Transverse Modeling of Concrete Box-Girder Bridges for Prediction of Deck Slab Ultimate Load Capacity
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 18, Issue 12
Abstract
Concrete box-girder bridges are one of the most commonly used bridge types owing to ease of maintenance and economy in construction. However, current design codes do not realistically consider the effects of haunches and web restraints on the strength enhancement of the top deck slab in the box-girder bridges. The purpose of this paper is to propose a rational model that can consider the effects of arching and haunches on the prediction of ultimate load capacity of deck slabs in concrete box-girder bridges under vertical loading. A rational frame model for the transverse direction of box girders that considers the effects of rigid joints and nonprismatic elements was formulated in this study. The flexural strength enhancement of the upper slab from the restraints of webs and arching action also was derived. To verify the model, a comprehensive experimental program was set up, and several full-scale concrete box girders were tested. The displacements and strains of steel bars and concrete were measured for test box girders during the vertical loading process. It was found that the cracking patterns and failure modes of box girders vary greatly depending on the existence and size of haunches. The present test results also indicate that an increase in haunch size increases the ultimate load capacity of the deck slab of a box girder greatly. The load capacity of a haunched deck slab is more than two times greater than that of the deck slab without haunches depending on the size of haunches. This effect is taken into account in this analysis through the consideration of arching action for the upper slab with various haunch sizes. Comparison of the proposed theory with test data shows good agreement on the ultimate loads and displacements. This study indicates that the theory without considering arching action greatly underestimates the ultimate load capacities of deck slabs in box-girder bridges. Therefore, the effects of haunches and arching action must be considered realistically for more advanced and economical design of box-girder bridges.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
Financial support from the National Research Laboratory (NRL) Program of Korea is gratefully acknowledged.
References
AASHTO. (2012). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, 6th Ed., Washington, DC, 5–33.
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2011). “Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary.” ACI 318-11, Detroit.
American Concrete Institute (ACI) Innovation Task Group 3. (2004). “Report on bridge decks free of steel reinforcement.” ACI ITG-3-04, Detroit.
Canadian Standards Association (CSA). (2000). “Canadian highway bridge design code.” CAN/CSA-S6-00, Toronto.
Christiansen, K. P. (1963). “The effect of membrane stresses on the ultimate strength of an interior panel in a reinforced concrete slab.” J. Struct. Eng., 41(8), 261–265.
Hognestad, E., Hanson, N. W., and McHenry, D. (1961). “Concrete stress distribution in ultimate strength design.” J. Am. Concr. Inst., 52(6), 455–479.
Kulka, F., et al. (1982). “Feasibility of standard sections for segmental prestressed concrete box girder bridges.” Final Rep. FHWA-RD-82-24, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Mattock, A. H., Kriz, L. B., and Hognestad, E. (1961). “Rectangular concrete stress distribution in ultimate strength design.” J. Am. Concr. Inst., 57(8), 875–926.
McDowell, E. L., McKee, K. E. and Sevin, E. (1956). “Arching action theory of masonry walls.” J. Struct. Div., 82(2), 915-1–915-18.
Oh, B. H., Lee, S. C., Park, S. Y., and Kim, B. S. (2005). “Flexural behavior of PSC box girders according to haunch size.” KSCE J. Civil Eng., 25(2A), 217–280.
Rankin, G. I. B., and Long, A. E. (1997). “Arching action strength enhancement in laterally restrained slab strips.” Proc. ICE Struct. Build., 122(4), 461–467.
Ruddle, M. E., Rankin, G. I. B., and Long, A. E. (2003). “Arching action—flexural and shear strength enhancement in rectangular and Tee beams.” Proc. ICE Struct. Build., 156(1), 63–74.
U.K. Highways Agency. (2002). “BD 81/02: Use of compressive membrane action in bridge decks.” Section 4, Part 20, Design manual for roads and bridges, Vol. 3, London.
Xiang, Y., Tang, G., and Liu, C. (2011). “Cracking mechanism and simplified design method for bottom flange in prestressed concrete box girder bridge.” J. Bridge Eng., 16(2), 267–274.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 18 • Issue 12 • December 2013
Pages: 1373 - 1382
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 28, 2012
Accepted: Mar 6, 2013
Published online: Nov 15, 2013
Published in print: Dec 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.