NACE International. 2002. “Highways and bridges: Corrosion resources for highways and bridges.” Accessed April 3, 2018. http://www.nace.org/Corrosion-Central/Industries/Highways-and-Bridges/.
NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program). 1989. Performance of weathering steel in bridges. Riverdale, MD: Transportation Research Board.
ODOT (Ohio DOT). 2013. Traffics survey reports. Columbus, OH: ODOT.
Okasha, N., D. Frangopol, F. Fletcher, and A. Wilson. 2012. “Life-cycle cost analyses of a new steel for bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (1): 168–172. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000219.
Paik, J. K., S. K. Kim, and S. K. Lee. 1998. “Probabilistic corrosion rate estimation model for longitudinal strength members of bulk carriers.” Ocean Eng. 25 (10): 837–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-8018(97)10009-9.
Sajedi, S., Q. Huang, A. Gandomi, and B. Kiani. 2017. “Reliability-based multiobjective design optimization of reinforced concrete bridges considering corrosion effect.” J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst., Part A: Civ. Eng. 3 (3): 04016015. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000896.
Soliman, M., and D. Frangopol. 2015. “Life-cycle cost evaluation of conventional and corrosion-resistant steel for bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (1): 06014005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000647.
Val, D. V., and M. G. Stewart. 2003. “Life-cycle cost analysis of reinforced concrete structures in marine environments.” Struct. Saf. 25 (4): 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(03)00014-6.
Xanthakos, P. P. 1994. Theory and design of bridges. New York: Wiley.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 24Issue 4April 2019

History

Received: Dec 3, 2017
Accepted: Sep 17, 2018
Published online: Jan 16, 2019
Published in print: Apr 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Jun 16, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kiswendsida J. Kere, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Akron, ASEC 210, Akron, OH 44325 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Qindan Huang, Ph.D., M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Akron, ASEC 210, Akron, OH 44325.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share