Technical Papers
Mar 8, 2021

Propeller Characterization for Distributed Propulsion

Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 34, Issue 3

Abstract

The goal of this study was to characterize the effect of propeller variables as relevant to the design of a flight vehicle with numerous distributed propulsors. The impact of propeller radius, quantity, airfoil section characteristics, and blade count is examined. The test case is a small general aviation aircraft evaluated at a condition corresponding to cruise, such that thrust is constrained and propeller slipstream effects are negligible. From the perspective of power required, a minimal number of large-radius propellers are preferable. Increasing the number of propellers or blade count reduces the individual loading on each blade, which can lead to a significant drop in efficiency if the airfoil characteristics of the blade’s section are not well matched to the operating conditions. Reducing propeller radius is associated with a reduction in estimated range and endurance for a battery-powered aircraft.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Code used during the study is available online; see: Traub, L. W. 2017. “Inverse propeller design for a prescribed chord or blade angle.” J. Aircr. 54 (2): 823–828. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C034023.

References

Adkins, C. M., and R. H. Liebeck. 1994. “Design of optimum propellers.” J. Propul. Power 10 (5): 676–682. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.23779.
Armstrong, M. J., C. A. H. Ross, M. J. Blackwelder, and K. Rajashekara. 2012. “Trade studies for NASA N3-X turboelectric distributed propulsion system electrical power system architecture.” SAE Int. J. Aerosp. 5 (2): 325–336. https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-2163.
Betz, A. 1919. “Schraubenpropeller mit geringstem energieverlust (screw propeller with least energy loss).” In Nachrichten der Koniglichen Gesellshcaft der Wissenschafen zu Gottingen, Mathematisch-Physikalsche Klasse, 193–217. Gottingen, Germany: Akademie der Wissenschaften in Gottingen.
Bjarnholt, P. 2016. “Electric propulsion in passenger jet airplanes.” M.Sc. thesis, KTH School of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
Borer, N. K., J. M. Derlaga, K. A. Deere, M. B. Carter, S. Viken, M. D. Patterson, B. Litherland, and A. Stoll. 2017. “Comparison of aero-propulsive performance predictions for distributed propulsion configurations.” In Proc., 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 0209. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-0209.
Borer, N. K., M. D. Patterson, J. K. Viken, M. D. Moore, J. Bevirt, A. M. Stoll, and A. R. Gibson. 2016. “Design and performance of the NASA SCEPTOR distributed electric propulsion flight demonstrator.” In Proc., 16th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conf., 3920. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016.
Cessna Aircraft Company. 1981. Pilot’s operating handbook. Wichita, Kansas: Cessna Aircraft Company.
Dynasciences Corporation. 1964. Effects of propeller slipstream on V/STOL aircraft performance and stability. Washington, PA: Dynasciences Corporation.
Felder, J. L., H. D. Kim, G. V. Brown, and J. Chu. 2011. “An examination of the effect of boundary layer ingestion on turboelectric distributed propulsion systems.” In Proc., 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 300. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-300.
Gohardani, A. S. 2014. Distributed propulsion technology. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Goldstein, S. 1929. “On the vortex theory of screw propellers.” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 123 (792): 440–465.
Hartman, E. P., and D. Biermann. 1938. The aerodynamics of full-scale propellers having 2, 3 and 4 blades of Clark Y and R. A. F. 6 airfoil sections. Langley Field, VA: National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics.
Hepperle, M. 2012. “Electric flight: Potential and limitations.” Accessed May 1, 2020. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power-to-weight_ratio#Electric_motors_and_electromotive_generators.
Hyun, K., P. Aaron, and J. Phillip. 2018. “A review of distributed electric propulsion concepts for air vehicle technology.” In Proc., 2018  AIAA/IEEE Electric Aircraft Technologies Symp., 1–21. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-4998.
Jacobs, E. N., J. Stack, and R. M. Pinkerton. 1930. Airfoil pressure distribution investigation in the variable density wind tunnel. Langley Field, VA: National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics.
Ko, A., J. A. Schetz, and W. H. Mason. 2003. “Assessment of the potential advantages of distributed-propulsion for aircraft.” In Proc., 16th Int. Symp. on Air Breathing Engines. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Larrabee, E. E. 1979. “Practical design of minimum induced loss propellers.” In Proc., SAE Transactions, 2053–2062. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
Marchman, J. F., and T. D. Werme. 1984. “Clark-Y airfoil performance at low Reynolds numbers.” In Proc., AIAA 22nd Aerospace Science Meeting. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1984-52.
Maynard, J. D., and L. B. Salters. 1957. Aerodynamic characteristics at high speeds of related full-scale propellers having different blade-section cambers. Langley Field, VA: National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics.
McCormick, B. W. 1994. Aerodynamics, aeronautics, and flight mechanics. 2nd ed., 317–318. New York: Wiley.
McLemore, H. C., and M. D. Cannon. 1954. Aerodynamic investigation of a four-blade propeller operating through an angle-of-attack range from 0 to 180 degrees. Langley Field, VA: National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics.
Miranda, L. R., and J. E. Brennan. 1986. “Aerodynamic effects of wingtip-mounted propellers and turbines.” In Proc., 4th Applied Aerodynamics Conf., 1802. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1986-1802.
Moore, M. D. 2016. “Distributed electric propulsion (DEP) aircraft.” In Proc., Presentation, 5th Symp. on Collaboration in Aircraft Design. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Murphy, P. C., and D. Landman. 2015. “Experiment design for complex VTOL aircraft with distributed propulsion and tilt wing.” In Proc., AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conf., 0017. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-0017.
Napolitano, M. 2011. Aircraft dynamics: From modeling to simulation. New York: Wiley.
Omar, N., M. Daowd, P. Van den Bossche, O. Hegazy, J. Smekens, T. Coosemans, and J. Van Mierlo. 2012. “Rechargeable energy storage systems for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles—Assessment of electrical characteristics.” Energies 5 (8): 2952–2988. https://doi.org/10.3390/en5082952.
Patterson, M. D., J. M. Derlaga, and N. K. Borer. 2016. “High-lift propeller system configuration selection for NASA’s SCEPTOR distributed electric propulsion flight demonstrator.” In Proc., 16th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conf., 3922. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-3922.
Phillips, W. F. 2004. Mechanics of flight, 135–145. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Sabo, K. M., and M. Drela. 2015. “Benefits of boundary layer ingestion propulsion.” In Proc., 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 1667. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-1667.
Schiltgen, B., M. W. Green, A. R. Gibson, D. W. Hall, D. B. Cummings, and C. Hange. 2012. “Benefits and concerns of hybrid electric distributed propulsion with conventional electric machines.” In Proc., 48th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conf. and Exhibit, 3769. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-3769.
Silverstein, A. 1934. Scale effect on Clark-Y airfoil characteristics from NACA full-scale wind-tunnel tests. Langley Field, VA: National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics.
Stoll, A. M., J. Bevirt, M. D. Moore, W. J. Fredericks, and N. K. Borer. 2014. “Drag reduction through distributed electric propulsion.” In Proc., 14th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conf., 2851. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-2851.
Taylor, J. W. 1982. Janes’ all the world’s aircraft, 345. Coulsdon, UK: Janes Group.
Traub, L. W. 2011. “Range and endurance estimates for battery powered aircraft.” J. Aircr. 48 (2): 703–707. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031027.
Traub, L. W. 2016a. “Calculation of constant power lithium battery discharge curves.” Batteries 2 (2): 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries2020017.
Traub, L. W. 2016b. “Camber effects on minimum power and thrust relations for propeller aircraft.” J. Aircr. 53 (1): 299–304. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C033491.
Traub, L. W. 2016c. “Semi-empirical prediction of airfoil hysteresis.” Aerospace 3 (2): 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace3020009.
Traub, L. W. 2016d. “Simplified propeller analysis and design including stall effects.” Aeronaut. J. 120 (1227): 796–818. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2016.31.
Traub, L. W. 2017. “Inverse propeller design for a prescribed chord or blade angle.” J. Aircr. 54 (2): 823–828. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C034023.
Traub, L. W., and C. Coffman. 2019. “Efficient low-reynolds number airfoils.” J. Aircr. 56 (5): 1987–2003. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C035515.
UIUC (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign). 2019. “UIUC propeller data base.” Accessed October 1, 2019. http://aerospace.illinois.edu/m-selig/props/propDB.html.
Veldhuis, L. L. M. 2005. “Propeller wing aerodynamic interference.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, Delft Univ. of Technology.
Wick, A. T., J. R. Hooker, C. J. Hardin, and C. H. Zeune. 2015. “Integrated aerodynamic benefits of distributed propulsion.” In Proc., 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 1500. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-1500.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 34Issue 3May 2021

History

Received: May 10, 2020
Accepted: Dec 2, 2020
Published online: Mar 8, 2021
Published in print: May 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Aug 8, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, Embry Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Prescott, AZ 86301. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8258-362X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share