Statistical Distribution of Bridge Resistance Using Updated Material Parameters
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 17, Issue 3
Abstract
Resistance (load-carrying capacity) of a bridge girder is a random variable and can be determined by considering the uncertainty in material, fabrication, and professional/analysis properties. Previous calibrations of load and resistance factor design (LRFD) determined the distribution of bridge resistance on the basis of data from more than 30 years ago. This study uses the latest Material properties available in, the literature to update the resistance distribution. The statistical distribution of the resistance was determined through Monte Carlo simulation. The results of the analysis show an increase in bias and a decrease in the coefficient of variation (COV) for all types of bridges in comparison with those used in previous calibration studies. The changes in bias and COV are the result of higher bias and lower COV in material properties owing to better quality control in concrete and steel manufacturing. Steel and concrete bridges saw the greatest change in resistance distribution. Prestressed bridges saw little change because the material properties of prestressing steel, which is the most sensitive parameter in the prestressed bridges, did not change significantly since the previous calibration study. With these resistance distributions, it is expected that the calibration of the load factor in the AASHTO specification will lead to a lower live load factor, thereby possibly reducing the material cost of the bridge. In addition, the ratio of actual to required (design) resistances of representative bridges in Missouri was determined. The analysis showed that almost all representative bridges had a capacity-to-demand ratio greater than 1 according to current AASHTO standards.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported through MoDOT and the National University Transportation Center (NUTC). Undergraduate students (Issac Hop, Ashley Schmidt, Greg Neihus, and Joe Kirby), who helped to process the data on the many bridges were greatly appreciated.
References
AASHTO. (2008). LRFD bridge design specifications, 2008 interim revisions, 4th Ed., Washington, DC.
Bartlett, F., and MacGregor, J. (1996). “Statistical analysis of the compressive strength of concrete in structures.” ACI Mater. J., 93(2), 158–164.AMAJEF
Ellingwood, B., Galambos, T., MacGregor, J., and Cornell, A. (1980). “Development of a probability based load criterion for American National Standard A58.” National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC.
Galambos, T. V., and Ravindra, M. K. (1978). “Properties of steel for use in LRFD.” J. Struct. Div.JSDEAG, 104(ST9), 1459–1468.
Kulicki, J. M., Prucz, A., Clancy, C. M., Mertz, D. R., and Nowak, A. S. (2007). “Updating the calibration report for AASHTO LRFD code.” Final Rep. Project No. NCHRP 0-7/186, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
Kwon, O., Kim, E., and Orton, S. (2011). “Calibration of the live load factor in LRFD bridge design specifications based on state-specific traffic environments.” J. Bridge Eng.JBENF2, 16(6), 812–819.
Kwon, O., Orton, S., Kim, E., Hazlett, T., and Salim, H. (2010). “Calibration of live load factor in LRFD design guidelines.” Final Rep. TRyy0913, 〈http://library.modot.mo.gov/RDT/reports/TRyy0913/or11003revised.pdf〉 (Mar. 19, 2012).
Mirza, S. A., Hatziuikolas, M., and MacGregor, J. G. (1979). “Statistical descriptions of the strength of concrete.” J. Struct. Div., 105(ST6), 1021–1037.JSDEAG
Mirza, S. A., and MacGregor, J.G. (1979). “Variations in dimensions of reinforced concrete members.” J. Struct. Div., 105(ST4), 751–766.JSDEAG
Nowak, A. (1999). Calibration of LRFD bridge design code NCHRP Rep. 368, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
Nowak, A., and Szerszen, M. (2003). “Calibration of design code for buildings (ACI 318). Part 1: Statistical models for resistance.” ACI Struct. J., 100(3), 377–382.ASTJEG
Nowak, A., Yamani, A., and Tabsh, S. (1994). “Probabilistic models for resistance of concrete bridge girders.” ACI Struct. J., 91(3), 269–276.ASTJEG
Oracle. (2008). Oracle Crystal Ball Fusion Edition Release 11.1.1.1.00 [computer software]. Redwood City, CA.
Schmidt, B., and Bartlett, F. (2002). “Review of resistance factor for steel: Data collection.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 29(1), 109–118.CJCEB8
Tabsh, S. (1996). “Reliability of composite steel bridge beams designed following AASHTO’s LFD and LRFD specifications.” Struct. Saf., 17(4), 225–237.
Tabsh, S., and Nowak, A. (1991). “Reliability of highway girder bridges.” J. Struct. Eng.JSENDH, 117(8), 2372–2388.
Van de Lindt, J. W., Fu, G., Pablo, R., and Pei, S. (2005). “LRFD Load Calibration for State of Michigan truckline bridges.” Rep. RC-1466, Michigan Dept. of Transportation, Lansing, MI.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 17 • Issue 3 • May 2012
Pages: 462 - 469
Copyright
© 2012. American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 25, 2010
Accepted: Jun 3, 2011
Published online: Jun 6, 2011
Published in print: May 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.