Technical Papers
Nov 8, 2016

Effects of Near-Fault Motions and Artificial Pulse-Type Ground Motions on Super-Span Cable-Stayed Bridge Systems

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 22, Issue 3

Abstract

This paper evaluates the seismic responses of a super-span cable-stayed bridge subjected to near-fault ground motions. A new method, record-decomposition incorporation (RDI), is proposed to synthesize the artificial near-fault pulse-type ground motions by combining the high-frequency background record (BGR) with simple equivalent pulses. The effects of forward-directivity pulses and fling-step pulses on the responses are assessed for the Sutong cable-stayed bridge (with a main span of 1,088 m) in China. The results show that the near-fault pulse-type ground motions generate larger displacement and internal force to the bridge compared with the nonpulse ground motions, and the fling-step ground motions are more damaging to the bridge than those of the forward-directivity ground motions. The high-frequency components of near-fault records have a significant effect on the responses of the bridge. Subsequently, the longitudinal displacement and bending moment of the tower induced by artificial ground motions with different pulse parameters (i.e., pulse period, velocity amplitude, and numbers of pulselike wave peaks) are analyzed. Last, the effects of artificial ground motions incorporating actual records originally exhibiting fling-step effects with a forward-directivity pulse model on the responses of the tower are assessed. The arrival time of the peak has notable effects on the responses of the tower.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 51378110), Graduate Student Research Innovation Project of Jiangsu Province (Grant KYLX15_0086), and Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (Grant CE02-2-6). The financial support is greatly appreciated.

References

Adanur, S., Altunişik, A. C., Bayraktar, A., and Akköse, M. (2012). “Comparison of near-fault and far-fault ground motion effects on geometrically nonlinear earthquake behavior of suspension bridges.” Nat. Hazards, 64(1), 593–614.
Agrawal, A., Yang, J., and He, W. (2003). “Applications of some semiactive control systems to benchmark cable-stayed bridge.” J. Struct. Eng., 884–894.
Agrawal, A. K., and He, W. L. (2002). “A closed-form approximation of near-fault ground motion pulses for flexible structures.” Proc., 15th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conf., ASCE, Reston, VA.
Alavi, B., and Krawinkler, H. (2004). “Behavior of moment‐resisting frame structures subjected to near‐fault ground motions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 33(6), 687–706.
ANSYS Mechanical APDL 14.0 [Computer software]. ANSYS, Canonsburg, PA.
Baker, J. W. (2007). “Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 97(5), 1486–1501.
Billah, A., Alam, M., and Bhuiyan, M. (2013). “Fragility analysis of retrofitted multicolumn bridge bent subjected to near-fault and far-field ground motion.” J. Bridge Eng., 992–1004.
Bray, J. D., and Rodriguez-Marek, A. (2004). “Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 24(11), 815–828.
Dabaghi, M., and Kiureghian, A. D. (2014). “Stochastic modeling and simulation of near-fault ground motions for performance-based earthquake engineering.” PEER Rep. No. 2014/20, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Dyke, S., Caicedo, J., Turan, G., Bergman, L., and Hague, S. (2003). “Phase I benchmark control problem for seismic response of cable-stayed bridges.” J. Struct. Eng., 857–872.
Ernst, H. J. (1965). “Der E-Modul von Seilen unter berucksichtigung des Durchhanges.” Der Bauingenieur, 40(2), 52–55.
Ghahari, S. F., Jahankhah, H., and Ghannad, M. A. (2010). “Study on elastic response of structures to near-fault ground motions through record decomposition.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 30(7), 536–546.
Gulerce, Z., Erduran, E., Kunnath, S. K., and Abrahamson, N. A. (2012). “Seismic demand models for probabilistic risk analysis of near fault vertical ground motion effects on ordinary highway bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 41(2), 159–175.
He, W., and Agrawal, A. (2008). “Analytical model of ground motion pulses for the design and assessment of seismic protective systems.” J. Struct. Eng., 1177–1188.
He, W. L., and Agrawal, A. K. (2007). “Passive and hybrid control systems for seismic protection of a benchmark cable-stayed bridge.” Struct. Control Health Monit., 14(1), 1–26.
Iervolino, I., Chioccarelli, E., and Baltzopoulos, G. (2012). “Inelastic displacement ratio of near‐source pulse‐like ground motions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 41(15), 2351–2357.
Ismail, M., Casas, J. R., and Rodellar, J. (2013). “Near-fault isolation of cable-stayed bridges using RNC isolator.” Eng. Struct., 56, 327–342.
Jalali, R. S., Jokandan, M. B., and Trifunac, M. D. (2012). “Earthquake response of a three-span, simply supported bridge to near-field pulse and permanent-displacement step.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 43, 380–397.
Jiang, Y., Yang, D., and Li, G. (2010). “Effects of forward directivity and fling step of near-fault ground motions on seismic responses of high-rise steel structure.” Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao, 31(9), 103–110.
Kalkan, E., and Kunnath, S. K. (2006). “Effects of fling step and forward directivity on seismic response of buildings.” Earthquake Spectra, 22(2), 367–390.
Khoshnoudian, F., and Ahmadi, E. (2013). “Effects of pulse period of near‐field ground motions on the seismic demands of soil–MDOF structure systems using mathematical pulse models.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(11), 1565–1582.
Liao, W. I., Loh, C. H., and Lee, B. H. (2004). “Comparison of dynamic response of isolated and non-isolated continuous girder bridges subjected to near-fault ground motions.” Eng. Struct., 26(14), 2173–2183.
Mavroeidis, G. P., and Papageorgiou, A. S. (2003). “A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 93(3), 1099–1131.
McCallen, D., Astaneh-Asl, A., Larsen, S. C., and Hutchings, L. J. (2009). “The response of long-span bridges to low frequency, near-fault earthquake ground motions.” Proc., 2009 Technical Conf. on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering ASCE, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Ministry of Communications of the People’s Republic of China. (2008). “Guidelines for seismic design of highway bridges.” JTG/T B02-01-2008, People’s Communications Press, Beijing.
Mortezaei, A., and Ronagh, H. R. (2013). “Plastic hinge length of reinforced concrete columns subjected to both far‐fault and near‐fault ground motions having forward directivity.” Struct. Design Tall Special Build., 22(12), 903–926.
Psycharis, I. N., Fragiadakis, M., and Stefanou, I. (2013). “Seismic reliability assessment of classical columns subjected to near‐fault ground motions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(14), 2061–2079.
Quan, W., Li, H. N., and Liu, X. Z. (2008). “Seismic response of large-span cable-stayed bridge under multi-component multi-support earthquake excitation.” Proc., 14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing.
Saiidi, M., Vosooghi, A., Choi, H., and Somerville, P. (2013). “Shake table studies and analysis of a two-span RC bridge model subjected to a fault rupture.” J. Bridge Eng., A4014003.
Sehhati, R., Rodriguez-Marek, A., ElGawady, M., and Cofer, W. F. (2011). “Effects of near-fault ground motions and equivalent pulses on multi-story structures.” Eng. Struct., 33(3), 767–779.
Shrestha, B. (2015). “Seismic response of long span cable-stayed bridge to near-fault vertical ground motions.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 19(1), 180–187.
Somerville, P. G., Smith, N. F., Graves, R. W., and Abrahamson, N. A. (1997). “Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity.” Seismol. Res. Lett., 68(1), 199–222.
Soyluk, K., and Sicacik, E. A. (2012). “Soil–structure interaction analysis of cable-stayed bridges for spatially varying ground motion components.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 35, 80–90.
Tan, P., Agrawal, A. K., and Pan, Y. (2005). “Near-field effects on seismically excited highway bridge with nonlinear viscous dampers.” Bridge Struct., 1(3), 307–318.
Wu, G., Zhai, C., Li, S., and Xie, L. (2014). “Effects of near-fault ground motions and equivalent pulses on Large Crossing Transmission Tower-line System.” Eng. Struct., 77, 161–169.
Xing, C., Wang, H., Li, A., and Xu, Y. (2013). “Study on wind-induced vibration control of a long-span cable-stayed bridge using TMD-type counterweight.” J. Bridge Eng., 141–148.
Xu, Z., Agrawal, A. K., He, W. L., and Tan, P. (2007). “Performance of passive energy dissipation systems during near-field ground motion type pulses.” Eng. Struct., 29(2), 224–236.
Yan, G., and Chen, F. (2015). “Seismic Performance of midstory isolated structures under near-field pulse-like ground motion and limiting deformation of isolation layers.” Shock Vib., 2015, 730612.
Yang, D., Pan, J., and Li, G. (2010). “Interstory drift ratio of building structures subjected to near-fault ground motions based on generalized drift spectral analysis.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 30(11), 1182–1197.
Yang, D., and Zhou, J. (2015). “A stochastic model and synthesis for near‐fault impulsive ground motions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 44(2), 243–264.
Yang, D. X., and Zhao, Y. (2010). “Effects of rupture forward directivity and fling step of near-fault ground motions on seismic performance of base-isolated building structure.” Acta Seismol. Sin., 32(5), 579–587.
Zheng, J., and Takeda, T. (1995). “Effects of soil-structure interaction on seismic response of PC cable-stayed bridge.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 14(6), 427–437.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 22Issue 3March 2017

History

Received: Jan 19, 2016
Accepted: Sep 12, 2016
Published online: Nov 8, 2016
Published in print: Mar 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Apr 8, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structure of China Ministry of Education, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 210096, China; Visiting Ph.D. Student, School of Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada V1V 1V7. E-mail: [email protected]
MASc Candidate, Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structure of China Ministry of Education, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 210096, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Jing-quan Wang [email protected]
Associate Professor, Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structure of China Ministry of Education, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 210096, China. E-mail: [email protected]
M. Shahria Alam, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, 1137 Alumni Ave., EME 4225, Kelowna, BC, Canada V1V 1V7 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Jian Zhang, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share