Technical Papers
Nov 11, 2016

Optimal Design of Seismic Protective Devices for Highway Bridges Using Performance-Based Methodology and Multiobjective Genetic Optimization

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 22, Issue 3

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness and optimal design of protective devices for the seismic protection of highway bridges. The Painter Street Overcrossing is seismically redesigned with protective devices. Component-level fragility functions are first derived by probabilistic seismic demand analysis using nonlinear time history analyses that include soil–structure interaction effects and ground motion uncertainties. The bridge repair cost ratios are then derived using a performance-based methodology and the associated component failure probability. Results of the comparison of two initial protection designs show that the bridge repair cost ratios provided an efficient evaluation of the protective devices. Subsequently, a multiobjective genetic optimization method utilizing the Pareto optimal concept is employed to identify the optimal design parameters of protective devices for six design cases with various combinations of isolation bearings and fluid dampers. Finally, the repair cost ratios of the bridge with optimally designed protective devices are evaluated. The results show that these optimal devices are able to minimize the overall damaging potential of the bridge, hence validating the optimal design procedure as a practical method for selecting protective devices.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AASHTO. (2014). Guide specifications for seismic isolation design, 4th Ed., Washington, DC.
Adeli, H., and Cheng, N. (1993). “Integrated genetic algorithm for optimization of space structures.” J. Aerosp. Eng., 315–328.
Agrawal, A., and Amjadian, M. (2016). “Seismic component devices.” Innovative bridge design handbook, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, 531–553.
Agrawal, A., Ghosn, M., Alampalli, S., and Pan, Y. (2012). “Seismic fragility of retrofitted multispan continuous steel bridges in New York.” J. Bridge Eng., 562–575.
Agrawal, A., Tan, P., Nagarajaiah, S., and Zhang, J. (2009). “Benchmark structural control problem for a seismically excited highway bridge—Part I: Phase I problem definition.” Struct. Control Health Monit., 16(5), 509–529.
Basöz, N. I., Kiremidjian, A. S., King, S. A., and Law, K. H. (1999). “Statistical analysis of bridge damage data from the 1994 Northridge, CA, earthquake.” Earthquake Spectra, 15(1), 25–54.
Billah, A. H. M. M., and Alam, M. S. (2015). “Seismic fragility assessment of concrete bridge pier reinforced with superelastic shape memory alloy.” Earthquake Spectra, 31(3), 1515–1541.
Cha, Y. J., Agrawal, A. K., Kim, Y., and Raich, A. M. (2012). “Multi-objective genetic algorithms for cost-effective distributions of actuators and sensors in large structures.” Expert Syst. Appl, 39(9), 7822–7833.
Cha, Y. J., Raich, A., Barroso, L., and Agrawal, A. (2013). “Optimal placement of active control devices and sensors in frame structures using multi-objective genetic algorithms.” Struct. Control Health Monit., 20(1), 16–44.
Choi, E., DesRoches, R., and Nielson, B. G. (2004). “Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones.” Eng. Struct., 26(2), 187–199.
Cornell, C., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R., and Foutch, D. (2002). “Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines.” J. Struct. Eng., 526–533.
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., and Meyarivan, T. (2002). “A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II.” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., (2), 182–197.
FEMA. (2003). “Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake model.” HAZUS MH MR4- technical manual, FEMA Mitigation Div., Washington, DC.
Gluck, N., Reinhorn, A., Gluck, J., and Levy, R. (1996). “Design of supplemental dampers for control of structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 1394–1399.
Goel, R. K., and Chopra, A. (1997). “Evaluation of bridge abutment capacity and stiffness during earthquakes.” Earthquake Spectra, 13(1), 1–23.
Housner, G., et al. (1997). “Structural control: Past, present, and future.” J. Eng. Mech., 897–971.
Hwang, H., Liu, J. B., and Chiu, Y. (2001). “Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges.” Technical Rep., Center for Earthquake Research and Information, Univ. of Memphis, Memphis, TN.
Jangid, R. S. (2005). “Optimum friction pendulum system for near-fault motions.” Eng. Struct., 27(3), 349–359.
Jangid, R. S. (2007). “Optimal lead-rubber isolation bearings for near-fault motions.” Eng. Struct., 29(10), 2503–2513.
Jiang, X., and Adeli, H. (2008). “Neuro-genetic algorithm for non-linear active control of structures.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Eng., 75(78), 770–786.
Karim, K. R., and Yamazaki, F. (2001). “Effect of earthquake ground motions on fragility curves of highway bridge piers based on numerical simulation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 30(12), 1839–1856.
Karim, K. R., and Yamazaki, F. (2007). “Effect of isolation on fragility curves of highway bridges based on simplified approach.” Soil. Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 27(5), 414–426.
Kelly, J. M., and Quiroz, E. (1992). “Mechanical characteristics of neoprene isolations bearings.” Rep. No. UBC/EERC-92/11, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Kim, H. S., and Roschke, P. N. (2006). “Fuzzy control of base-isolation system using multi-objective genetic algorithm.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 21(6), 436–449.
Konak, A., Coit, D. W., and Smith, A. E. (2006). “Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: A tutorial.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 91(9), 992–1007.
Mackie, K., and Stojadinovic, B. (2005). “Fragility basis for California highway overpass bridge seismic decision making.” PEER Rep. 2005-02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Makris, N., Badoni, D., Delis, E., Gazetas, G. (1994). “Prediction of observed bridge response with soil-pile-structure interaction.” J. Struct. Eng., 2992–3011.
Makris, N., and Black, C. (2004). “Dimensional analysis of bilinear oscillators under pulse-type excitations.” J. Eng. Mech., 1019–1031.
Makris, N., and Zhang, J. (2004). “Seismic response analysis of a highway overcrossing equipped with elastomeric bearings and fluid dampers.” J. Struct. Eng., 830–845.
MATLAB [Computer software]. MathWorks, Natick, RI.
Mori, A., Moss, P. J., Cooke, M., and Carr, A. J. (1999). “The behavior of bearings used for seismic isolation under shear and axial load.” Earthquake Spectra, 15(2), 199–224.
Naeim, F., and Kelly, J. M. (1999). Design of seismic isolated structures: from theory to practice, Wiley & Sons, New York.
Narasimhan, S., Nagarajaiah, S., Johnson, E. A., and Gavin, H. P. (2006). “Smart base-isolated benchmark building. Part I: Problem definition.” Struct. Control Health Monit., 13(2–3), 573–588.
Navarrete, B. A. O., Guerrero, J. M. J., Juana, M. D. L. C. T., Soberón, G., and Díaz, M. J. (2016). “Influence of RC jacketing on the seismic vulnerability of RC bridges.” Eng. Struct., 123 236–246.
Nielson, B. G., and DesRoches, R. (2007). “Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(6), 823–839.
OpenSees [Computer software]. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Ozbulut, O. E., and Hurlebaus, S. (2011). “Optimal design of superelastic friction type isolators for seismic protection of highway bridges against near-field earthquakes.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 40(3), 273–291.
Padgett, J., and DesRoches, R. (2008). “Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(8), 1157–1174.
Padgett, J. E., Nielson, B. G., and DesRoches, R. (2008). “Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(5), 711–725.
PEER. (2013). Ground motion database. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Reinhorn, A. M., Lavan, O., and Cimellaro, G. P. (2009). “Design of controlled elastic and inelastic structures.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vib., 8(4), 469–479.
Seible, F., and Priestley, M. J. N. (1999). “Lessons learned from bridge performance during Northridge Earthquake.” Seismic response of concrete bridges, ACI International, Farmington Hills, MI, 29–56.
Shinozuka, M., Feng, M., Lee, J., and Naganuma, T. (2000). “Statistical analysis of fragility curves.” J. Eng. Mech., 1224–1231.
Siqueira, G. H., Sanda, A. S., Paultre, P., and Padgett, J. E. (2014). “Fragility curves for isolated bridges in eastern Canada using experimental results.” Eng. Struct., 74, 311–324.
Soneji, B. B., and Jangid, R. S. (2007). “Passive hybrid systems for earthquake protection of cable-stayed bridge.” Eng. Struct., 29(1), 57–70.
Soong, T., and Dargush, G. F. (1997). Passive energy dissipation systems in structural engineering, Wiley, New York.
Spencer, B., and Nagarajaiah, S. (2003). “State of the art of structural control.” J. Struct. Eng., 845–856.
Symans, M. D., and Constantinou, M. C. (1998). “Passive fluid viscous damping systems for seismic energy dissipation.” J. Earthquake Technol., 35(4), 185–206.
Wang, Y. P., Chung, L. L., and Liao, W. H. (1998). “Seismic response analysis of bridges isolated with friction pendulum bearings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 27(10), 1069–1093.
Yi, J. H., Kim, S. H., and Kushiyama, S. (2007). “PDF interpolation technique for seismic fragility analysis of bridges.” Eng. Struct., 29(7), 1312–1322.
Zhang, J., and Huo, Y. (2009). “Evaluating effectiveness and optimum design of isolation devices for highway bridges using the fragility function method.” Eng. Struct., 31(8), 1648–1660.
Zhang, J., and Makris, N. (2002a). “Kinematic response functions and dynamic stiffnesses of bridge embankments.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31, 1933–1966.
Zhang, J., and Makris, N. (2002b). “Seismic response analysis of highway overcrossing including soil-structure interaction.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31 1967–1991.
Zhang, J., Makris, N., and Delis, T. (2004). “Structural characterization of modern highway overcrossings—Case study.” J. Struct. Eng., 846–860.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 22Issue 3March 2017

History

Received: May 16, 2016
Accepted: Sep 16, 2016
Published online: Nov 11, 2016
Published in print: Mar 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Apr 11, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yazhou Xie, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095. E-mail: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1214-5808. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share